Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNate Silver Nevada 2010 Final Prediction: Sharron Angle+3. Actual Result: Harry Reid +5
http://elections.nytimes.com/2010/forecasts/senate/nevadaJust goes to show you making predictions is tricky. This election is going to be close. Make sure you GOTV for Obama and other Dems.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1904 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver Nevada 2010 Final Prediction: Sharron Angle+3. Actual Result: Harry Reid +5 (Original Post)
rhombus
Oct 2012
OP
Nate got right 34 out of 36 in 2010 though...And 1 of the two losses he was off by 1%
boingboinh
Oct 2012
#3
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)1. He Nailed About 99% Of Em
BTW, I felt Harry was going to win.
mzmolly
(50,996 posts)2. I don't think anyone is
complacent.
boingboinh
(290 posts)3. Nate got right 34 out of 36 in 2010 though...And 1 of the two losses he was off by 1%
So his record is quite impressive....stunning in fact.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)4. But when the election is close, those predictions are quite useless.