Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:41 AM Apr 2016

so we are seriously going to let this "whore" stuff distract us from issues?

we are in the critical phase of a presidential primary, and we are distracted by a comment someone made who WAS NOT BERNIE and WAS NOT WORKING FOR BERNIE. he called them out because he is uber classy, case closed.

we have a major debate tonight in a critical primary state and people are prattling on about something that is over?

oh wait, major debate, critical primary state, multiple distractions,....never mind, i think i got it.

squirrel!

113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
so we are seriously going to let this "whore" stuff distract us from issues? (Original Post) restorefreedom Apr 2016 OP
Because women's issues just not what is important? Ya, kinda the whole discussion with Sanders. seabeyond Apr 2016 #1
Because corporate control of our government.... daleanime Apr 2016 #4
Nothing to do with what you said. seabeyond Apr 2016 #8
I am so tired of Sanders fans claiming to decide what's important for everyone else anigbrowl Apr 2016 #70
I should let you decide...... daleanime Apr 2016 #92
No, but you appear to be attempting to do exactly that for SeaBeyond anigbrowl Apr 2016 #112
"whore" is not gender specific. there are MANY men who have sex for money m-lekktor Apr 2016 #13
Yes, it is gender specific. seabeyond Apr 2016 #15
Not in this context it's not, there are far more male corporate whores. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #25
Yes. It is. seabeyond Apr 2016 #32
No it's not, corporate and media whores were crucified on DU for years. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #33
Whore is exclusively a gender specific word even when directed to men. seabeyond Apr 2016 #37
Corporate whore has a completely different definition which has nothing to do with gender. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #38
+++++ Zen Democrat Apr 2016 #60
I want to gift that mug to some Kittycat Apr 2016 #69
The word whote by itself is what is at issue here, and once again the American public Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #77
Actually it's not since the word by itself wasn't used. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #78
Neither side cares, each side uses whatever the issue is to promote their candidate. Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #82
Oh spare me the drama and the dime store psychology. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #86
I'd like that mug too. Good post, bmus. nt. polly7 Apr 2016 #99
No. It is not. revbones Apr 2016 #34
The word whore doesn't apply to anyone. It's simply name-calling. nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #71
Sure. I guess you are starting a campaign against Webster's now too. revbones Apr 2016 #74
Context is everything. procon Apr 2016 #40
EVERYTHING to you is about gender. phleshdef Apr 2016 #91
Educate your own self anigbrowl Apr 2016 #72
Fail treestar Apr 2016 #96
You have really jumped the shark choie Apr 2016 #49
No, I really have not. Don't call women whores, lesson learned. seabeyond Apr 2016 #55
You not very smart if you don't see the context. Zen Democrat Apr 2016 #61
Ah, because i do not agree with you I am stupid? What does it say about you that you ignore seabeyond Apr 2016 #66
You know damn well that Bernie didn't say it choie Apr 2016 #64
Point out where I said, Bernie said it. You know damn well.... I didn't say, Bernie said it. seabeyond Apr 2016 #65
If you are really losing sleep over this then don't support Biaviians Apr 2016 #106
I am losing sleep over this? Do you guys ever just stick to the fuckin' facts. seabeyond Apr 2016 #107
I understand Biaviians Apr 2016 #110
Silliness. I was never into these games. seabeyond Apr 2016 #111
Oh course, is there anything more important then inappropriately expressed anger? daleanime Apr 2016 #2
it depends which world you are in restorefreedom Apr 2016 #14
Funny how the same people foaming with poutrage right now about this VulgarPoet Apr 2016 #3
its almost as if the reputation of one idolized politician restorefreedom Apr 2016 #16
Maybe if you guys stopped using that word? onehandle Apr 2016 #5
how about these words? restorefreedom Apr 2016 #10
How about keeping on topic with your own choice of words. procon Apr 2016 #39
your post illustrates the problem perfectly. restorefreedom Apr 2016 #41
You have been predicted Bernie's imminent demise for 6 months. It's comical at this point. morningfog Apr 2016 #29
He lost the day he declared. onehandle Apr 2016 #30
LOL. 7 million voters (and counting) disagree. morningfog Apr 2016 #58
Yiou are correct. Corporate Control of government won't matter if Clinton is the nominee Armstead Apr 2016 #31
Yup. As a woman with a uterus just as worthy as that of any Hillary supporter... ScreamingMeemie Apr 2016 #6
exactly. i would love to see the same folks who claim outrage restorefreedom Apr 2016 #20
ANYTHING to distract from issues - until they can be parroted, of course. djean111 Apr 2016 #7
