Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:06 PM Mar 2016

Flash from the past: Clinton, Feingold have shouting match over campaign finance reform

Hillary, the dedicated reformer. lol


2002

WASHINGTON -- Sens. Russ Feingold and Hillary Clinton got into in a heated argument over the impact of Feingold's campaign finance reform legislation on Senate Democrats, Feingold said Friday.

"'You're not living in the real world,"' Clinton screamed at him, according to Feingold, D-Wis., the party's leading backer of the McCain-Feingold law.

"I picked up my glass of water, and said, 'I do live in the real world and I'm doing just fine in it,"' Feingold responded, raising his voice at the closed-door meeting of Senate Democrats Thursday.

At issue was the law's ban on soft money -- large, unregulated donations to parties from corporations, unions and wealthy people. Feingold said Clinton was worried the ban would open Democrats to legal liability because of what she considered the vagueness of the law.

Feingold said a "core group" of five or six Democrats -- including Clinton, D-N.Y. -- was trying to find ways to get around the ban.

"It was a troubling display for a party that claims to be for trying to clean up the system," Feingold said.

Clinton spokeswoman Karen Dunn noted that Clinton and her GOP opponent, Rick Lazio, agreed to ban soft money from their campaign in 2000. The ban did not apply to direct mail or get-out-the-vote efforts.

"Senator Clinton participated in the only soft money ban in last year's election cycle," Dunn said. "She voted for the bill and she supports it. Senator Clinton has the greatest respect for Senator Feingold's leadership and advocacy on this issue."

She did not address Feingold's comments about Thursday's meeting.

The exchange took place at a forum organized by Sen. Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., pitting Fred Wertheimer, head of Democracy 21, which supports the ban, against Robert Bauer, the lawyer for the Senate and House Democratic fund-raising committees, who has argued that soft money should still be allowed for several non-campaign purposes.

Daschle was among those at the meeting. Daschle spokesman Jay Carson called Feingold's comment about the Democratic Party "perplexing."

"I think Senator Daschle's and the Senate Democrats' commitment to this can be seen in the painstaking work and blood, sweat and tears that went into getting this bill passed," he said.

Feingold called the exchange amazing.

"It's not surprising, but I don't know how they think they're going to get away with, in a closed room, trying to figure out every way they can to keep raising soft money, and then publicly, act like they're getting rid of it. It's going to sound phony," he said.

The New York Daily News, citing anonymous sources, first reported the exchange Friday. Feingold said he would not have discussed the meeting publicly were it not for the leak.

Feingold said Clinton apologized to him on the Senate floor later in the day.

"I said it was a good show, and she said we should have sold tickets," said Feingold, laughing.

But he said he will fight anyone who tries to keep the current system -- "even those who vote for it and then try to undercut it."

http://chippewa.com/clinton-feingold-have-shouting-match-over-campaign-finance-reform/article_94f8c743-93e1-5e6a-ac64-ce7206ae7b8b.html

