2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumOctafish
(55,745 posts)Like the time Krugman said Bernie's plans weren't sound? Krugman was wrong then, too.
William K. Black explains:
Krugman and the Gang of 4 Need to Apologize for Smearing Gerald Friedman
EXCERPT...
If we combine both of Pauls screeds we see that the only way to disagree with a prominent economist is to demonize them as either corrupt or enemies. They are apparently inerrant. Paul was eager to use authority raised to the second power (the Gang of 4 plus both barrels two hours apart The Full Krugman) to prevent anyone actually looking at the Gang of 4s letter and Friedmans study. Indeed, as I was finishing this first article in a series on their smear I found that Krugman has tripled down on his smear of Friedman with a Sunday column.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Not the DNC which will just give it to Hillary anyway.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)One is a Green Party candidate running against an incumbent Democrat in Connecticut's 5th district. http://www.politics1.com/ct.htm
revbones
(3,660 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)I'm sure its why she's aligned herself with him.
But point taken, I shouldn't have used "Dems". Some are definitely Independents or Greens.
And I'm ok with that.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)even if the Green is running against the bluest of blue dogs, the only thing they can do is be a spoiler, flipping the seat to a Republican.
As such, that part of the "revolution" is not strengthening the Democratic Party.
To my surprise though, Democrats DO have a candidate for the Senate in SD. I wonder who made that happen? http://www.jaywilliams2016.org/#!issues/wp1vs
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)dchill
(38,556 posts)"And did we tell you the name of the game, boy,
We call it Riding the Gravy Train..."
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)How low the once sometimes-pretty-good have fallen!
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... is helping to get this out there.