Clinton camp moving the goalposts again

[peacebird]

When Hillary Clinton lost the New Hampshire primary to Bernie Sanders in February, Robby Mook, her campaign manager, took the long view and declared the nomination would "very likely be won in March, not February."

The campaign is now taking an even longer view, with April now being the month they hope to put Sanders away. It's an optimistic projection, with Sanders support far from fading and the Vermont senator vowing to compete in primaries and caucuses through June 7 in California, and possibly to the Democratic convention.
Even though Clinton aides say her lead in pledged delegates is "almost insurmountable," they are now doing something they never expected: Investing considerable time and money to the April 19 New York primary.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/31/politics/clinton-new-york-sanders/index.html

[Renew Deal]

1. NY is big and expensive

The biggest media market, lots of square miles, second or third largest population, highest diversity in terms of melting pot.

[EmperorHasNoClothes]

2. I don't know why they would do this.

Clinton is just simply not able to reach half of the pledged delegates until June. It just won't happen. So why make predictions like this that they must know are wrong?