2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis is NOT first time Sanders camp feinged or faked some type of endorsement or proxy credibility
I'm disappointed in Sanders thinking on the endorsements and this move with Pope Francis
I think Francis is a stand up guy to speak the truth quickly, I would want my name not to be associated with influencing a campaign either
Right now Sanders is losing something more important than the primaries, I don't think his staff is doing him justice
your take?
tia
EDIT: Pope Francis: "..I greeted him, I shook his hand and nothing more..." direct quote
kstewart33
(6,551 posts)Bern has some serious thinking to do about the quality of advice he's getting from his staff.
Not good.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... whomever green lit that move should lose some credibility
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)liberal from boston
(856 posts)It is quite revealing how the lies keep coming from Hillary supporters: Bernie begged for an invitation; fact is the Papal Office invited him in March. The Monsignor from the Papal Office (who is a close aide to Pope Francis) also stated the Vatican is aware of Senator Sanders economic policies. IMO, the anger coming from Clinton supporters is the fact that Senator Sanders message is resonating with Americans & internationally. Sad that Hillary supporters do not see the integrity, character of Bernie. Pope Francis, millions of others have responded to his message to those who have no voice. Pope Francis statement greeting Senator Sanders: " I see in Senator Bernard Sanders a man of great integrity and moral conviction, who understands these principles and genuinely wants what's best for all people".
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... or his campaign claimed and this is not the first time Sanders camp has misrepresented proxy cred.
MaeScott
(878 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Hillary would not have gone, it was more important to sit down and listen to voters.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Response to uponit7771 (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
They've lost a lot of credibility with me.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts).... he's losing something more important than this primamry
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)liberal from boston
(856 posts)What Lie? MSNBC reported that Pope Francis was staying in the same hotel as Bernie. Senator Sanders mentions Pope Francis in his speeches because they agree on Climate Change, economy, peace, etc. Pope Francis statement greeting Senator Sanders: " I see in Senator Bernard Sanders a man of great integrity and moral conviction, who understands these principles and genuinely wants what's best for all people".
Lucinda
(31,170 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)look it up on snoopes
LiberalFighter
(50,928 posts)Sanders requested an invite.
Bodhi BloodWave
(2,346 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Yeah, we get it.
"Truth to Power", as long as the truth is the truth we like ... or maybe a lie.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)...at your willingness to accept sequences on dishonesty from the Sanders campaign.
Voice for Peace
(13,141 posts)but you all apparently do. I just would imagine you'd find it a plus, not complain about it.
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Bernie was not seeking an endorsement from the Pope and he never claimed he got one. Bernie knows that the Pope does not make political endorsements but he also knows that it is important to reach out to influential world leaders.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... by proxy of a meeting with the Pope and placed the pope in a position to counter Sanders claim of a "meeting"
That's straight up selfish
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Bernie was not seeking an endorsement nor did he claim otherwise.
Bernie did not put the Pope into any position, the Vatican invited Bernie and the Pope allowed a meet and greet with him. If the Pope did not want to meet Sanders he could have got security to remove Bernie from the area before he walked through, the fact that security allowed him to be there to meet the Pope proves that the Hillary supporters on this site who claim it was an ambush are completely wrong.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... move with the pope forcing a person who wanted nothing to do with the US primary to issue a statement.
Sanders is... wow
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)If the Pope did not want Bernie to greet him he could have easily had him removed by security before the Pope even walked through the area.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts).. Francis just wouldn't have came out with a statement on the matter if Sanders didn't come out first with his.
So yeah
forced..
totally selfish move
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)I read the Pope's words and I did not see him suggest that Bernie misrepresented their meeting, what I did see is that the Pope said Bernie greeted him with kindness. You made the claim that Bernie misrepresented the meeting and this is a "fact not in dispute" but you have not been able to link to anything that Bernie misrepresented.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)I asked you for a link to back up that supposed "fact not in dispute" and you cited the Pope's words. The problem is the Pope never said anything to suggest what you claim is a "fact not in dispute".
