Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:40 PM Apr 2016

Sanders made $205,271 in 2014 and only paid a tax rate of 13.5%. The average US worker pays 31.5%...

and makes far less than $205,271.

Funny how that works.

------

Sanders return shows federal tax rate of 13.5 percent in 2014

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders and his wife paid $27,653 in federal income taxes in 2014, an effective federal tax rate of 13.5 percent, according to their tax return released on Friday by his campaign.

Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont, and his wife, Jane, had income of $205,271, according to the tax return. They made charitable contributions totaling $8,350.

On Thursday night, in a debate in the New York City borough of Brooklyn, Sanders promised to release his tax returns after his rival for the Democratic nomination, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, raised the issue.

"You'll get them, yes," Sanders said. "They are very boring tax returns. No big money from speeches, no major investments. Unfortunately - unfortunately - I remain one of the poorer members of the United States Senate."

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-sanders-taxes-idUSKCN0XC2UF



----------------

110 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders made $205,271 in 2014 and only paid a tax rate of 13.5%. The average US worker pays 31.5%... (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 OP
He's working to change that. Join us bitter one. morningfog Apr 2016 #1
Yes join us bitter one... berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #2
He is a small fry class traitor. n/t Admiral Loinpresser Apr 2016 #3
Yes he is...I love "bitter one" angstlessk Apr 2016 #4
His big deduction was for the interest on his mortgage loan as I read it. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #5
Probably real estate taxes too. phleshdef Apr 2016 #41
Yep. He's in kind of a sweet spot. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2016 #98
He does not pay payroll taxes because he is over 70. JDPriestly Apr 2016 #103
Interesting. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #6
Me too CorkySt.Clair Apr 2016 #11
no - it is not funny - this is the system that hillary supports SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #15
NOW you're getting it! Come on in, the water's fine! nt jmg257 Apr 2016 #7
He's just like any other wealthy man ... NurseJackie Apr 2016 #13
Just like Hillary works Citizen United cuz she can? riderinthestorm Apr 2016 #25
Another dumb post, to dumb to ignore. Rich is short-lived in one's life, wealth passes generations TheBlackAdder Apr 2016 #26
Except he isn't wealthy AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #27
Well - not really, $220K combined income, a Mayor/Congressman/Senator since '81, and jmg257 Apr 2016 #29
Ha! :-D NurseJackie Apr 2016 #58
Do you think the tax rate should be higher for rich people? n/t noamnety Apr 2016 #33
Yes, I do think the tax rate should be higher for rich people... NancyDL Apr 2016 #82
... beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #8
You know their hearts sank when they didn't find the hidden millions. morningfog Apr 2016 #10
They'll just continue lying about his alleged offshore accounts and painting him as filthy rich. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #14
And then there's the Secret Israel Bribe theory from QC Apr 2016 #65
They've hinted at it here, they claim some of his foreign donations come from Israel. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #73
How long before we start hearing about those Elders of Zion? n/t QC Apr 2016 #94
Well there was an op citing a despicable anti-Semitic article from tomato bubble that was rec'd. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #97
The person who linked Stormfront said that she's Jewish QC Apr 2016 #100
GOOD ONE !!! pangaia Apr 2016 #53
Thats only federal income tax at 13 whats his total tax rate? Csainvestor Apr 2016 #9
The average American pays a 31.6% tax rate MADem Apr 2016 #12
Federal, state, local, property combined = 31.6% AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #30
Stop that. They confuse easily. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #37
Plus unmarried and zero kids krawhitham Apr 2016 #90
His effective tax rate would be 18.87% before deductions katsy Apr 2016 #76
You don't know what you are talking about kcjohn1 Apr 2016 #16
He made $205,271 and only gave $8,350 to charity? Wow! he sounds like a Republican! dubyadiprecession Apr 2016 #17
Just another politician. Not. Special. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #18
You mean like the avatar of Bernie you're using to mock him? Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #66
My avatar is The Lorax. What is your problem? Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #69
You're not funny, you are obvious as hell, like your candidate...deceptive. n/t Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #72
Your avatar is the capital building. Mine is The Lorax. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #77
You can pretend all you want, most people can see exactly what you're doing. Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #78
Okey dokey. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #79
