Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Maximumnegro

(1,134 posts)
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:05 PM Oct 2012

IPSOS PROJECTS SWING STATES FOR OBAMA

Yeah. That's right. You heard me.

Obama still holds a substantial advantage in the battleground states that will determine the outcome of the election. Ipsos projects Obama will carry hotly contested states such as Florida, Ohio and Virginia, for a relatively comfortable electoral college victory.


More Here

This is a BFD people. Of course the worry warts and handwringers looking at mangled dead bodies will just see the tied numbers. Sorry but it's 2 weeks before the election, it's time for you to suck it up and put on a smile and GOTV. Sad as it may sound Obama may actually win and win by more than you are expecting. Bad news I know. Frankly I think they are subtly stating what many of us who aren't choking on Maalox think is really the case on the ground.

Of course this is just one poll, but the the fact they went out on a limb to drop that projection is no small matter IMO. Ipsos is a solid pollster with as good a rep as the other majors. If you're willing to soil Depends over PPP, you should be willing to run commando over this.

This is great news.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IPSOS PROJECTS SWING STATES FOR OBAMA (Original Post) Maximumnegro Oct 2012 OP
I read this earlier today... AJH032 Oct 2012 #1
Doesn't matter. What would you do if you saw them? Maximumnegro Oct 2012 #2
How do they come to their projections? TroyD Oct 2012 #4
You are not a pollster or privy to info Maximumnegro Oct 2012 #5
I didn't say it wasn't plausible TroyD Oct 2012 #12
Maybe same place showing FL Latinos Obama 70-20 unc70 Oct 2012 #9
That is nonsense TroyD Oct 2012 #11
You are skeptical even with supporting data unc70 Oct 2012 #15
Agree and we still should GOTV! n/t courseofhistory Oct 2012 #3
Interesting ProudToBeBlueInRhody Oct 2012 #6
I know VA does not budkin Oct 2012 #8
Ohio I can see... but FL and VA? budkin Oct 2012 #7
Misses the point. Maximumnegro Oct 2012 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author rosesaylavee Oct 2012 #13
You Can Get It If You Really Want struggle4progress Oct 2012 #14

Maximumnegro

(1,134 posts)
2. Doesn't matter. What would you do if you saw them?
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:14 PM
Oct 2012

Just obsess over them. The point is what they have seen makes them confident enough to put it in print.

This ain't Gravis doing blow and whiteout over poll numbers.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
4. How do they come to their projections?
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:34 PM
Oct 2012

Usually a pollster would include a paragraph explaining how they come to those conclusions (eg. the way Nate Silver does).

I can understand Obama winning Ohio, because he has a good shot there, and Virginia still seems possible too, but I'm curious as to where their Florida projection for Obama comes from since the majority of polls have him behind there.

Maximumnegro

(1,134 posts)
5. You are not a pollster or privy to info
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:38 PM
Oct 2012

any more than Nate. FL is not plausible to you because you have made the subjective decision it is not plausible, not because the available data indicates otherwise. If you need to know so badly why don't you ask them?

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
12. I didn't say it wasn't plausible
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:58 PM
Oct 2012

I said it didn't look as likely as the other states.

Ipsos can't just publish information making projections without even mentioning the numbers they used to get to those conclusions.

Nate Silver has Florida in Romney's column right now, and while that could certainly be incorrect, Ipsos needs to explain to their readers why their projections are different.

unc70

(6,115 posts)
9. Maybe same place showing FL Latinos Obama 70-20
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:50 PM
Oct 2012

You never seem happy with any positive news for Dems. I don't know why you would spent so much time here to be depressed and skeptical!

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
11. That is nonsense
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:55 PM
Oct 2012

I respond to positive news and post a lot of it, but you're darn right I'm skeptical about polls or information that doesn't provide supporting data, and I can promise you the Obama campaign is too. If you work on campaigns, you would know you need to balance out between being positive and being cautious.

unc70

(6,115 posts)
15. You are skeptical even with supporting data
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 08:25 PM
Oct 2012

I am skeptical, an informed skeptic. Both by education and by experience doing polling, survey, and other data collection and analyses. Not to mention 50+ years working in campaigns. I know when and what to question, what looks valid, internally consistent, robust, and reliable.

I have worked in campaigns since 1960 (Kennedy and Terry Sanford), a lot since 1968. The Obama campaign, at least in the battleground states, is paying little notice to any of these public polls. They pretty much know about each individual eligible to vote person, in detail. That is why the GOTV is likely to really surprise Republicans, pundits, and many skeptics here.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
6. Interesting
Mon Oct 22, 2012, 06:48 PM
Oct 2012

Ohio, based on early voting, I would understand if they see a trend.

Do Florida and Virginia vote early?

Response to Maximumnegro (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»IPSOS PROJECTS SWING STAT...