2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Clinton scream.
Why does she protest so much? Environmental issues should be a major part of the Democratic platform.
villager
(26,001 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)supporters. They won't believe it anyway
dana_b
(11,546 posts)#TheClintonScream
good one!
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Remember that old Beavis & Butthead schtick? Beavis hunched-over with his shirt collar framing his face, asking "Are you threatening me? I am the Great Cornholio!!" Substitute "I am so sick..." and you've got Hillary to a T, except that Beavis was much more likable and occasionally even endearing.
-app
dana_b
(11,546 posts)lol... man, the late nights in the 90s watching this stuff.
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Let's hope we can avoid the wrath of her bunghole.
-app
Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)And he went on to the win the nomination but lost to Bush in 2004.
desmiller
(747 posts)Yuugal
(2,281 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)If he had any principles, he'd admit that his campaign was destroyed for less.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... at the distortions being perpetrated by the Sanders camp. See my recent posts from the evening news, PBS newhour and Erin Burnett.
mia
(8,361 posts)Some information about fossil fuel lobbyists.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2015/07/hillary-clinton-bundlers-fossil-fuel-lobbyists
LAS14
(13,783 posts)Sanders fossil fuel donations 4 100ths of 1%.
Clinton fossil fuel donations 15 100ths of 1%.
Why don't facts count anymore????
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)Second time I've seen this claim, no links, no backup, and it probably doesn't include dark PAC money.
Any help here?
questionseverything
(9,657 posts)All told, the campaign to elect Hillary Clinton for president in 2016 has received more than $4.5 million from lobbyists, bundlers, and large donors connected the fossil fuel industry.
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/campaign-updates/hillary-clintons-connection-oil-gas-industry/
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)care to compare votes? Wasn't she lobbying for fracking? I am pretty sure she has some pro offshore oil drilling votes. let's not attempt to muddy the waters, your candidate already supports that though.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)to Asia where they may get three to five times as much. But it will kill jobs and we may end up in substantially higher heating and electricity costs - also, its significantly possible we could lose a lot of housing in cities, and possibly rent stabilization laws.
pacalo
(24,721 posts)Sanders' popularity with young people, as well as his interest in protecting the environment, brought Hillary's paranoia to the surface &, very embarrassingly, caused her to act on an assumption. She -- being a lawyer -- should know better about making assumptions.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)She was brave to ask the question - I would have been terrified to stand there with clinton jabbing at me.
Umbral18
(105 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Just a few of the people who have always known the Clintons are full of bullshit neoliberal New Democrats on a poors-killing rampage. Today they may be Sanders camp? So what? In 2008 if they were old enough plenty of them were for Obama as the alternative to the Arkansas/Wall Street gang (even though he was not quite that). Corrupt machine politicians naturally organize their own opposition, in various guises. Hey, it's a tribute to the success of the Clinton machine. The smart and aware have always been trying to stop it, and it usually wins anyway. Not this time.
revbones
(3,660 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)The third way Democrats thought they had permanently buried environmental issues. How inconsiderate of some Greenpeace hippie to attempt to raise an environmental question. Doesn't he know the whales were already saved?
Jackilope
(819 posts)Hill, please. You want to see sick and tired? Get out of your protective bubble and $2,500 a plate fundraising parties and see packed stadiums and arenas of folks wanting real change.
BainsBane
(53,038 posts)totally $23 million so far, as cited in federal documents by the FEC. http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/12/f-e-c-tells-sanders-campaign-that-some-donors-may-have-given-too-much/?_r=4
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/988/201602110300034988/201602110300034988.pdf
https://gobling.wordpress.com/2016/02/13/fec-hits-bernie2016-with-campaign-finance-violations/
https://gobling.wordpress.com/2016/03/22/bernie-2016-returns-donations-to-remedy-campaign-finance-issues/
There are links of FEC documents on the FEC website in those stories above as well as the Sanders Campaign Treasurer's response.
Funny how much more you object to legal fundraising that flagrant violations of the law.
Bernie's entire campaign has been based on these kind of false smears against Clinton. It's not projection. It's all he says. To pretend otherwise is absurd.
But accepting a campaign contribution from someone who works at a fueling station or an energy company, that's outrageous. She ought to be taking single checks 5x the legal limit like Bernie so she can claim to be a 'man of the people."
dchill
(38,514 posts)Congrats! Hope you don't do this for free...
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Women apparently can't raise their voices...they can only scream...a right-wing talking point enabled by Bernie's self-righteous supporters.
mia
(8,361 posts)The gender card comes to the rescue. In vain.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Pathetic post and pathetic response. You can't even see your own bias. when all else fails say "_____ card" because that's all you got. Do you use gay card and race card too? Are we at Fox Noise level now?
mia
(8,361 posts)Wish you well.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)And you'll post sexist crap because you are so on the side of right it's justifiable.
elias7
(4,022 posts)It's not about sexism at all. It's all about ugliness in a moment. And in a vacuum. We're all capable of it, and all prone to potential distortions. Like Dean, Hillary was loud because it was loud in the room, but the microphone can be isolated.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)If Bernie yells, he's passionate. If Hillary yells, she's a b*.
mia
(8,361 posts)men aren't supposed to scream?