Your OP is wrong because you failed to read or understand the links you posted. PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #19
17% is probably too high too, but it might depend on what you mean by average jfern Apr 2016 #24
I estimated by using the edge of a paper for a straight edge on a bar graph PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #32
The employer's share of social security was also included in the 31%... k8conant Apr 2016 #47
Correct; both employee and employer withholding for social security is part of the 31%. PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #57
BS Bobcat Apr 2016 #20
False, the average worker pays less than 31.5% in federal income taxes jfern Apr 2016 #21
Dirty trick they aren't including what bernie paid in state taxes. Csainvestor Apr 2016 #31
Or payroll taxes jfern Apr 2016 #34
Wait, you mean the op distorted the truth? I'm SHOCKED! beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #36
Ignorant or dishonest? QC Apr 2016 #46
And there won't be, it's intentional imo. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #49
"The average American"... krispos42 Apr 2016 #22
Does that 31% include FICA Csainvestor Apr 2016 #23
Romney Paid a Higher Tax Rate Than Bernie Haveadream Apr 2016 #28
Wow, nice of you to use net rather than adjusted gross income. revbones Apr 2016 #35
And he still released nothing about his investments. I bet his IRA has $ in big oil or Wall Street. anotherproletariat Apr 2016 #38
Ha ha ha! Senator salary of $174,000, a yearly pension of $5,000...Yeah he's rolling in it! jmg257 Apr 2016 #51
It's amusing... Corporate666 Apr 2016 #109
I still can't tell the Hillary supporters from a typical Republican. (nt) w4rma Apr 2016 #39
It's really ludicrous to go after Sanders on taxes Onlooker Apr 2016 #40
Nice argument about his taxes MattP Apr 2016 #42
What are you looking for anyway? I guess he's hoarding millions - right? snowy owl Apr 2016 #99
bogus enid602 Apr 2016 #43
I dont think he is releasing fake tax returns Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #70
Where ARE those TRANSCRIPTS? AzDar Apr 2016 #44
You're going to use that avatar of Bernie even though you know Jefferson23 Apr 2016 #45
What I find ironic, two decades of adult life not contributing in. Now, still contributing less. seabeyond Apr 2016 #48
Tens of thousands of dollars = NOT GOOD ENUFF BERMIE!!1! I WANNA SEE HIS BERTH CERTIFICAT!! beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #56
I want to see a man that is more than talk. He talks about ALL of us contributing, yet he doesn't. seabeyond Apr 2016 #59
Contributing thousands to charity = NOT GOOD ENUFF BERRRNY! beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #63
He is right there with Romney. seabeyond Apr 2016 #64
ZOMGWTFBBQ?!! WHERE DOES HE KEEP HIS DOG WHEN HE'S TRAVELLING TO THE SOVIET UNION??? beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #68
Ever notice how most Hillary talking points are also Republican talking points? QC Apr 2016 #85
I have, now that you mention it. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #86
And ever notice how we have to abandon every fundamental Democratic principle QC Apr 2016 #87
When I saw them defend her willingness to compromise on abortion I saw the light. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #88
And just imagine if Bernie had participated in a racist skit. QC Apr 2016 #89
Exactly, the way they laughed that off was chilling. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #91
In fact, pointing out antisemitism is worse than being an antisemite. QC Apr 2016 #93
Yes I do, the purge that many still insist never happened. beam me up scottie Apr 2016 #95
Purely coincidental, I am sure. QC Apr 2016 #96
so 13.5% on FED income tax return = not contributing Stargleamer Apr 2016 #107
Speakum sentence full? Mind me never--snargleblatt. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #104
Fail philosslayer Apr 2016 #50
Fail? Or LIE... dchill Apr 2016 #52
bernie's taxable income $140,994 paid $26,961 in fed taxes questionseverything Apr 2016 #54
Epic Fail! HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #55
gee I make 5 times less and my tax rate is higher than his. damn oligarchs nt msongs Apr 2016 #60
That (Not you) is just stupid. pangaia Apr 2016 #61
My 'income,' elleng Apr 2016 #62
First off matt819 Apr 2016 #67
Now that you know the difference between marginal tax rate lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #71
Future credibility implies there was credibility in the past. hobbit709 Apr 2016 #74
Way, way too late to start caring about credibility. QC Apr 2016 #84
Lol. this one never had any credibility. ibegurpard Apr 2016 #102
This is a Fistful of Fail frylock Apr 2016 #75
I've heard that Politicalboi Apr 2016 #80
Tax code favors the upper/middle class Cal Carpenter Apr 2016 #81
When talking about taxes it is helpful if people actually u deist and the difference between Nanjeanne Apr 2016 #83
The Truth Will Set You Free krawhitham Apr 2016 #92
ATTENTION EVERYONE WHO IS CONFUSED ABOUT THE "31.5% AVERAGE" TAX RATE!!! cheapdate Apr 2016 #101
That isn't especially interesting to me. David__77 Apr 2016 #105
Uggh. His comments last night really annoyed me! ecstatic Apr 2016 #106
So what? mgcgulfcoast Apr 2016 #108
KICK Cha Apr 2016 #110

