2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHow does Bernie woo super delegates after a speaker at his campaign event refers to them as whores?
This is a very interesting situation.
Bernie has been trying to get Democratic super delegates to spurn Hillary and support him:
http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-superdelegates-dnc-voters-switch-sides
Paul Song now says he was referring to members of Congress and not Hillary as "corporate Democratic whores".
The problem is that many of those "corporate Democratic whores" are super delegates.
It's going to be harder for Bernie to woo those super delegates IMO.
msongs
(67,420 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)him when he wins. That's what they do. Whoever the people clamber for, they will support because they have to live in the same towns and cities with the rest of it.
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)like hell to keep the current corruption system in place.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)Dawgs
(14,755 posts)And, he apologized for it.
Is Hillary responsible for all the stupid shit her supporters say?
JudyM
(29,251 posts)Rather than SSDD, with her it's DSDD.
She is so slippery she gives lawyers a bad name.
Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)You just have to wait for the right "C.P." time to ask them.
apcalc
(4,465 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)but even that wouldn't be good enough for the jackals.
bluedigger
(17,086 posts)People that understand he can't be responsible for everything other people say?
As opposed to on line forum members, for instance?
Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
The Old Lie This message was self-deleted by its author.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)well it's a start
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Reading comprehension appears to be an issue here.
Bernie is the one who's trying to woo Hillary's super delegates.
Without the super delegates, Hillary still has a pledged delegate lead.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Chuckles, actually.
Bernie tries to woo super delegates and then a speaker at his campaign event refers to them as "corporate Democratic whores".
You couldn't make this stuff up.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Especially when you consider the fact that he's been trying to get them to switch from Hillary.
Why is this so difficult for you to understand?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)that's why it makes no sense for a speaker at Bernie's event to call them "corporate Democratic whores".
It's going to make it tougher to court them.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)it is certainly true that she's not depending on the superdelegates to change the outcome of the voting
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)At the end of the voting, the candidate with a majority of pledged delegates will be the only one with a legitimate claim to the nomination.
If that turns out to be Sanders, congratulations he's the nominee.
If it's Clinton, she's the nominee.
Super delegates are not going to help Bernie Sanders steal our party's nomination. To even entertain that possibility requires a complete dissociation from reality.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)berni_mccoy
(23,018 posts)apnu
(8,758 posts)... I don't think it will hurt him.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Because you're sort of implicitly admitting that the super delegates are politicians who are taking corporate money and enacting policy accordingly.
That what was meant by the statement, and now here you are saying, "How will corporate whores take this?"
Which is hilarious.
Seriously. Think a post through once in awhile.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)They are part of the problem.
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)They'll never admit that they're corporate whores.
DesertRat
(27,995 posts)hellofromreddit
(1,182 posts)The very thing those whores all cry about.
mainer
(12,022 posts)Don't you have to be a corporate shill to qualify? How did we end up with a whole party of corporate sell-outs as super-delegates?
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)But maybe some of them will realize that Bernie is the only one that has been correct about this shit all along and decide to not be on the wrong side of history
edited to remove my incorrect crack about lying
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)I must have had a senior moment
I apologize for the 'lying' bit
floriduck
(2,262 posts)He'd kick Hill's ass and you could continue your worthless rants til the cows come home. And by the way for the third time, are you a paid poster? You seem to be so good at stirring up shit, I'd say you're a professional poster. C'mon, tell me.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Many states have "sore loser" laws where someone who lost the nomination for a party cannot throw a temper tantrum and run as an independent.
They prevent candidates from running in a party primary and then a general as a candidate not from that party.
Too bad for Bernie.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)w4rma
(31,700 posts)I consider the word "whore" to be genderless, but many don't. What would be a good genderless alternative?