2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy is Bill Clinton trying to provoke Sanders supporters?
His "shooting every 3rd person on Wall Street" comment seems profoundly irresponsible so what are his motives.
He's also repeated this "joke" more than once. Strange since nobody thinks it's funny. Is he purposely trying to get people to respond back with comments that can be construed as threats against himself, his family, or others? Would they be above politicizing secret service arrests and use that to marginalize the Sanders or Democracy Spring Protests?
Food for thought.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)I think that there is no way that the Clintons could be doing this new stupid thing, but they do it.
Then I have another, more likely, theory: that the Clintons are actively trying to run progressives OUT of the Democratic Party and are trying to bring the neoconservatives INTO the Democratic Party.
I really, think that the Clintons have a visceral hatred towards the progressive voters that make up over half of the Democratic Party. They are users.
Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)n/t
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)The reason corporations donate so heavily to the a Third Way isn't to beat the GOP, it's to keep the populists from winning.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Don't exaggerate.
Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)Sky Masterson
(5,240 posts)He wants to find a Bernie "Dean Scream" and he figures the best way to do that is by provoking young voters to act out.
This is really sad and Bill does know better. He just doesn't give two shits
Myrina
(12,296 posts)He is trying to find a crack in Bernie's relatively calm personality. The Brooklyn debate showed Bernie has had it just about upto here with her shit & Bill is trying to push him over the edge.
But I think Bernie's 1960s Nonviolent Resistance training will serve him well, in the end.
Cheese Sandwich
(9,086 posts)You know how Bernie Sanders loves guns and hates Wall Street and talks about revolution and socialism? If he gets elected his supporters might murder a lot of stock brokers. Basically Bernie = Pol Pot.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)the same as Ronald Reagan was in his later years.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)A big difference is the situation with the wives. As I recall, Nancy was not pushing him into the public, but tried to protect him. OTOH, Bill is on campaign duty.
Bill back in the White House as the little dawg may not be a pretty set of events.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)nc4bo
(17,651 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Ridicule an argument that's actually not made by the opponent.
Now on it's face it seems that Mr Clinton's issue isn't that Wall Steeters are innocent. It's that 1/3 of them are guilty, and 1/3 of all Wall Streeters is too many to jail. It's a argument outside the law, just as being too big to fail isn't a feature of law, neither is being too numerous.
That's certainly not a criterion that Clinton himself applied in his work to establish the poor as a criminal underclass.
Vinca
(50,271 posts)The one thing the Clintons have in common is massive ego. If she wins, she's the headliner in the history books as the first woman to be elected and he's a footnote about cigars and blue dresses.
Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)Money has always been a big issue for them.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)Someone caught that on video. He was involved in a private conversation and didn't know he was being recorded.
That's going to hurt in Court.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)Democrats were so hungry for the Presidency after 20 of 24 years with Republican Presidents, and the Republicans went after him so hard, that most Democrats convinced themselves that Bill Clinton's economic bubble represented the triumph of Democratic politics. In hindsight, it became clear that he did a great deal to turn the party to the right, away from its legacy of FDR. He destroyed countless lives with his Welfare Reform bill, Crime bill and NAFTA. He helped create the corporate media with the Telecommunications Act. He fed the financial bubble and did the bidding of Wall Street by surrounding himself by people like Bob Rubin and Larry Summers and enacting the financial deregulation of Wall Street. And he disgraced himself and the office of the Presidency with the Monica Lewinsky scandal, with the corrupt wave of pardons as he departed office, and by his money grubbing behavior post Presidency that has included consorting with some of the most vile foreign despots in the world.
I think Bill Clinton's anger is less about Hillary having a tough primary race than it is about so many Democratic voters finally seeing him and his legacy clearly and repudiating him. Even Hillary tiptoes around Bill's record as President.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)and I think he is angry because he no longer draws the crowds he used to draw. He is basically jealous of Bernie because he is used to being the center of attention and now he's not.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Say something ... don't say something ... either way, they're going to be disgruntled.
Lone_Wolf
(1,603 posts)Or are those rose colored glasses Hillary gave you making you see things differently?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)... but having watch them for quite a few years now, it's clear that no matter what happens, they're angry.
The see no nuance. No complexity.
An event occurs, any event, and their hair immediately bursts into flames.
Outrage is always the goal.
I stopped taking them seriously a long time ago.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)... at you, then they fight you, then you win?
Looks like Bernie's in the hone stretch.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)so seems fair.
w4rma
(31,700 posts)As one of the last orders of business for a losing campaign, they recorded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet the names and deeds of members of Congress. They carefully noted who had endorsed Hillary, who had backed Obama, and who had stayed on the sidelinesstandard operating procedure for any high-end political organization. But the data went into much more nuanced detail. We wanted to have a record of who endorsed us and who didnt, a member of Hillarys campaign team said, and of those who endorsed us, who went the extra mile and who was just kind of there. And of those who didnt endorse us, those who understandably didnt endorse us because they are [Congressional Black Caucus] members or Illinois members. And then, of course, those who endorsed him but really should have been with her
that burned her.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/hillary-clinton-hit-list-102067
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)The Big Dog is pretty obviously suffering from declining faculties. If Hillary ends up in the Oval Office (*vomit*), it's going to be hard to watch his very public descent.
Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)The old moderate/DLC/third way hatred of people who live according to the principles they once had when they were young but no longer do.
TheDormouse
(1,168 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)it blinds them to the fact that most people on Wall Street are drones, eeking out a living: clerks, receptionists, computer operators, food industry people, janitors. Not everyone is a broker or CEO. Almost none in the industry are responsible for the bad management at the top.
And most of them suffered from the crash too. Layoffs, salary freezes, and outsourcing.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Thanks for that gem....lol
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)That really was a gem.
Like we don't know the difference in the lowly wage earners and those at the top stealing from all of us. SMH.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)A lying, cheating, back-stabbing asshole at that.