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
5. His big deduction was for the interest on his mortgage loan as I read it.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:43 PM
Apr 2016

Also, he is in a bracket in which he pays less on his payroll taxes -- a lower percentage.

You are making an excellent argument for raising the cap on the payroll of Social Security taxes.

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
98. Yep. He's in kind of a sweet spot.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:35 PM
Apr 2016

No payroll tax on almost half his earnings and enough disposable income to carry a larger property tax, mortgage and charity burden.

The right wing clowns would be embarrassed at their own silly arguments if they had any concept.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
103. He does not pay payroll taxes because he is over 70.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:29 PM
Apr 2016

The right wing supports this tax system. But it is fair that a person who is supposed to be retired since he is over 70 does not pay payroll taxes.

He is very, very careful with money. He probably owes a lot on his house or houses.

Remember that he returns to Vermont nearly every weekend to be with his constituents. He probably eats out during the week, too, and that costs a lot of money.

Our members of Congress are well paid, but they incur a lot of expenses due to their work.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
25. Just like Hillary works Citizen United cuz she can?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:54 PM
Apr 2016

Look, you are nuts to not follow the laws as written for now while still advocating for change.

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
29. Well - not really, $220K combined income, a Mayor/Congressman/Senator since '81, and
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:57 PM
Apr 2016

only worth $500K now???

HE really isn't playing the system so well.

NancyDL

(140 posts)
82. Yes, I do think the tax rate should be higher for rich people...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:55 PM
Apr 2016

...and I think your taxpayers should get a LOT more bang for their bucks. I live in Canada where taxes are roughly the same. What do we get for that? Universal health care, good schools, good law enforcement, pretty good maintenance of roads and public buildings, reasonable bankruptcy laws, lower university tuition, etc.

We had a conservative government that tried to take all that away. We got rid of them. I hope you do the same.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
14. They'll just continue lying about his alleged offshore accounts and painting him as filthy rich.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:47 PM
Apr 2016

It's actually kind of sad that they're unable to recognize an honest politician.

Bernie's one of the poorest senators in Washington and who do they support? The person who made millions from corporations.


beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
73. They've hinted at it here, they claim some of his foreign donations come from Israel.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:36 PM
Apr 2016

As well as Russia, Cuba, China and elsewhere, it's just being funneled through citizens.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
97. Well there was an op citing a despicable anti-Semitic article from tomato bubble that was rec'd.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:34 PM
Apr 2016

There have been many links to anti-Semitic articles at right wing websites in fact. One person even linked to Stormfront in an attempt to associate a Jewish candidate with neo-Nazis. Still another called Bernie Israel's #1 shill, and an op that used and associated Bernie with the Yiddish n-word was also posted.

QC

(26,371 posts)
100. The person who linked Stormfront said that she's Jewish
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:36 PM
Apr 2016

when she was called on it.

