2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLet's talk about privilege - being actively investigated by the FBI...
...but still being the "odds on" favorite for the Presidency!?!
Has any other candidate in recent memory been in a situation where they were actively being investigated by the FBI but yet still has the largest chance of winning the Presidency? Sounds incredulous when you think about it.
What if Sanders or any other candidate was in this situation? How far would their candidacy go?
It seems like there's one set of rules for Hillary Clinton, but another set of rules for the rest of us.
Why is she being so vigorously propped up?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)There are some deep pockets with their grandkids' trust funds riding on this.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)We have a winner.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)That's for sure.
Marr
(20,317 posts)This isn't some stupid gaffe in front of a tv camera. If it doesn't pan out the way Clinton's fans insist it will, we lose the election, period. And even if it does, she's given Trump more than enough to rip her to shreds with. She's already widely viewed as untrustworthy.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... Bernie supporters have latched on to.
The indictment fairly is not coming.
Marr
(20,317 posts)While I agree that an indictment seems unlikely, neither of us has privileged information and shouldn't pretend to. An indictment is a possibility, no matter how hard you squint your eyes and shake your head. If one does materialize, and she's the nominee, we've lost.
And again, even if it just drags on quietly, she's given Trump all he needs to shred her to pieces. She's already seen as untrustworthy. Anything he says will stick on this topic, and few will listen to her explanations.
randome
(34,845 posts)We don't know that about Sanders either, do we?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Whether that leads to an indictment or anything worse is not known. But she is being investigated....yet again.
And yet again for arrogant stupidity of breaking the rules that mere mortals have to follow.
Marr
(20,317 posts)What we don't know are specifics of the case.
randome
(34,845 posts)That is not the same thing as an investigation with her as the target. It doesn't matter how many of these tiresome posts appear on DU, they won't affect a thing.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Aspire to inspire.[/center][/font][hr]
Scuba
(53,475 posts)I defended the Clinton's for decades, got fucked as my reward. I'm done with their lying and thieving ways.
Darb
(2,807 posts)VRWCish. How does it feel to be a part of that group of asshats?
dchill
(38,514 posts)I have a feeling we're not alone.
840high
(17,196 posts)the FBI not you.
CorporatistNation
(2,546 posts)She is the "Queen of Obfuscation" and cannot provide even a straight answer when she is asked if she lies... I mean there is no there there when it comes to Hillary's personal and political integrity... It just is TOTALLY NONEXISTENT! Not one other person to blame but herself!
We have seen this "movie" before...
&ebc=ANyPxKo3FYgrSaDiiPQKi0oDYV1LeRckXqbj2MKz39MMnxSlaW1gysgU2SuONujzFt3R-s1QWLsk9gXOaGVeq__izm1qUAtHjw
read a reuters report this morning posted here on du that investigation has now come to an end.
Although, I have to say it was a bit confusing, FBI told State Dept. to suspend investigation. It almost seemed like a typo.
I agree that other matters will poison her run up to the election but there will be no indictment, there will be no grand jury on this specific matter and as far as I can tell, pending interviews have either been suspended or already taken.
The powerful and wealthy do not ever receive justice for anything others would be thrown in the slammers for in a blink of an eye.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)So it is still ongoing.
2banon
(7,321 posts)there are conflicting reports, which is not unusual. matter of fact it seems like in so many other countless instances.
I'll take your word for it, and assume I read the reuters piece incorrectly.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)2banon
(7,321 posts)That the FBI had informed and instructed the State Dept, that the investigationcan be brought to a halt, because their investigation was complete, and did not require any further action.
This clearly paints a different picture.
I suspect a whole lot of sand is going to be thrown at this case and it will eventually be buried.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)There are possible interviews, but it is only speculation who and when. Another piece of information is that Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, Heather Samuelson, and Phillipe Reines, all Clinton inner circle people all are using the same top notch DC lawyer, who incidentally is David Gregory's wife. You don't hire expensive legal assistance at a point when everything has ended.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Thanks for the correction on my mis read of the reuters report..
I understand this all seems imminent. but I'm skeptical due to the fact that I've seen way too many huge crimes go unfettered in Washington.
This will go the way they always do, the rich and powerfully connected will not have to sweat a tear over anything anyone else would be thrown in the slammer for life.
With good friends like the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds' (literally) HRC and her patsies have it in the bag.
