2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBill's attack on the BLM protesters: fair & defensible, or not?
An good intro, for those who haven't yet heard about this:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1675780
Corollary question: If Bill had done this two days before Super Tuesday, what effect do you think it would have had on the results in those states?
69 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Fair and Defensible | |
7 (10%) |
|
Unfair and Indefensible | |
62 (90%) |
|
Not Sure | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Response to Ken Burch (Original post)
imari362 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:20 PM - Edit history (1)
And that's really saying something.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)uponit7771
(90,364 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)iwannaknow
(210 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)No Siree Bob.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)On Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:44 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Well at least you're being more civil than last time.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1679506
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Offensive.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Apr 8, 2016, 09:53 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is equivalent to a direct quote. I wouldn't hide a direct quote, so I can't find the logic behind hiding this post.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: The poster wrote it. He owned it. I am disappointed in both posters, though. Private conversations should remain just that unless they include a credible physical threat.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Your own words are offensive, morningfog? Good, glad you think so.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It's the DU Mail that is offensive. Posting it, not so much. DUers CAN post DU Mail they have received. This one deserves to be posted, IMO.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)As a black person, I have no problem with Bernie talking about that reality. I do have a problem with Hillary blocking a wage increase for Haitian garment workers.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... even though 3/4 of blacks aren't poor and even most of the poor blacks don't live in "ghettos"
That fact not in dispute is not relevant to skin color either
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)It is very comphrensive. The problem of poverty among AA's is as disproportional as are all the other statistics. I think that reality is more important than mentioning wealthy or middle-class black people everytime he mentions poverty. Yeah...it sucks that Clarence Thomas can't get a cab.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)What's hurtful and racist is the reality of mass incarceration, entrenched poverty and racism. And the fact that some Democrats are as bad or worse than republicons on those issues. 1 million people are losing food stamps because of Clintons welfare reform, and you are whinimg about hurt feelings over the use of a word. Whatthefuckever.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)vintx
(1,748 posts)Seriously it is amazing how well those blinders work.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)vintx
(1,748 posts)about how not racist they are, and demonstrating this by ranting about how racist it is to associate ghettos with inner city poverty, which disproportionately affects black people - while simultaneously ignoring substantive issues with which Hillary has repeatedly demonstrated her lack of concern with the issues of poverty OR race - is a sight to behold.
Not a good thing, but amazing nonetheless.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... herrings aren't going to change that
vintx
(1,748 posts)Up really is down in shillary-land.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Both Clintons worked to stop a wage increase for garment workers, some of poorest people in the world. This poster claims there must be more to the story, but heaven forbid Bernie used the word ghetto. The hypocrisy is stunning.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... for more than 10 mins and do it with dignity instead of lookin at folks like they stink.
The BLM folk didn't give Clinton a pass at all and some of the things he said helped and hurt but again, he's there... not having someone who called Obama niggerized last year stump for him in IA
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)If it is true...I am sure there is more to the story...blah, blah, blah. But let's harp on the word ghetto endlessly, and give the Clintons a pass for making sure Haitian workers remain poor. Total hypocrisy.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)uponit7771
(90,364 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Only fools believe he associates blacks with ghettos...really.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And they still are harping about a single fng word.
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)This is a good example.
"Oooooh, Bernie used a historically loaded word in a possibly slightly thoughtless way! He's a racist and not fit to be president! Oooooh!"
(Never mind the fact that Bernie is undoubtedly aware that the original term "ghetto" referred to the segregated Jewish neighborhood. Are the Clintons aware of this? Maybe, maybe not.)
Meanwhile, the Clintons can yammer on about how BLM is all about defending 13-year-old crack-addicted superpredators who are killing each other, and that's just straight talk from them, right?
The Clintons are all about discussing word choice and tone of voice because they know they're not on the winning side of the issues.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)In hopes of attracting the racially insensitive?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)comments. How was his racist rant fair or defensible? What is the defense?
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... stump for him in front of mostly white IA and NH does NOT get the benefit of the doubt.
See the difference?
tia
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Because he's a Clinton?
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... people
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)And there he was defending that racist bullshit yesterday. That was the former president and candidate's husband, not some college professor who you cannot forgive.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)and are an absolutist for the other. That is an incredibly disingenuous position to hold. You lose any credibility on race issues when you bend depending on the speaker.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)or Camp Pinocchio might jump on him.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Sad.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)and accusing BLM of defending murderers.
And Bernie didn't say that ALL AA communities could be called "ghettos" btw, Bernie is Jewish, and the term "ghetto" was first used to describe the neighborhoods European Jews were segregated into). That was what the AA community itself used to describe some, but not all, predominately AA neighborhoods in the 1960's and early '70s.