yup. when one has no position to defend, restorefreedom Apr 2016 #22
Since when do Bernie fans care about issues? DanTex Apr 2016 #9
Be fair. They have shown great concern about the rising cost of unicorn chow. nt onehandle Apr 2016 #17
People like you are the reason I'll sit home if Hillary is nominated. Zen Democrat Apr 2016 #62
+1, lol... uponit7771 Apr 2016 #95
Yep, the bat squirrel has been deployed. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #11
yup. its so obviously brockian, too. nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #23
People need to stop blaming EITHER candidate for missteps of others and blm Apr 2016 #12
yes. more chaff from the corporate masters restorefreedom Apr 2016 #26
Why not? rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #18
would you like to share an example restorefreedom Apr 2016 #24
Of course they are. What the Sanders rally last night was -- was Amazing Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #19
methinks someone is getting nervous about ny.... restorefreedom Apr 2016 #27
It would go away ... but Bernie supports are defending the use of the term. JoePhilly Apr 2016 #21
i have seen supporters of both candidates on both sides of the issue restorefreedom Apr 2016 #28
Nah I doubt Bernie supporters even noticed that in the speech Kalidurga Apr 2016 #80
All over Du today, Bernie supporters are defending the use of that term ... JoePhilly Apr 2016 #81
Yes I got that, wasn't I clear I got that. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #84
the only people offended ibegurpard Apr 2016 #88
Yep. Because elections in the US are actually IQ tests Triana Apr 2016 #35
also, if people were not working a million hours restorefreedom Apr 2016 #46
I never thought of that. -none Apr 2016 #75
The last thing Hillary supporters want to do is discuss Hillary stances on important B Calm Apr 2016 #36
thats the thing. when one has no positions to stand on, restorefreedom Apr 2016 #44
Glass-Steagall, private prisons, welfare reform, etc etc etc Zen Democrat Apr 2016 #63
Only if you let it. jillan Apr 2016 #42
good point. but they will try and force this issue restorefreedom Apr 2016 #43
And caring about it is only feeding their poutrage. jillan Apr 2016 #45
perhaps. nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #47
Notice...Hillary camp is just a long series of Faux Outrages because NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #48
bottom line -- if it walks like a duck . . . . pdsimdars Apr 2016 #50
Hey, I'll keep the screeching crows busy sparing over road kill notadmblnd Apr 2016 #51
Princess Weathervane's campaign is all about distractions. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #52
Yes, the question is- My Good Babushka Apr 2016 #53
Yes, it's distracting, isn't it? LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #54
By "are going to let", I think you meant "desperately need". lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #56
Of course it won't distract anyone. bjo59 Apr 2016 #57
I'm far from distracted by this. desmiller Apr 2016 #59
Yes, why not start another thread about it? auntpurl Apr 2016 #67
It's working as intended, but only here on DU. nt NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #68
They tried to make it work on twitter but just like every other meme Kalidurga Apr 2016 #83
Personally, NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #90
Yeah Kalidurga Apr 2016 #100
Same here pretty much. NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #109
The very *purpose* of the whore stuff is to distract us from issues. QC Apr 2016 #73
Yes, we MUST focus on the deBlasio skit, dammit! PeaceNikki Apr 2016 #76
And the dangling coversation Ichingcarpenter Apr 2016 #79
the magic weathervain seems to think so azurnoir Apr 2016 #85
the poutraging fanbois will try ibegurpard Apr 2016 #87
Yes! Because I already got two converts in my dorm from the use of this word...and working anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #89
Bernie!?!?!? Is this you!?! You're usually trying to minimize bias issues as "distractions" but I... uponit7771 Apr 2016 #93
Well I don't think Bernie treestar Apr 2016 #94
such as.... nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #98
Sing it with me! randome Apr 2016 #97
Not me, the biggest story is the offshoring, American companies, and the Clintons! ViseGrip Apr 2016 #101
Nope. I maintain that Hillary Clinton has sold her soul to the devil. longship Apr 2016 #102
yes. much worse. nt restorefreedom Apr 2016 #105
Nope, it's a non-issue and review mirror. Waiting For Everyman Apr 2016 #103
Well, we certainly are if people, like you for instance, keep posting about it. DUH! pdsimdars Apr 2016 #104
maybe it is the issue reddread Apr 2016 #108
I think it IS an issue. Adrahil Apr 2016 #113
 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
70. I am so tired of Sanders fans claiming to decide what's important for everyone else
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:05 PM
Apr 2016

