2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumNo pope meeting, let alone photo op, for Bernie.
http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/04/14/bernie-sanders-itinerary-in-rome-will-not-include-pope-francis-visit/?_r=0In a routine briefing with reporters in the Vatican press office on Thursday, the spokesman, the Rev. Federico Lombardi, was asked if the pope would meet with academics and politicians, including Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who are participating in a Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences conference on Friday.
There wont be a meeting with the Holy Father, Father Lombardi said.
A papal encounter was always going to be a long shot for Mr. Sanders, whose trip is not on an official visit to the Holy See. The politician was never scheduled to have an audience with Pope Francis, and the conference is not exactly the high-level meeting that the Sanders campaign billed it as in its news release about the trip. But as recently as Wednesday, Mr. Sanders was still hopeful for a face-to-face with the pontiff.
Brilliant move.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)The pope, who made a brief trip to Greece on Saturday to visit a refugee camp, spoke to reporters on the plane home about his encounter with the American politician. "When I came down, I greeted him, I shook his hand and nothing more. This is called good manners and it is not getting involved in politics," the pope said, according to Reuters. "If anyone thinks that greeting someone is getting involved in politics, I recommend that he look for a psychiatrist," he said, laughing.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/04/16/bernie-sanders-met-pope-francis/83118290/
While you are correct, he did not have a scheduled meeting with the Pope, he did get to meet the Pope. So, both sides are right and both sides are wrong.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)The Vatican doesn't endorse political candidates.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Gosh, lies on the Pope
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)would be very damaging to the church in not just our nation but many around the planet. It will not happen.
rock
(13,218 posts)is being sarcastic.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)But we Sanders supporters are, understandably, really thrilled for the tacit and implied endorsement of the Senator's ability to contribute to the discussion.
And that is an endorsement, but not one directly related to the primary or general election.
rock
(13,218 posts)in fact, make a really really big whoop-dee-doo about it! You'd have thought it was the second coming of Christ!
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)The Second Coming simply can't happen this month, I still have to get my tomato seedlings in the ground.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Is this a troll post?
pangaia
(24,324 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)His fundraising emails have claimed that Pope Francis is "feeling the Bern."
Blatant pander to Catholic voters blatantly failed.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Ever. Why would he? This visit became political instantly, so he's simply ignoring it altogether, which is an appropriate response.
Bernie's remarks will be heard by about 30 people, most of them clerics. It's a private meeting. I still don't understand the attraction this has for a candidate right before one of the most important primaries.
I really wonder how much press coverage it will even generate. I guess we'll find out.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)that.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I suppose the thinking was that this Vatican visit would influence Catholic voters in New York. That seems doubtful to me, really. I suppose we'll see on Tuesday night or Wednesday morning next week.
I'm going to be interested in how much press coverage this jaunt receives and how the event is characterized in the media once it happens.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Probably not a surprise to Sanders either. I don't think he was going for the photo op.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)demmiblue
(36,865 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)were because people "didn't care." They cared plenty until it turned out to be a clusterfuck. Now you all want to pretend it never mattered. Even if it didn't involve the Pope, the guy is leaving the country right before the NY make or break primary. That communicates the message that he knows he's going to lose NY. That and of course his campaign manager is talking about contesting the convention, which obviously means he doesn't have a prayer of catching up with Clinton's delegate leader. So now we are left with a candidate who thinks it acceptable to seize power against the electoral will of the people.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)...and if he "loses" the debate (say, an inartful comment about Hillary Clinton), he can't clean up the problem.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)brooklynite
(94,598 posts)...and even if there is, he doesn't have a window of time until maybe late Friday night, when he's probably tired and not in the best shape to deal with political issues.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)You are willfully ignorant.
Sad, that. Although some claim that ignorance is bliss.
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)For the bulk of the electorate, most of what goes in in between the actual primary days in any state is all white noise.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Of course the pope doesn't want to interfere with American elections. The notion that he would is absurd.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Last edited Thu Apr 14, 2016, 01:58 PM - Edit history (1)
He's still stonewalling on his taxes.
Let's see. It's Thursday. That must mean being rich is bad again. Of course when I posted about the hypocrisy of Susan Sarandon calling for revolution while owning 6 multimillion dollar homes, I was accused of demonizing the rich. The infinite elasticity of supposed causes are truly a marvel.
How long until the next post about one of Bernie's army of 1 percenters telling Americans telling Americans how to vote or insulting citizens who don't vote as instructed?
Armstead
(47,803 posts)2014 family Income: $28 million
Estimated family net worth: $110 million
The early years: For nearly two decades, Hillary Clinton served as half of a variation of the the Wives of Wall Street model, working as a lawyer in Little Rock and serving on corporate boards (Walmart, TCBY, LaFarge Corp.) as husband Bill Clinton served in low-paying positions like Governor of Arkansas (1991 salary: $35,000). In 1991, when Bill Clinton launched his presidential campaign, Hillary earned about $60,000 from her board seats and $110,000 from her work as a lawyer. Hillary Clinton also made highly controversial six-figure profits on commodity trading.
When Bill Clintons tenure as president ended, the two swapped roles seamlessly. Ex-President Clinton hit the speaking circuit and wrote a big-bucks memoir, and Hillary ran (successfully) for the Senate in both 2000 and 2006. (The job paid $145,000.) Hillary managed to get an $8 million advance for the first memoir, Living History, which she wrote and published while serving in the Senate. After unsuccessfully competing for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008, she moved from the Senate to Secretary of State (2009 salary: $186,000).
