Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"More Problems for Romney" by Josh Marshall at TPM
More Problems for Romneyby Josh Marshall at TPM
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/10/more_problems_for_romney.php?ref=fpblg
"SNIP................................................
Meanwhile, an article published yesterday afternoon in the LA Times suggests that these initial reports remain what US intelligence still believes happened: an attack with relatively little advanced planning, a high degree of disorganization and at least some level of triggering by the riots in Cairo earlier that day.
From the LAT
The attack was carried out following a minimum amount of planning, said a U.S. intelligence official, who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a matter still under investigation. The attackers exhibited a high degree of disorganization. Some joined the attack in progress, some did not have weapons and others just seemed interested in looting.
..........................................
As I mentioned after the debate last week, Romney totally got hoisted on his own petard by the ridiculous hyperfocus on the word terror. But really the whole focus on this word only makes sense in a hyper-ideological mindset in which using the terror buzzword signifies you fully understand some global war on Islamofascism which Romneys advisors are trying to bring back from the middle years of the Bush era.
My global take remains the same: only in the final weeks of a presidential campaign, with one candidate desperate for an America under siege Carteresque tableau to play against, would this ever remotely have been treated like a scandal or cover up. A bunch of reporters basically got played and punkd.
...............................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1849 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"More Problems for Romney" by Josh Marshall at TPM (Original Post)
applegrove
Oct 2012
OP
Agreed. Those people get paid by the right-wing corporations who own their networks. nt.
OldDem2012
Oct 2012
#2
JI7
(89,254 posts)1. the reporters didn't get " played and punk'd "
they are doing what they have been for years with their shitty reporting. they are trying to make news rather than report it. they aren't calling out Romney on his lies. they attacked Obama in the first debate and claimed Obama should have done it.
OldDem2012
(3,526 posts)2. Agreed. Those people get paid by the right-wing corporations who own their networks. nt.
Mr.Bill
(24,305 posts)3. There is no journalism on your television. None.
Hasn't been in decades.