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)The 'Dean Scream', it was called. That's what the OP is referencing.
There is no sexist double standard here.
jfern
(5,204 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)And bleh, I'm so tired of seeing my sex used as a weapon. Sexism! Its a real thing & it sucks, but in Hillary's case, its used as a false flag, over & over & over. They use it so much, the real thing becomes lost. Its starting to really piss me off.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Bernie is angry because he has stuff to be angry about.
What, pray tell, is Clinton angry about?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)So your "gender card" is fully reversible. Plus they were real people speaking their minds truthfully, i.e. the opposite of Clinton.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Howard Dean is, as far as I know, a male.
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Uncalled for.
mia
(8,361 posts)Can't see the forest for the trees?
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)mia
(8,361 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)you don't belong in this business- Sam Rayburn. Those were the days! Too bad there aren't politicians who do take their money who we can count on to operate on that principle. Sadly, a lot of them apply it to ordinary citizen rather than lobbyists and corporate America.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)Not very presidential
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)mia
(8,361 posts)of the tone-gate disaster.
http://www.salon.com/2016/03/30/hillary_clintons_tone_gate_disaster_why_her_campaigns_condescending_bernie_dismissal_should_concern_democrats_everywhere/
...This has become a regular strategy for the Clinton campaign, consistently attacking the Sanders campaign for being negative, while itself running a dishonest and petty campaign, from the misleading attack on Sanders healthcare plan to Clintons deceptive auto-bailout remark to the malicious attempts to smear Sanders as a racist. (Black lives dont matter much to Bernie Sanders, said Clinton surrogate David Brock in January.)
Needless to say, if the Clinton camp thinks that the Sanders campaign is being negative, wait until they face Donald Trump. This kind of touchiness about Sanders stating inconvenient truths (like her $225,000 speeches for Goldman Sachs) should worry any Democrat about the general election, when a Republican challenger, most likely Trump, will be going after Clinton on everything from the email scandal to the Clinton foundation to her deep ties to Wall Street and other industries. If Trump has proven anything over the past year, its that nothing absolutely nothing is off limits (this includes all the scandals from the 90s, from Whitewater to Travelgate to Monica Lewinsky).
Clinton has proven over the past months that she is not a natural-born politician. (She even said it herself.) And for someone with her political baggage, this is concerning. On Wall Street criticisms, for example, Clintons retorts have been impressively clumsy, from her reference to 9/11 at the first debate (I represented Wall Street as a Senator from New York) to her dismissive thats what they offered reply about her Goldman Sachs speeches.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)I didn't care if people thought she came off however they perceive her. I figure that is their problem if they can't handle her demeanor. But, if she is going to complain about tone then it's gonna come back at her that is just the way it is. I can't complain about people being aggressive for the same reason. Unless they are violently so, in that case sure they get to face the authorities and answer for that. But, verbal aggression no I have no room to complain in that department.
mia
(8,361 posts)Thank you.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)mia
(8,361 posts)BainsBane
(53,038 posts)The desperation is showing. Anything to avoid discussing issues I guess.
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)Many of them are to never think to question any linkage campaign promises and high net worth, but the majority of voters know better.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)please make her stop
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)makes me sad and uncomfortable.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I have two comments on your OP:
1. This is a good illustration of how it is NOT sexist to criticize her. You see, Dean WAS attacked for being emotional (as many men are as well. Many). Hillary is not immune because she is a woman and cries of sexism cannot grant her immunity.
2. Dean's Scream was a nasty set up that didn't give a fair portrayal of that moment. The audio cut out the noise of the crowd so it appeared he was deranged. This video of Hillary on the other hand is exactly what happened.
Thank you.
oasis
(49,395 posts)When will these amateur "activists" ever learn?
mia
(8,361 posts)Perhaps she'll do better when questioned by professionals.
oasis
(49,395 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)Clinton's rude response to a valid citizen question did not hurt Greenpeace but it did hurt Clinton.
Clinton needs to keep her cool.
oasis
(49,395 posts)don't expect them to be in the business of ambushing Democratic candidates.
Like it or not, Hill's going to be president, and with that, comes a giant "to do" list. I'd hate to see Greenpeace issues placed near the bottom because of a brash representative who is serving two masters.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)She is not the right candidate for this time of environmental crisis.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)oasis
(49,395 posts)they have some explaining to do.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)That explains much.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)That's the demographic that her campaign expected to overwhelmingly support her. So her actions here can be taken as emblematic of her feelings regarding that not being the case. As well as other similar frustrations.
"Is it a meme yet?"
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)arikara
(5,562 posts)Deans scream was played over and over again by the msm because he wasn't the favourite establishment candidate, and he was getting too popular. It wasn't even that bad if you go back and listen to it now. But the msm took great pleasure in mocking and making a fool of him over it and successfully trashed his campaign.
On the other hand, Hillary is the establishment candidate so you will hear crickets over this except on alternate news who aren't inclined to play the same 5 second clip over and over.