2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Truth About Hillary Clinton's Email Controversy
This video is a bit long, but he does put a lot of facts out there. This is one of the best I've seen and he seems to cover everything.
I am sure there will be loads of crap thrown at this guy (Stefan Molyneux)
but I don't know how you can argue with all the information he puts out.
Response to pdsimdars (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)I did like the way he laid it out in a timeline. Oh well. Maybe it isn't appropriate for DU.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)The weekend crowd is focused elsewhere today.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)this one is really good and lays everything out. I'll try it during the week.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Bodych
(133 posts)I have no reason to believe that Canadian Stefen Molyneux has his facts wrong, after doing a spot check of his dates.
Based on information that is available to the public, and based on known law, everything he said/referenced was accurate.
Absolutely agree with his assessment at the end about Bernie. I'm a supporter, but it was a mistake to dismiss "those damned emails" like he did. It's not about emails; it's about gross violations to national security and putting peoples' lives in jeopardy.
It will be interesting to see if there is Clinton Foundation involvement in any of this. If there *is*, you can bet the opposition has the proof in hand, since the server was easily hacked by outsiders. Information is power.
creon
(1,183 posts)State secrets are not - repeat not- transmitted over this sort of standard email.
And, this was standard e mail.
The SOS, and other departments, use other means for communicating state secrets.
Now, you may argue that these were "Clinton secrets" - secrets of her own that she did not want others to know - that is a different matter altogether.
Tempest meet teapot.
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)The FBI has some emails that were the highest of the TOP SECRET level.
Watch the video and then get back with us and tell us what he got wrong. and give us the links to where you can say he got something wrong.
No
pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)I'm guessing the No is the correct answer because you could not have watched the video and brought up the point you did.
You don't find the truth unless you are honest and truthful.