Is it really any different than the term "the 'hood" today?
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)For Haitian garment workers?
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... are rational and pragmatic.
I'm sure this is not portraying the whole story about her decision, typical
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Google it yourself. This supposed friend of Black people blocked a wage increase for Haitian garment workers to help US clothing manufacturers. That's a fact. Typical Clinton two-faced BS.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)And it wasn't silly.
Why are you fighting so hard for the much more conservative candidate, especially since Bill's rant proves they don't care about you?
Nothing Bernie ever said or did could possibly be worse than Bill and Hill's record of appeasing white supremacists.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)A country where the vast majority of people are essentially paid nothing for their labor. A country where HRC essentially supported the coup against Aristede, the democratic elected leader, and then colluded in rigging the last Haitian election to guarantee a victory for the most right-wing, anti-worker, antigay candidate in the race.
It's as though HRC thinks Haitians owe it to us to be offshore slaves. There's no other way to describe it.
Decent wages for Haitian workers were never going to do any harm to the U.S. economy. We have an obligation to let that country achieve social and economic justice.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)Here's a black person who harps on Bernie's use of a word, but has nothing to say about Haiti...nothing, but some vague insinuation that it is not true. Just pathetic.
beedle
(1,235 posts)in America, what traditionally do you think you are talking about?
Or are you one of those who really believe that going after 'super predators' was a dog whistle for Wall St. Speculators?
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)...cause of the white supremacists stereo type
beedle
(1,235 posts)when he talks about poverty as being the main issue?
Remember, when he talked about Ghettos, it was in response to always being criticized that he never mentions Blacks when he talks about poverty.
He talks about poverty and he is criticized that he isn't talking about race in regards to poverty, so he starts to talk about race as it regards pvoerty and he gets criticized that he is protraying poverty as just a 'racial' thing.
In the meantime Hillary is looking out for the elites who cause this problem whether you look at it through a lens of poverty OR race. And she gets credit while doing absolutely nothing except spouting platitudes ... every decision she has made, every ;aw she has supported, every war she has cheered on, does nothing but harm minorities.
uponit7771
(90,364 posts)... cause that's just ignorant.
I'm saving all the post who are still trying to defend that dumb ass'd statement too... ya'll to prone to amensia
beedle
(1,235 posts)or
Thats when the conversation got awkward.
Respectfully, if that is your position, then I will talk only to white people about how we are going to deal with the very real problems, Clinton snapped back, eliciting a wide-eyed look of horror from Daunasia Yancey, the founder of Black Lives Matter in Boston who was standing directly to Hillary Clintons left.
or try googling pictures of "American Ghettos". From your comment I fully expected to see pages and pages of Irish
https://www.google.ca/search?q=%22Hillary+Clinton%22+Ghetto&espv=2&biw=1855&bih=881&tbs=cdr:1,cd_max:2015-01-01&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlvo3G8oTMAhWJPD4KHTuaDfs4ChD8BQgGKAE#tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_max:2015-01-01&tbm=isch&q=%22American+Ghettos%22
or this from http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/ghetto.aspx
Response to Ken Burch (Original post)
Post removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)you're not helping Hillary, or yourself, or anyone.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)Not ONE person here would be defending him.
Not one.
vintx
(1,748 posts)which has fueled the third way movement
They think things which Republicans would be excoriated for are fine and dandy as long as it's a dem doing it.
Rebkeh
(2,450 posts)Divide and conquer, stir up conflict so we don't talk about the issues.
God forbid we talk about the issues!
(She would lose if we did)
Edited to add:
What Bill did was trolling in its finest form, it's also a republican tactic. They are making it harder and harder to come to their defense when they are (occasionally) right.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)"You damn sure don't try to drown out popular former President Bill Clinton because he won't put up with your BS and will make feel like you need to find a dark hole to climb into."
Response to cherokeeprogressive (Reply #23)
imari362 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,215 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)beedle
(1,235 posts)They had a panel on to discuss the Bill vs BLM issue ... the did the whole fucking segment without so much as actually letting anyone know what Bill actually said, didn't mention BLM at all ... the only thing being discussed was Bernie and how many ways this was a knock on him.
How Bernie voted for the bill as well (without mentioning his speech explaining why and warning of the obvious problems and where they would lead to); How Bernie saying Bill should apologise will hurt him with Blacks(?); etc.
Then the next segment was suppose to be a follow on regarding the issues with the crime bill ... again, without mentioning Bill or Hillary and only talking about Bernie.
Joy got her redearch direct from the Clinton camp. How fucking embarrassing.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)I'll have to conclude that nothing they do is defensible.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511705048