2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIdiot who invited scorn upon himself by calling Hillary a whore
Timi Burke @gotdem#DemocraticWhore Here's the idiot who invited scorn upon himself for forgetting who freed his sister
T. Fisher King @T_FisherKing Houston, TX
Noted #democraticwhore Bill Clinton rescued Paul Song's sister in law, Laura Ling from North Korean imprisonment.
Democratic Whore @AnOldLefty
In Release of Journalists, Both Clintons Had Key Roles
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/world/asia/05korea.html?mwrsm=Twitter
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)...by the NYFD?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)Minimum. Total over 24 months from 2013-2015 was $21,648,000.
I can see how, in the context of a political campaign, Hillary supporters are incensed at the actual definition. It DOES reflect very badly on Hillary to be doing what she is doing - positioning her office to benefit the already rich and powerful who have directly paid her vast sums of money.
I feel for you. It sucks to be faced with unethical behavior by someone you've put your faith in. But it's your own fault since the has been transparently catering to the wealthy from day one. She didn't hide anything from you and if you didn't see it, that is entirely on you.
A corporate whore is someone who sells themselves to corporate interests by giving up their beliefs and/or values in exchange for money and/or power.
A whore is someone who sells their body for sex, typically this is a derogatory term that applies to women. It's a loaded word which is colloquially interpreted as insulting to women but is not inherently so since male prostitutes could just as accurately be called whores. The insulting component of whore comes from the supposition that it is inherently wrong to sell your body for sex even though that is not inherently wrong.
Whore as an insult insinuates that a whore is someone who's selling moral virtue (in the form of chastity) for money. Whore as a descriptor is simply another term for prostitute. This is similar to how 'jew' can be both an insult and a descriptor depending on how it is used.
So corporate whore as an insult is claim that they are selling their morality to the highest bidder. Despite that the root word 'whore' is colloquially understood as insulting to women, the term 'corporate whore' does not have inherently gendered implications and does not reinforce sexism.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)That was your response to that?
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Which meshes with the full range of social problems in the US. This was your response to that?
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)No.
But hey glad you are here to keep me in line, God forbid I have a thought of my own.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Jimmy Carter: U.S. Is an 'Oligarchy With Unlimited Political Bribery'
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/videos/jimmy-carter-u-s-is-an-oligarchy-with-unlimited-political-bribery-20150731
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Sanders held a rally in Washington Square Park, which was closed all day Wednesday at the request of the Secret Service. 6,500 people were estimated to be in the park for the rally with an additional 5,000 supporters outside the park for a total of 11,500.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Square 1915 to support Women's Suffrage.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)You do understand the rules for how many people can gather in the park safety is different now?
And we have no way of knowing those numbers are accurate.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Sorry. It's not smaller now. If it was you'd have some sort of evidence....
Read about it here:
http://washingtonsquareparkconservancy.org/history/
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)No way it was more than 10k in the park.
Too bad rallies aren't votes huh?
Sorry.
RandySF
(58,911 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)competent people like Clinton or Obama in office, and not a guy who is promising 5.3% GDP growth but can't even figure out how to release his own tax returns.
livetohike
(22,145 posts)gabeana
(3,166 posts)yeah good stuff their, another dumb comment from the shrills
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
While trying to cast one in bad light, it draws attention to what "corporate Democratic whores" are.
And the word is pluralized, meaning more than one.
wiki:
Corporatocrisy: is a term used to refer to an economic and political
system controlled by corporations and/or corporate interests
.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Who needs facts when you can make it up as you go along?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)let alone continually responding to their multiple threads of completely baseless word salads.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I do not think that is correct
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 14, 2016, 08:49 AM - Edit history (1)
I apologize for posting the quote out of context previously.
That is incredible. And Bernie supporters are claiming he didn't call Hillary a whore. Unbelievable.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Completely indefensible comment and I'm glad both Paul and Bernie have apologized for this statement.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)She exactly fits the definition of a politician that is a corporate whore. You don't get to rewrite the english language because your candidate's ethical failings are being placed front and center. She took Twenty One Million Six Hundred Forty Eight Thousand Dollars over 24 months between 2013 to 2015 when she KNEW she was running for president.
If you were trying to make up and example to illustrate the term corporate whore you couldn't devise a better one even in the hypothetical.