The cash allowed the couple to maintain a lovely home in the Chappaqua, New York (Zillow estimates its worth $1.8 million), and a far more sumptuous mansion in Washington, D.C, (Zestimate: nearly $6 million).
Few people resent politicians who make lots of money from selling memoirs, or starting a business. But the Clintons particular businessgetting paid a multiple of the typical American familys annual income for a 40-minute speechraises some appearance problems. Its hard to come across as a credible critic of Wall Street when your bed is feathered with six-figure speaking payments to investment banks and private equity firms.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Perrier anyone?
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)He's unlikely to encounter Perrier in Rome.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Because it's available in California I mean.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)think
(11,641 posts)global poverty.
I understand some people care more about photo ops than discussing global poverty but some people actually care about making the world a better place for people to live in.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)when it comes to these issues.
his campaign hyped this as a meeting with the Pope, he even said it would be a meeting with the Pope on live television.
think
(11,641 posts)just word games for their own amusement...
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)...rather than a conference that's intended to achieve something?
think
(11,641 posts)brooklynite
(94,598 posts)CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)to attend this conference.
They are also honored to have Bernie there, as well. The Vatican issued a press release about the conference, listing Bernie as the first name mentioned in their list of participants--in the first paragraph of the press release.
"We're delighted to host this conference to celebrate the 25th anniversary of Centesimus Annus, bringing together world leaders, including U.S Senator Sanders."
I am proud of Senator Sanders for getting the invite, and for attending this prestigious conference where he will have the opportunity to discuss important issues such as poverty, income inequality and social justice.
All of his supporters should be very proud.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)All the way to Italy in the middle of a do or die primary for a 10 minute speech to 30 academics and no meeting with the Pope.
Still say if I were him, I'd cancel and fire whoever got me into this. This is political insanity.
still_one
(92,219 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)incorrect. So yes, that post was sarcasm, because there was no planned meeting with the Pope
basselope
(2,565 posts)In fact, everything in the interview turned out to be factually true.
He was invited by the Vatican
and
He met the Pope.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)At last!
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)They still floating this lead balloon?
polly7
(20,582 posts)He'll have lots of opportunities when he's President.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)he was invited by the Pope for a meeting with the Pope.
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I thought the purpose of the trip was to attend the conference, not show up for a photo op.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Why did he lie about being a speaker?
His surrogate had to retroactively insert Sanders into the schedule.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)meeting with the Pope?
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Nope.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Aww...I thought Bernie was going to meet the Pope and have a great photo op and a sparrow would descend out of a cloud and land on Bernie's shoulder while a rainbow magically appeared behind him and...unicorns?
Guess not.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I wonder why. No speakers fees? No "contributions" foreseen? Not interested what she might say?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)What I do care about is integrity. BS speaks about it constantly, but is not honesty about it. Why not just say "Jeffrey Sachs was able to get me into a conference sponsored by the Vatican and HOPEFULLY I will get a chance to meet the Pope".
Huh
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Get over this stupid shit already.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I admit, it seems more likely that he follows through now than it did a few days ago. but they seem to finally have taken no for an answer from the pope.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He's still going to speak at a conference on inequality and greed, while Her Majesty will be sucking at the golden teet.
CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)You know, Congress!
PufPuf23
(8,791 posts)because of the flood of negativity from the Clinton campaign.
The Pope and the Vatican was put in the position of avoiding Sander's visit regardless of the original intent or what may have happened less formally.
Sanders may not have fully known what was involved - visit with Pope or not - but was relying on what he had been told in initial statements by advisors or Jeffrey Sachs; I do not believe he meant to deceive and was genuine in desire because the current Pope is more supportive of social justice than other recent Popes.
One could assume that the affair is an embarrassment to the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences and has placed a cloud on their conference.
The trip could have been a positive but some had to deliberately make it negative. Sad.
kennetha
(3,666 posts)PufPuf23
(8,791 posts)You must have learned that from David Brock the professional.
Seeinghope
(786 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)A small meeting of scholars has now become Sanders meeting with world leaders, since he can no longer promote it a meeting with the Pope. Still not true.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)And a rec.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)are not getting meetings with them.
Desperate stunt backfired.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)On Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:02 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
Nostra-fucking-domas. Tell me some more, please.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1754719
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Unnecessary vitriol.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:10 AM, and the Jury voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Most of DU is unecessary vitriol; there's nothing especially egregious about this one.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Way beyond civil or decent. Hide.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Yes, the poster misspelled "Nostra-fucking-damus", but it's not alert-worthy.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Please tell us what "necessary vitriol" would look like. Lighten up, Francis.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)No meeting, no photo, no endorsement, in fact no record except for witnesses, but whatever transpired allows Sanders to get what he thought he needed, i.e. bragging rights. The benefit remains to be seen, but it was a bold campaign maneuver, and Francis would have to be a cold-hearted ass to brush him off altogether. Basically Bernie came to Rome to kiss the ring, like many a prince and potentate before him, and the opportunity presented itself or more likely was arranged, so Francis split the baby so to speak without injecting himself into the election.
I worry though because these are dangerous waters for the first Jesuit pope and if it were up to me I would have made sure the opportunity did NOT arise. But who am I as Peter Lorre says in Casablanca LOL.
JCanete
(5,272 posts)your interpretation seems pretty even handed. Thanks for that.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)You watching Rangers?!
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Original post)
Post removed