Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSander's Stance on Big Banks Endorsed By Warren As She Shuts Down Krugman's Big Bank NONSENSE!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/elizabeth-warren-big-banks_us_570ea9d6e4b03d8b7b9f52aaElizabeth Warren Has Basically Had It With Paul Krugmans Big Bank Nonsense
WASHINGTON Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) appeared to offer a thinly veiled rebuke of liberal economist Paul Krugman on Wednesday by highlighting a scary too-big-to-fail ruling from federal bank regulators.
The Federal Reserve and the FDIC said Wednesday that five of the biggest banks in the country cannot credibly be unwound safely without bailout money from taxpayers.
This announcement is a very big deal. Its scary, Warren said in a written statement. After an extensive, multi-year review process, federal regulators concluded that five of the countrys biggest banks are still literally too big to fail. They officially determined that five U.S. banks are large enough that any one of them could crash the economy again if they started to fail and were not bailed out.
The banks Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, State Street and Bank of New York Mellon were all given until Oct. 1 to present more credible plans for how theyd enter bankruptcy, or face penalties from regulators. If they continue to fail to present credible living wills, regulators will eventually be required to break them up.
But Warren directed her sharpest words at an unnamed set of people who have recently downplayed the role of big banks in the financial crisis and questioned the value of breaking up big banks an apparent reference to the Nobel Prize-winning Krugman.
Theres been a lot of revisionist history floating around lately that the Too Big to Fail banks werent really responsible for the financial crisis, Warren said. That talk isnt new. Wall Street lobbyists have tried to deflect blame for years. But the claim is absolutely untrue.
The Federal Reserve and the FDIC said Wednesday that five of the biggest banks in the country cannot credibly be unwound safely without bailout money from taxpayers.
This announcement is a very big deal. Its scary, Warren said in a written statement. After an extensive, multi-year review process, federal regulators concluded that five of the countrys biggest banks are still literally too big to fail. They officially determined that five U.S. banks are large enough that any one of them could crash the economy again if they started to fail and were not bailed out.
The banks Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase, State Street and Bank of New York Mellon were all given until Oct. 1 to present more credible plans for how theyd enter bankruptcy, or face penalties from regulators. If they continue to fail to present credible living wills, regulators will eventually be required to break them up.
But Warren directed her sharpest words at an unnamed set of people who have recently downplayed the role of big banks in the financial crisis and questioned the value of breaking up big banks an apparent reference to the Nobel Prize-winning Krugman.
Theres been a lot of revisionist history floating around lately that the Too Big to Fail banks werent really responsible for the financial crisis, Warren said. That talk isnt new. Wall Street lobbyists have tried to deflect blame for years. But the claim is absolutely untrue.
I think we all know who those unnamed people are who've been downplaying the role of big banks in the Financial Crisis!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 647 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (33)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sander's Stance on Big Banks Endorsed By Warren As She Shuts Down Krugman's Big Bank NONSENSE! (Original Post)
berni_mccoy
Apr 2016
OP
It's clear she was calling him a revisionist as her statement was in reference to his latest
berni_mccoy
Apr 2016
#4
The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2016
#11
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)1. knr
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)2. Actually, she never mentioned Krugman.
berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)4. It's clear she was calling him a revisionist as her statement was in reference to his latest
Article claiming the banks weren't big enough to cause a problem.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)3. K & R
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)5. I've got a simple way to break up the TBTF banks
Draft and pass legislation that mandates that the CEO, CFO and every member of the bank's Board of Directors will be charged with and go to trial for gross negligence should their bank have to be bailed out, with a mandatory minimum sentence of 20 years in federal prison and a fine of $10 million or their last 5 years of total compensation, whichever is most, if found guilty. The TBTF banks would immediately start breaking themselves up.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)8. pass such legislation? u said "simple" lololol
Never in a hundred million years.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)6. "eventually be required to break them up"--Not if Hillary gets elected
Hillary and the Wall Street types she intends to appoint to the cabinet & federal agencies have NO intention of breaking up no banks.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)7. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, berni_mccoy.
Thanks for posting
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)10. K N R-ed
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)11. The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later
The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks. Lord Acton