67 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Flash from the past: Clinton, Feingold have shouting match over campaign finance reform (Original Post) Jefferson23 Mar 2016 OP
Thank you so much, Jefferson23. We need this kind of context. senz Mar 2016 #1
It is and you're very welcome. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #8
She is the poster child for everything that is wrong with Washington... GeorgiaPeanuts Mar 2016 #2
The transcripts are a big joke for some of her supporters...so funny. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #10
Hillary Is The Poster Child For EVERYTHING That Bernie Is Talking About That Is Wrong W/ Washington CorporatistNation Mar 2016 #19
When asked by Maddow on Clinton Foundation kcjohn1 Mar 2016 #3
They don't give a shit about anyone but themselves. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #6
Thank you for posting. /nt think Mar 2016 #4
Clinton at her finest, right? lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #14
Indeed. Hillary earned those low ratings all on her own. think Mar 2016 #23
Thank you. I know for sure I am donating to the right man. jwirr Mar 2016 #5
Me too. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #11
Thanks. Feingold was also right on the IWR voting Nay. HRC got that one wrong as well. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #7
I want him to win back his Senate seat sooo bad. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #13
Please consider ... Scuba Mar 2016 #51
Thanks, Scuba..I saw that yesterday and contributed. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #54
Thanks again!! Scuba Mar 2016 #55
Feingold also was the only Senator to read the PATRIOT ACT before the vote, and he voted against it. HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #15
Very interesting...thanks for this post! haikugal Mar 2016 #9
I think so too. We have a very good idea of what her administration would look like Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #35
K and R! bbgrunt Mar 2016 #12
Great find! I hope the people in Wisconsin remember/see this! cui bono Mar 2016 #16
Feel free to spread it around, twitter etc. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #21
Thank you for shining the light on campaign speak azurnoir Mar 2016 #17
The pleasure was all mine. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #22
in 2008 Feingold said Clinton was a Great Candidate JI7 Mar 2016 #18
What does that have to do with Clinton and her unethical approach to reform? Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #20
Reuss Feingold: "If Sanders wins, we're in trouble" brooklynite Mar 2016 #24
Link to where he said that? JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #25
He said it to me, personally, when we had dinner last year... brooklynite Mar 2016 #27
Forgive me if I don't take your word for it. n/t JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #29
Feel free to check my FEC reports. brooklynite Mar 2016 #38
This message was self-deleted by its author brooklynite Mar 2016 #39
I didn't say I don't believe you met him at a fundraiser. JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #41
If it makes you feel better, I wasn't expecting him to say it... brooklynite Mar 2016 #42
I think there are a lot of people like Russ who are broadly supportive of his goals JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #60
If it makes you feel better: I don't care if you believe me. brooklynite Mar 2016 #61
lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #30
Obama said the same thing to me yesterday about Hillary revbones Mar 2016 #33
As I said before, feel free to check my FEC contribution list brooklynite Mar 2016 #40
Access... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #50
Russ Feingold is "Status Quo"? brooklynite Mar 2016 #62
Maybe the voting public matters more... HumanityExperiment Mar 2016 #64
Lol. So sorry, that definitely proves it... rofl revbones Mar 2016 #59
I'm not trying to "prove it"...you can accept what I say or not. Doesn't matter to me. brooklynite Mar 2016 #63
I spoke with him last summer and he was enthused by Bernie's candidacy. Scuba Mar 2016 #53
He told me yesterday that he secretly endorsed Bernie. beam me up scottie Mar 2016 #56
lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #57
Do you have a link for that I Googled the quote correcting the spelling of Russ azurnoir Mar 2016 #28
Thank you so much Jefferson23! This article is revealing! JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #26
I thought so too and you're most welcome, Jon. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #32
Interesting. Autumn Mar 2016 #31
#ToneDownForWhat JonLeibowitz Mar 2016 #34
So she said, the Senator from Government Sachs! longship Mar 2016 #36
She had to hang out with with him...she has no choice. lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #45
She gets outraged when having to face how she has sold out. nt Skwmom Mar 2016 #37
Yes yet the words oligarchs and corruption are sooo yesterday. lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #44
Its funny that 60% of Primary Voters read above and think MEH, Clinton is my man. Blows my mind!nt quantass Mar 2016 #43
Corruption is only a Republican thing. Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #46
''It was a troubling display...'' Octafish Mar 2016 #47
Hopefully Russ will win back his Senate seat and if Bernie loses, this guy is the one Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #49
"It was a troubling display for a party that claims to be for trying to clean up the system" Scuba Mar 2016 #48
Claims being the operative word. I was just sayin to another poster, if Bernie loses Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #52
Hillary Supporters hate Feingold quantumjunkie Mar 2016 #58
Feingold rocks. felix_numinous Mar 2016 #65
I want him to win..he is a great guy. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #66
kick. n/t Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #67
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
2. She is the poster child for everything that is wrong with Washington...
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:10 PM
Mar 2016

Stuck in a bubble of privilege and corruption so big she didn't even think it was improper to give speeches for huge payouts prior to running for president.

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
19. Hillary Is The Poster Child For EVERYTHING That Bernie Is Talking About That Is Wrong W/ Washington
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:48 PM
Mar 2016

And politics overall!

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
3. When asked by Maddow on Clinton Foundation
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:13 PM
Mar 2016

During her presidency, she saw no conflict of interest of her husband and daughter soliciting donations from parties with business with the federal government.

These people have no ethics or standards. They are super pretenders.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
14. Clinton at her finest, right? lol
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:29 PM
Mar 2016

It cracks me up when her supporters blame Republicans for her low trustworthy ratings.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
15. Feingold also was the only Senator to read the PATRIOT ACT before the vote, and he voted against it.
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:30 PM
Mar 2016

Should be an interesting April 2nd... Feingold and Sanders and Clinton arescheduled to be at the Dem Party of WI gala and dinner as well as strongly anti-Sanders people including Al Franken (not from WI), Tammy Baldwin and Gwen Moore.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
35. I think so too. We have a very good idea of what her administration would look like
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:41 AM
Mar 2016

so hopefully more people will pick Bernie.

JI7

(89,269 posts)
18. in 2008 Feingold said Clinton was a Great Candidate
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:48 PM
Mar 2016

he ended up endorsing Obama but he said both of them were great candidates.

he got a lot of attacks from edwards supporters at the time.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
20. What does that have to do with Clinton and her unethical approach to reform?
Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:52 PM
Mar 2016

I think we all know the value of endorsements..their exchange on campaign finance
is another window into Hilary's mindset.

brooklynite

(94,736 posts)
38. Feel free to check my FEC reports.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:27 AM
Mar 2016

I find it ironic that people like to beat me up for being a 1%er who helps fund political campaigns, and then beat me up for lying about it.

