Clinton's Brilliant Idea: Wait until the banks are in trouble to break them up.

[Skwmom]

Because it is sooooo much easier to break up a bank when it is in trouble.



Yes, corruption does breed incompetence.

[radical noodle]

1. Link? eom

[Skwmom]

2. Here's one. She's not in favor of breaking up the banks UNLESS

it is determined they pose a systemic risk......

By that time it is too late. You have a mess on your hands.

http://inthesetimes.com/article/18962/break-up-banks-end-racism-and-sexism

And of course don't forget her YES, YES, YES, I would let them fail comment on the Colbert Show.

[radical noodle]

3. Thanks! eom

[Skwmom]

5. There are plenty of links. Bottom line. She is not in favor of breaking up the banks that are

bigger than they were before the whole too big to fail bailout. Somewhere I have a post about her plan. I called it the "blame it on the regulators" plan. They always love to have someone to blame it on.

[radical noodle]

7. Posing a systemic risk is quite different than being in trouble

[kennetha]

4. you have no idea what you are talking about

[msanthrope]

10. Threads like this are useful. nt

[AgingAmerican]

6. Transation: allow the economy to collapse again

Brilliant

[longship]

8. So, now we have it on her word. Hillary Clinton supports moral hazard.

That has got to be the worst political stance ever. EVER!!!

[msanthrope]

9. Well yeah.....that's the law. Unless Sanders thinks he can rule by fiat, he has no power

to break up the banks.

[stillwaiting]

11. She has very poor judgment which very coincidentally usually seems to help

The billionaire class while hurting average citizens.