2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders' New York supporters showed their true selves today.
And if Bernie does not denounce those who call his opponents "whores", he shows that is more than happy to wag his bony finger over name-calling while others do his dirty work. Lee Atwater would be proud.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)I didn't think so. You are definitely hard core.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Please refrain from using outdated terms. "Corporate Whore" isn't outdated. In fact, it's quite new. Do keep up.
WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)on this theme that Sanders is personally responsible for everything said by anyone who supports him.
TCJ70
(4,387 posts)...we should start holding Hillary responsible for everything her supporters say.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)dsc
(52,163 posts)Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)Because that made it okay in a "C.P. time" kind of way.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)He hasn't done much of anything to keep the most fervent of his supporters from becoming abhorrent slur-throwers. This, since it happened on his stage, requires an apology.
revbones
(3,660 posts)riversedge
(70,243 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)Sheesh. No comment from you about the CP Time joke either I bet.
Perogie
(687 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)and honestly looked at the situation and your ridiculous statement just now, you might realize your error.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)No.
The comment was, "Corporate Democratic Whores." It was plural.
Why do you automatically think of your Girl Wall Street when that's said? That would be on you, hon.
The most honest politician out there.
revbones
(3,660 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Remembers it's been acceptable to call people media and corporate whores for years on DU, recovers and goes off to watch another spectacle.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Downwinder
(12,869 posts)"a venal or unscrupulous person." From Webster.
RandySF
(58,919 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)What a hypocritical license you allow yourself.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Petrushka
(3,709 posts)RandySF
(58,919 posts)This is a right wing PAC.
Petrushka
(3,709 posts). . . that link was one of the first ones to pop up when I did an online search. Here's
another one (hopefully, not considered "right wing" too!) --->
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856&page=1
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)But no one would take issue with the word. A whore is a person who trades sex for money. In a political sense it is a politician who trades votes and access for money and campaign help. It's an apt comparison. Trying to make it about misogyny is an example of fake outrage.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)nt
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)corporate whores.
Suddenly, DU is all atwitter about the use of the word "whore" after it has been used thousands of times to characterize corporate whores, media whores, and attention whores.
Hell, Cindy Sheehan was lambasted over and over again as an attention whore as was Palin.
Never once saw Skinner issue an apology.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)That doesn't bother them... at all!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511728442
pantsonfire
(1,306 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Your poutrage is hilarious!
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)(Also it could be interpreted as Black people are slow)
They are blind to Hypocrisy
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)2009
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5137276
2011
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100255400
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1005231
2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026859417
Some are 'corporate whore'. These are YOUR threads, people talking to you. And you never once objected.
Why is that?
ecstatic
(32,712 posts)the Democratic frontrunner and likely nominee. Big difference.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)plural 'surrogates' which you use. The surrogate (singular) said this-
"corporate democratic whores who are beholden to big pharma"
'Whores' is the plural, and thus not about one specific person. Whore would be specific, singular. Whores is plural. And what's more is that he defines being beholden to big pharma as the defining quality of said multiple politicians of low virtue.
We often hear 'it's the math' about elections but today it's the English. Plural. Singular.
Tomorrow's lesson, the difference between 'imply' and 'infer'.
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)Those were a lot less insulting to prostitutes--though the Rubio one got close.
The stuff said today was really over the top. Those people have it bad enough without being called politicians.
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I demand Randy apologize to us right now!!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)He's in a high dudgeon over something he usually has no reaction to whatsoever. None. For years and years. Because it's Bernie.
RichVRichV
(885 posts)Well done Bluenorthwest! I think you just won this thread.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)Well-done, BNW!
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Who does that? Who's fault is THAT? Some people are getting angry, and the truth comes out. That's what we call politicians who take money for bribes. It's NOT sexism. That word works for both genders.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)And especially the Bay Area where the pimping and whoring will continue at a glamorous dinner this weekend.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)the faux outrage. Lee Atwater? You obviously haven't got a clue. Sorry but you're stuck with David Brock. There isn't anyone on the Sanders team that's ever going to come close to Brock. Nice try though. I'm sure it bothers you deep down that you have Brock or you wouldn't try to spin this like you're doing but you just have to face it - You do have Brock and he's not going away.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)Has some really nasty supporters. It is an embarrassment to the Democratic party.
Reminds me of Trump's campaign on the other side.
He tacitly supports it at this point.
Just awful.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)The victimhood schtick used to rationalize incompetence, i.e. the NYDN interview was an "inquisition", the RNC rules are unfair, yada, yada, yada.
UNFAIR, RIGGED, BIASED...everything and everybody is against us, Waaaaaaah!