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)I specifically asked for a link to where Sanders misrepresented the meeting but instead of providing me a link you cited "the Pope's words". If the Pope never said that Sanders misrepresented their meeting then why would you cite his words when I asked for a link to back up that claim?
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)The Pope specifically said Sanders greeted him with kindness, how is that selfish and why would anyone need to make excuses for it? If the Pope's words supersede Sanders supporters then they supersede yours as well. The Pope used the word "kindness" to describe Bernie's behavior, that is a very different word than the word "selfishness" that you use. If you want me to take the Pope's word I will do that, but the Pope's position is very different than yours.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... walking out to a flight
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)Bernie never claimed it was anything more than that.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Not a meeting behind closed doors, but Bernie was there to meet him at the time prearranged between the Pope and him (most likely through Sachs).
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)The Pope was not saying he never said a word to Sanders in their greeting. He was saying they never had a "political" discussion. There was nothing that could be construed as politics or endorsements in the meet and greet. And I suspect he answered the way he did, because the reporters had just asked him if he was endorsing Sanders or something like that. He answered in a way to establish that nothing like that happened. Otherwise there was no reason for him to even phrase his statement to them the way he did. He was trying to stop them from going there.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)When I came down, I greeted him, I shook his hand and nothing more. This is called good manners and it is not getting involved in politics, he said. If anyone thinks that greeting someone is getting involved in politics, I recommend that he look for a psychiatrist.
That's from the popes airplane vid
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You did not real what I said with an open mind. You just read the words and didn't even hear me.
this is useless.
No one can stop you all from hating Bernie, but what a waste of energy.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... "and nothing more"
I'm choosing to believe Francis's exact words than inject something else into them... it doesn't matter if it was small talk or a mere handshake the point is Sanders and Sachs misrepresented the encounter and its not the first time these type of proxy credibility tactics have been employed by Sanders camp.
The mailers with the union and other logos on them that never endorsed Sanders is a big tell tale
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Why did he say and nothing more? What compelled him to even say that? what question was he asked just prior to his answer?
He had no reason to say that unless he was trying to stop a thought that the reporters had pursued, like was this about politics and endorsements?
If he wasn't responding to a question that was not given us in context, he never would have said it like that.
You are trying to take his answer literally instead of understanding the nuance of what he meant and why he said it.
Don't be so literal. You have to take what he said in context with everything he said, not just those three words. He was trying to set the reporters straight. What reason would Sachs have to lie, and the Pope would get all over him if he did.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... logos of left groups that never endorsed him.
If Sanders camp didn't have a track record of misrepresenting proxy cred then I'd give them the benefit of the doubt, as of now their past actions don't lend an objective person to give them the benefit of the doubt because of their own actions misrepresenting endorsements to primary voters.
I've said in my response to you that it doesn't matter that it was a meet and greet a hand shake or even a 5 minute meeting the pope explains the encounter much different than Sanders and Sachs.
That's a fact that no one is disputing
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And not everyone agrees with you that his campaign (not Sanders personally) tried to imply that he had been endorsed when he hadn't been. It was kinda like this fiasco of all the accusations you've thrown at Bernie over this trip. His campaign made a mistake in including logos on some of their literature without prior permission, but they were not claiming endorsements, just support. If they meant endorse they would have said endorse. And Bernie did not do it. Get over it.
Nothing about this Rome trip has been disingenuous either. Bernie never lied about a thing, yet you all continued to say that he did, as one item after another you were proven wrong...and now even with proof you refuse to let go of your smears because you will never admit you were wrong.
When I make a mistake here, I admit it. When I see something stupid or untrue being said about Clinton, I stand up for her, even though I don't like her, because to me lying about someone is wrong. I can't understand how people can be so filled with hate that they just ignore the truth and keep perpetuating lies in the face of proof to the contrary.
It's like talking to a fucking brick wall here.
And now I'm going to bed before my feet swell up any more than they already have for staying up too late...I should have been in bed hours ago, but I was so pissed at the absolute intransigence of some of you that I just couldn't let it go. I'm sorry I even let you drag me into this crap.
