Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPolitifact: Clinton pants on fire. Only candidate Wall Street is "actually running ads against."
Hillary Clinton says she's the only candidate Wall Street is "actually running ads against."
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/apr/03/hillary-clinton/hillary-clinton-claims-meet-press-wall-street-atta/
"I'm the only candidate in the Democratic primary, or actually on either side, who Wall Street financiers and hedge fund managers are actually running ads against," she responded. "So I find this, again, a kind of, you know, circuitous way to raise questions about my record."
Is it true that Clinton is the sole target of Wall Street this cycle?
The Clinton campaign referred us to our own fact-check of an attack ad sponsored by the hedge fund-backed conservative super PAC, Future45. While this supports Clintons point that the financial sector has spent money against her, it doesnt back the notion that Wall Street has only attacked her.
--snip--
Future45 has also sponsored one ad against Sanders. ESA Fund, a conservative super PAC, is 56 percent funded by the financial sector and has aired one anti-Sanders ad in Iowa. And last summer, Generation Forward, a pro-Martin OMalley super PAC, went after Sanders record on guns. A fifth of its donations come from Wall Street.
Clintons own affiliated super PAC, Priorities USA Action, took a third of its donations from the financial sector. It has aired 11 ads against Trump and spent more than $61,000 targeting the Republican frontrunner.
---snip---
Our ruling
Clinton said, "I'm the only candidate in the Democratic primary, or actually on either side, who Wall Street financiers and hedge fund managers are actually running ads against."
Wall Street financiers and hedge fund managers are running ads against Clinton. But to say shes the only one being attacked by people associated with the financial sector is preposterous.
The financial sector has contributed to both sides of the aisles, including to Clintons own campaign. Groups backed by Wall Street have run attack ads against virtually every candidate.
Clintons claim rates Pants on Fire!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 794 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (21)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politifact: Clinton pants on fire. Only candidate Wall Street is "actually running ads against." (Original Post)
Kittycat
Apr 2016
OP
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)1. Hillary, take this L. nt
reformist2
(9,841 posts)2. Shouldn't it be "pantsuits on fire"? I know, it's too easy. :)
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)9. Wasn't there a movie of that? Pantsuits of Fire
AzDar
(14,023 posts)3. Hillary Clinton is a LIAR.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)4. Wall Street is terrified she'll tell them to cut it out again.
So much so they paid her millions.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)6. Full House
840high
(17,196 posts)5. Another friggin' lie by Hillary.
Unwanted Democrat
(18 posts)8. That pants on fire from a thermonuclear holocaust done to it.
All I had to do was Greenpeace's statement and check their sources, and do confirm that one Hillary D. R. Clinton has taken at least 350,000 in fossil fuel dollars.