A corporate whore is someone who sells themselves to corporate interests by giving up their beliefs and/or values in exchange for money and/or power.
A whore is someone who sells their body for sex, typically this is a derogatory term that applies to women. It's a loaded word which is colloquially interpreted as insulting to women but is not inherently so since male prostitutes could just as accurately be called whores. The insulting component of whore comes from the supposition that it is inherently wrong to sell your body for sex even though that is not inherently wrong.
Whore as an insult insinuates that a whore is someone who's selling moral virtue (in the form of chastity) for money. Whore as a descriptor is simply another term for prostitute. This is similar to how 'jew' can be both an insult and a descriptor depending on how it is used.
So corporate whore as an insult is claim that they are selling their morality to the highest bidder. Despite that the root word 'whore' is colloquially understood as insulting to women, the term 'corporate whore' does not have inherently gendered implications and does not reinforce sexism.
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/32ps5x/cmv_corporate_whore_is_not_a_sexist_term/
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I'm not reading any crap defending this, sorry.
I'm ready to move on but people like yourself aren't.
It's a losing battle, why on Earth are you embarrassing yourself?
Stop defending the indefensible and it will disappear as an issue since it wasn't even Bernie that said it and Bernie disavowed said comment this morning:
Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive. There's no room for language like that in our political discourse.
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/720590717706506240
kristopher
(29,798 posts)If you don't like it, I suggest it's because it reflects an aspect of your candidate that you are ashamed of - she is completely an integrated part of the Corporate Oligarchy.
I believe that referring to a politician, or anyone for that matter, male or female, as a corporate whore does not reinforce sexism against women.
A corporate whore is someone who sells themselves to corporate interests by giving up their beliefs and/or values in exchange for money and/or power.
A whore is someone who sells their body for sex, typically this is a derogatory term that applies to women. It's a loaded word which is colloquially interpreted as insulting to women but is not inherently so since male prostitutes could just as accurately be called whores. The insulting component of whore comes from the supposition that it is inherently wrong to sell your body for sex even though that is not inherently wrong.
Whore as an insult insinuates that a whore is someone who's selling moral virtue (in the form of chastity) for money. Whore as a descriptor is simply another term for prostitute. This is similar to how 'jew' can be both an insult and a descriptor depending on how it is used.
So corporate whore as an insult is claim that they are selling their morality to the highest bidder. Despite that the root word 'whore' is colloquially understood as insulting to women, the term 'corporate whore' does not have inherently gendered implications and does not reinforce sexism.
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/32ps5x/cmv_corporate_whore_is_not_a_sexist_term/
Hillary took $21,648,000 from corporations from 4/2013 - 3/2015 when she KNEW she was running for president. That is as clear an example of selling out your integrity to corporations as you could possibly devise.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive. There's no room for language like that in our political discourse.
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/720590717706506240
kristopher
(29,798 posts)I believe that referring to a politician, or anyone for that matter, male or female, as a corporate whore does not reinforce sexism against women.
A corporate whore is someone who sells themselves to corporate interests by giving up their beliefs and/or values in exchange for money and/or power.
A whore is someone who sells their body for sex, typically this is a derogatory term that applies to women. It's a loaded word which is colloquially interpreted as insulting to women but is not inherently so since male prostitutes could just as accurately be called whores. The insulting component of whore comes from the supposition that it is inherently wrong to sell your body for sex even though that is not inherently wrong.
Whore as an insult insinuates that a whore is someone who's selling moral virtue (in the form of chastity) for money. Whore as a descriptor is simply another term for prostitute. This is similar to how 'jew' can be both an insult and a descriptor depending on how it is used.
So corporate whore as an insult is claim that they are selling their morality to the highest bidder. Despite that the root word 'whore' is colloquially understood as insulting to women, the term 'corporate whore' does not have inherently gendered implications and does not reinforce sexism.
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/32ps5x/cmv_corporate_whore_is_not_a_sexist_term/
Hillary took $21,648,000 from corporations from 4/2013 - 3/2015 when she KNEW she was running for president. That is as clear an example of selling out your integrity to corporations as you could possibly devise.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive. There's no room for language like that in our political discourse.
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/720590717706506240
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Yes.
You can't devise in the abstract a more appropriate example of what makes a "corporate whore".