(Of course, she also claimed to be an economist when she was called on her decidedly right wing economic pronouncements. On the Internet, I am Anastasia, Last of the Romanovs.)

Csainvestor

(388 posts)
9. Thats only federal income tax at 13 whats his total tax rate?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:44 PM
Apr 2016

Total tax rate will be much higher, do we really have to spell this out?

That 31% is total tax rate, federal, state, local, property combined, get it?

MADem

(135,425 posts)
12. The average American pays a 31.6% tax rate
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:47 PM
Apr 2016
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a group of 34 advanced economies, said the rate for childless workers in the United States is lower than in many other industrialized nations.

The 31.5 average is the 11th lowest rate among OECD countries, putting the U.S. just behind Canada and the United Kingdom. The average rate throughout the OECD is 36 percent, a figure driven up rates in Belgium (55.3 percent), Austria (49.4 percent), Germany (49.3 percent) and Hungary (49 percent).
Chile, New Zealand, Mexico and Israel had the lowest average rates for single workers among OECD countries. Roughly two-thirds of the OECD's members are in Europe, and emerging economies like Brazil, China and India aren't members.

The report, released on the eve of the IRS's filing deadline, comes as Republicans and Democrats remain divided over what to do about the top tax rate for individuals in the U.S.

Democrats have no desire to bring the top rate of 39.6 percent down, after it was raised by the "fiscal cliff" deal more than two years ago. Top Republicans want to slash that rate and have called the divide one of the larger obstacles to an overhaul of the tax code that doesn't focus just on businesses.



I guess the rich get richer....

katsy

(4,246 posts)
76. His effective tax rate would be 18.87% before deductions
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:42 PM
Apr 2016

Not 33%

Use a tax calculator and enter VT as residence

kcjohn1

(751 posts)
16. You don't know what you are talking about
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:48 PM
Apr 2016

Majority of Americans don't pay federal taxes (this is because they don't earn enough). Without any deductibles his maximum federal tax would be 20%.

What you are confusing is other taxes like state taxes which there is very little deductibles and everyone is forced to pay.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
66. You mean like the avatar of Bernie you're using to mock him?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:32 PM
Apr 2016

He is special enough to be appreciated as authentic and CONSISTENT
on income inequality. Consistent his entire career fighting against greed.

Your candidate is a pretender.

 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
69. My avatar is The Lorax. What is your problem?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:33 PM
Apr 2016

He wants income equality, but only suckers pay their whole tax burden.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
78. You can pretend all you want, most people can see exactly what you're doing.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:45 PM
Apr 2016

Disgusting that you're proud of it.

PufPuf23

(8,776 posts)
19. Your OP is wrong because you failed to read or understand the links you posted.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:51 PM
Apr 2016

The reported federal tax in the report for the 31% includes income tax plus tax withholding for social security.

The average federal income tax rate in the US is somewhat over 17%.

PufPuf23

(8,776 posts)
32. I estimated by using the edge of a paper for a straight edge on a bar graph
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:58 PM
Apr 2016

of a link in a link posted by the OP (as I thought the 31% was way off).

There was not the raw data but a graph of the raw data.

We get the idea.

The OP is wrong.

k8conant

(3,030 posts)
47. The employer's share of social security was also included in the 31%...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:16 PM
Apr 2016

is no one else even looking at the link?

And yes, about 17% for income tax rate for a single worker without children.

PufPuf23

(8,776 posts)
57. Correct; both employee and employer withholding for social security is part of the 31%.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:25 PM
Apr 2016

I don't think the OP was posted in good faith so why bother to understand?

sheeshh.

Bobcat

(246 posts)
20. BS
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:51 PM
Apr 2016

I call bullshit. First, the article references effective tax rates for singles. Sanders is married and no doubt has considerable deductions related to his employment. Effective tax rate is the rate paid on gross income AFTER deductions. Divide income tax paid into gross income and you get EFFECTIVE tax rate. My (an economics teacher) effective tax rate for the last 25 years has been in the teens. Also, we are told that half the country pays ZERO income tax. I'm having a hard time swallowing these numbers.