Frankly I'm reminded of those busybodies who ask whether I've been 'saved.' Yes, I care deeply about a lot of the same issues that Sanders fans do. So much so that I studied a lot of economics and law in order to understand them better and be a more effective advocate, as opposed to merely parading my attitude without doing any of the work to understand what factors drive the status quo.

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
112. No, but you appear to be attempting to do exactly that for SeaBeyond
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 06:41 PM
Apr 2016

She says she has a problem with something, you jump in and say that your preferred issue is more important. You need to take a good long look in the mirror and ask yourself why you think it's OK to just negate other people's opinions.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
13. "whore" is not gender specific. there are MANY men who have sex for money
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:53 AM
Apr 2016

I am gay, I have had many male friends who did and do it for money. rentboy.com anybody? educate yourself PLEASE!

"whore' is not "women's issues"

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
33. No it's not, corporate and media whores were crucified on DU for years.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:13 AM
Apr 2016

In fact it was how we amused ourselves during the Bush years, the vast majority of them are men.

Pretending that it's suddenly a misogynist term isn't going to work.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
77. The word whote by itself is what is at issue here, and once again the American public
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:29 PM
Apr 2016

proves it isn't responsible enough to properly use the language.

Words arent the problem, people are.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
78. Actually it's not since the word by itself wasn't used.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:33 PM
Apr 2016

It was used with a qualifier that changes the definition to something non-gender specific.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
82. Neither side cares, each side uses whatever the issue is to promote their candidate.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:37 PM
Apr 2016

Very few here actually care that much about women when the whore word is used or gay people when they are attacked or especially black people when they are attacked or used.

Sure, there are some on each side who actually care about these things but they are also usually not the ones to use the issues to advance an agenda.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
86. Oh spare me the drama and the dime store psychology.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:45 PM
Apr 2016

Many of us who support Bernie are tired of our gender being used as a wedge issue, what you see here is a backlash that's been coming for a long time.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
34. No. It is not.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:14 AM
Apr 2016

It is a common term, so common in the vernacular that it is in the urban dictionary. But you already know that.

Corporate whore:

One who has sold more than their labor to the corporation; one who has forsaken personal values and constitution for corporate $$; meaning of "whore" belittled when preceded by the word “corporate”; person who will sell their soul for $$.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=corporate+whore

Basically it does apply to Hillary and many Democrats as well as most if not all Republicans...

procon

(15,805 posts)
40. Context is everything.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:37 AM
Apr 2016

Song was not speaking about men or even Congress as a whole. He specifically targeted Clinton, naming her twice in the same paragraph. The cheering crowd certainly knew who he was talking about, and the public response clearly understands who he was referring to.



TRANSCRIPT:

Dr. Paul Song: Now Secretary Clinton has said that Medicare for all will never happen. [boos] Well, I agree with Secretary Clinton that Medicare for all will never happen if we have a president who never aspires for something greater than the status quo. [cheers] Medicare for all will never happen if we continue to elect corporate Democratic whores [cheers] who are beholden to big pharma and the private insurance industry instead of us.”

