2016 Postmortem

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts) Tue Oct 23, 2012, 04:31 AM Oct 2012

Romney was against going after Osama, now he’s for it

More Romnesia, and a very damning one at that. Mitt Romney, in the presidential debate, just said that President Obama was right to go after Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. But that’s not what Romney said five years ago. He was against going into Pakistan for bin Laden, and he was generally against spending much time worrying about Osama bin Laden. Now he’s trying to change his tune, again.

http://americablog.com/2012/10/romney-was-against-going-after-bin-laden-now-hes-for-it-retroactively-video.html

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Romney was against going after Osama, now he’s for it (Original Post) UCmeNdc Oct 2012 OP

Of course he was because he's an Idiot like he wanted Detroit to Bankrupt. Cha Oct 2012 #1

The whole debate, Romnisia had its effect liberal N proud Oct 2012 #2

Cha

(297,494 posts)

1. Of course he was because he's an Idiot like he wanted Detroit to Bankrupt.

Reply to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 04:42 AM

Oct 2012

he hopes no one remembers Anything he says. And, he can get by on his looks.

liberal N proud

(60,339 posts)

2. The whole debate, Romnisia had its effect

Reply to UCmeNdc (Original post)

Tue Oct 23, 2012, 06:47 AM

Oct 2012

It sounded to me like he was just trying to agree with Obama without agreeing. He flipped on almost everything that he had previously stated in an attempt to thwart Obama from calling out his preposterous policy objectives.

I give credit to the President for pointing out his hypocrisy.

Reply to this discussion