That's why she said so confidently, "Not Going to Happen" in that debate in response to the question: (paraphrasing) should voters be concerned regarding these new reports.
dchill
(38,514 posts)FBI investigation is ongoing. They've taken over from the State Department. So sorry.
2banon
(7,321 posts)It isn't necessary to beat me over the head time and time again.
I am, however, concerned my friends are investing energy behind the notion of a day of justice delivered.
History has shown, no matter how high the crime, no matter how clear or how abundant the evidence, the rich and powerful never faces the consequences which would be delivered to any other citizen for much lesser crimes.
At the end of the day, I'm fairly certain she will not face a grand jury, or face any serious charges for these violations.
Not because the evidence isn't there, not because her guilt is in doubt, but because her connections to TPTB will protect her all the way. She is completely insulated.
I've lived through too many decades of watching how this actually works for people like her, and it never ever works out the way it ought to.
It would be a first, if the results of the ongoing FBI investigations ultimately brought down a political titan like Clinton.
WMDemocract
(36 posts)Just imagine what sort of skeletons Trump has in his closet. Clinton has been coldly calculating a presidency for decades, no doubt (somewhat) keeping her record spotless. Trump has been a d*ckish alpha male business mogul doing whatever he wants for the last few decades. Remember the backlash Romney got from angry workers who were squeezed out by his private equity firm? That's going to look like a ringing endorsement in comparison to whatever comes crawling out Trump's dossier...
revbones
(3,660 posts)"Indictment fairy", that counters anything...
Autumn
(45,120 posts)the nomination will put a republican in the White House. You are right on only one thing there will be no indictment, one isn't needed for her to finally slide into the dustbin of history.
link for anyone who needs it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ash_heap_of_history
pinebox
(5,761 posts)Why doesn't Obama dismiss the investigation as the FBI falls under the Obama administration?
daleanime
(17,796 posts)Worried about? Oh hell yes. If she gets shoved down our throats it's going cost us tons both up and down the ticket.
polly7
(20,582 posts)Last edited Sat Apr 2, 2016, 02:49 PM - Edit history (2)
Thousands of people killed. Tens of thousands of African migrants driven out, hung in the streets, burned alive, tortured, raped - as well as Qaddafi loyalists. Millions who had been living with the highest standard of living in the area, had jobs, equal pay, health-care - are now being terrorized by the IS freaks who were basically handed all those weapons left behind in this lying sham.
Blumenthal (who was hoping for investment in a failed Libya) was emailing her wrt action on Libya - apparently, Obama didn't trust him. Clinton pushed Obama on Libya ....... these emails to and from Blumenthal were all kept from any scrutiny even from Obama - do you think that's alright? I find it amazing, seeing all the horror then and now.
2banon
(7,321 posts)if only justice can be served on those that righteously deserve it.
It won't happen here, sad to say it.
Samantha
(9,314 posts)He is also someone Obama specifically told Hillary was banned from participating in his administration. Yet, there we see those emails....
One might say she was running a rogue State Department on her own.
Sam
2banon
(7,321 posts)it just may come to that at some point.
That'll give ya something to whine about, surely?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And the impotent threats.
I'll Let George Carlin Respond explain it to ya..
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)On the Republicans side, we've got Donald Trump, a ridiculous, Fascist clown as the frontrunner.
On the Democratic side, we've got a candidate who is being investigated by the FBI, and who is about to be questioned by the FBI for having a private, unsecured email server on which she sent classified information.
This investigation into what Hillary did is going to be very rough on our country. This is going to be very rough on the Democratic party to endure all of this.
It's not funny.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)What if it was Obama or another person of color? There's no way.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)and that's saying something.
So I agree, if you are person of color, you have to nearly be able to walk on water.
Definitely a lower bar for white males....
But seemingly a very low, low bar for Clinton...
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Isn't that when the Monica Lewinsky and the blue dress scandal was happening?
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)were several...will look for a link.
speaktruthtopower
(800 posts)filegate may have had more substance, but once political spinning is involved the real facts can get lost.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)sorry I can't get a better link....