Csainvestor

(388 posts)
31. Dirty trick they aren't including what bernie paid in state taxes.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:58 PM
Apr 2016

Obama just released taxes and they added up all the taxes, not just federal income tax.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
49. And there won't be, it's intentional imo.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:18 PM
Apr 2016

This is just one of many, they're calling him cheap for not donating enough to charity while comparing his income to Hillary's.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
22. "The average American"...
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:53 PM
Apr 2016

Yeah, that needs to be defined.

Often what is done is they simply divide the total paid in taxes (for the country) by the number of taxpayers.

However, our income tax system is progressive, if not progressive enough. So higher earners pay a higher percentage.

The "average American" makes about $45k per year. Assuming taxable income is $30k, you're claiming he or she pays over 9 grand a year.

I made somewhat above average last year and paid less than that, single with one kid and no mortgage, medical, or education evidences to deduct.

So I think some of the anti-tax talking points are seeping into this conversation.

Csainvestor

(388 posts)
23. Does that 31% include FICA
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 08:53 PM
Apr 2016

Just curious if it does, or it doesn't.

Once again this is only federal income tax not, state tax not fica and not property tax.

You would have to add all of those up, to get the total tax rate.

 

revbones

(3,660 posts)
35. Wow, nice of you to use net rather than adjusted gross income.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:00 PM
Apr 2016

Good way to make it completely inaccurate. Oh but that's not what you or the Hillary campaign is going for is it?

 

anotherproletariat

(1,446 posts)
38. And he still released nothing about his investments. I bet his IRA has $ in big oil or Wall Street.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:04 PM
Apr 2016

The Clinton tax statement are much more thorough.

Either way, he is certainly not middle class. Heck, he's not even in the bottom 97%. Oh Bernie...I'm so disillusioned.

Corporate666

(587 posts)
109. It's amusing...
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 01:54 AM
Apr 2016

..that the definition of poor has been revised up to include someone with no kids earning over $200,000 a year.

I suspect that 99.999% of the people who don't have a problem with Sanders paying less than Romney does in taxes would have a MAJOR problem with someone earning over $200k a year and paying less than Romney being considered "poor" and would never defend such an individual.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
40. It's really ludicrous to go after Sanders on taxes
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:07 PM
Apr 2016

Whatever one thinks of Sanders, it's pretty obvious that he's never really focused on enriching himself. I suspect he'd still be a Senator even if the job paid $50k/year.

snowy owl

(2,145 posts)
99. What are you looking for anyway? I guess he's hoarding millions - right?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:36 PM
Apr 2016

What a bunch of fools on this thread.

enid602

(8,619 posts)
43. bogus
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:11 PM
Apr 2016

Used to work (moonlight) at H&R Block. The claim of $203k in income is bogus, as he made $200k in the Senate alone. He was over 70.5 years old, meaniing he HAS do take at least 5% of his almost $1mm 401 (k), or its government equivalent. Asumably he's drawing SS. Jane's $200k golden parachute was payable over a 4 year period. She may have earned a salary in 2014. $203k my ass!

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
70. I dont think he is releasing fake tax returns
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:34 PM
Apr 2016

After schedule A, personal exemption etc what he is claiming is realistic.

I trust Bearnies CPA's to get it right more than somebody who read one article and moonlights and HR Block.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
63. Contributing thousands to charity = NOT GOOD ENUFF BERRRNY!
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:31 PM
Apr 2016

Maybe he should set up a family foundation and funnel millions into it!



QC

(26,371 posts)
85. Ever notice how most Hillary talking points are also Republican talking points?
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:58 PM
Apr 2016

Free stuff, commies, lazy hippies, superpredators, damn kids, etc. It's all purely coincidental, I'm sure, but interesting nonetheless.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
86. I have, now that you mention it.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:02 PM
Apr 2016

At first I thought they were just defending the Clintons but it's become apparent that I was mistaken.

The increased use of rabid right wing talking points has convinced me that this hatred of Bernie and his supporters is based on something other than primary tribalism.

