2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'm not apologizing for shit
3 reasons
1) I wasn't the guy who said it.
2) In the context of our corrupt political environment, I have no problem with the term.
3) I support Bernie, but he doesn't set my standards.
onehandle
(51,122 posts)The 'Not Hillary' Party is Berning out.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Response to onehandle (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Well done.
Viva_La_Revolution
(28,791 posts)I've tried to ignore it, but i'm also curious. Why?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)That term was coin here for over a decade. I suppose when you don't have anything you can still have 'outrage' over a word that was fine until yesterday.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)The corporate soul and orifice salesmanship of the Democratic party has to end.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)the sorry asses over there are feeling sorry for themselves.
I'm sorry. It needed saying.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)JEB
(4,748 posts)We workers are the ones getting screwed.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Babel_17
(5,400 posts)or the wikipedia entry, would be the guide as to meaning.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sugar-daddy
a wealthy, middle-aged man who spends freely on a young woman in return for her companionship or intimacy.
Zarif arrived in Moscow to expand cooperation with Russia and pay homage to his sugar daddy for making all of this possible.
How Iran, Putin and Assad Outwitted America
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sugar_daddy
Going to urban dictionary is going to give a certain kind of result, if the query offers any kind of naughty potential. Oh well, his house, his rules.
jillan
(39,451 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Autumn
(45,107 posts)I don't apologize for the truth.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)elana i am
(814 posts)she couldn't possibly be any more of a corporate whore. and that is true for many dems these days i'm sure.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)The whole thing is utter nonsense.
Marr
(20,317 posts)It's all bullshit with them-- just deceitful attacks separated by attempts to play the victim. It's just a game of scoring points for them.
demwing
(16,916 posts)why apologize? No one is REALLY offended, it's just a ridiculous, fraudulent game, designed to depress Bernie's support.
We're supposed to apologize to frauds?
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)If she's so proud of currying favor with corporations and being paid on a hush-money scale for it, then she should wear the term for it proudly too.
It isn't as if by rejecting that plain-spoken clear term, people suddenly forget what she is and does. It doesn't make the slightest bit of difference. This pseudo-fuss is only a way to deflect the issue of her conduct away from her and onto those who are objecting to it.
That really doesn't fly, most people are sharp enough to see that for what it is: yet another dishonest gaslighting maneuver.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...phrase used lots and lots of times on DU.
Why is it suddenly an issue now?
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)needed something to replace Vaticangate.
Response to whatchamacallit (Reply #24)
ChisolmTrailDem This message was self-deleted by its author.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)anotherproletariat
(1,446 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)"proletariat"?
Autumn
(45,107 posts)VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Corporate whore politicians and their corporate johns are what's wrong with pour political system, period...no amount of transparently phony butthurt is going to change that.
laruemtt
(3,992 posts)by inept decision-making that results in the deaths of tens of thousands.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Yeah, we know about Hillteam standards.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Fuck apologies for true statements taken in the context they were intended to be taken in.