A corporate whore is someone who sells themselves to corporate interests by giving up their beliefs and/or values in exchange for money and/or power.
A whore is someone who sells their body for sex, typically this is a derogatory term that applies to women. It's a loaded word which is colloquially interpreted as insulting to women but is not inherently so since male prostitutes could just as accurately be called whores. The insulting component of whore comes from the supposition that it is inherently wrong to sell your body for sex even though that is not inherently wrong.
Whore as an insult insinuates that a whore is someone who's selling moral virtue (in the form of chastity) for money. Whore as a descriptor is simply another term for prostitute. This is similar to how 'jew' can be both an insult and a descriptor depending on how it is used.
So corporate whore as an insult is claim that they are selling their morality to the highest bidder. Despite that the root word 'whore' is colloquially understood as insulting to women, the term 'corporate whore' does not have inherently gendered implications and does not reinforce sexism.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)I love eggs.
I looove eggs.
Watch starting at 1:50
That's why I order a omelette.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)As always.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:07 PM - Edit history (1)
It makes Hillary look weak. The impression is that she's always whining about personal insults.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts)I believe that referring to a politician, or anyone for that matter, male or female, as a corporate whore does not reinforce sexism against women.
A corporate whore is someone who sells themselves to corporate interests by giving up their beliefs and/or values in exchange for money and/or power.
A whore is someone who sells their body for sex, typically this is a derogatory term that applies to women. It's a loaded word which is colloquially interpreted as insulting to women but is not inherently so since male prostitutes could just as accurately be called whores. The insulting component of whore comes from the supposition that it is inherently wrong to sell your body for sex even though that is not inherently wrong.
Whore as an insult insinuates that a whore is someone who's selling moral virtue (in the form of chastity) for money. Whore as a descriptor is simply another term for prostitute. This is similar to how 'jew' can be both an insult and a descriptor depending on how it is used.
So corporate whore as an insult is claim that they are selling their morality to the highest bidder. Despite that the root word 'whore' is colloquially understood as insulting to women, the term 'corporate whore' does not have inherently gendered implications and does not reinforce sexism.
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/32ps5x/cmv_corporate_whore_is_not_a_sexist_term/
Hillary took $21,648,000 from corporations from 4/2013 - 3/2015 when she KNEW she was running for president. That is as clear an example of selling out your integrity to corporations as you could possibly devise.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)I believe that referring to a politician, or anyone for that matter, male or female, as a corporate whore does not reinforce sexism against women.
A corporate whore is someone who sells themselves to corporate interests by giving up their beliefs and/or values in exchange for money and/or power.
A whore is someone who sells their body for sex, typically this is a derogatory term that applies to women. It's a loaded word which is colloquially interpreted as insulting to women but is not inherently so since male prostitutes could just as accurately be called whores. The insulting component of whore comes from the supposition that it is inherently wrong to sell your body for sex even though that is not inherently wrong.
Whore as an insult insinuates that a whore is someone who's selling moral virtue (in the form of chastity) for money. Whore as a descriptor is simply another term for prostitute. This is similar to how 'jew' can be both an insult and a descriptor depending on how it is used.
So corporate whore as an insult is claim that they are selling their morality to the highest bidder. Despite that the root word 'whore' is colloquially understood as insulting to women, the term 'corporate whore' does not have inherently gendered implications and does not reinforce sexism.
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/32ps5x/cmv_corporate_whore_is_not_a_sexist_term/
Hillary took $21,648,000 from corporations from 4/2013 - 3/2015 when she KNEW she was running for president. That is as clear an example of selling out your integrity to corporations as you could possibly devise.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)About time.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)...
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Thanks for playing "Pay to Play"!!!
bigtree
(85,998 posts)...said no one in particular.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)Legalized bribery, true. But bribery nonetheless.
Jimmy Carter: U.S. Is an 'Oligarchy With Unlimited Political Bribery'
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/videos/jimmy-carter-u-s-is-an-oligarchy-with-unlimited-political-bribery-20150731
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Sanders supporter, unacceptable. The mud needs to stop, Sanders said he has never run a dirty campaign, now he should not say this anymore.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Its so obvious too.
Can't have people talking about the historically large rally for Bernie, right? Can't have people look into Bernie's actual speech.