 

anigbrowl

(13,889 posts)
72. Educate your own self
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:10 PM
Apr 2016

Just because a word admits of more than one definition does not mean that it is commonly understood to encompass those definitions. Ignoring the fact that words like whore and slut are vastly more likely to be applied to women than men is as facile as saying that racism is over because we got a black President or that homophobia is no longer an issue because gay marriage is now legal. I'm pretty sure you don't care for people tossing around the term faggot even though a lot of under-30s use it as a non-specific put-down rather than as a descriptor of someone's sexual orientation.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
61. You not very smart if you don't see the context.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:56 PM
Apr 2016

And if you don't understand that corporate whores are not gender specific, you need the education.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
66. Ah, because i do not agree with you I am stupid? What does it say about you that you ignore
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:57 PM
Apr 2016

the context of whore, and why people get a giggle using it, and using it on stage toward Clinton witha crowd cheering?

Ya, I am smart enough to get it. Why don't you? Doesn't work for you?

choie

(4,111 posts)
64. You know damn well that Bernie didn't say it
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:18 PM
Apr 2016

but because you and others are feeling threatened by his candidacy, you continue to lie about him. Clinton is a liar and corrupt. You're unable to address that fact, so you lie about Bernie to obviscate. Simple and very transparent.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
65. Point out where I said, Bernie said it. You know damn well.... I didn't say, Bernie said it.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

Point being, .... Sanders tweeted. Not good enough and his campaign, him included has moved to this place so ya, he is responsible too, and he is responsible reigning his supporters in.

Biaviians

(167 posts)
106. If you are really losing sleep over this then don't support
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:24 PM
Apr 2016

a candidate who is bought and sold by corporate America. Truth is not negative. Ignorance of the truth is negative. That's how we got into this mess. Will you help get big money out of politics?

Biaviians

(167 posts)
110. I understand
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:44 PM
Apr 2016

It was painful for me too when I realised much of Washington is controlled by corporate America.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
2. Oh course, is there anything more important then inappropriately expressed anger?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:44 AM
Apr 2016

Like maybe what caused the anger?

VulgarPoet

(2,872 posts)
3. Funny how the same people foaming with poutrage right now about this
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:44 AM
Apr 2016

seem to be the same ones completely content with complete American military hegemony across the planet-- because we can spill the blood of foreigners and American servicemen and women all day and all night long, but as soon as you call a spade a spade, everyone loses their goddamn minds!

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
16. its almost as if the reputation of one idolized politician
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:55 AM
Apr 2016

is more important than the quality of life.

no, wait. strike "almost"


onehandle

(51,122 posts)
5. Maybe if you guys stopped using that word?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:45 AM
Apr 2016

I know I'm tired of it.

None of this will matter after Hillary defeats Not Hillary next week.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
10. how about these words?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:50 AM
Apr 2016

jew (said perjoratively)
antisemite
misogynist
sexist
racist
gun nut
commie

when is ANYONE going to address that?

procon

(15,805 posts)
39. How about keeping on topic with your own choice of words.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:25 AM
Apr 2016

Sanders already has a problem (perceived or otherwise) regarding women's issues. His male followers have contributed to the negative press, adding to the impression. Your pejorative use of the word "whore" (dismissive quote marks notwithstanding) and the equally contemptuous addition of "stuff" to minimize and diminish women based on nothing more than gender, is under critique. Yes, in 2016 this is still an important issue for women and we should not be distracted from matters of equality when some people still find it a necessary strategy to resort, and even defend, this kind of ugly misogynist and sexist language that maligns all women.

