Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

amborin

(16,631 posts)
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 09:50 PM Apr 2016

Politifact: Hillary Did Get Money From the Fossil Fuel Industry

According to the latest tallies from Center for Responsive Politics, Clinton's campaign has received $307,561 from people who work for oil and gas interests so far in the presidential race

Super PACs supporting Clinton have directly given an additional $25,701. Sanders does not have a super PAC.
But in Clinton’s case, that doesn't include "bundlers," a fancy name for fundraisers who collect money from individual donors and bundle the money together for a campaign.


The Huffington Post article from July 17, 2015, cited by Sanders found that "nearly all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry." It links to 40 registered lobbyists but only offers details on some donors who still work for the industry.
However, the Greenpeace report says that when you add in the bundlers’ donations (lobbyists with some alleged tie to the fossil fuel industry), Clinton's total rises to nearly $1.8 million.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/apr/01/sorting-out-clintons-fossil-fuel-contributions/

Hillary Clinton is getting a lot of money from fossil fuel executives and lobbyists acting as bundlers (fundraisers who collect donations) who represent fossil fuel companies. (She also has lobbyist bundlers who represent other environmentally challenged corporations like Monsanto.)

Here’s just a partial list of the fossil fuel–friendly bundlers who raised money for Clinton from April through June:
• ExxonMobil executive Theresa Mary Fariello raised $21,200. ExxonMobil is the world’s largest oil and gas company, and it has a particularly ugly history of funding climate change denial. It is also eager to exploit oil reserves in delicate regions such as the Arctic, despite its responsibility for the most devastating Arctic oil spill in history.


• Brian Wolff, executive vice president at the Edison Electric Institute, a utility company trade association, came up with $26,600. EEI opposes and lobbies against the EPA’s Clean Power Plan to limit CO2 emissions from power plants, the centerpiece of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan. The power-plant regulations are essential for the U.S. to meet its emission-reduction targets under the Copenhagen Accord and to live up to the promises it is laying out in advance of U.N. negotiations in Paris this December. Clinton has pledged to protect the Clean Power Plan regulations.

• Heather Podesta and Tony Podesta have raised $31,150 and $74,575, respectively. The power ex-couple are big-shot Democratic lobbyists. Tony’s brother John is Clinton’s campaign chair and former White House chief of staff to Bill Clinton. Even though John Podesta is considered a climate hawk, Tony and his ex-wife Heather represent fossil fuel companies. Heather’s recent past clients include Marathon Oil and Bill Koch’s Oxbow Carbon, a coal giant, and from 2004 to 2006 she lobbied for Koch Industries.

Tony lobbied for BP in the wake of its disastrous Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion, and through last year he represented Golden Pass, a company co-owned by ExxonMobil and Qatar Petroleum that wants to export liquefied natural gas. To be fair, they also work on behalf of renewable fuel companies — Tony represents SolarReserve, a solar power company, and Heather lobbies for the ethanol industry. You might call the Podestas the very embodiment of the Obama/Clinton “all of the above” energy policy.

• Scott Parven and Brian Pomper, lobbyists for Chevron, bundled $24,700 and $29,700 for Clinton, respectively. Their work includes opposing the Clean Power Plan controls that Clinton supports, and protecting the tax breaks for oil companies that Clinton has previously called for eliminating.