Hint: Its incredible. Watching this will make people want him to lead our country.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)Clinton supporters are really entrenched in their love of quid pro quo politics.
dsc
(52,162 posts)that would be Hillary. So yea he kind of is a an ingrate for calling the woman who helped save his sister in law a whore.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)because he got a benefit. If you think that's normal and good, maybe that's part of the problem. Quid pro quo thinking.
dsc
(52,162 posts)I said he was an ingrate for calling Hillary a whore.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)about Hillary, and I'm sure he'll address.this as well
I'm a Bernie supporter and this definitely does NOT represent me.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)You must be very proud of yourself.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Would Pauly like it if it was used on his wife and daughter?
Nah, I didn't think so.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)just announced that Bernie denounced his words.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Do you think it is women that gay guys pay for?
whathehell
(29,067 posts)likely to both work in the industry, and be penalized for their sexuality generally, with ugly labels like "slug" and "whore"
Come back when you get real.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)out come the gender slurs.
Bernie has already spoken out about the sexist comments of the 'Bernie bros', he needs
to speak out about this too.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)You are getting very messy these days, I'm just a bit surprised.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)...then get back to me about my 'bullshit.'
whathehell
(29,067 posts)It's an ugly, stupid gender slur.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)"The Talk" with their candidate and other grifters regardless of title, position or political affiliation.
The adjective isn't personal. It's gender neutral and it fits any politician or political party that caters to the 1% minority's interests over those of the 99% majority's interests. But you and others of the poutraged set know this very, very well.
IF the shoe doesn't fit then it doesn't apply now does it?
Don't all of a sudden act like Liberals haven't called a spade a spade as far as the wealthy and corporate interests influencing OUR party and OUR politics in an undemocratic way. We've been doing it for years against Republicans. Now suddenly because grifting, ass kissing corpo Democrats are being targeted in this election, there's this sudden outrage?
Seriously ? Why, because IOKIHDI? Well, it's NOT ok.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Nobody from Bernie's side said that.
Nice outrage. Plays great on tee vee.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)But you keep on lying.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Seemed incomplete.
On another note, not even close to the turn offs the BS camp has been cranking out of the ICK factory for the last 9 months. News articles have even been dedicated to the phenom, yeah this is a "thing."
MattSh
(3,714 posts)this thread would be in negative territory.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)...a complaint is as good as a kick.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)Lots of 'straphangers' there.
Response to bigtree (Original post)
Vilis Veritas This message was self-deleted by its author.
Perogie
(687 posts)I'm not saying she is but what if she is
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporate+whore
One who has sold more than their labor to the corporation; one who has forsaken personal values and constitution for corporate $$
Umbral18
(105 posts)This is just too funny.
randr
(12,412 posts)Hillarys' supporters just assumed he was referring to her.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)As in many corporate whores.
So, not Clinton.
Or, not ONLY Clinton.
Congress is full of them. They voted to forbid Medicare from negotiating drug prices, way back, and have only gone downhill from there.
But, if the shoe fits ...
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)When is Hillary apologizing for her surrogates who pass laws hurting people?
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)What, did you Hillary supporters suddenly wake up to reality?
This is how America sees her and there isn't a damn thing you or anybody else can do about it.
And BTW it's "corporate whore", not "whore" she was called. There's a difference.
From 2003. I think the definition has been well known awhile now.
Nanjeanne
(4,961 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)Nanjeanne
(4,961 posts)Of many politicians much more worrisome than the word "whore".
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)matters.
Now, the following are OP's by bigtree over the years in which many persons use the word 'whore' to describe political groups and yes, individuals. In these threads the word is used with gusto and bigtree never once raises an objection to the word 'whore' singular nor to the word 'whores' plural, with or without the modifier 'corporate' or 'media'.
If the word is so super offensive to the OP, one would think the OP would mention that when people employ that word to him repeatedly over the years but this is not the case at all:
he's a teabagger whore yes INDEED
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100238441
Kid Rock-"ever the PR whore peddling his crap "entertainment" lol nt"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021918349
I could do this all day. Apparently it is wrong to say 'corporate whores who are beholden to Big Pharma' but jus fine to say Kid Rock is a whore, Speaker of the House, a whore' in the world of bigtree.
