2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum3/29: NEW PPP poll--> Hillary up 18% nationwide #FeeltheMath
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/polls/
TWEET
NaphiSoc @NaphiSoc 16h16 hours ago
PPP just out
#HillaryClinton up 18% nationwide
84% of her supporters firm in choice to 61% for Sanders
#FeelTheMath
w4rma
(31,700 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)that has hurt Sanders. Sanders supporters are not better informed. There is absolutely no evidence to support your sense of superiority. All it does is reveal values diametrically opposed to equality. I have seen that same attitude from the start of the primaries, even before. That is how I have known that the goal is not to lessen inequality but instead to advance the interests of a few over the Democratic base they hold in such contempt. That is among the first things that turned me off Sanders. You can congratulate yourselves for communicating that message perfectly clearly to American voters.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)her husband's coattails are what is keeping her in the race. The better Sanders is known, the better he does. The better Clinton is known, the worse she does.
riversedge
(70,305 posts)shawn703
(2,702 posts)Being the spouse of a former and popular president who can call in a lot of favors within the Democratic Party? If Bill wasn't President from 1993-2000, nobody would be talking about Hillary today.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)It's not like Sanders message is particularly complex. He's repeated it ad nauseum. I dare say there are few people in this country who couldn't recite it by now.
I've done a lot of get out the vote activities and made phone calls to multiple states, and I have yet to encounter one person who doesn't know who Bernie Sanders is. On the other hand, I have yet to encounter a high-profile Sanders supporter on this site who has bothered to inform themselves about Clinton's policy positions. In fact, many pointedly refuse to look at her issues page. Instead, they habitually make up crap they project onto her.
Clinton is exponentially more qualified than Sanders. For you to attribute her success to her "husband's coat tails" is more of the gender-based condescension that is typical in this election. Considering her opponent has only one major legislative accomplishment in 25 years in federal office, the dismissal of her qualifications is absurd. It's not everyone who can boast the single lowest rating in bipartisanship of anyone in the Senate. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357/report-card/2015
But your claim is Americans voters are just too stupid to know how much better he is than Clinton.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)riversedge
(70,305 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)riversedge
(70,305 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)one does have to wonder whether she would be in this annointed position without the name recognition of a larger than life husband and president.
Would she be considered the bestpresidential candidate if she had followed the path of most successful politicians -- including successful woman politicians -- of climbing the ladder and progressing through elected offices and actually putting in the time and paying dues along the way. Making their own names strictly on their own merits.
If you look at in those terms, I think women like Amy Klobeshar (spelling?), Dianne Feinstein, Jan Schiakovsky, Barbara Boxer and many, many other women are much more qualified.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)I would vote for Elizabeth Warren for any political office that she decided to run for.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)She didn't do things like sit on Walmart's board. A position greased by her husband's position as governor, I'll add.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)She also did it without a marital brand name
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)"husband's coattails" is. It also says far more about you than Hillary Clinton.
In just a few sentences in this thread you've made your values perfectly clear.
riversedge
(70,305 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)Then I'd use the exact same argument against Bill that he was riding his wife's coattails. If you think that the use of the word "husband" automatically means "sexism", then you're probably radicalized.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)What a surprise. You can't even bother to try to provide evidence for your claims. That might take a few minutes of actual work and ultimately confronting the realization that you have simply invented nonsense to try to justify your imperious worldview and entirely unjustified sense of superiority.
Your kind of attitude deserves to go down in flames. It is entirely incongruous with a party or movement that is meant to promote equal opportunity and equal rights.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)riversedge
(70,305 posts)She is a Progressive who gets things done!
Hillary Clinton, Enemy of the Status Quo
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/03/hillary-clinton-enemy-status-quo
By Kevin Drum
| Thu Mar. 31, 2016 10:44 AM EDT
The headline news from today's Washington Post poll is the astonishing unpopularity of Donald Trump. His net favorable rating is -37 percent: 30 percent like him and 67 percent don't. The other candidates have net negative ratings too, but nothing close to this.
On another subject, 69 percent of respondents claim to believe that the "current political system" is dysfunctional. I don't know whether to take that seriously, or just as a generalized gripe about politics. What's interesting, though, is who would do the most to address this. Trump is the top choice, unsurprisingly, but Hillary Clinton is close behindwhich is a bit surprising. It certainly suggests, along with other evidence in this poll, that support for Hillary isn't just strong, but roughly as enthusiastic as it is for anyone else.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... lack the self-awareness to comprehend.
My guess is that the air is very very thin way up on the high horse they ride.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)You're essentially calling Hillary voters Republicans. When people get angry they post stupid things.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)are both more committed and more enthusiastic, which goes against the MSM meme.
From the PPP summary of their poll:
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2016/03/trump-most-acceptable-candidate-to-gop-clinton-leads-comfortably.html#more
riversedge
(70,305 posts)oasis
(49,408 posts)riversedge
(70,305 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 31, 2016, 12:49 PM - Edit history (1)
A feel good tweet--for all the enjoy.
TWEET
NaphiSoc @NaphiSoc 6h6 hours ago
"You have to have the right number of delegates to get the nomination"
#HillaryClinton does indeed #FeelTheMath
https://twitter.com/NaphiSoc/status/715348402507153408
Image
#FeeltheMath
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)oasis
(49,408 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)BainsBane
(53,072 posts)What do you prefer? One of those internet polls showing Bernie winning in 50 states?
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Nothing really.
BainsBane
(53,072 posts)That does not qualify as "horrifically wrong." But if you have evidence to back up your claims, but all means, provide it.
I think what you really meant to say is: "Don't post polls that bum me out. I'm still pretending Bernie can win."
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Renew Deal
(81,872 posts)Other than Michigan which was the biggest upset in 30 years?
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Sometimes by quite embarrassingly huge margins. Check his predictions for the last round of contests if you don't believe me.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)He has done remarkably well.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)PPP still suck though.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)synergie
(1,901 posts)Gothmog
(145,567 posts)LexVegas
(6,097 posts)Renew Deal
(81,872 posts)auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)It was put up on Pollster a couple of days ago.