FYI - I've had private time with Feingold, Strickland, Kander, Kirkpatrick, Duckworth, Hassan, Murphy, Grayson and Ross

Response to brooklynite (Reply #38)

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
41. I didn't say I don't believe you met him at a fundraiser.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:18 AM
Mar 2016

I said I won't take your word for what e said.

brooklynite

(94,736 posts)
42. If it makes you feel better, I wasn't expecting him to say it...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:25 AM
Mar 2016

...I figured he was broadly supportive of Sanders even if wasn't going to openly endorse.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
60. I think there are a lot of people like Russ who are broadly supportive of his goals
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 10:38 AM
Mar 2016

and his ways to get there, but feel Clinton is the right candidate for the time because of how the party works (said another way: inevitable).

I doubt Clinton will get Russ anywhere with his concrete goals, but politically it would be advantageous for a candidate for Senate (not an incumbent) not to back an insurgent.

Still don't believe what you say though.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
33. Obama said the same thing to me yesterday about Hillary
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:19 AM
Mar 2016

It was in between the bunny rabbit boxing matches that we were watching from a row boat on a lake. The sky was purple for some reason, I can't remember why since I woke up right after noticing that.

brooklynite

(94,736 posts)
40. As I said before, feel free to check my FEC contribution list
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:32 AM
Mar 2016
XXX,

Not a problem. There is space. We've actually decided to move to a restaurant in SoHo that is a favorite of our host. I should have the name and address shortly and will send it along this afternoon. But please plan on 7:30 PM and we'll look forward to seeing you and XXX on Thursday evening.

Thanks so much and look forward to seeing you.

XXXX

PS-Here's the link for the dinner: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/09.24.15derroughdinner
 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
50. Access...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:50 AM
Mar 2016

gotta love that 1% access that us normal citizens don't have, maybe the comment "If Sanders wins, we're in trouble" relates to your your continued easier access to politicians?

Now that would be inline with Bernie's platform and what he's pushes in this primary, so there is that...

again, your comment "I find it ironic that people like to beat me up for being a 1%er who helps fund political campaigns, and then beat me up for lying about it.

FYI - I've had private time with Feingold, Strickland, Kander, Kirkpatrick, Duckworth, Hassan, Murphy, Grayson and Ross"

Maybe, just maybe Bernie is making the status quo very nervous and you just happen to have a 'front row' seat right now that's getting the feedback that Bernie's message is working

brooklynite

(94,736 posts)
62. Russ Feingold is "Status Quo"?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 10:50 AM
Mar 2016

Who, then, are the House and Senate members who will be rallying to Bernie's agenda?

 

HumanityExperiment

(1,442 posts)
64. Maybe the voting public matters more...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 11:18 AM
Mar 2016

as to whom the 'rallying' will be centered on, it's the power of the people, guess whom politicians are more fearful of when it really comes down to it... the voting public, when they get motivated and vocal guess what happens?

So, to answer your question...

voters will drive politicians to be more motivated towards Bernie's agenda or those politicians will be voted out

This is the true power that's behind all of this and that is exactly what has the establishment concerned, no, afraid and you know that...

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
59. Lol. So sorry, that definitely proves it... rofl
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 10:09 AM
Mar 2016

Seriously? That's your evidence for backchannel conversations?

brooklynite

(94,736 posts)
63. I'm not trying to "prove it"...you can accept what I say or not. Doesn't matter to me.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 10:55 AM
Mar 2016

I've reported many times about events and meetings I've been to...and been criticized for them and my "access". You can choose to believe them or not.

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
53. I spoke with him last summer and he was enthused by Bernie's candidacy.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:51 AM
Mar 2016

Didn't offer an endorsement, but said he was happy Bernie was running.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
56. He told me yesterday that he secretly endorsed Bernie.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:56 AM
Mar 2016

We were enjoying brunch on the veranda, the caviar and Dom mimosas were to die for!

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
28. Do you have a link for that I Googled the quote correcting the spelling of Russ
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:08 AM
Mar 2016

what I came up with was you making the same claim twice before with no link even when asked for one

longship

(40,416 posts)
36. So she said, the Senator from Government Sachs!
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 01:34 AM
Mar 2016

Support Bernie Sanders, the candidate who will not be the president for Government Sachs!

I'll leave it at that.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
44. Yes yet the words oligarchs and corruption are sooo yesterday. lol
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:35 AM
Mar 2016

It's only a Republican issue.... la la la la la

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
47. ''It was a troubling display...''
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:40 AM
Mar 2016
"It's not surprising, but I don't know how they think they're going to get away with, in a closed room, trying to figure out every way they can to keep raising soft money, and then publicly, act like they're getting rid of it. It's going to sound phony," (Feingold) said.