If you want to hang a man for what he has said, you need to quote his actual words, not your revised characterization of those words.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Not only calling Bernies female opponent a whore but stabbing in the back the very people that freed his sister in law from a horrible fate in North Korea!
What a scumball!
kristopher
(29,798 posts)I absolutely despise people who sell their integrity to corporations and then pretend to represent the interests of the weakest among us.
That conduct is indefensible - which is why HRC's defenders resort to chickenshit like faux outrage over a common expression that is applicable and highlights her ethical shortcomings.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Then why did Bernie apologize for it?
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)Gothmog
(145,321 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)So, first he insults a woman candidate by calling her a "corporate whore" and turns out that he's also an ungrateful ass to boot???? Who had to go in person to bring your sister home, Song? Kim Jong-il requested Bill Clinton's presence before agreeing to free the two women. Hillary, as SOS, had to negotiate the terms of their release.
Nice going, Song. What a jackass!!!
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)and Laura's sister.
Would have loved to have overheard the coversatiosn between the Songs after this went viral last night.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Still in very poor taste.
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)A corporate whore is someone who takes money for favors. That describes her to a Tee. He didn't say Hillary, but you guys go on and lie some more.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)support her? Never going to happen. Good luck with your unity party of none.
You all know good and well having been the long time members of DU that you claim to be, what a Corporate whore is. If you have forgotten, here is the definition entered in to the Urban Dictionary in 2003:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporate+whore
One who has sold more than their labor to the corporation; one who has forsaken personal values and constitution for corporate $$; meaning of "whore" belittled when preceded by the word corporate; person who will sell their soul for $$.
My efforts are not driven by my passion for work, but by my own gluttony, my addition to money. I have become what I once despisedforsaken myself, sacrificed my values at the corporate alter of greed. I am a corporate whore.
by Syllabus September 28, 2003
And used quite often on DU:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1727002
(hat tip to Joe the Revelator for this small sampling)
A fun look back at the use of 'Corporate Whore' on DU over the years [View all]
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x429981 (Bush)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x471829 (Michelle Bauchman)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3834259 (Huckabee)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x370897 (Obama)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026282102 (Prescott Bush was a NAZI whore. 115 recs)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x778732 (Michelle Ree)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7279334 (Rick Berman)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3989371 (Everybody)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=105x2014241 (anyone who doesn't support local buisness)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1481831 (Romney)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x2072784 (The sierra club)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5393707 (Clinton, Obama, McCain)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x139160 (MSNBC)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1905122 (Jeff Landry)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/125142040 (Huffpo)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014863175#post36 (Michelle Bauchman)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511580034#post33 (CNN)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023707036#post55 (Chuck Todd)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014537440 (The entire congress)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=1175068&mesg_id=1175149
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=5679089&mesg_id=5679933 (Obama)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8613952&mesg_id=8614150 (Rahm)
The list goes literally on and on and on.....
Vinca
(50,278 posts)The last time I checked we have freedom of speech in this country and he can call anyone whatever he wants. He can be grateful on one hand, but on the other be totally pissed about the way some campaigns have been bought off . . . presumably for favors down the road. He said a dumb thing. Big fucking deal.
polly7
(20,582 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511733592
Okay now I'm REALLLY PISSED at the deflection. I just looked up who Paul Song is.
(I should be working, but I keep coming back to the unadulterated CRAP the Clinton campaign, its supporters and the MSM are perpetuating over his unfortunate use of the phrase corporate whores.)
We have sunk to a new low in sleazy politics and media coverage. Thanks for the collateral damage to the reputation of a guy who...well, here's a little background.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-y-song-md/
Paul Y. Song, M.D. is a physician, progressive activist, and biotechnology executive. He is the grandson of the late Sang Don Kim, the very first popularly elected Mayor of Seoul, South Korea. Dr. Song serves as the Executive Chairman of the Courage Campaign, a leading California-based online organization made up of more than 1 Million members who fight for a more progressive CA and country. In 2013, Dr. Song was named and served as the very first visiting fellow on healthcare policy in the California Department of Insurance. In addition, Dr. Song serves the co-chair of the Campaign for a Healthy California and on the executive board of Physicians for a National Health Program California, Liberty in North Korea, People for the American Way, and the Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional Studies. Dr. Song graduated with honors from the University of Chicago and received his M.D. degree from George Washington University. He completed his residency in radiation oncology at the University of Chicago and did a brachytherapy fellowship at the Institute Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-y-song-md/the-real-healthcare-debat_b_9121210.html
The real debate Democrats should be having
Excerpt:
Recently, a fierce debate has been ignited within the Democratic Party regarding the merits and feasibility of a single-payer Medicare-for-All universal healthcare system. Some liberal commentators have summarily dismissed Senator Sanders proposal as politically unrealistic or as greatly lacking in details while championing a slightly improved status quo, and other political surrogates have spread GOP-like untruths that have no place in any honest discussion.
