Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
3/29: NEW PPP poll--> Hillary up 18% nationwide #FeeltheMath (Original Post) riversedge Mar 2016 OP
Low information voters who don't know anyone else exists in the race would be "firmly committed". nt w4rma Mar 2016 #1
It's that kind of contemptuous attitude BainsBane Mar 2016 #3
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's been true in every state that Clinton's name recognition and w4rma Mar 2016 #5
Hillary is a strong intellegent woman: Yet you demean her by 'her husbands coattails" shame on you riversedge Mar 2016 #8
She wouldn't be where she is now if it wasn't for her husband shawn703 Mar 2016 #37
How about providing some evidence for that? BainsBane Mar 2016 #9
I'd rather have someone with good judgement than a puffed up resume. (nt) w4rma Mar 2016 #12
You still have no evidence--just a sexist comment riversedge Mar 2016 #13
Whatever. Quit trying to pretend that every criticism against Hillary is "sexist". (nt) w4rma Mar 2016 #15
Saying that "husband's coattails are what is keeping her in the race" is about as Sexist you get!! riversedge Mar 2016 #16
We will never know how she would have fared without Bill. However.... Armstead Mar 2016 #38
And Elizabeth Warren, *definitely* is better qualified than Hillary Clinton for this office. w4rma Mar 2016 #43
I didn't mention her because she has not been in politics all that long, but I agree Armstead Mar 2016 #44
Elizabeth Warren has a long and distinguished resume. And she did things that I like. w4rma Mar 2016 #46
I totally agree. Armstead Mar 2016 #47
Every criticism isn't BainsBane Mar 2016 #18
Yes. it HAS!! riversedge Mar 2016 #40
If Bill and Hillary's roles were reversed and Hillary had Bill's charisma and had been President w4rma Mar 2016 #45
So no evidence BainsBane Mar 2016 #17
And there's the misogyny Dem2 Mar 2016 #33
*shrug* frustrated_lefty Mar 2016 #23
But NEW WPOSTpoll says they Hillary can get things done-break the gridlock in DC--Bests Sanders!! riversedge Mar 2016 #41
Well said ... their attitude speaks volumes and in ways they apparently ... JoePhilly Mar 2016 #26
That's just wrong Dem2 Mar 2016 #31
I've seen other polls showing that Clinton supporters BainsBane Mar 2016 #2
Yes. That is an important segment of the poll riversedge Mar 2016 #6
I'm with her. oasis Mar 2016 #4
"You have to have the right number of delegates to get the nomination" #HillaryClinton does indeed # riversedge Mar 2016 #7
Thank you! nt fun n serious Mar 2016 #10
Fantabulous! oasis Mar 2016 #11
A PPP poll? Seriously? Kentonio Mar 2016 #14
What's wrong with PPP? BainsBane Mar 2016 #19
Apart from the fact they've been horrifically wrong pretty much the entire primary? Kentonio Mar 2016 #20
Silver rates them as a B- BainsBane Mar 2016 #21
That would be Silver who has also been horrifically wrong for much of the primary? Kentonio Mar 2016 #27
Which states did he get wrong? Renew Deal Mar 2016 #29
He's pretty much consistently under called Bernies victories Kentonio Mar 2016 #30
Considering his model predicts chance of victory and not final margin of victory Godhumor Mar 2016 #34
Well it's your industry, so I'll bow to your superior knowledge. Kentonio Mar 2016 #36
Ha! PPP has a house bias for Clinton, yes n/t Godhumor Mar 2016 #39
The internet ones reward "enthusiastic participation", and deliver more pleasant results :-) synergie Mar 2016 #24
Thanks for posting Gothmog Mar 2016 #22
Cue the thinly veiled "low information" minority voter shit. nt LexVegas Mar 2016 #25
I first read the hash tag as feel the meth Renew Deal Mar 2016 #28
Great numbers, and I especially like the "firmly committed" bit. nt auntpurl Mar 2016 #32
Oh, this isn't new Dem2 Mar 2016 #35
I posted it 3/30 yesterday. It was published 3/29 per the link in OP. riversedge Mar 2016 #42
 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
1. Low information voters who don't know anyone else exists in the race would be "firmly committed". nt
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:46 AM
Mar 2016