The laughable excuses for refusal to release detailed tax histories, i.e. too busy to get home and open the file cabinet, being audited--so no can do. LOL!
The openly misogynist and dismissive body language, rhetorical choices, and vocabulary.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Jackilope
(819 posts)Rob me of my retirement, push your thumb down on me while I pay more in taxes than the Corporate Overlords, grease the palms of Democratic and Republican elected so they serve corporations as opposed to people, strip me of labor rights, ship my job away with trade deal language, send my children to unjust war, and send me to jail for not paying bills on time or taping abuses on my cell phone camera. But DARE to call these actions or the people who enable this rigged system "Corporate Whores"?!?!?! GASP!
Seriously?
I think we are long over due in calling out the grand theft happening to us what it is. Let's not clutch pearls. We are being sold out and our finances, our environment, the future for our kids is being compromised by GREED. Those that enable the corporate cheats and thieves aren't are friends. Let's call it what it is.
QC
(26,371 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)because a lot of us would like something new to call them...
i hope it is as effective....you know, triggers the right response from the intended targets...
you know, like 'corporate whore' triggered in you...
MFM008
(19,818 posts)Fossil,ancient, antiquated, creaky, hoary, primeval, rusty, elderly, pre-historic, relic, moth eaten, old goat, fogey, cranky, would never fit one of the candidates on the democratic side . ( hint B.S.)
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)They sure as hell did. 48,000 of them came out to support Bernie!
Hello New York!
dchill
(38,505 posts)The thing that will BRING HIM DOWN!!! If he doesn't prostrate himself before your highnesses of truth and propriety, then the gods and goddesses of decency and purity will erase his name from all ballots to come!
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)RandySF
(58,919 posts)I actually finished school and put it to better use.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)you are a whore!
Got that democrats!?
Avalon Sparks
(2,566 posts)Just my opinion......
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Where she is called a "corporate Democratic whore"?
That's the bit that upsets you AND NOT THE FACT SHE SUPPORTS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE HAVING NO MEDICAL COVERAGE?
Be grateful "corporate whore" is the language used here, because the words that go through my mind are much less polite.
And visit this thread http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511727002 for a laugh - you're fake outrage over nonsense is showing.
dinkytron
(568 posts)will denounce whatever phantom nutcase you are making a fuss about in this post. See how it works?!!
Logical
(22,457 posts)Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)Want all Muslims to speak out aginst ISIS every time they act out? Do you want BLM to also protest black on black crime? Quack like a Elephant you will be taking as a Elephant. Stop with GOP broad brush crap.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)In his desperation, he's showing his true colors.
And, they're not pretty.
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)...so attack his supporters.
Way to unify.
LexVegas
(6,067 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)the economic lives of most Americans.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)It seems more technically accurate.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)Her Bank Account says so, at least what's visible on the surface.
Five shell corporations and there's no Hanky Panky going on. C'maahn' You think I was born Yesterday? Feh.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)You think we should be quiet and quit disturbing the Coronation?
Hillary will never be Queen; not even for a Day.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)HillareeeHillaraah
(685 posts)I think he should say it again and again. I hope he calls her "a corporate Democratic whore" on national television tonight. I hope he follows up with "every woman who is a democrat who doesn't agree with my vision for America's future is a some kind of a whore."
I really want America to see that. Let's not call for him to denounce it. Let's have him and his campaign own it. Let's have Paul Song use it in every introduction before every speech Sanders makes.
Then let's see how America votes.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)HillareeeHillaraah
(685 posts)Because sneaking in under the trans umbrella are non-trans people, men in particular who are NOT gender dysphoric but instead are men who get a stiffy putting on a dress and visually, verbally and sometimes physically assaulting women, taking away women and girls' sense of privacy and safety which is why we have sex segregated spaces for natal women in the first place. Many say it doesn't happen, women are not being violated by transwomen and let me state empirically: that I agree with. But they are being violated by autogenphiles.
Google it and learn.
Its a complicated issue and if I have to choose one side or the other to protect, I fall on the side of rights of natal women. I also support looking for a solution that keeps both sides feeling safe. People gotta pee after all. And really, it's not bathrooms, it's locker rooms, homeless shelters, hospitals and jails where it gets complicated.
Edit: this is really off topic but you asked. I responded. I won't be participating in a back and forth over this - not here. It's off topic. Peace.
Note to jury: I am not anti Trans. I am homosexual myself. I don't advocate violence towards anyone. I am only stating an opinion in a calm manner.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)HillareeeHillaraah
(685 posts)I just happen to be a woman with an opinion on a complex issue.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Nagging isn't a winning strategy.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)..but that isn't Hillary.