2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie disavows the "whore" remark. Do you?
"Dr. Song's comment was inappropriate and insensitive. There's no room for language like that in our political discourse."
https://twitter.com/BernieSanders/status/720590717706506240
Bernie says that the use of "whore" is "inappropriate and insensitive." Will Sanders supporters continue to defend something Bernie will not?
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)When the shoe fits.
The fact that Hillarybots immediately make it an attack on their candidate only shows that the corporate whore remark and Hillary is on their cape. Not the Bernie camp.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)No punitive sentiment was expressed but you chose to employ the language of confrontation and fear. Many a true word is said in jest, though not always intentionally.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)especially based on your attempt to "glimpse into my mindset" based on less than one sentence. You guys are too fucking HILLarious.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)so it is valid to bring-up this serious issue.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)And tell it to all the women who supports him.
Your candidate have far bigger problems than whatever triggers over sensitive Hillarybots who love their own smear jobs and love to play the victim when it comes back to them like a boomerang
It's more valid why Hillary calls herself a leader with full transparency when she wants others to lead by example and foreclose whatever transcripts they have from and speeched they have given.
She alligns herself with the republicans in this matter. The faux outrage and the disgusting accusations of Bernie being a misogynist is an echo from the dirt campaign against Obama.
I mean, don't you people get tired of acting like mental patients, expecting a different result using the same tactic?
TM99
(8,352 posts)exit polls and number of voters that are women for Sanders before you post another lie.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Any perjorative in a political storm will do, the uglier the better -- as long as it doesn't come back and smack the user? You are right though, shill is safer than whore.
Response to Renew Deal (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I would be more concerned with that.
Response to Renew Deal (Reply #10)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)It is basically slut shaming when you use it on a woman.
Response to Renew Deal (Reply #24)
Name removed Message auto-removed
TheFarseer
(9,323 posts)So I disagree with your assertion that whore is automatically sexist but I agree with Bernie that the phrase does not belong in our political discourse.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)You guys did that all by yourselves. Congratulations. And I feel it fits too, so you're not alone.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)And laugh at those who are whining about it. Hillary once again goes from " I am woman, hear me roar" to "don't pick on me, I'm just poor little girl" , as the weathervane turns.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)FSogol
(45,488 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Perhaps you need to get out more?
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Because now Bernie supporters are denouncing their candidates denouncement. Mr. Perfect is wrong about something.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:46 AM - Edit history (1)
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)But they are hypocrites?
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)He is right for what he needs to to and they are right for what they need to do.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)And be considered reasonable.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Bernie supporters are individuals.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)It's all "you're with us or against us" in his camp
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)As you try to give Sanders the attributes of Hillary.
Marr
(20,317 posts)It explains a lot, really.
TM99
(8,352 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:41 PM - Edit history (1)
He is right within the national context of his campaign. He has to disavow this because of the Clinton/Brock Machine faux poutrage and backlash.
We supporters don't march in lock step with our candidate of choice. It is not a cult of personality for us. Therefore, many of us will continue to use the vernacular phrase 'corporate whores' because it describes in gender neutral terms what they are, on both sides of the aisle. It is a phrase that was used here at DU from the beginning of the site. Media Whores Online was a prominent linked to site between 2001 and 2004.
So you can stop your condescending, authoritarian preaching. We are not buying it. We could care less how you feel or what you think further on this matter. Your hypocrisy and rat-fuckery is more than apparent.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)..always looking for the Big Score.
Autumn
(45,107 posts)bigtree
(85,998 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)So not only no but HELL NO!
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Now that Bernie has denounced it and Song has apologized?
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)And this
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)I'm not buying his remarks either, frankly.
No, this is kind of thing we've seen from day one. It will continue to the bitter end, which thankfully will be soon.
George II
(67,782 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)No polls.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)whore," or "attention whore" going forward here on DU.
This whole thing was really, really silly, and I don't care who you support. Let us discuss real issues.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)and can't be trusted to look out for interests of the citizens of this country.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)I'll continue to use the word in situations I find the comparison to be appropriate.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)to set their moral compasses according to what a politician thinks or does.
Whether they support that politician or not that idea is patently absurd.
Marr
(20,317 posts)ever-shifting 'principles'.
IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)I appreciate he is a classy guy. This isn't a cult; I am comfortable disagreeing with him about this because I am not a statesman and he is. The standard is different - tact and diplomacy are required for him. I am an Internet poster with a "finally somebody said what I've been thinking all along!"
alarimer
(16,245 posts)When will Hillary disavow her supporter calling Bernie's "Nazis"?
hereforthevoting
(241 posts)Sorry I am more about judging people by their actions. But I don't really see much in this situation anyway.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Corporate whores are corporate whores.
A light needs to be shone very brightly on the FACT that our govt has been taken over by Moneyed Interests.
Its at the root of almost every problem in the US.
What a phenomenal country this could be if our "representatives" actually represented "We The People" again.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)and as usual, his critics on twitter, who have unleashed a torrent of antisemitic bilge, have not.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)messiah
(1,092 posts)Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)we are not all spin-addicts like a certain other camp, which proclaims to always have considerd the sky green as soon as their preferred candidate "misspeaks".
mcar
(42,334 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)doesn't bother me a bit.
For most people (except those who are being sincere in their honest distaste for the word) it is a great term to describe the practice of selling one's political position (or media influence) for money.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Another slap in the face to workers all over America and beyond who supports HRC. UGH.
frylock
(34,825 posts)randr
(12,412 posts)but I am at a lose as to what to call those who would vote against Health Care for all while taking money from Big Pharma.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)We can come up with lots of stuff. But using that word in a campaign when talking about a female candidate is wrong. I think Armstead explained it well in one of these threads.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)When making public remarks, I think additional sensitivity is in order.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)pinebox
(5,761 posts)Does the dose of reality from America bother you how most see Hillary?
Triana
(22,666 posts)However I stand by the substance of Song's comment which was that we need a President and a congress who will represent US (the 99%), not corporations. We need a President who is NOT beholden to big money, big corporations, and Wall St. And BERNIE SANDERS IS that candidate.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)Once again, you prove to be more honorable than some of your followers.
MadCrow
(155 posts)I bet it was some man using language derogatory to women to make a point. I haven't heard any objections to the term until now, but now that we have a woman Presidential candidate who is part of the corporate establishment suddenly it is offensive. Why do so many offensive words always refer to women (you know the ones I mean I don't have to list them here). Now suddenly we have the word police telling us what words or phrases are or are not acceptable because they refer to a specific individual; but when they are demeaning to women in general they are perfectly acceptable. I think we have a double standard here.
That being said, I agree with the premise of Dr. Songs statement.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Politicians who trade access and votes for campaign contributions and support are whores.
DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)They've corrupted the nation and its political system. I fail to see how any person of conscience is ok with this. Meantime, we're playing puritanical word games while the rest of the world uses salty language as a matter of course. This is how the world works, and we're beginning to look like some kind of weird religious cult that keeps itself separated from the world. So to answer your question, no, you won't be browbeating me into feeling guilt about a statement I agree with.
Broward
(1,976 posts)Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)PADemD
(4,482 posts)Parliament of Whores: A Lone Humorist Attempts to Explain the Entire U.S. Government Paperback January 7, 2003
http://www.amazon.com/Parliament-Whores-Humorist-Attempts-Government/dp/0802139701
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)and unless we elect one as our party standard, I hope that we keep on doing it.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)... and yet another day to refuse to answer questions of allowing the release of state secrets and payola from Wall Street from the comfort of the fainting couch.
In that sense, I'd prefer that he'd said "vile, lickspittle, sellout corporate tools". But they'd have continued to vitriolically demand to see Sanders' irs worksheet on student loan interest.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)The shoe fits certain feet rather alarmingly well, but I agree that the terminology lends itself far too readily to distraction threads like this one.
The trigger word has been used by the fringe right to describe women for decades, and in particular Sanders' primary opponent. One should step carefully through that minefield. If one really wants to talk about corruption by corporate money, one shouldn't make it easy for one's opponent to derail that discussion.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)it is, if you use it with a group and there are women it becomes inappropriate and could be hurtful.
There are other words that aren't loaded. Shill, sellout, lackey etc.
I've seen people say 'whore is gender neutral' & that it means a 'dirty person' <<-- everyone knows what whore means, let's not rewrite the definition.