That's all this attack on Bernie and his trip to Rome is. Pure unadulterated crap.
Goodnight!
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Good, on those grounds we agree...
We also agree that this "mistake" happened more than once and some say more than twice including Nevada
Its rational for a discerning person NOT to take Sanders word for what happened and take Francis's word for what happened.
Have a good nights sleep
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)on the plane, the Pope said:
Not I met him and shook his hand, but I greeted him. That means he spoke to him (and presumably to Jane and the other couple as well). Now you can greet someone by just saying hi...or you can greet him with some welcoming language. He's the pope...Bernie traveled half way across the globe to come to his conference...do you really think he said "nothing"...which means he lied when he said "I greeted him"?
How did he "greet" him? What word, or words did he use to greet him? He did not say how he specifically greeted him. So how can you presume that Sachs is lying?
I still stand by "and nothing more" being a response to a question from a reporter involving politics. But for how he greeted Bernie (for what he actually said), I go with Sachs...
This is a greeting from a compassionate and thoughtful man.
If you cannot see what you are doing here and why it's so damned frustrating to reasonable people who are not trying to make everything Bernie does a lie, then there is nothing more I can say to you or anyone.
And one more thing. Everyone went Ballistic over the clip of The View asking Bernie if he was meeting with the Pope, and he said YUP. And that short clip "Are you meeting with the Pope?, "YUP" was played over ad nauseam here, to show how he "lied". He did meet with the Pope, and more than likely expected to, because he was probably told by Sachs that the Pope would be coming to the conference on Friday, as originally planned...but he changed his plans and met with Bernie on Sat morning instead.
Ok, I'm done with this conversation...if you and your camp don't see your mistake and apologize for the nasty things you've said about Bernie, it's on you. I don't expect any apologies, or even admissions of error.
gabeana
(3,166 posts)your coming like a buffoon, you have have no credibility
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)It depends on what the definition of "is" is.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)look at the clever placement of Bernie-2016 and parallel placement of Pope Francis and bernie.com.
Nothing but dirty politics.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Team Clinton is shitting their collective pants over Bernie's momentum.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)CentralCoaster
(1,163 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)ACTUAL ISSUES.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... other ways on other issues.
This establishes that there's no need to take a chance on someone who MIGHT be slightly better
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)That's it. I don't care who you support, but this has gone to whole new levels of crazy anger.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts).... this isn't the first time him or his camp has done something like this
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Seriously, I am gobsmacked by the sheer number of silly posts on this topic.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... campaign on being straight up.
This is an issue, he's losing more than just the primary
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)with the lack of substance.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)monopolistic global corporations setting the agenda for everything.
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2008/05/monsanto200805
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/judy-frankel/hillary-vs-bernie-on-fran_b_7638846.html
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I do not know whether that is a personality trait, or if you are simply participating in the cynical larger politically opportunistic attempt to make mountains out of molehills to distract attention from the actual important issues that rae at the base of this election.
You asked. That's my own honest take.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... wrong on Thrusday there would be 23432 threads about it here and
Armstead
(47,803 posts)If you are referring to Nevada, that was a dumb mistake by campaign staffers.
I disagree about his motivations for going to Rome...But if you choose to believe that Sanders visited the Vatican was just a campaign stunt....Well WTF? All campaigns engage in political stunts every day.
EVEN IF your erroneous claim were correct....That is a tiny gnat compared to the issues he is addressing regarding the future of America and the planet.
Hey, you disagree with him? Fine. Don't like him? Fine.
But blowing up specks of personalized dust into political obsessions is exactly what is wrong with politics.It;s why so many peopel have tuned out from politics, and turned the henhouse over to the foxes.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)If you want to spend this nice spring day obsessing over some campaign staffers doing a few stupid things, and tyong it into some non-existent pattern, be my guest.
Life's too short....
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Forget the large corporations that donate millions to candidates...and forget the fact that no legislation can get through Congress without being vetted and approved by lobbyists and Wall St. and Big Business...Forget all that.
