>and Hillary would be a far less corporate president than any republican since IKE.
No, thats not true.
You don't know whats in the pipeline, (and whats already there.. but not much used - yet).
The things she's doing which have the most impact are related to existing and pending trade deals, and many will effect everybody's lives and have a substantial financial impact-
when you add them all up, I am 100% certain that the difference will likely be in the several hundreds of thousands of dollars- to each of us.
In many cases it would be the difference between having a job and not.
Many businesses that would likely thrive never get started because of the huge costs of health insurance, Also, the prices of many Rx drugs has been skyrocketing, something which will be made much worse by TPP, which likely will be passed during the lame duck session.,
Why is he US pushing private (and why are we pushing backroom policy which globally opposes a right to to public education, and especially, trades away services - and service jobs Thats a huge huge mistake on services - 70% of all jobs)
Public health care by the way, actually saves a huge amount of money. (if its not "optional". That super important. It cant be an afterthought, or a plan of last resort for sick poor people that requires impoverishment and unemployment first. (what competition policy would demand under Hillary so as not to "crowd out" commercial providers of those services.)
A high quality single payer health care alone would save each of us enough for each American to buy a house with the savings over their lifetime.
= new reply since forum marked as read