In real life I use the 'b' word. I call the lawn mower the 'b' word when it's not working right. My best friend and I call each other that word. I have a tee shirt that has an awesome saying with that word on it. I don't say it here. Even if it were allowed, I wouldn't use it here because I know it's hurtful to some and I don't *need* to use that word. I'd rather not hurt people. there are plenty of other words I can use. So I choose not to hurt people.
Anyway that's my take.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)phleshdef
(11,936 posts)I would not call Hillary Clinton that word. But I don't disavow the word itself. I will NEVER accept the notion that its sexist in modern context. I WILL use the word myself if I think it applies to someone.
People need to toughen the fuck up, just a little bit.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Corporate whores (bought and sold politicians) have no place in the Democratic party
revbones
(3,660 posts)"corporate whore" is fitting.
Corporate whore:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporate+whore
Basically it does apply to Hillary and many Democrats as well as most if not all Republicans...
islandmkl
(5,275 posts)Bernie has bigger fish to fry than this modern instant-tempest-in-a-chatroom...
he's done what he needed to do...
we, on the other hand, only have to deal with Hillary folks here on DU...
it's a fucking sport, don't you know?
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)Corporate whore... what word could we substitute that would convey what is happening in Congress... or do you support Citizens' United ?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)I'm only responsible for the things I say. We still have free speech, and I don't expect to be protected from other people's ideas or speech. If you want to talk about realism, that is unrealistic, to have everyone talk in a way that you agree with.
snot
(10,530 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Can't help it if Hillary people think it was about her. I guess her actions resemble that word.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)"Corporate whore" means 'someone who takes money from big business and shills for them'. And that speaker was right-- so long as we keep electing corporate whores, we're not going to get anywhere.
Sanders can apologize if he likes-- he's his own person. I don't see a problem the phrase, I don't see a point in kowtowing to the petulant screams of the perennially 'outraged', and I don't, and this may be hard for you to understand but give it a shot, just mindlessly adopt the positions of my chosen candidate.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)disavow it, and he looses nothing by not fighting it - so why fight it?
For everyone else? It must be a slow news day - cause this is a non-issue...
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)I just served on a jury where I was in the minority voting to hide it due to the use of the word whore. It is more than inappropriate and insensitive but at least the candidate made a statement. His followers rarely are as classy as he is.
Let the feeding frenzy begin.
CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)She is in the pocket of big business. What better way to describe it than corporate whore.
leftinportland
(247 posts)If the shoe fits...
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)The Clintons INVENTED the "Democratic Corporate Whore", fer fucks sake. I am not going to pretend the last 20+ years didn't happen to the Democratic Party -- which is EXACTLY what I have been fighting against.
longship
(40,416 posts)However, in context of Hillary being a woman, it was a bit insensitive.
Instead, I would have said, "Hillary Clinton has sold her soul to the devil."
There! A much better metaphor.
polichick
(37,152 posts)But I will continue to call elected officials - men and women - who sell out this country WHORES. It is the perfect word for them.
Beowulf
(761 posts)third way democrat. Adding "whore" or "prostitute" is redundant.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)elana i am
(814 posts)because a lot of dems and ALL repugs ARE corporate whores, and there couldn't possibly be a more apropos and direct term.
Kittycat
(10,493 posts)No, but unlike Bernie - I don't have to worry about responding to people's delicate ridiculousness when they refuse to look at context, and focus on a single word rather than the entire statement and it's full contextual meaning. Further, it wasn't Bernie who said it, nor I.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporate+whore
My efforts are not driven by my passion for work, but by my own gluttony, my addition to money. I have become what I once despisedforsaken myself, sacrificed my values at the corporate alter of greed. I am a corporate whore.
by Syllabus September 28, 2003
bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)ieoeja
(9,748 posts)The folks at mediawhoresonline.com had a great deal fun laughing at people who intentionally "mispronounced" their name as "horse" because, "mercy, me!"
So would you be happier if we all just called Hillary "a corporate horse"?
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)"Whore" most commonly references an alleged permiscuous woman or a prostitute.
That meaning is agreed upon, and it is offensive that it is used as a metaphor for corruption and coziness with corporations.
I am glad that Bernie is honorable and courageous enough to apologize.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)but just between you and me, corporate whores do exist. The Alaska legislative majority fits the bill.