2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDan savage reminds us of Sarandon's idiocy of 2000
There was more I wanted to say. Lots more. Like this: People were saying the exact same thingSarandon said the exact same thingin run up to the 2000 election. Bill Bradley (Google him) was the real Democrat and there was no difference between Gore and Bush and if Gore got the nomination instead of Bradley then everyone should vote for Ralph Nader or not vote at all because Gore and Bush were equally badand some were saying that George W. Bush was so awfulso obviously terriblethat Bush's election would surely bring the revolution. (Strangely... they didn't say the same thing about Gore, who was supposedly no different than Bush. They were exactly the same, no difference, but Gore's election would not bring the revolution.)
And like this: It's easy for white people with a lot of money to fantasize about what might happen if Donald Trump gets elected... because if Trump's election doesn't bring the revolution, if his election only visits misery on Mexicans, Muslims, African Americans, LGBT Americans, women who get abortions, etc., the wealthy and white can jet off to their homes in France and wait it out.
Anyway.
http://www.thestranger.com/slog/2016/03/31/23890388/bernie-or-hillary-or-both
CalvinballPro
(1,019 posts)Not only is she wrong, she's a big hypocrite.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Won't matter to Sarandon who wins, but it will matter to a lot of people.
jfern
(5,204 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)When he does, we can chastize him...right now we'll concentrate on a really stupid woman like Sarandon.
jfern
(5,204 posts)As for Bernie, he lost a close friend because he campaigned for the Democratic nominee in 1984.
http://www.sevendaysvt.com/vermont/a-former-ally-says-bernie-sanders-has-changed/Content?oid=2775474
You can't attack him there, so you have to resort to attacking his supporters. Pathetic.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)And your repsonse i so typical...What Sarandon said is magnificently ignorant...From a grouip of people whohave thrown Rachel Maddow under the bus now, your response is rich.
jfern
(5,204 posts)who lost a close friend because of supporting the Democratic nominee in 1984, and has supported the Democratic nominee for every Presidential election since.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)I am only posting this about Sarandon because she is rightfully being called out...one person...try and define one person as anyone...what dictionary do you use?
frylock
(34,825 posts)But why bring Brown up if he's not relevant to the discussion...just trying to deflect on the stupid comments of Sarandon.
frylock
(34,825 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)You want to call more women 'stupid' for not supporting Clinton?
You want to burn more and more bridges that you are going to need?
Those of us that voted for Nader in 2000 did not give the US Bush. Get your facts straight and maybe you would understand why a significant portion of the unaffiliated left is being lost yet again in a national election that the Democratic Party should win easily with the right candidate.
JI7
(89,259 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)JI7
(89,259 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)JI7
(89,259 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)JI7
(89,259 posts)I don't know if he voted for nader but being in california it would not make much difference.
His words before the election mattered more. And he was not attacking for like others.
jfern
(5,204 posts)No need to attack Sarandon if Jerry Brown gets off the hook.
JI7
(89,259 posts)Jerry Brown publicly supported Gore.
jfern
(5,204 posts)JI7
(89,259 posts)dsc
(52,165 posts)I find nothing suggesting he did so.
dsc
(52,165 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)dsc
(52,165 posts)he was a famous Democrat, he had no business endorsing Nader and may have thrown some Florida or NH votes his way.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)She has no chance to win the nomination, so no need to spend so much time talking about her.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Are higher than any female
Candidate ev.... Strike that. Never mind.
jillan
(39,451 posts)But try to listen to more than one person...he's far more intelligent than Sarandon.
jillan
(39,451 posts)He's loud and he's crazy.
I love Sarandon but she is an actress. Why did Chris Hayes even have her on?
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)She's a spokesperson for Bernie...of course he's going to have her on.
jillan
(39,451 posts)They are entertainers and supporters and yes, occasionally they introduce the candidate.
Silly!
Sarandon shows up everywhere...
jillan
(39,451 posts)Are you going to attack him too?
lol.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)You're minimizing her role. Besides, as Charles Blow noted, what she said a lot of people found outragous.
SheenaR
(2,052 posts)Friggin Socialist. None of his fellow celebrities have endorsed him either
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)elected - things will get so bad people will finally rise up and things will get better.
YEAH RIGHT!
Actually, what history shows us is that often things just keep getting worse and worse, and people don't rise up at all - they get beaten down and defeated all they can do is focus on survival. Sometimes it can take generations for some societies to turn things around.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)She's probably even farther to the right than Bernie.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 2, 2016, 01:28 AM - Edit history (1)
Trajan
(19,089 posts)I supported Gore, but I am not butthurt over Susan's other choice ...
And to think I once thought highly of you ... Ah well .... Political expediency trumps all ....
CLICK !
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Ignore what she said...I have not posted about her until her stupid comments of the other day...typical Bernie supporter response...you can't criticize anyone who supports him no matter what he/she says...are you one of the many who has thrown Rachel under the bus...she apparently is not worshipping Bernie and about half this place has accused her of selling out.
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Susan is a actress. Do you think That Susan lets her support of Sanders change the way she acts in a movie? Rachel does with way she reports the news and it is worse when a news person does it.
Anyway Susan lives in CA and there is no way her one vote matters in that State. All this outrage of people not voting for Clinton only matters in a handful of states. I am surprised that most of you don't know that we use a electorate system in the US and not popular votes.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Hey, I don't hate Clint Eastwood or Bruce Willis for being republicans. I still would sing Firework by Katy Perry in my car going 60 plus on the freeway on a bright sunny day because that is what that song is all about...
They are engaged citizens. They make art, art that I like to watch or listen to or sing along with. All Susan has done is voice her opinion...which is her own. Get a grip.
It isn't like she cluster bombed and villages or toppled any regimes.
Ned_Devine
(3,146 posts)Gothmog
(145,433 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)and the time spent to destroy someone to bits--just because you don't agree with their views.
Sarandon is being taken apart piece by piece.
Sarandon is a very kind person, a good mother and she has opinions. She's a decent human being.
And so are Katy Perry and Amy Poehler.
Just because someone doesn't endorse your candidate--doesn't mean they're the spawn of hell.