Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:30 AM Apr 2016

The defenders of our "clean" election system are contradicting Clinton's own words

It has become a tactic of deflection to cite the letter of campaign finance laws to deny that Clinton's campaign could possibly be supported by Big Money interests.

Like we have a system in which no campaign or politician can be unduly influenced by Big Corporate Support. As if no politician does "workarounds" and other diversions that allow Big Bidness and their lobbyists to unduly influence our political process -- and the operation of government.

This argument contradicts even the "conventional wisdom" of the mainstream for years....Long before Citizens United.

Even, Clinton disagrees with that stupid argument (at least publicly) on her own website.

www.hillaryclinton.com

“We have to end the flood of secret, unaccountable money that is distorting our elections, corrupting our political system, and drowning out the voices of too many everyday Americans. Our democracy should be about expanding the franchise, not charging an entrance fee.”

HILLARY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2015
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The defenders of our "clean" election system are contradicting Clinton's own words (Original Post) Armstead Apr 2016 OP
Truth contradicts Clinton 2pooped2pop Apr 2016 #1
24/7 it sometimes seems Armstead Apr 2016 #4
It's all part of the smoke and mirrors tk2kewl Apr 2016 #2
yeah not even as deep as Clinton 's own admission about the system... Armstead Apr 2016 #3
Bernie lied about her getting money from the fossil fuel industry. It's not "deflection". DanTex Apr 2016 #5
Yes Dan. And in Washington Corporations have no power. Armstead Apr 2016 #6
Sure, they have power. But that doesn't excuse Bernie's lie. DanTex Apr 2016 #7
Dan your defense of this is based on a core fallacy about how the system works Armstead Apr 2016 #8
The defense is based on the simple fact that Bernie lied or at the very least intentionally gave a DanTex Apr 2016 #9
Okay then this should be easy for her to do Armstead Apr 2016 #10
Haven't seen that, but I would advise her to wait for Greenpeace to retract their dishonest DanTex Apr 2016 #11
They issued this in January...long before the present dustup Armstead Apr 2016 #14
by Greenpeace's own standards he violated it dsc Apr 2016 #17
If he did, Greenpeace would be all over him like a cheap suit Armstead Apr 2016 #19
in their own figures they ding Hillary for contributions to her campaign from donors dsc Apr 2016 #20
Bernie signed the pledge and, by his definition of fossil fuel contributions, has violated it....n/t Henhouse Apr 2016 #18
KNR amborin Apr 2016 #12
Agree with Clinton. Nt NCTraveler Apr 2016 #13
I agree with Clinton's statement on her website Armstead Apr 2016 #16
kick azmom Apr 2016 #15
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
3. yeah not even as deep as Clinton 's own admission about the system...
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 10:45 AM
Apr 2016

on her own damn website.

It's really turning into Alice in Wonderland....ooops. Is that sexist?

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
5. Bernie lied about her getting money from the fossil fuel industry. It's not "deflection".
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:53 AM
Apr 2016

It's the truth. No corporation in the energy industry or any other industry has supplied her campaign with a dime. It's all individual money, and Bernie knows this, but he intentionally tried to shade the truth for political gain.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
6. Yes Dan. And in Washington Corporations have no power.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:55 AM
Apr 2016

All all legislation is pure as the driven snow with no influence buying

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
7. Sure, they have power. But that doesn't excuse Bernie's lie.
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 11:57 AM
Apr 2016

They also have power over people like Bernie, by the way. You don't think he voted for gun industry immunity because he actually thought it was a good idea, do you?

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
8. Dan your defense of this is based on a core fallacy about how the system works
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:01 PM
Apr 2016

I think you're smart enough to understand that, but you choose not for political purposes.

And Bernie's stance on guns -- which is NOT that different than Clinton -- reflects the views of the PEOPLE in his state. The gun lobby has nothing to do with it.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
9. The defense is based on the simple fact that Bernie lied or at the very least intentionally gave a
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:06 PM
Apr 2016

false impression. You're trying to excuse his flagrant dishonesty by vaguely floating the fact that there's generally too much money in politics, but that doesn't fly. Bernie tells a lie, he owns the lie. There is too much money in politics, but the tiny amount that Hillary raised from people who work in the energy industry is not evidence of any kind of corruption.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
10. Okay then this should be easy for her to do
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:13 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/20-organizations-ask-presidential-candidates-sign-fix-democracy-pledge/


Bernie Sanders became the first presidential candidate to sign a new pledge launched today asking all major candidates to support a people-powered democracy and reject campaign contributions from the fossil fuel industry.


