Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:55 AM Apr 2016

Barack Obama: Taking money from 1 percenters compromised my politics

http://boingboing.net/2016/04/15/barack-obama-taking-money-fro.html

From: The Audacity of Hope

And perhaps as the next race approaches, a voice within tells you that you don’t want to have to go through all the misery of raising all that money in small increments all over again. You realize that you no longer have the cachet you did as the upstart, the fresh face; you haven’t changed Washington, and you’ve made a lot of people unhappy with difficult votes. The path of least resistance — of fund-raisers organized by the special interests, the corporate PACs, and the top lobbying shops — starts to look awfully tempting, and if the opinions of these insiders don’t quite jibe with those you once held, you learn to rationalize the changes as a matter of realism, of compromise, of learning the ropes. The problems of ordinary people, the voices of the Rust Belt town or the dwindling heartland, become a distant echo rather than a palpable reality, abstractions to be managed rather than battles to be fought.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barack Obama: Taking money from 1 percenters compromised my politics (Original Post) TalkingDog Apr 2016 OP
Is this in reference to Sanders accepting a ride to Rome in a private jet... Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
No, but it is directly applicable to his opponent! reformist2 Apr 2016 #11
Right. I forgot about the the double standard thing. Thanks for reminding me. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #12
So do you think he would funnel money to the Church in exchange? artislife Apr 2016 #17
The Voice of Experience FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #2
this is almost perfect ibegurpard Apr 2016 #14
This is exactly why I support Bernie. Kentonio Apr 2016 #3
This was aimed at Hillary Clinton. The Clintons have amassed hundreds of millions given rhett o rick Apr 2016 #4
The Clintons are 1-%ers, comfortable with 1-%ers, and will change nothing. /nt NCjack Apr 2016 #5
Actually their amasses wealth puts them in the top 1% of the top 1%. And that doesn't rhett o rick Apr 2016 #9
Then why is he all but endorsing Clinton, who constantly tries to paint Obama as the same as her? Skwmom Apr 2016 #6
Rhetoric is one thing. Action is another. EndElectoral Apr 2016 #7
But he replaced Clinton with Kerry and Holder with Lynch... Both moves were positive. lostnfound Apr 2016 #10
yes, and Pres Obama did NOT personally profiteer from speaking fees amborin Apr 2016 #8
Has Obama released the transcripts from his many Goldman Sachs speeches? CentralCoaster Apr 2016 #13
I think the fact that he understands the degree to which it affected him means you are right. TalkingDog Apr 2016 #16
This is why Bernie Sanders supproters are the the Real Democrats in the Party. quantumjunkie Apr 2016 #15
 

Buzz Clik

(38,437 posts)
1. Is this in reference to Sanders accepting a ride to Rome in a private jet...
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:58 AM
Apr 2016

... and visiting the most ridiculously opulent places on the entire planet as a publicity stunt?

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
17. So do you think he would funnel money to the Church in exchange?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 12:54 PM
Apr 2016

Will he help them with their tax breaks? Oh, they don't need that help.

Funny, there is nothing Bernie can exchange with the Church by meeting the head of it. Unlike meeting with the CEOs of Wall Street.

 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
3. This is exactly why I support Bernie.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:59 AM
Apr 2016

After all those years in Congress and the Senate he still holds normal peoples problems and needs close to his heart. That's so incredibly rare at that level of politics.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
4. This was aimed at Hillary Clinton. The Clintons have amassed hundreds of millions given
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:10 AM
Apr 2016

to them from the Rich Fat Cats that expect quid pro quo. The Fat Cat investments will all be repaid many times over at the expense of the 99%.

It's not that the Rich Fat Cats hate us, they just want our wealth and resources. Those that die of poverty or lack of health care in the process, remember, it's not personal, it's just capitalism. Those that bow before Mammon like Clinton because she is tough, not because she is empathetic.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
9. Actually their amasses wealth puts them in the top 1% of the top 1%. And that doesn't
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:57 AM
Apr 2016

include their Clinton Foundation Retirement program.

Mammon

EndElectoral

(4,213 posts)
7. Rhetoric is one thing. Action is another.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:29 AM
Apr 2016

I was really dissapointed and knew something was wrong when Obama announced his major cabinet leaders.

Secretary of Treasury - Tim Geitner - President of the NY Fed.

http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2013/11/media-ignore-timothy-geithners-disastrous-leadership-ny-fed.html

“As president of the New York Fed in 2008, Mr. Geithner helped lead the federal government’s response to the financial crisis, including the sale of Bear Stearns and the bailout of the American International Group.”

The NY Fed, of course, was supposed to be the leading examiner and supervisor of many of the Nation’s largest banks and bank holding companies. Geithner was the top regional supervisor during the key years of the three epidemics of control fraud that drove the financial crisis and the NY Fed drew special criticism for its total failure as a supervisor during the crisis. Naturally, President Obama responded to his failures by promoting him. The NYT whitewashes Geithner’s role as the Fed’s top regional supervisor out of history. The fact that Geithner used AIG to secretly bail out some of the world’s largest banks (at the direct expense of the U.S. government) also disappears from the paper’s account.

Secretary of Defense - Robert Gates - "Bush's Sec. of Defense for God's sake."

Secretary of State - Hillary Clinton - 'She'll say anything and change nothing"

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/3/12/1500138/-Obama-2008-Campaign-Ad-She-ll-say-anything-and-change-nothing

Attorney General - Eric Holder - I've a boatload on his actions alone, but the three above really speak to judgment

I won't even go into the disaster Arne Duncan or Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel.

Obama is one of the most gifted orators I've ever seen, but his cabinet appointment actions negated a great deal of what he spoke of when elected. Rhetoric is easy. Actions however have real consequences.

lostnfound

(16,179 posts)
10. But he replaced Clinton with Kerry and Holder with Lynch... Both moves were positive.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:58 AM
Apr 2016

Jimmy Carter pointed out that the efforts at peace happened during the Kerry time, not under Clinton.
Lynch is still a little new but I have hope she will be stronger than Holder.
I still think Obama has done what he could, within the confines of "the system". If we can get Bernie elected, then there's a new force at work to influence the system, which is a consensus of the American public (including independents) on the need to separate corporate money from politics.

The American public needs to evolve, and by the looks of the youth voting preferences, they ARE evolving.

I also expect Obama to be like Jimmy Carter -- as a former president, he will show character and good values.

amborin

(16,631 posts)
8. yes, and Pres Obama did NOT personally profiteer from speaking fees
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 11:29 AM
Apr 2016

even though HRC has repeatedly tried to smear him by suggesting he did

he only got $$$$ from banks, corps, as campaign donations, NOT
speaking fees

and we can see that even these campaign donations probably had an impact; Elizabeth Warren lamented how there were so few prosecutions of the bad guys

so, one can imagine how the personal profiteering affects a politician's decisions....[

 

CentralCoaster

(1,163 posts)
13. Has Obama released the transcripts from his many Goldman Sachs speeches?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 12:01 PM
Apr 2016

I know, right?

Moral people wouldn't do what Hillary has done and Obama is NOT morally bankrupt.

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
16. I think the fact that he understands the degree to which it affected him means you are right.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 12:49 PM
Apr 2016

He at least has the conscience to be bothered about his choices.

 

quantumjunkie

(244 posts)
15. This is why Bernie Sanders supproters are the the Real Democrats in the Party.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 12:10 PM
Apr 2016

Because they understand how money from special interests compromises politics -- as Obama admitted in his book.

I just wish Hillary Supporters would wake up and not be part of the corruption problem. We should be ALL democrats.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Barack Obama: Taking mone...