2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIPSOS PROJECTS SWING STATES FOR OBAMA
Yeah. That's right. You heard me.
More Here
This is a BFD people. Of course the worry warts and handwringers looking at mangled dead bodies will just see the tied numbers. Sorry but it's 2 weeks before the election, it's time for you to suck it up and put on a smile and GOTV. Sad as it may sound Obama may actually win and win by more than you are expecting. Bad news I know. Frankly I think they are subtly stating what many of us who aren't choking on Maalox think is really the case on the ground.
Of course this is just one poll, but the the fact they went out on a limb to drop that projection is no small matter IMO. Ipsos is a solid pollster with as good a rep as the other majors. If you're willing to soil Depends over PPP, you should be willing to run commando over this.
This is great news.
AJH032
(1,124 posts)but I can't find any recent state polls published by Ipsos.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)Just obsess over them. The point is what they have seen makes them confident enough to put it in print.
This ain't Gravis doing blow and whiteout over poll numbers.
TroyD
(4,551 posts)Usually a pollster would include a paragraph explaining how they come to those conclusions (eg. the way Nate Silver does).
I can understand Obama winning Ohio, because he has a good shot there, and Virginia still seems possible too, but I'm curious as to where their Florida projection for Obama comes from since the majority of polls have him behind there.
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)any more than Nate. FL is not plausible to you because you have made the subjective decision it is not plausible, not because the available data indicates otherwise. If you need to know so badly why don't you ask them?
TroyD
(4,551 posts)I said it didn't look as likely as the other states.
Ipsos can't just publish information making projections without even mentioning the numbers they used to get to those conclusions.
Nate Silver has Florida in Romney's column right now, and while that could certainly be incorrect, Ipsos needs to explain to their readers why their projections are different.
unc70
(6,115 posts)You never seem happy with any positive news for Dems. I don't know why you would spent so much time here to be depressed and skeptical!
TroyD
(4,551 posts)I respond to positive news and post a lot of it, but you're darn right I'm skeptical about polls or information that doesn't provide supporting data, and I can promise you the Obama campaign is too. If you work on campaigns, you would know you need to balance out between being positive and being cautious.
unc70
(6,115 posts)I am skeptical, an informed skeptic. Both by education and by experience doing polling, survey, and other data collection and analyses. Not to mention 50+ years working in campaigns. I know when and what to question, what looks valid, internally consistent, robust, and reliable.
I have worked in campaigns since 1960 (Kennedy and Terry Sanford), a lot since 1968. The Obama campaign, at least in the battleground states, is paying little notice to any of these public polls. They pretty much know about each individual eligible to vote person, in detail. That is why the GOTV is likely to really surprise Republicans, pundits, and many skeptics here.
courseofhistory
(801 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Ohio, based on early voting, I would understand if they see a trend.
Do Florida and Virginia vote early?
budkin
(6,703 posts)budkin
(6,703 posts)Seems a stretch
Maximumnegro
(1,134 posts)Response to Maximumnegro (Original post)
rosesaylavee This message was self-deleted by its author.