2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat if Clinton is nominated and then the transcripts get leaked & they are damaging as all hell?
And they just sink her in the general? What then?
Democrats need to know what is in those transcripts.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)...and then indicted?
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)it to the American Public - but where they will get the time after answering questions about the Clinton Foundation, the speaking fees, the consulting fees ...
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Just this really isn't looking good.
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)the transcripts and will release them if Hillary does not. Then nothing more has been said. Wonder if he will.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)WhenTheLeveeBreaks
(55 posts)Hillary's transcripts are of utmost importance to DEMOCRATIC VOTERS in general and Bernie supporters in particular. I can't imagine what could be in them that jeopardizes her in the GE. It may make Dems mad, but they're going to vote for her anyway. Independents and GOPers won't care at all.
As stated before - nominated, then either indicted or pardoned, is the thing that would sink Hillary and the entire Democratic Party in 2016. FBI recommendation for indictment and then a brush-off by Obama would sink Hillary, the Dems and Obama's legacy all at the same time.
Not leaked speech transcripts.
jfern
(5,204 posts)revbones
(3,660 posts)If she's the nominee, there's no unifying the party and definitely no bringing in the independents.
demosincebirth
(12,540 posts)dinkytron
(568 posts)UMTerp01
(1,048 posts)She needs to release them!!! Her whole "I'll release them when Republicans do" add to the sentiment that people find her untrustworthy.
cui bono
(19,926 posts).
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It's ALWAYS the fault of the left with the party establishment crowd.