This imagined "Endorsementgate" is ever so much more important than the cumulative effect of systemic corruption of out government.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... their encounter a "meeting" vs a greeting as Francis did continues to go against the
3hummingbirds
(58 posts)For God's sake. He was invited to Vatican and Hillary was not.
Cha
(297,240 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Smart man.
Cha
(297,240 posts)stunt.
revbones
(3,660 posts)IamMab
(1,359 posts)His campaign used their logos on mailers, or in the case of NH newspapers, implied their endorsement in a television ad ahead of the NH primary.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)salinsky
(1,065 posts).... to buttonhole the Pope, before he could slip out of town does seem a little crass.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts).. the judgement here... really bad judgement
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)And it was a prearranged meeting to greet each other, thank each other and wish each other well.
http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/pope-francis-meets-bernie-sanders-vatican-confirms/#ixzz4633ABBnr
So, apparently the Pope did plan on attending the conference on Friday for greetings or blessings or whatever, but had to change his plans because of his early trip in the morning. So instead he arranged a meeting with Sanders for sat morning to thank him for coming.
Nothing political was talked about and no endorsements were asked for or given.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)When I came down, I greeted him, I shook his hand and nothing more. This is called good manners and it is not getting involved in politics, he said. If anyone thinks that greeting someone is getting involved in politics, I recommend that he look for a psychiatrist.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/tamerragriffin/bernie-sanders-says-he-met-with-the-pope#.sg0dq0Ydp
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Cry us a fucking river.
The Pope doesn't want Hillary around. Deal with it.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)You aren't fooling anyone.
Give it up.
I care fuckall who you "trust." Since it's clearly Clinton, then YOU aren't trustworthy either.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)um, I guess a "your concern is noted" is due here.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)I hope you have been saving your earnings, for it might be a long wait until your next Gig.
Someone stepped on their Dick....
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Why does the Hill clan keep trying to put her behavior onto him? Are you that desperate?
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The Vatican invited Sanders to speak about inequality and meet the Pope. They did not invite Clinton.
I expect him to highlight this at every opportunity. I expect her supporters to lie about it.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... misrepresenting to the point where they had to issue a strong countering statement.
That's bad character
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)And it's you who is doing the misrepresenting re: an endorsement.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)The Pope doesn't meet people by accident.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... proxy credibility
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)The Pope says Sanders greeted him with kindness...
http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2016/04/16/pope-francis-calls-sanders-greeting-only-common-courtesy/
This morning as I was leaving, Senator Sanders was there, Francis said. He knew I was coming out at that time, and he had the kindness to greet me.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... and not something set up
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)They are generally not long and formal meetings, but they are meetings. Bernie never claimed to have a long one on one with the Pope but he did meet him.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... time he was leaving for his flight
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)http://www.cruxnow.com/church/2016/04/16/pope-francis-calls-sanders-greeting-only-common-courtesy/
This morning as I was leaving, Senator Sanders was there, Francis said. He knew I was coming out at that time, and he had the kindness to greet me.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)the OP is about Sanders campaign and Sanders own words on the greeting... not the server minute "meeting"
Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)He made it clear that there was no endorsement despite what you misleadingly implied. And yes you did imply it, using the word "or" does not mean the implication is not there.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Whose the diplomat now, Hillary?
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)A handshake and discussion is a meeting.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)if you were seen shaking hands and exchanging greetings with someone and were asked, say by the FBI-"Did you ever meet so and so?" and told them "no", they would be most unhappy with that answer....
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Vinca
(50,273 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Vinca
(50,273 posts)Hillary would have killed for that trip to the Vatican and everyone knows it. I bet she would have given the Pope a discount rate . . . maybe a hundred thousand off her usual fee. For charity's sake.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... but believe what you want.