More women vote than men. Good luck with that strategy.





restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
41. your post illustrates the problem perfectly.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:15 AM
Apr 2016

i used quotes to distinguish the word within the sentence, and stuff is a generic term.but leave it to team victim to blow everything out of proportion. the Hillary people are once again, trying to play the victim card while at the same time reassuring voters that this poor victimized woman can and should be trusted to oversee the free world.

good luck with THAT strategy.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
31. Yiou are correct. Corporate Control of government won't matter if Clinton is the nominee
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:09 AM
Apr 2016

She and you people will avoid the issue and sweep it right under the rug. Back to the normal practices of the Oligarchy. Oh joy.


http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511730693

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
6. Yup. As a woman with a uterus just as worthy as that of any Hillary supporter...
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:45 AM
Apr 2016

Yup.

All I know is that we had better never see the use of "corporate whore," "media whore" or "attention whore" here ever again.

I usually let people say whatever they need to say, but this outrage is ridiculous and born of fear/hatred. Actual issues that actually affect women are getting tossed out the window due to this.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
20. exactly. i would love to see the same folks who claim outrage
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:58 AM
Apr 2016

actually express the same outrage about pay inequity, crappy minimum wage, violence sgainst women, not just here, but in PLACES WHERE WE HAVE INTERVENED.

but not gonna happen. words are easy to criticize. its much harder to enact true progressive policies.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
7. ANYTHING to distract from issues - until they can be parroted, of course.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:46 AM
Apr 2016

Lies, poo flinging, manufactured outrage, bot infestations.
I honestly do not see their point, here - anyone, IMO, who switched from Bernie to Hillary, at this point, doesn't give a flying fuck about issues, which is, again IMO, not a characteristic of a Bernie supporter here at DU.

You know what? Depending on what happens with the nomination, I will be either all in or all out of the GE campaign. Except for some down-ticket stuff, here in Florida, and no need to bother with the prez campaign if I cannot stomach it. Looking forward to that, honestly. Since I have no control over it. There are issues and politicians I will not shill for under any circumstances.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
22. yup. when one has no position to defend,
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:00 AM
Apr 2016

the conversation has to change to arguments about words.

i am trying not to think too much about the ge until we are there. all i know is i am done holding my nose.

Zen Democrat

(5,901 posts)
62. People like you are the reason I'll sit home if Hillary is nominated.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:02 PM
Apr 2016

Because of you and the Hillary weepers, whiners and whimps on this board, the sound of her name irritates me. I voted for her husband twice, and I used to care about the Clintons, but things have changed. You people here have convinced me that the type of people who support Hillary are just not my kind of people. That Hillary hired David Brock to smear Sanders is the turd on the cake for me. Just don't like or respect her anymore. She's power mad.

Love, light and Bernie!

blm

(113,065 posts)
12. People need to stop blaming EITHER candidate for missteps of others and
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:51 AM
Apr 2016

judging their candidacies by the words of internet trash-talkers here at DU. The worst actors from both sides are likely GOP operatives finding DU to be a fruitful planting ground for their propaganda campaigns against our candidates and the Dem party.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
26. yes. more chaff from the corporate masters
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:02 AM
Apr 2016

for the little people to fight about while they go on feasting on first class food.

reminds me of a zombie movie....

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
18. Why not?
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:56 AM
Apr 2016

Bernie supporters have done exactly the same with small gaffes and slips by Clinton supporters.

Good for the goose.

Nanjeanne

(4,961 posts)
19. Of course they are. What the Sanders rally last night was -- was Amazing
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:57 AM
Apr 2016

It had been Clinton, Cruz or Dump.

But it's Bernie so let's talk about what a bad word Whore is. Frankly if I were a whore I'd be insulted that it was used to mean corporate shills. But that's just me.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
21. It would go away ... but Bernie supports are defending the use of the term.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 09:58 AM
Apr 2016

The SMART thing for Bernie supports to do is denounce the term, and the guy who said it.

Look around DU. That's not what they are doing. In thread after thread, they are defending the term. Some even think Bernie should use it.