• One of Hillary’s top fundraisers, Gordon Giffin, is a former lobbyist for TransCanada, the company pushing to build the Keystone XL pipeline.
That’s just a sampling. As the Huffington Post reports, “Nearly all of the lobbyists bundling contributions for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign have at one time or another worked for the fossil fuel industry.”
http://grist.org/climate-energy/hillary-clinton-rakes-in-money-from-fossil-fuel-interests/
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politifact: Hillary Did Get Money From the Fossil Fuel Industry (Original Post) amborin Apr 2016 OP
gee, a Koch connection to Hillary. nt grasswire Apr 2016 #1
The question is will she or won't she "Dance with them what brung ya" nt Electric Monk Apr 2016 #9
LIES! LIES! #Imsickofit. Meanie! nc4bo Apr 2016 #2
Hillary Campaign Cannot Tell The Truth Because The Truth Hurts! Watch Rosario Dawson Warm Up! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #3
total frauds amborin Apr 2016 #21
So did Bernie... joeybee12 Apr 2016 #4
I'm willing to accept that. Show me your evidence. elias7 Apr 2016 #5
A link joeybee12 Apr 2016 #6
That doesn't back up your claim, where is the proof he took money from the industry? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #8
It is the same old game. TM99 Apr 2016 #12
Exactly, it isn't about donations, it's about her record of taking money from special interests. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #14
Well she will tell big oil TM99 Apr 2016 #15
The arguments her supporters use to defend that money is equally mind boggling. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #16
when you add in her lobbyists, HRC got millions from fossil fuel industry amborin Apr 2016 #17
Bernie's Take Billsmile Apr 2016 #7
Bernie received $24 from one lobbyist. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #11
LOL amborin Apr 2016 #18
a lot of vocabulary games. oldandhappy Apr 2016 #10
File under: Well Duh! Meteor Man Apr 2016 #13
kick amborin Apr 2016 #19
K & R AzDar Apr 2016 #20

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
2. LIES! LIES! #Imsickofit. Meanie!
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 09:59 PM
Apr 2016

They will ignore the superPAC and lobbyists and laserbeam on the individual employees.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
8. That doesn't back up your claim, where is the proof he took money from the industry?
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 10:10 PM
Apr 2016

He received $24 from a lobbyist, is that what you meant?

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
12. It is the same old game.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 10:17 PM
Apr 2016

The issue is about industry lobbyist funneling big funds through SuperPAC's to the Clinton campaign in a quid pro quo fashion. It is not about 'individual contributors' who just happen to work in those industries.

This would be like saying that since I am a psychologist and have contributed to the Sanders campaign that ALL psychologists are supporting Sanders. The APA and other professional organizations are doing so just because I did, and I am a member of those organizations.

For those of lesser intelligence the fallacies are convincing. That is why it is called rhetoric, and that is why her campaign officials are using it.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
14. Exactly, it isn't about donations, it's about her record of taking money from special interests.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 10:26 PM
Apr 2016

The same thing with the millions she received from Wall Street, how are we supposed to believe her when she says she'll take them on?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
16. The arguments her supporters use to defend that money is equally mind boggling.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 10:33 PM
Apr 2016

Money doesn't mean influence, she was probably taking about gender equality in the workplace, and my personal favourite: it's sexist to want her to take less for her speeches!!!

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
11. Bernie received $24 from one lobbyist.
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 10:14 PM
Apr 2016
The Bernie Sanders campaign countered by pointing to a Greenpeace tally that says she has collected “$1,259,280 in bundled and direct donations from lobbyists currently registered as lobbying for the fossil fuel industry.”

Additionally, Greenpeace found “$3,250,000 in donations from large donors connected to the fossil fuel industry to Priorities Action USA,” the main Super PAC backing Clinton’s campaign.


Meteor Man

(385 posts)
13. File under: Well Duh!
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 10:17 PM
Apr 2016

It is astounding that I read a claim that Bernie received $50k in contributions, so he is hypoctitical to criticize Hillary's commitment to Leaving All Carbon Energy Sources In The Ground.
I hate to be a "Bernie Purist", but the fossil fuel industry may have already destroyed the planet beyond repair for human existence. The only question is not IF mankind will survive, but whether HOW MANY DECADES we have until the extinction of homosapiens.

Hillary's prior enthusiasm for global fracking, in addition to massive financial support from the fossil fuel criminal cartel make it impossible for me to consider giving her my vote.

Pardon my lack of enthusiasm for Hillary's feminist bona fides, but the millennials may be the final generation that grows old enough to make the decision about whether to give birth.

The bulk of the Democratic Party is guilty of sacrificing our global ecology to massive fossil fuel profits, in exchange for campaign contributions ever since Reagan removed the solar panels that Jimmy Carter installed on the White House.

How can Hillary Clinton, or any of her supporters (or surrogates), even to pretend there is a good faith question about her massive meltdown in response to the "Greenpeace" questioner?

I am genuinely baffled that any "environmentalist democrat" can support Hillary Clinton.



Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politifact: Hillary Did G...