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
3. It's that kind of contemptuous attitude
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:56 AM
Mar 2016

that has hurt Sanders. Sanders supporters are not better informed. There is absolutely no evidence to support your sense of superiority. All it does is reveal values diametrically opposed to equality. I have seen that same attitude from the start of the primaries, even before. That is how I have known that the goal is not to lessen inequality but instead to advance the interests of a few over the Democratic base they hold in such contempt. That is among the first things that turned me off Sanders. You can congratulate yourselves for communicating that message perfectly clearly to American voters.


 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
5. Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's been true in every state that Clinton's name recognition and
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:03 AM
Mar 2016

her husband's coattails are what is keeping her in the race. The better Sanders is known, the better he does. The better Clinton is known, the worse she does.

riversedge

(70,305 posts)
8. Hillary is a strong intellegent woman: Yet you demean her by 'her husbands coattails" shame on you
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:08 AM
Mar 2016

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
37. She wouldn't be where she is now if it wasn't for her husband
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:20 AM
Mar 2016

Being the spouse of a former and popular president who can call in a lot of favors within the Democratic Party? If Bill wasn't President from 1993-2000, nobody would be talking about Hillary today.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
9. How about providing some evidence for that?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:19 AM
Mar 2016

It's not like Sanders message is particularly complex. He's repeated it ad nauseum. I dare say there are few people in this country who couldn't recite it by now.

I've done a lot of get out the vote activities and made phone calls to multiple states, and I have yet to encounter one person who doesn't know who Bernie Sanders is. On the other hand, I have yet to encounter a high-profile Sanders supporter on this site who has bothered to inform themselves about Clinton's policy positions. In fact, many pointedly refuse to look at her issues page. Instead, they habitually make up crap they project onto her.

Clinton is exponentially more qualified than Sanders. For you to attribute her success to her "husband's coat tails" is more of the gender-based condescension that is typical in this election. Considering her opponent has only one major legislative accomplishment in 25 years in federal office, the dismissal of her qualifications is absurd. It's not everyone who can boast the single lowest rating in bipartisanship of anyone in the Senate. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357/report-card/2015
But your claim is Americans voters are just too stupid to know how much better he is than Clinton.


riversedge

(70,305 posts)
16. Saying that "husband's coattails are what is keeping her in the race" is about as Sexist you get!!
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 06:19 AM
Mar 2016
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
38. We will never know how she would have fared without Bill. However....
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 09:33 AM
Mar 2016

one does have to wonder whether she would be in this annointed position without the name recognition of a larger than life husband and president.

Would she be considered the bestpresidential candidate if she had followed the path of most successful politicians -- including successful woman politicians -- of climbing the ladder and progressing through elected offices and actually putting in the time and paying dues along the way. Making their own names strictly on their own merits.


If you look at in those terms, I think women like Amy Klobeshar (spelling?), Dianne Feinstein, Jan Schiakovsky, Barbara Boxer and many, many other women are much more qualified.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
43. And Elizabeth Warren, *definitely* is better qualified than Hillary Clinton for this office.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:45 PM
Mar 2016

I would vote for Elizabeth Warren for any political office that she decided to run for.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
46. Elizabeth Warren has a long and distinguished resume. And she did things that I like.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:51 PM
Mar 2016

She didn't do things like sit on Walmart's board. A position greased by her husband's position as governor, I'll add.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
18. Every criticism isn't
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:09 AM
Mar 2016

"husband's coattails" is. It also says far more about you than Hillary Clinton.