No wonder the guy got so little help in 2010 from Rahm and Debbie.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
49. Hopefully Russ will win back his Senate seat and if Bernie loses, this guy is the one
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:49 AM
Mar 2016

next up to run for president.

His loss back at the time:

In Feingold’s Loss, Independents Turn on One of Their Own

MIDDLETON, Wis. — The irony was lost on no one. Senator Russ Feingold, a liberal with a fierce streak of independence who crusaded against the influence of money in politics, was toppled Tuesday in a campaign awash in the kind of unregulated cash he had struggled to keep out of the system.

And in a poignant twist, the loss came, in part, because independents flocked to his opponent, despite Mr. Feingold’s record of one maverick vote after another.

He was the sole senator to oppose the USA Patriot Act after the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001. He also broke with President Obama on several occasions, opposing the expansion of the war in Afghanistan, the bailing out of financial institutions in 2008 and the regulation of Wall Street this year, saying the restrictions did not go far enough.

Most prominently, he battled his colleagues to overhaul the campaign finance system; the resulting law, passed in 2002, bore his name and that of Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican (who won re-election Tuesday).

After being eroded for years, the McCain-Feingold Act was gutted this year by the Supreme Court, helping to pave the way for millions of dollars to gush into campaigns from outside groups, most of whom do not have to reveal their donors — including at least $4 million in Wisconsin this year, virtually all of it against Mr. Feingold, 57, or for his opponent, Ron Johnson, 55, a wealthy Republican businessman.

Mr. Feingold rejected such money, as he had his entire career, but analysts said that probably had little to do with his loss.

“Independents deserted Democrats, period,” said Ken Goldstein, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin at Madison. “This was not about Feingold’s record or the money or the advertising. It was about the anger of independents at the status quo.”

Still, others saw the flow of unregulated money as an added dimension to the narrative, in which Mr. Feingold was “hoist on his own petard,” said Mordecai Lee, who was first elected to the State Senate with Mr. Feingold in 1982 and is now a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee.

“Because his good-government streak and his push for changes in the campaign finance system had no political constituency,” Mr. Lee said, “they led to the lawsuit that opened up the floodgates.”

As it happens, Mr. Feingold raised and spent more money than Mr. Johnson, at least as of mid-October. In fact, their arms race led to what appeared to be the most expensive Senate race in Wisconsin history, topping out at more than $35 million.

Mr. Feingold had raised $18.2 million and spent $16.2 million by the middle of last month, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Mr. Johnson raised $12.8 million, and spent $10.5 million, pumping in more than $8.2 million of his own money.

Mr. Feingold has served in the Senate for 18 years and was seeking his fourth term. Mr. Johnson, a plastics manufacturer who had never run for office, won with 52 percent of the vote, to Mr. Feingold’s 47 percent.

Mr. Feingold was caught in an avalanche that crushed Democrats nationwide. Apart from capturing Mr. Feingold’s seat, Republicans here made a clean sweep of state government, winning the governor’s office and control of both houses of the State Legislature. One poll found that Mr. Obama’s approval rating here had declined at a faster rate than in any other state.

Despite his independence, Mr. Feingold allied himself strongly with certain Obama policies, including the health care bill, for which Mr. Johnson repeatedly bashed him.

Mike Wittenwyler, a Madison lawyer who had worked for Mr. Feingold in previous elections, said that the desire for “change” this year had overwhelmed everything else.

“This is the kind of climate where you would vote your mother out of office,” he said. “If you had a ‘D’ after your name, it was a liability.”

Mr. Feingold has spent his life in government. After winning a Rhodes Scholarship and graduating from Harvard Law School, he worked for a few years in private practice, then ran for the Wisconsin State Senate and has served in public office for nearly three decades.

It is not clear what he will do next. In a brief speech Tuesday night, he told the 300 supporters gathered in a hotel here in his hometown, “It’s on to the next fight, it’s on to the next battle, it’s on to 2012 and it is on to our next adventure. Forward.”

He then raised his fist in the air and left the stage.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/05/us/politics/05feingold.html?_r=0

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
48. "It was a troubling display for a party that claims to be for trying to clean up the system"
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:48 AM
Mar 2016
"It was a troubling display for a party that claims to be for trying to clean up the system," Feingold said.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
52. Claims being the operative word. I was just sayin to another poster, if Bernie loses
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:51 AM
Mar 2016

and Feingold wins his seat back, he will be well positioned to run for president
next time around. I would love it.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
65. Feingold rocks.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:38 PM
Mar 2016

Anyone holding onto their scruples in this day and age, with all that money flying around, deserves the highest respect.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Flash from the past: Clin...