QC

(26,371 posts)
87. And ever notice how we have to abandon every fundamental Democratic principle
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:06 PM
Apr 2016

in order to support the Clintons?

First, we agree with the reasoning behind Citizens United, that big money doesn't corrupt politicians. And now, apparently, we are supposed to believe that progressive taxation is a bad thing.

Is there anything or anyone these people won't abandon in order to help Hillary get that ultimate résumé line?

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
88. When I saw them defend her willingness to compromise on abortion I saw the light.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:11 PM
Apr 2016

That's one thing I was sure that would unite us all, one thing that we could all agree on - no further restrictions on abortion. If Bernie had said that (or any other man for that matter) all hell would have broken loose.

No, there is nothing and no one they won't abandon.

QC

(26,371 posts)
89. And just imagine if Bernie had participated in a racist skit.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:14 PM
Apr 2016

The weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth would never end.

But then we're talking about a crowd that's willing to accept antisemitism if it comes from a member of their circle, so there's clearly nothing that can't be tactfully overlooked for the sake of Hillary.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
91. Exactly, the way they laughed that off was chilling.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:21 PM
Apr 2016

And you're right, a hateful anti-Semitic screed that was so offensive it made its way to FSTDT is being defended and shrugged off as though it was nothing.

If someone on our side had used hate speech against a minority group after smearing a member of that minority for months they would be driven off the site.

QC

(26,371 posts)
93. In fact, pointing out antisemitism is worse than being an antisemite.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:26 PM
Apr 2016

That's such twisted morality than I can't begin to comprehend it, but it's nothing new--we saw plenty of good, decent LGBT people banned for kicking back against homophobes who were allowed to torment them for years and are in most cases still members in good standing. Remember that? It was OK to *be* a homophobe, but to fight back against a homophobe was a bannable offense.

Pretzel ethics.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
95. Yes I do, the purge that many still insist never happened.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 10:28 PM
Apr 2016

And it's quite a coincidence that many of the players who engaged in and defended homophobia are now excusing anti-Semitism, isn't it?

Stargleamer

(1,989 posts)
107. so 13.5% on FED income tax return = not contributing
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 12:25 AM
Apr 2016

Also your "he talks about ALL of us contributing"--does not really characterizes his position, and I think you know that. His emphasis has always been on a much more progressive taxation rates, not on everyone contributing. He knows that many people don't pay any Federal Income tax because they're too poor to meet the threshold. Is he like going around saying this should be different, that they should pay something? No. You know that too.

If he paid just slightly less as a percentage than Romney, it wasn't through a taxation rate of his choosing. Obviously he wants Romney to pay much more, and I think he wants even people making the amount of money he does to pay more. Fox News has had wealthy progressives on their shows advocating a more progressive tax rate. One of the 1st things out of the mouths of Fox News Commentators, is well, do you make up the difference between what you are advocating for those in your class and what you legally owe by sending the Federal Government a check?? As if they don't they're being hypocrites when they are calling for a class action for all in their class. You could probably level the hypocrisy charge against a number of progressive politicians, such as Barbara Lee, if they don't make up the difference between what they are advocating and what they themselves are paying when it comes to taxes.

Also, as others have pointed out here, 13.5% doesn't really reflect all of Bernie's taxes paid. The 31.5% percent reflects both Federal, State, city, and other taxes. So who knows what the rate Bernie paid for all his taxes combined.

 

philosslayer

(3,076 posts)
50. Fail
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:19 PM
Apr 2016

No way in hell the average US worker pays 31.5% in Federal taxes. Especially when 45% of Americans pay NO Federal Income Taxes.

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
54. bernie's taxable income $140,994 paid $26,961 in fed taxes
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:23 PM
Apr 2016

clinton's taxable income ,same year 2014

$22,787,248. and paid $8,970,503. in fed taxes

so clinton's rate was about 39% and bernie's about 19%

since the clintons made 161 times as much money i am fine with their rate being higher

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
61. That (Not you) is just stupid.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:29 PM
Apr 2016

You seen to have zero idea what goes into a tax return, how the tax is calculated and why.

