Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman keeps sticking to Bern (Original Post) Cryptoad Apr 2016 OP
Gee. Isn't that what a Hater would say? Octafish Apr 2016 #1
Here's a list of 191 Dems running "with Bernie". They get my $$ riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #2
well, at least one of them is NOT a dem hfojvt Apr 2016 #5
Of that race, which one has better policies? nt revbones Apr 2016 #6
Stephanie Piddick's platform is completely in line with Bernie’s riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #7
and I'm not hfojvt Apr 2016 #8
Just dying to get that cabinet job, eh? Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #3
"Oh by the way, which one's Pink?" dchill Apr 2016 #4
Is there a Nobel Prize in attack dog? JackRiddler Apr 2016 #9
I've always thought this, and I'm so glad that someone like Krugman is... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #10

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
1. Gee. Isn't that what a Hater would say?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:11 AM
Apr 2016

Like the time Krugman said Bernie's plans weren't sound? Krugman was wrong then, too.

William K. Black explains:



Krugman and the Gang of 4 Need to Apologize for Smearing Gerald Friedman

EXCERPT...

If we combine both of Paul’s screeds we see that the only way to disagree with a prominent economist is to demonize them as either “corrupt” or “enemies.” They are apparently inerrant. Paul was eager to use “authority” raised to the second power (the Gang of 4 plus both barrels – two hours apart – The “Full Krugman”) to prevent anyone actually looking at the Gang of 4’s letter and Friedman’s study. Indeed, as I was finishing this first article in a series on their smear I found that Krugman has tripled down on his smear of Friedman with a Sunday column.


hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
5. well, at least one of them is NOT a dem
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:29 AM
Apr 2016

One is a Green Party candidate running against an incumbent Democrat in Connecticut's 5th district. http://www.politics1.com/ct.htm

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
7. Stephanie Piddick's platform is completely in line with Bernie’s
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:43 AM
Apr 2016

I'm sure its why she's aligned herself with him.

But point taken, I shouldn't have used "Dems". Some are definitely Independents or Greens.

And I'm ok with that.



hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
8. and I'm not
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:14 PM
Apr 2016

even if the Green is running against the bluest of blue dogs, the only thing they can do is be a spoiler, flipping the seat to a Republican.

As such, that part of the "revolution" is not strengthening the Democratic Party.

To my surprise though, Democrats DO have a candidate for the Senate in SD. I wonder who made that happen? http://www.jaywilliams2016.org/#!issues/wp1vs

dchill

(38,556 posts)
4. "Oh by the way, which one's Pink?"
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 10:18 AM
Apr 2016

"And did we tell you the name of the game, boy,
We call it Riding the Gravy Train..."

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
10. I've always thought this, and I'm so glad that someone like Krugman is...
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 01:17 PM
Apr 2016

... is helping to get this out there.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Krugman keeps sticking to...