You might want to take your case into the Bernie group. Maybe they'll listen there.



restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
28. i have seen supporters of both candidates on both sides of the issue
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:05 AM
Apr 2016

but perhaps we should talk about the underlying issue which precipitated this...,the takeover of corporate media by a mere SIX companies and the near shutdown of non propoganda on the airwaves.

i would much rather discuss THAT.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
80. Nah I doubt Bernie supporters even noticed that in the speech
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:34 PM
Apr 2016

It was Hillary supporters who took the story and ran with it. We just happened to notice the term fits Hillary too well.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
81. All over Du today, Bernie supporters are defending the use of that term ...
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:35 PM
Apr 2016

... both in the abstract, and in its being attached to Hillary.

Bernie supporters appear to not only want to use that term themselves, some of them want Bernie to start using it.

You don't have to check many threads on this topic to notice this simple fact.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
84. Yes I got that, wasn't I clear I got that.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:43 PM
Apr 2016

I am saying Bernie supporters wouldn't have noticed the use if it wasn't pointed out. And it was pointed out in faux outrage. It's seriously fake when Hillarians support all the things that corporations do via supporting Hillary, that truly fuck the nation. It's not a term I have been using. I will probably repeat it several times now, but I sure wouldn't have without the faux outrage of Hillarians.

When I see some outrage from Hillarians about the horrors of millions of women who are used and abused by corporations for less than a living wage we can then see about me being outraged that some 1%er was called a Democratic Corporate Whore.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
35. Yep. Because elections in the US are actually IQ tests
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:15 AM
Apr 2016

And often, we FAIL. This is one reason it happens.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
46. also, if people were not working a million hours
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:18 AM
Apr 2016

just to get by in this rigged economy we might have fewer low info voters.

but the oligarchy does NOT want an informed public.

-none

(1,884 posts)
75. I never thought of that.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:27 PM
Apr 2016

But you are correct. Absolutely correct. Elections ARE IQ tests. One either sees the actual issues and can think for themselves, or one waits for the talking points to decide on which side of the issue they are supposed to be on.
Bernie is campaigning on the issues. That is why he is in the race in the first place - The issues that are keeping people down. Pay down. Interest rates down. Job prospects down.
Or ignore the issues and use talking points, which makes it easier to control your unthinking followers, even when the next talking point contradicts the last one... Camp Weather Vane is an apt label.
A reasonably high IQ, using logic and critical thinking on the issues requires thinking for oneself. Blindly following someone's talking points short circuits doing that. Talking points are a conservative trait and should not have much following in Liberal or Progressive thinking.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
36. The last thing Hillary supporters want to do is discuss Hillary stances on important
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 10:16 AM
Apr 2016

issues like marijuana legalization, fracking, etc etc etc.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
44. thats the thing. when one has no positions to stand on,
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:17 AM
Apr 2016

deflect, destract, and denigrate is the only strategic option.

how sad for our country.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
48. Notice...Hillary camp is just a long series of Faux Outrages because
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:19 AM
Apr 2016

THEY CANNOT TALK ABOUT ISSUES. This is how they attempt to control the discussion. Don't give them the time of day. Stick to discussing real issues, and don't waste any of your time responding to baseless accusations of Hillarians.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
51. Hey, I'll keep the screeching crows busy sparing over road kill
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:49 AM
Apr 2016

while you and the rest of the adults work on the important stuff.

Sound like a plan?

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
52. Princess Weathervane's campaign is all about distractions.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:50 AM
Apr 2016

Hillary appeals to low-information voters...it's as simple as that. The more you discover about her and her record, the less appealing she is (unless you're an oligarch).

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
53. Yes, the question is-
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 11:51 AM
Apr 2016

Is Hillary a quid pro quo politician who will favor corporate friendly legislation for campaign contributions, because it sure looks like it. It's too bad the speaker wasn't elegant and refined enough for the delicate sensibilities of some.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
56. By "are going to let", I think you meant "desperately need".
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:01 PM
Apr 2016

The thing that is most prominent about Clinton campaign issues d'jour is the absolute contempt inherent in their appraisal of the intelligence of the people likely to be swayed by it.

