If you labor you should support Bernie because capital is funding Hillary

[Csainvestor]

Last edited Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:12 AM - Edit history (1)

Bernie makes his money from labor, he stands with Labor he defends labor, meanwhile Hillary is funded by capital she would be nowhere without capital.

Should we stand with Verizon workers, or with the CEO that makes 20 million a year, and is trying to Outsource their jobs.

Are you supposed to stand with the workers who have to beg for raises and sick days, or should we elect the person that takes money from the rich CEO that doesn't want to give you a raise, and wants you to lose your job because you make too much?

It's absolutely mind-boggling that people are voting against their best self-interest. A vote for Hillary is a vote for the rich CEO.

That ceo is always trying to outsouce your job, theceo wants to lower your benefits and doesn't want to give anyone a raise.


Workers are supporting the candidate funded by the rich and greedy Ceo?

[think]

1. Verizon paid Hillary $225,000 for a speech. They know what they paid for. Access...

[SusanCalvin]

2. Yep. That "name one thing" of hers gets so old.

She knows that's not the way it works, and so do I.

[panader0]

3. "Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital.

Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not
first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."
Abraham Lincoln