Question: Should we as a Party nominate someone, namely Hillary Clinton, who is the current focus

[berniepdx420]

of an FBI criminal investigation ?

[delrem]

1. Why not?

Would that be worse than nominating someone who with her husband took in over $150million in bribes, for political favors, that being the only product they were in any position to sell?

How about nominating someone endorsed by Robert Kagan, and who in fact has the neocon Kagan family on payroll. They being people after her true heart.

I have to laugh at US politics, it is so fucking BAD, with nothing to redeem it but individuals like Sanders who dare to put their head above the barricades long enough to get it shot off. It is really, really, bad.

[berniepdx420]

2. +1

[w4rma]

3. We need to dump Hillary, now, before she takes us all down with her. (nt)

[RiverLover]

4. It's not a proud moment for the Democratic Party.

But then, establishment Dems have the morals of republicans.

[rjsquirrel]

5. Answer

Don't you ever get tired of self-righteous posturing?

It's not a criminal investigation. And she's hot getting indicted. And she's going to be president, your butthurt notwithstanding. She puts it away Tuesday. There will never be any indictment. That this is your finest hope says all I need to know about where you stand. And it tells me lots about your level of privilege.

I'm a former Bernie supporter. In New York. Because of people saying shit like this.

[uponit7771]

6. If it was genned up by stupid republicans? Hell yes, even a better reason she should be POTUS

[griffi94]

7. We as a party are about to nominate her

She's winning because Democrats support her.

Obviously not you personally but she's very popular with the Democratic party.
Much more so than Bernie.

Nothing you posted is new and yet Democrats are still
choosing Hillary and rejecting Bernie.

So there's your answer.

[Dawgs]

8. After winning back to the house and the senate...

The Republicans will immediately start impeachment hearings.