2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRomney hinted at last debate they have mined Obama's retirement for investment source.
So if Romney is attacked on his Bain record the response will be your retirement has investments in China or there is Chinese stock in your portfolio. I truly doubt anyones retirement does not have investments free of Chinese investment. For most of us our retirement is truly a blind trust and does not involve retirement investment involving a predatory company we founded like Bain Capital. As disgusting as I find it Bain Capital was listed in some of the investments of my retirement. I am retired I profited from vultures like Romney. There was also Chinese stock and I have no problem with Chinese companies or their investments. I do have a problem with American Companies who ship profitable American jobs out of the country. I also hope Romney plays this tactic similar to what he did in the Republican debates on Obama who will then jam it down Romney's throat.
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)and it fell limply to the floor
gordianot
(15,242 posts)He used this tactic before in Republican debates and I think it will come back.
SingleSeatBiggerMeat
(220 posts)Is "limply falling to the floor."
(I liked that one...)
MSMITH33156
(879 posts)while Sensata is awful, the best attack was never to go after Bain doing it now, cause Romney will just say, "everyone has a bunch of stuff in their retirement fund, and some of you profit it in the same way." But the important thing is he did this as CEO. He was active participant. Sensata is bad, but talk about stuff like this:
Etc, etc, etc
There are a list of companies a mile long, and that was easy picking.
lalalu
(1,663 posts)investments. They are even more bundled and convoluted than mortgage investments. So that is completely different from Romney actually having a controlling interest and say in what his companies and investors do.
Just another example of Romney insulting our intelligence by thinking the average American does not know the difference.
This would be an opening for President Obama to bring up Sensata. I see another please proceed governor moment.
RichGirl
(4,119 posts)All Obama has to say is that he didn't choose his retirement, it was given to him by the country like every other president. And that he plans on looking into it and changing it so it only has investments with U.S. companies.
AND point out that ALL of Romney's investments were of his choosing.
I really don't see why Romney would want to bring it up again since it would open the door for mention of his foreign bank accounts and why it is so important to see his last 10 years of tax returns.
Obama can point out that all his personal investments are U.S. and he only has bank accounts in the U.S. Good one two punch!
JSK
(1,123 posts)God, I hope they have a good response planned for this attack from Mittwit. I am sure it will be coming again on Monday.
Anybody whose retirement plan is invested in mutual funds undoubtedly has "investments" in China. They own the world! But the difference is that Romney is a big part of the reason WHY China owns the world! It's absolutely true that he was a pioneer of outsourcing, instructing already profitable companies how to outsource production and jobs, all in the name of greed. We've seen the video about his trips to China and his extolling the wonders of those factories that paid workers 24 cents an hour. Remember his explanation of the fence around one of the factories? He said it was there to keep OUT the throngs of people who were dying to work there. (pun intended)
morningfog
(18,115 posts)investments you have, mittens? Or did you just suffer another Romnesia attack?"
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Mitt best have a response to counter POTUS. Hope he remembers the last time he stepped into a pile of elephant shit - just a few days ago.