2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumShould Bernie have stood strong on Whore-gate? Was it cowardly of him to apologize?
I have seen a lot of defense on this board of what was said last night. If it was a-ok, why did Senator Sanders feel the need to apologize?
Dem2
(8,168 posts)jmg257
(11,996 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)If this is an actual serious response then let me humor you. As most of us said the word and meaning had nothing to do with the faux outrage by the HRC clan, but the usage of the word even though it was clearly directed at the entity of the house and senate , was a poor choice since the word by itself is a loaded word. It was too crass, and should not have been used in my opinion. But people can get offended by it so best to steer away from it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I'd call it trolling but that will bring out the pearl-clutchers too.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)for the actions of another. It is a breath of fresh air to experience.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)elana i am
(814 posts)that said, no i did not agree with him.
i don't think calling corporate whores corporate whores is the least bit offensive and there was nothing for paul song to apologize for.
what else do you call someone who can be bribed with money to do a corporate master's bidding? the truth is ugly, and i think corporate whore is a good word for the ugly truth.
astrophuss42
(290 posts)This is a huge issue.
I see what you did there
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Christ the disinterest in anything beyond inane word games is stunning.
Freddie Stubbs
(29,853 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Your OP has zero to do with words mattering. It's about stirring pots, nothing else.
merrily
(45,251 posts)to Bernie's?
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)You know this, but you're pretending to be obtuse. You failed.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)will change as long as big money owns our government.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)the Clintonites try to echo the distraction in the corporate media echo chamber, thus overwhelming any actual conversation on the issues.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)If I am going to complain about CP time based on the fact that there are many people who would feel devalued, I am going to be consistent.
That wording can reasonably be interpreted as sexist. It was a pretty sickening display, and I'm glad Bernie has the courage to apologize.
JSup
(740 posts)...for your effort at consistency; it can be hard to not rationalize your way into defending those you support.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Right or wrong, it's in the past.
Like if Hillary released those transcripts, good or bad, it's done. You can get mad about what she said but that scab will heal. But when she doesn't. it will keep coming up over and over and that gets annoying to people, they really start to wonder why she doesn't release them. It makes it a bigger issue, they can imagine anything in their minds.
Buttons3345
(39 posts)IMO
It was uncalled for. Bernie doesn't want to act like the Republicans. He and Hillary want to deal with the issues. Name calling whether it was directed at her or not is wrong.
I think it was very honorable of him.
It is okay to have your opinion about things, but when you have to get nasty then it is just very sad. Fighting on here is not helping support your candidate.
polichick
(37,152 posts)again that she could always release the transcripts - so, ahem, nobody gets the wrong idea.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Really send his numbers with women through the floor. Go for it! Throw that word and all the other ones you claim mean nothing around, folks!
Broward
(1,976 posts)the lives of most Americans. Bernie had nothing to apologize for.
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)I'm sure he agreed 100% with the whore statement, but knew it would hurt him politically, especially in NYC. If he had really been outraged, he wouldn't have waited so long to object. Took him awhile to get the temperature of the electorate.
Renew Deal
(81,863 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)IamMab
(1,359 posts)Calling a statement "inappropriate" is not the same as apologizing that his surrogate made the statement in the first place. He's getting credit were it's not due.