© Greenpeace / Robert Meyers
“From the halls of Congress to the presidential campaign trail, politicians are taking money from mega industries like the fossil fuel industry, and prioritizing corporations over constituents. At the same time, many in power are making it harder for the poor, communities of color, the elderly, and students to vote in the first place. We need to get money out and people into our democracy,” said Annie Leonard, Executive Director at Greenpeace USA.

“A critical way for candidates to show they support a people-powered democracy is by rejecting fossil fuel money and supporting voters rights. So far only Bernie Sanders has agreed to fossil fuel-free funding and protection of voters rights. It’s time for Hillary Clinton and anyone with serious White House aspirations to match Sander’’s leadership. Our democracy has to stop being sold at auction to the highest bidders,” said Leonard.

More than 20 organizations and individuals from advocacy, to academia, to business have signed onto the letter to all the major presidential candidates asking they take the pledge. Organizations include Greenpeace, 350.org, Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Popular Democracy, Climate Justice Alliance, Climate Parents, Common Cause, Democracy Initiative, Energy Action Coalition, Food and Water Watch, Friends of the Earth, Indigenous Environmental Network, Labor Network for Sustainability, Oil Change International, People for the American Way, Public Citizen, Rainforest Action Network, SumOfUs, US Rebel Alliance, and US Student Association. Additional individuals who have signed on include activist and 350 founder Bill McKibben, author Colin Beavan, columnist and author Jim Hightower, former Dean of Yale’s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Gus Speth, and Ben Cohen of Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream.

The pledge to #fixdemocracy that was sent to candidates reads as following:

I pledge allegiance to a democracy of, by, and for the people.

If elected, I pledge to fight for a people-powered democracy where every voice is heard

By defending the right to vote for all, and

Supporting common-sense measures like public funding for campaigns and overturning Citizens United to ensure a government by and for the people, not the biggest donors.

And I will prove that I work for the people by refusing money from fossil fuel interests and by championing these solutions for a people powered democracy on the campaign trail.

Read the full letter:

http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Candidate-letter-General.pdf

Nearly every Republican presidential candidate receives a substantial contribution from the fossil fuel industry — either directly or via a super PAC. On the Democratic ticket, Hillary Clinton receives money connected to the fossil fuel industry via industry lobbyists who have bundled contributions to the campaign. GOP hopefuls Governor Jeb Bush and Senator Ted Cruz and Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton are the top three beneficiaries of contributions from oil and gas employees.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
11. Haven't seen that, but I would advise her to wait for Greenpeace to retract their dishonest
Sat Apr 2, 2016, 12:15 PM
Apr 2016

statements about her before signing anything of theirs.

dsc

(52,165 posts)
17. by Greenpeace's own standards he violated it
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:56 AM
Apr 2016

he has also taken contributions from employees of the fossil fuel industry which they are counting against Clinton in their numbers.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
19. If he did, Greenpeace would be all over him like a cheap suit
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:02 AM
Apr 2016

They not exactly shrinking violets. And they are not politically correct.

If they felt that Sanders was violating the pledge, they'd be saying so.

Why is it so hard to acknowledge that we have a SYSTEMIC PROBLEM in which lobbyists and campaign contributions and Big Business, Wall St. and the Billionaire Class has too much damn influence in our political system?



As noted in the OP, even, Clinton disagrees with that stupid argument (at least publicly) on her own website.

www.hillaryclinton.com

“We have to end the flood of secret, unaccountable money that is distorting our elections, corrupting our political system, and drowning out the voices of too many everyday Americans. Our democracy should be about expanding the franchise, not charging an entrance fee.”

HILLARY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2015

dsc

(52,165 posts)
20. in their own figures they ding Hillary for contributions to her campaign from donors
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:06 AM
Apr 2016

related to the fossil fuel industry. He has less from them but he did get some. He violated their pledge by their standards.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
16. I agree with Clinton's statement on her website
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:53 AM
Apr 2016

The contrary claims that our system is so clean that the involvement of lobbyists and bundlers and Pacs and SuperPacs make no difference....not so much.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The defenders of our &quo...