Not issues, just flung monkey-shit.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
57. Of course it won't distract anyone.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:02 PM
Apr 2016

Certainly not the die hard Clinton fans and certainly not the huge numbers of people who support Bernie Sanders. I listened to the speech that Paul Song gave and anyone who did knows he gave a great speech. Anyone who heard the context in which he used the term "Democratic corporate whore" also knows that the corporate media is spinning this as they spin everything else. It's a tempest in a tea pot.

desmiller

(747 posts)
59. I'm far from distracted by this.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 12:38 PM
Apr 2016

Trial Lawyer Hall of Famer, Mike Papantonio, has been calling corporate shills and other shilling types "whores" as long as I can remember.

Here's an example:

skip to 12:30 and watch it to the end


Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
83. They tried to make it work on twitter but just like every other meme
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:39 PM
Apr 2016

Camp Weather-vane starts that got hijacked too. #DemocraticWhores taken over by Bernie people. Of course people will think Bernie supporters started it, but that isn't how it started at all.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
90. Personally,
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:09 PM
Apr 2016

I'm having a ball on Twitter this primary season. People are far more politically saavy and completely aware of the fabricated memes and intentional misquotes from the Hillary campaign than you would even garner from reading posts here on DU.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
100. Yeah
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:49 PM
Apr 2016

I have had my account since 2010 and barely used it til now. I try to stop by daily to read what people I follow post.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
109. Same here pretty much.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:37 PM
Apr 2016

Long time with an account and yet probably 80% of my posts have been since Bernie announced. I usually have a tab here on DU open, but mostly peruse Twitter. Don't have a FB account but I hear the pro-Bernie activity there is quite good as well.

QC

(26,371 posts)
73. The very *purpose* of the whore stuff is to distract us from issues.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:11 PM
Apr 2016

Honestly, has any campaign ever been as determined to avoid all discussion of issues as this one?

It's something right out of the Reagan years, with all that "morning in America" sentimentality and absolutely nothing about real people and their lives.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
79. And the dangling coversation
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:33 PM
Apr 2016
And we note our place with bookmarkers
That measure what we've lost.
Like a poem poorly written
We are verses out of rhythm,
Couplets out of rhyme,
In syncopated time
And the dangled conversation
And the superficial sighs,
Are the borders of our lives.
 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
89. Yes! Because I already got two converts in my dorm from the use of this word...and working
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 02:49 PM
Apr 2016

on more. For women, this has been the most eye-opening statement from Sanders's side so far. Besides, going to college in NYC, many of us were at the rally, and heard how the crowd was turned on by that comment. There was certainly no qualms about going very dirty from the people near us last night.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
93. Bernie!?!?!? Is this you!?! You're usually trying to minimize bias issues as "distractions" but I...
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:25 PM
Apr 2016

... didn't think you'd do such on DU.

Hey, when you gonna quit and join the part?!?!

thx man for running

treestar

(82,383 posts)
94. Well I don't think Bernie
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:26 PM
Apr 2016

Should get passes that Hillary doesn't. There are even more silly things held against her.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
97. Sing it with me!
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 03:29 PM
Apr 2016
All the girls are monsters.
All the boys are whores.
So when you lose the one you love,
There's always plenty more.



[hr][font color="blue"][center]Don't ever underestimate the long-term effects of a good night's sleep.[/center][/font][hr]

longship

(40,416 posts)
102. Nope. I maintain that Hillary Clinton has sold her soul to the devil.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:13 PM
Apr 2016

Forget the corporate whore claim. It's worse than that.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
103. Nope, it's a non-issue and review mirror.
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:14 PM
Apr 2016

I'm trashing every thread using it as a criticism, so they're out of my way. Poof! all gone.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
104. Well, we certainly are if people, like you for instance, keep posting about it. DUH!
Thu Apr 14, 2016, 04:16 PM
Apr 2016

Are you secretly a Hillary supporter with a Bernie logo just to confuse?
If you think this distracts, why are YOU posting about it?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
113. I think it IS an issue.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 07:11 PM
Apr 2016

I think this kind of attack is an issue, IMO.

So is Bernie's dismissal of black voters in the south.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»so we are seriously going...