Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:07 PM Apr 2016

Is Corporate Lackey an acceptable term? Or is that somehow sexist or impolite?

Just wondering. The number of acceptable words in the English language gets smaller every day that Clinton is running.

If she is President, I guess acceptable language will be narrowed down to a few grunts after four years.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is Corporate Lackey an acceptable term? Or is that somehow sexist or impolite? (Original Post) Armstead Apr 2016 OP
Corporate Socialist, tell it like it is. Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #1
An Oligarch? Armstead Apr 2016 #5
Yes, whose society is the upper class, the oligarchs and their hangers-on. Kip Humphrey Apr 2016 #6
The correct term is Corporate Superiors-Who-Deserve-All-Our-Respect jfern Apr 2016 #2
How About Phony? Simple and says it all! Chasstev365 Apr 2016 #3
I would say, go with "the indebted one"..because that she is. Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #4

Kip Humphrey

(4,753 posts)
1. Corporate Socialist, tell it like it is.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:12 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary BELIEVES IN her universe wholeheartedly.
So, don't be dismissive about it.
Label her properly: she is a proud Corporate Socialist.

jfern

(5,204 posts)
2. The correct term is Corporate Superiors-Who-Deserve-All-Our-Respect
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 10:13 PM
Apr 2016

You must report immediately for re-education camp.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Is Corporate Lackey an ac...