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a-brief-guide-to-clinton-scandals-from-travelgate-to-emailgate/article/2562906
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)The White House FBI files controversy of the Clinton Administration, often referred to as Filegate,[1] arose in June 1996 around improper access in 1993 and 1994 to Federal Bureau of Investigation security-clearance documents. Craig Livingstone, director of the White House's Office of Personnel Security, improperly requested, and received from the FBI, background reports concerning several hundred individuals without asking permission. The revelations provoked a strong political and press reaction because many of the files covered White House employees from previous Republican administrations, including top presidential advisors. Under criticism, Livingstone resigned from his position. Allegations were made that senior White House figures, including First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, may have requested and read the files for political purposes, and that the First Lady had authorized the hiring of the underqualified Livingstone.
Response to Land of Enchantment (Reply #23)
imari362 This message was self-deleted by its author.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)It would all go away once he was President, but the Supreme Court smacked him down hard on that.
Oh, and that wasn't to be confused with Bill and Hillary going on 60 Minutes and lying to the country about his having an affair with Gennifer Flowers - of course, she had tape recorded their phone calls, so...
840high
(17,196 posts)of the accusers? Maybe Jones?
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)seem to matter to them.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)The "great right wing conspiracy" is very very real.
840high
(17,196 posts)paid Jones off with $600 thousand.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)And David Brock admitted he made it all up. Why not continue the façade if you knew you'd get paid? Frankly the story is unbelievable to me.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)"Money trumps peace," meaning wars without end for profits without cease so the richer can become richer while We the People settle for Austerity.
smiley
(1,432 posts)I don't understand how this fact alone doesn't disqualify her. She is not the best candidate we have. In fact she's a liability.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)R B Garr
(16,966 posts)InvEsTiGaShUnS!!!!
His while spiel is a corrupt campaign finance system, and he is being investigated for oorrupt campaign donations. LOL.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Or the equivalent agency at the state and local levels. Investigation of campaign finance is ongoing, and is conducted in regard to all candidates, PACs, and political parties. I used to do it as part of my job, so I am not making this up.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But when your candidate is under investigation by the FBI you have to create a diversion somehow.
R B Garr
(16,966 posts)But your post pretty much agrees that "investigations" aren't really that big of a deal, after all.
Bernie's whole brand is tainted by this, though. His main platform is whining about the campaign finance system, but he's under "investigation" himself. If he can't even get his main theme right himself, it discredits him.
merbex
(3,123 posts)back.
There's a big problem.
Remind me again, how many ACTUAL fundraisers has he had? Under 10?
She should wish for a problem like this.
It's called enthusiasm.
R B Garr
(16,966 posts)How funny. And what do fundraisers have to do with anything. He's made a corrupt campaign finance system the cornerstone of his campaign and he openly maligns other politicians about it, yet he can't get it right himself. Nice to see Bernie supporters acknowledge that INVESTIGATIONS aren't really all that big of a deal, after all. Wink Wink.
amborin
(16,631 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)No real point, not even an article to link to and discuss. Just a blog-ish screed denigrating Clinton for the evil-crime-of-the-day.
They've realized that talking up Sanders and his causes isn't making his path to the nomination viable, so the only avenue left it to tear Clinton down.
By all means, carry on.
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)Because, reasons!!!
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)It's disgusting and I hope she gets to see the inside of a jail real soon. Both Clinton's are disgusting.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)I hope they give the little baby some time before the little one is pushed out on the Gerber speaking circuit.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Perhaps what she did/does wasn't/isn't illegal but it damn sure isn't ethical and it certainly is reeking in hypocrisy.
I have zero fucks to give if the likes of a lil Kim, George Clooney or Angelina Jolie do trifling, shady shit but I do care what a presidential candidate does.
If a candidate is going to be messy, they ought to be called on it and subsequently judged by their shady behavior.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)WMDemocract
(36 posts)Hillary has been in the spotlight and building her brand for decades. The investigation doesn't matter to the millions of people who will support her no matter what. The investigations only matter to people who weren't going to vote for her to begin with. Don't equate political preferences with rigid logic.
Attorney in Texas
(3,373 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)It's the insurance that went along with the $21,468,000.
Darb
(2,807 posts)who will have some splainin' to do Ricky, when this horseshit is put to rest. Ooops, I forgot, they'll just say that the fix was in. See how that works? No accountability, no honor, no integrity needed, just innuendo and belief. The bagger types have been doing it for years, and it works too.
And this coming from "democrats". Or should I say "Democratic Socialists"? What do you want to be called today?
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)would have sunk her candidacy.
Hence, the OP.
Sorry.