Do some research.

matt819

(10,749 posts)
67. First off
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:33 PM
Apr 2016

Whining about this is disingenuous. Depends on deductions.

And, as others have observed, to the extent that this is unfair, this is what Bernie is fighting for.

Also, it's not insignificant that Bernie's income is less than Hillary's pay for one speech.

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
71. Now that you know the difference between marginal tax rate
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:34 PM
Apr 2016

And effective... delete this bullshit.

Otherwise forfeit any future credibility.

QC

(26,371 posts)
84. Way, way too late to start caring about credibility.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:57 PM
Apr 2016

No point in shutting the barn door once the mule's already run away.

Cal Carpenter

(4,959 posts)
81. Tax code favors the upper/middle class
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:55 PM
Apr 2016

It primarily favors those with means and power. (And, in doing so, maintains their means and power.)

People of middle to upper middle income are most likely to have mortgages, property taxes, college expenses, business expenses, donations and tons of other things that can be written off.

It's fucked up. The working class and poor don't get shit. Even the opportunistic stimulus incentives like cash for clunkers only benefits people who are able to buy a new car. They need cash now, not write-offs in the next calendar year.

And don't even get me started on other regressive taxes like sales tax etc...

But that's not Bernie's fault and arguably he is working against that system. Aside from the charitable donations, he pretty much has to report all that stuff, the IRS knows most of it already anyway.

Nanjeanne

(4,960 posts)
83. When talking about taxes it is helpful if people actually u deist and the difference between
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

Marginal and effective tax rates. It's also helpful if people remember that we have progressive tax rates so if you are in, for example, the 35% tax bracket, you do t pay 35% on your entire income. You pay graduated percentages on each bracket, etc.

But that isn't as jazzy as a stupid OMG he paid 13.5%. It's much easier to post something you haven't a clue about.

Here is a link that spells out things very simply with examples and everything. Might help if someone really is interested in how taxes work. http://cawidgets.morningstar.ca/ArticleTemplate/ArticleGL.aspx?id=701059&culture=en-CA

cheapdate

(3,811 posts)
101. ATTENTION EVERYONE WHO IS CONFUSED ABOUT THE "31.5% AVERAGE" TAX RATE!!!
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:06 PM
Apr 2016

I'd like to make this more confusing.

The figure of "31.5%" reported in The Hill comes from an OECD report.

What this figure represents is the "tax wedge as a percent of the labor cost" and is described thusly by the OECD:

The tax wedge between total labour costs to the employer and the corresponding net take-home pay for average single workers without children


http://www.oecd.org/ctp/tax-policy/taxing-wages-tax-burden-trends-latest-year.htm

While it's not entirely clear what this means, it means something like the difference between what the employer pays for "labor cost" and what a single worker without children realizes for his or her take home pay.

Clear?

David__77

(23,402 posts)
105. That isn't especially interesting to me.
Fri Apr 15, 2016, 11:36 PM
Apr 2016

Nor, for that matter, is what rate other candidates are taxed at. I think there's nothing wrong in minimizing one's tax burden using any available, legal means to do so.

ecstatic

(32,704 posts)
106. Uggh. His comments last night really annoyed me!
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 12:00 AM
Apr 2016
"They are very boring tax returns. No big money from speeches"


Umm, sitting Congress members aren't allowed to give paid speeches. Next....

"No major investments.


OK, what were the minor investments?

Unfortunately - unfortunately - I remain one of the poorer members of the United States Senate."


What the hell is his point here? As a poli sci major, Bernie couldn't make additional money even if he wanted to. So that's a moot point. Is the fact that he didn't have additional skills and talents to make money outside of Congress supposed to make him superior somehow? Yes, Bernie, you are one of the poorer members of Congress, because your colleagues are lawyers, doctors, etc.-- they were successful before being elected to Congress.

It must be nice to make that much money for pretty much doing nothing.

Bernie's income lands him squarely in the top 1%. I too am amazed at how little he donated to charity.
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders made $205,271 in ...