2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThe Pope is so popular around here in GDP.
Never knew he had so many big fans here.
The leader of a religious institution that discriminates against women, LGBT, and helped shelter and protect child molesters.
Blech!
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)dogman
(6,073 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)think
(11,641 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)that.
turn about is fair game.
think
(11,641 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)think
(11,641 posts)and you cheer it on.
Goldman Sachs admitted to crimes of defrauding their customers. The CEO of GS personally held fundraisers for Hillary in 2007.
The company you keep speaks volumes about a person.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)You might think it not so important. But I do. deal.
think
(11,641 posts)OR is that a bridge too far?
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Or is that a bridge too far?
think
(11,641 posts)to better positions on those issues. I don't expect to agree with the Pope on every issue nor does Bernie Sanders.
Bernie went there to discuss global poverty. And you choose to ignore the global poverty issue and dump on both the Pope and Bernie instead for other issues.
Overall this Pope has been much more progressive than his predecessor and has been bold in pushing progressive views.
Still the Pope isn't stealing from the American people like Goldman Sachs and then spending that money for speeches from Hillary.
Hillary prefers the money and has no regrets taking it from crooks.
It is one thing to say you think his opinion on other issues deserves praise but quite another to tell us bull shit stories about him moving the church at all on these issues, he hasn't.
think
(11,641 posts)Pope Francis: Who am I to judge gay people?
Pope Francis has said gay people should not be marginalised but integrated into society.
Speaking to reporters on a flight back from Brazil, he reaffirmed the Roman Catholic Church's position that homosexual acts were sinful, but homosexual orientation was not.
He was responding to questions about whether there was a "gay lobby" in the Vatican.
"If a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge?"
Read more:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-23489702
Please find me any other Pope that has made such a statement.
dsc
(52,162 posts)they are still firing teachers who have the audacity to get married to same sex partners to cite but one example. He hasn't move the church at all and he could do so tomorrow. He could decide to be infallible and say gays shouldn't be fired for getting married but he hasn't.
think
(11,641 posts)isn't true. He's getting a lot of flack for making the steps he's made by right wing Christian types.
A senior American cardinal in the Vatican says that under this pope, the Roman Catholic Church is "a ship without a rudder'' and the faithful "are feeling a bit seasick.''
Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput complains that a recent Vatican conference called by Pope Francis produced "confusion,'' adding, "Confusion is of the devil.''
A group of conservative lay Catholics say they felt "betrayed" by a preliminary report from the conference that proposed a more welcoming attitude toward gay men and lesbians....
Read more:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/11/01/pope-francis-catholics-americans-culture/18263293/
apcalc
(4,465 posts)Is saying something.
But not much.
Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)prior to 2013 when she stood directly in the way of LGBT rights?
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)It's so hard to say you were ok with anti LGBT stances when your candidate was pushing them, especially when your bashing another for the same things your candidate spent decades giving speeches about.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Cassiopeia
(2,603 posts)It's what Hillary and her surrogates do.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)He said it was too soon to try to pass legislation in Vermont and he was right, it would never have been successful. He never said lgbt people shouldn't be allowed to marry and be definitely didn't say "marriage is a sacred bond between a man and a woman".
Do not try to smear his record because you can't defend Hillary's. At least don't pretend to know about lgbt rights and then use a debunked talking point like that.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)But you can google it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Here, I'll save you the trouble, debunked:
You're welcome!
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Because I said so isn't an argument. For someone who knows all about lgbt rights that's pretty sad.
And you didn't even watch the video.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Or are you a clairvoyant?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Is that your own personal video uploaded and you know my IP or something?
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)No one in their right mind would watch it and still use that talking point, it would be ludicrous.
You're welcome!
boston bean
(36,221 posts)There is no other possibility.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)have a good one!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)When they finally get a leader who focuses on the core tenets of Christianity of helping the poor and most needy, that's something that is worth supporting. If your position is that you have to vehemently oppose any group that doesn't 100% conform to your way of thinking, then you're just engaging in a pointless purity war that you will never ever win. That doesn't mean we should ever compromise on what is right, but it does mean we should engage people we disagree with and try and find familiar ground to move forward in a common direction.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)There are very long term interpretations of certain passages that are used to discriminate against LGBT but there's no core prohibition that I've ever seen. There are a lot more sections enshrining discrimination against women, but there are also a lot that were used to support slavery and we know how that turned out after public opinion moved substantially.
I say this as an atheist, and someone who frankly despises the history of the Catholic church by the way. Just painting the Catholics as an enemy is a very shortsighted strategy, and one that just makes Catholics more likely to cling to the old ways. The only viable strategy is to embrace what common ground we can and encourage them to interpret the bible more generously and kindly.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)good try though.