Regardless of ones individual beliefs on Medicare-for-All, it is crucial to note some indisputable facts regarding the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the current status quo:
1. While the ACA did indeed do some very positive things like end lifetime caps on medical coverage and do away with discrimination for pre-existing conditions, it was never intended to cover every uninsured individual. In fact, after the ACA is fully implemented, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that up to 29 million residents will still remain uninsured.
2. The only area of the ACA that both Democrats and Republicans found mutual agreement on was to exclude our undocumented brothers and sisters.
3. The average insured family still pays an extra $1,017 in premiums (hidden tax) to cover the cost of care for the uninsured.
4. A recent Commonwealth Fund study revealed that 31 million people with insurance had such high out-of-pocket costs or deductibles relative to their incomes that they were UNDER-insured and that 51% of these adults reported problems with their medical bills, while 44% of all adults reported not getting care because of high co-pays and deductibles despite being insured.
5. Even after a significant decrease in the total number of uninsured, there were still 1.7 million medical related bankruptcies in 2014 of which 75% were actually insured, and this is only expected to get worse.
6. Most individuals in the U.S. cannot afford an annual deductible of $6,850 and most families of four cannot afford an annual deductible of $13,700.
7. Despite premiums increasing over 150% over the past 9 years, there is no federal insurance rate regulation.
8. Despite the fact that average branded drug prices have increased 127% during the past 8 years to the point that 73% of Americans now find the cost of drugs unreasonable, there was no mechanism to control drug prices.
9. Many states have huge underfunded retiree healthcare liabilities. Californias alone is $150 Billion.
10. Healthcare costs are currently 17.5% of GDP with over 1% of GDP spent on Prescription drugs alone, and will only continue to climb as mandatory federal health spending is projected to double in the next 10 Years.
11. Recent data from the American Journal of Public Health found that tax-funded expenditures accounted for 64.3% of all U.S. health spending. U.S. health spending for 2013 was $9,267 per capita, with governments share being $5,960.
12. Prior to the bailout, GM spent more on healthcare for its employees than it did on steel. Rising healthcare costs are making U.S. companies less competitive and taking money away from wages and capital investments.
13. Most Americans continue to get employer-sponsored healthcare but workers contributions to premiums have increased 212% since 2000 while wages have only increased 54% during the same period.
14. Healthcare benefits have become the biggest source of labor negotiation strife.
So if anything, most health policy experts believe that our current healthcare system is unsustainable for individuals, businesses, states and our federal government, and to continue this status quo is what is really unrealistic.
The real debate Democrats should be having should not be about whether single payer, a highly successful proven system in so many industrialized nations, is the solution, but rather how we can collectively come together to overcome the corporate forces that derailed the ACA from providing a public option, drug price controls and insurance rate regulation, and how we get to the ultimate goal of Medicare for All.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)He seems like a brilliant and caring man. Extreme frustration with corruption, especially wrt health-care and people's lives, probably played a big part in why he said it how he did.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)Dr. Song is a Senior Adviser at Berg Pharma, where he previously served as its Chief Medical Officer for the companys first four years.
http://www.naisaglobal.org/team/paul-y-song/
vintx
(1,748 posts)And absolutely no one should be surprised.
I never had much love for the Clinton's. Always considered bill the best Republican president we bad.
Now, though? They literally make me sick.
TheFarseer
(9,323 posts)I knew you couldn't hide your bias against Asian people for the whole campaign. Why do you think Asian people aren't as good as you?
hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)mainer
(12,022 posts)After the way he's being slimed, I'm sure the women in Dr. Song's family -- women who earlier supported Hillary -- will be very happy to watch you tear him apart.