Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNeocon War Hawks Want Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump. No Surprise—They’ve Always Backed Her
http://inthesetimes.com/article/18998/neocon-war-hawks-want-hillary-clinton-over-donald-trump.-no-surprisetheyveThe neoconservative Right would have you believe this election affords them a uniquely tough choice. On the one hand, theres Hillary Clinton, liberal bogeywoman and hated embodiment of the Democratic establishment. On the other, theres Donald Trump, who has repeatedly called the Iraq war a mistake, accused the Bush administration of lying to drag the United States into said war, claimed he would be neutral in his dealings with Israel and just recently sketched out an unabashedly noninterventionist approach to world affairs for the Washington Post editorial board.
Whether or not Trump believes any of this is, as usual, up for debate. But some neocons are so disgusted with his rejection of foreign policy establishment thinking that theyve declared the unthinkable: Theyre going to vote for Hillary Clinton.
Concerned that Trump would destroy American foreign policy and the international system, author Max Boot told Vox that Clinton would be vastly preferable. Historian Robert Kagan has also come out in favor of Clinton, saying he feels comfortable with her on foreign policy. Eliot Cohen, a former Bush administration official who has been called the most influential neocon in academe, declared Clinton the lesser evil, by a large margin.
It would be convenient to accept that this support is just part of a Faustian bargain neocons have reluctantly entered into because of the looming specter of Trump. But the truth is, neocons and assorted war hawks have long had a soft spot for Clinton and her views on foreign policy.
When President Obama nominated Clinton for secretary of state in 2008, Richard Perle, one of the Iraq Wars primary cheerleaders and chairman of the Defense Policy Board in the lead-up to the war, said he was relieved. There's not going to be as much change as we were led to believe.
Perle, who was sometimes referred to as the Prince of Darkness and who once predicted there would be some grand square in Baghdad that is named after President Bush, made clear his support for Clinton was not due to a lack of choices. I heard about others on the list [for secretary of state] that I wouldn't be happy about, he said. Those were mostly Republicans.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 879 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Neocon War Hawks Want Hillary Clinton Over Donald Trump. No Surprise—They’ve Always Backed Her (Original Post)
eridani
Mar 2016
OP
AzDar
(14,023 posts)1. Yep. It isn't about D v. R ... it's about making sure the winner will 'play ball'.
JEB
(4,748 posts)2. Another generation reduced to cannon fodder.
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)3. And the veil falls.