In just a few sentences in this thread you've made your values perfectly clear.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
45. If Bill and Hillary's roles were reversed and Hillary had Bill's charisma and had been President
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:48 PM
Mar 2016

Then I'd use the exact same argument against Bill that he was riding his wife's coattails. If you think that the use of the word "husband" automatically means "sexism", then you're probably radicalized.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
17. So no evidence
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:05 AM
Mar 2016

What a surprise. You can't even bother to try to provide evidence for your claims. That might take a few minutes of actual work and ultimately confronting the realization that you have simply invented nonsense to try to justify your imperious worldview and entirely unjustified sense of superiority.

Your kind of attitude deserves to go down in flames. It is entirely incongruous with a party or movement that is meant to promote equal opportunity and equal rights.

riversedge

(70,305 posts)
41. But NEW WPOSTpoll says they Hillary can get things done-break the gridlock in DC--Bests Sanders!!
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:01 PM
Mar 2016


She is a Progressive who gets things done!












Hillary Clinton, Enemy of the Status Quo


http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/03/hillary-clinton-enemy-status-quo

—By Kevin Drum
| Thu Mar. 31, 2016 10:44 AM EDT

The headline news from today's Washington Post poll is the astonishing unpopularity of Donald Trump. His net favorable rating is -37 percent: 30 percent like him and 67 percent don't. The other candidates have net negative ratings too, but nothing close to this.

On another subject, 69 percent of respondents claim to believe that the "current political system" is dysfunctional. I don't know whether to take that seriously, or just as a generalized gripe about politics. What's interesting, though, is who would do the most to address this. Trump is the top choice, unsurprisingly, but Hillary Clinton is close behind—which is a bit surprising. It certainly suggests, along with other evidence in this poll, that support for Hillary isn't just strong, but roughly as enthusiastic as it is for anyone else.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
26. Well said ... their attitude speaks volumes and in ways they apparently ...
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:16 AM
Mar 2016

... lack the self-awareness to comprehend.

My guess is that the air is very very thin way up on the high horse they ride.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
31. That's just wrong
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:41 AM
Mar 2016

You're essentially calling Hillary voters Republicans. When people get angry they post stupid things.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
2. I've seen other polls showing that Clinton supporters
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:48 AM
Mar 2016

are both more committed and more enthusiastic, which goes against the MSM meme.

From the PPP summary of their poll:

On the Democratic side Hillary Clinton continues to have a resounding lead with 54% to 36% for Bernie Sanders. Clinton leads within every gender, race, and age group except younger voters and her supporters are also more committed- 84% say they will definitely vote for her compared to 61% who say the same for Sanders.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/03/trump-most-acceptable-candidate-to-gop-clinton-leads-comfortably.html#more


riversedge

(70,305 posts)
7. "You have to have the right number of delegates to get the nomination" #HillaryClinton does indeed #
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 04:07 AM
Mar 2016

Last edited Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:49 PM - Edit history (1)

A feel good tweet--for all the enjoy.

TWEET
NaphiSoc ‏@NaphiSoc 6h6 hours ago

"You have to have the right number of delegates to get the nomination"
#HillaryClinton does indeed #FeelTheMath



https://twitter.com/NaphiSoc/status/715348402507153408
Image

#FeeltheMath

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
19. What's wrong with PPP?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:10 AM
Mar 2016

What do you prefer? One of those internet polls showing Bernie winning in 50 states?

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
20. Apart from the fact they've been horrifically wrong pretty much the entire primary?
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:25 AM
Mar 2016

Nothing really.

BainsBane

(53,072 posts)
21. Silver rates them as a B-
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 07:29 AM
Mar 2016
http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/pollster-ratings/

That does not qualify as "horrifically wrong." But if you have evidence to back up your claims, but all means, provide it.

I think what you really meant to say is: "Don't post polls that bum me out. I'm still pretending Bernie can win."
 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
30. He's pretty much consistently under called Bernies victories
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:29 AM
Mar 2016

Sometimes by quite embarrassingly huge margins. Check his predictions for the last round of contests if you don't believe me.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
34. Considering his model predicts chance of victory and not final margin of victory
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 08:53 AM
Mar 2016

He has done remarkably well.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»3/29: NEW PPP poll--> Hil...