Meeting with the leader of that hate, is something that deserves to be discussed and opinions to be vented.
Kentonio
(4,377 posts)Has huge implications for your relations with the members. You can't treat a man they consider gods representative on Earth with disdain and just expect them to still engage with you.
With previous popes I've thought a lot more like you do because they really have been very aligned to Catholic dogma, but Francis (although I don't and never will agree with him on a lot of things) at least signals an attempt to move the CC in a more human, gentle direction and if we don't applaud that effort then how exactly can we ever expect change?
There will never be a magic moment where it goes from what it is now to what we'd like it to be, that's always going to be a journey that takes time, so how can we not support them in starting that journey?
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Kentonio
(4,377 posts)And then complaining each time that it still hurts. Have fun.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)at least here in the USA.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)could not inspire a hungry monkey to eat a banana.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)the charge against women and LGBT.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)So I think he and Hillary would have much more in common.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)so true.
Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Gregorian
(23,867 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
boston bean
(36,221 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)It's about all of the HRC crowd who said DEFINATELY that it would never happen.
HRC meets with Kissinger. Vacations with him too.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)It's a far cry from all the disparaging remarks here on DU when the Pope was installed. Praise the Lord!
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Priceless.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)when y'all didn't think Bernie would meet him you thought it would be fun and now that he actually did you've changed your tune. Now we're OUTRAGED by the pope!
Bravo!
boston bean
(36,221 posts)memory may be failing, or your making something up.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)And he's not the one who recently said he'd be willing to compromise on abortion so I have nothing to be ashamed of.
Spare me the drama, I've been speaking out about the pope and the church for years, Bernie's meeting was never about women's and lgbt rights until just now.
How convenient that people finally found their long forgotten indignation.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)the really bad parts about his views, like you and Bernie.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Like I said, spare me the strawmen and selective outrage, save it for someone else. I'm not buying what you're selling.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Because I've been here all along speaking out against religious bigotry, mine isn't selective at all.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Don't try to shame me by associating Bernie with the pope, it's not going to work.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Believe me I don't think any attention from you as a form of flattery.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Keep digging, this is hilarious.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)A true observation, considering the push back I am receiving from MANY, including you, here.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Oh do go on...
boston bean
(36,221 posts)the really bad parts, in favor of some political strategy.
I like the pic of Tina Turner, that displays perfectly exactly what I am doing reading your posts and responding to them.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Like I said, selective and convenient.
Tina would love the drama.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)This should be good, I'll wait.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)People can read what you wrote just in this thread and make up their own mind. I don't need to prove anything. You have done so yourself.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)"It's another example of the way in which this church is not measured by numbers. Yes, the numbers are big, they're certainly impressive. But it's measured by your impact. It's measured by the meaning that you give to lives here within this complex and so far beyond its boundaries. And the commitment that you demonstrate both to our faith in God and to doing His work here on earth is exemplary and that is one of the many reasons that I wanted to be here today.
You know, Rick has helped so many people with his lessons for a 40-day spiritual journey. But he knows those 40 days are just the beginning. "
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=77080
" It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS back in the 1980s and because of both president and Mrs. Reagan in particular Mrs. Reagan we started a national conversation, when before nobody would talk about it, nobody wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something I really appreciate with her very effective low-key advocacy. It penetrated the public conscience and people began to say, hey, we have to do something about this too."
I could post the video, but you and all of her supporters are willfully overlooking both of those comments. And you know, Joe Biden was with Francis all over the US weeping and grinning and touting his faith. Hillary says she's the continuation of Obama/Biden. Her endorsers in Congress, such as Pelosi, fawned over Francis when he came to DC. All of them did, and DU fawned along with them.
Reagan was the villain of those times and the fact that Hillary wants to erase that history is unacceptable. Stop overlooking it.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Cause you aint going to find me saying one kind thing about Rick Warren.
Yet, you continue on with this tactic.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)would eventually drive a person over the edge.
I'd rather be on the side that loses and be able to live with myself. But I'm a liberal, so I'm used to losing.
BainsBane
(53,032 posts)Failure to consider the mountain of evidence that shows Bernie does not live up to his own claims may make it easy to live with yourself, but you do so at your own expense. The irony is you references "self-delusions and machinations" in the midst of an event where the candidate you suggest is so superior misrepresented his visit to the Vatican and his encounter with the Pope. So much so that the Pope was compelled to defend his own integrity against charges he was playing favorites in the elections of a sovereign nation.
