Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 11:39 AM Apr 2016

Although it is traditionally done by presidential candidates,

there is actually no legal requirement for them to release their tax filings. Most do, of course, and people sometimes question why a particular candidate doesn't, if that is the case. However, it's not a requirement that candidates do so.

We may be making more of this than is necessary. I doubt that there will be anything odd about Bernie Sander's federal tax filings. I suspect they're quite simple, really, and wouldn't reveal anything that would hurt his chances.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Although it is traditionally done by presidential candidates, (Original Post) MineralMan Apr 2016 OP
I don't care about his taxes, I don't care about her transcripts. Dem2 Apr 2016 #1
There's also no requirement that she release those. MineralMan Apr 2016 #2
I wouldn't release them Dem2 Apr 2016 #3
Fortunately, I'll never be in a position to have to MineralMan Apr 2016 #4

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
1. I don't care about his taxes, I don't care about her transcripts.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 11:41 AM
Apr 2016

I just don't care, I can judge them just fine without playing these silly 'gotcha' games.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
2. There's also no requirement that she release those.
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 11:43 AM
Apr 2016

Her speeches at private events don't have to be released to the public. She could release them if she wanted to, but certainly is not required to do so.

If she does, I probably won't bother reading those transcripts. I figure they'll say just what I expect they'll say, so I won't spend any time on them.

Frankly, I don't think she will release them anyhow.

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
3. I wouldn't release them
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 11:46 AM
Apr 2016

She'd be an idiot to entertain such a thing. There's only one reason that people are harping on the transcripts, and it has nothing to do with being transparent and everything to do with creating a never-ending diversion which would be highly unproductive and only serve to help the Republicans.

MineralMan

(146,325 posts)
4. Fortunately, I'll never be in a position to have to
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 11:51 AM
Apr 2016

decide such a thing. I ran for County Supervisor once in California. I lost that election, but decided not to do that again. Political candidates have to have a lot of inner strength to deal with all of the crap associated with a campaign. I learned that right away after filing for that election.

It was interesting, but I decided that it was not something I wanted to repeat.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Although it is traditiona...