If Bernie's actions with the Pope don't constitute a political machination, nothing does.
That and the fact the OP is eluding to a complete about face of the denunciations of the Pope and Catholics more generally that have been common on this site for years. Clearly many here have no problem taking positions diametrically opposed to those they did just a few months ago. And your response is to insult someone who makes that observation rather than considering the contradiction.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)...poutrage, and butthurt. I'll be enjoying the meltdown. Stick around for the second act...The Indictment....mucho epicness to come.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)the bulk of DU, including many of those currently grinding about Bernie meeting him, lauded him as a perfected being, the new leader of the Democrats. His visit to Congress, a place of politics, was celebrated on DU by most everyone, in DC Joe Biden was in tearful awe, Nancy Pelosi was breathless and Boehner was a river of tears over Francis. His visit to Philly was huge news on DU.
What's different today is that all the Hillary people who were making daily OP's about the glory of Francis are now acting like they despise Francis. Of course some of them have made an issue of Bernie not being able to 'relate to the faith community' as well.
So in the past, Francis had way more fans here. Because all of his fans from Hillary land are denying him three times today.
The posters who loved him so who today use him as a punching object in politics are fairly naff in my view.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)disingenuous framing of my views.
I aint responsible for all of DU, deal with that.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I'm not going to call them out for you. Everyone here knows who they are. And everyone here can read that you are attempting to evade what I said to you by pulling his faked up prop out of the drama box. My words are clear as bells. No one said you were responsible. Jesus H Fuck.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)The cognitive dissonance you have on display here is nothing less than fantastical and mystical all at the same time.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)I think it's cheap, shoddy and mean spirited. Your OP is a bogus assertion, Francis has been wildly popular on DU and in the Party his entire tenure. He is less popular today because Hillary people are 'distancing themselves' from him, after having spent months lauding him as the savior of all things progressive.
But go head and insult me again. Jesus H Fuck.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Who fiercely spoke out against the Pope and the church are now lauding him as the Saviour of the planet because he allowed Bernie to use him as a political prop
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)So does Hillary:
randome
(34,845 posts)That's an example of Sanders pandering. Clinton does it, too, because, in case anyone hasn't been paying attention, they are both politicians.
DU has become an excellent study on unwarranted assumptions, herd mentality and boundless expectations. Neither Clinton nor Sanders will 'save us' and the Pope is still just an old man in a dress.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
Kip Humphrey
(4,753 posts)please.
20score
(4,769 posts)a truly horrible person. But it's not the Pope.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)That didn't take long. And it was an easy prediction.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)All is forgiven if one likes Bernie.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)matt819
(10,749 posts)Condensing 2,000 years of policy, principles, religion, conflict, and more into just a dozen words or so.
Can't wait to see your thoughtful insights into world wars I and II, nuclear proliferation, the partition of the Indian subcontinent, the Renaissance, etc.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Whiny butthurt bullshit posts; They're what's for breakfast.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)is just whiny butthurting.. OK..
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)you refuse to do anything to alleviate that sting. I ain't impressed.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)posting.
You are making a diagnosis and prescribing unnecessary drugs.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)So, yeah.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)LOL.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)I don't find it pleasurable at all. Most probably won't either.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I'm afraid it's terminal.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)boston bean
(36,221 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)Response to boston bean (Original post)
Armstead This message was self-deleted by its author.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)No problem with actual intellectual and moral consistency.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I'm being honest.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)Gomez163
(2,039 posts)apcalc
(4,465 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Bernie with the Pope. Why so mad?
Honestly, what the catholic church has done is being repaired by Pope Francis. He's followed his faith much better and interpreted the scripture to benefit people more than it ever has before. Has the church done all those bad things? Yes. Has the church improved under Pope Francis? Yes.
Give credit where it's due. But I mean, since Bernie is now associated with the Pope, feel free to bash bash bash all you want. It says more about you than it does about others. XD
LexVegas
(6,063 posts)Let them have this one thing.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)of Clinton campers over this. But do keep it up, when deep in a hole, dig deeper! Never surrender!
TDale313
(7,820 posts)Not sure why they're losing their collective shit over this. It was a nice moment, he talked about things he's been talking about for years, had a quick exchange with the Pope. If they'd let it go, shrugged or rolled their eyes but basically ignored it? Would have been a half a day story. The backlash? It's why we're still talking about it. Seriously, get over it. No one not in the Hillary bubble is buying what you're selling.
jillan
(39,451 posts)everything a person does, does NOT mean you cannot also see the goodness they bring into with the world.
Stop being so small minded.