Sanders used resources and misrepresented the encounter with the pope
Vinca
(50,273 posts)There is no motive campaign-wise. About half the talking heads say going was a big mistake because he lost time on the campaign trail and the other half say he's using it to promote his campaign. He's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. He had a great opportunity, he went and I'm very happy for him and proud an American was invited. You should put your hatred aside and be proud of that, too.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... primary they've misrepresented who was endorsing them.
This is a pattern not just a single instance
Vinca
(50,273 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Vinca
(50,273 posts)You should read a newspaper every so often.
840high
(17,196 posts)a good laugh.
polichick
(37,152 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... proxy credibility
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)Honestly, the more the HRC camp pulls these threads out, the more I want to post these. Is this wrong? It has as much to do with the election as this thread.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)My sources lied to me, I was told that was the 15 dollar an hour meeting.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)It turned out is was Bill, apparently Sean has been too busy posting on the Hillary Groups about Bernie's trip to Rome to take any new pictures.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)No I am responding, you are the one talking about Sean. Frankly you seem a bit obsessed. I don't even think you are on the right forum is you are a Sean fan, I think you want the Fox News forum. Why do you like Sean so much?
v
eShirl
(18,492 posts)deathrind
(1,786 posts)Gone off the deep end...
The Pope was right in his recommendation.
JI7
(89,249 posts)Gothmog
(145,242 posts)The pope is not endorsing Sanders. Neither did the other groups
grasswire
(50,130 posts)But you have managed to do so today.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)not likely any nefarious motives.
Just because Bernie Bros are so ridiculously suspicious of Hillary's every move, we don't have to act out in kind.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... if Hillary had a habit of doing such with no change of mind Id have to acknowledge reality.
BlindTiresias
(1,563 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Source: Washington Post
ROME U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders met privately with Pope Francis during his overnight trip here, his spokesman said.
"They discussed the issues that the senator raised that the pope has raised so often at the conference yesterday," Briggs said, adding that there was no discussion of U.S. politics or Sanders's candidacy.
"He said that there was radiance in his presence and that he was very honored and humbled to have the opportunity to meet with the pontiff."
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/04/16/italian-media-sanders-met-privately-with-pope-francis/
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... over someones camp who has lied about proxy cred many times in this primary
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)VATICAN CITY - Pope Francis met US presidential candidate Bernie Sanders on Saturday morning before leaving for a visit to the Greek island of Lesbos, a participant at the meeting said.
Columbia University Professor Jeffrey Sachs told Reuters that the meeting took place in the Vatican guesthouse where the pope lives and where Sanders had spent the night after addressing a Vatican conference on social justice.
The Vatican had said before the conference that a meeting was not planned. Sachs said Sanders, who was accompanied by his wife, and the pope spoke for about five minutes. Sachs, his wife and a Vatican official were also in the room.
Sachs, who has advised the United Nations on climate change, said Sanders thanked the pope for his pronouncements on the need for morality in the global economy and statements in defense of the environment.
http://www.jpost.com/US-Elections/Pope-meets-with-Bernie-Sanders-thanks-him-for-addressing-Vatican-on-the-moral-economy-451397
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)You're having a bad day!
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)but you sure seem to be bothered an awful lot by Bernie being invited to the conference, and by the POPE meeting (albeit unsheduled) and shaking hands with Bernie.
I think my bad day is looking brighter all the time. Yours, can't really get any worse or better. You're stuck with it.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... statement to Sanders "meeting" claim.
To the Pope, howeverwell, even the word meeting seems to overstate how he saw their encounter. He made a point of clarifying that the handshake and pleasantries they exchanged should not be seen as a political endorsement
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Never was about politics for him. They just share the same views on economics and ecology and this conference came up at an opportune time, and he was proud to be able to meet and shake the Pope's hand.
It tickles me to see you all going nuts over this.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)To the Pope, howeverwell, even the word meeting seems to overstate how he saw their encounter. He made a point of clarifying that the handshake and pleasantries they exchanged should not be seen as a political endorsement.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)so your concern is noted, but I think you made that up.
And they really did have a meeting. A meeting of the minds.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Do you even know how silly you sound?
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Word salad.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,956 posts)...don't think it was a "lie" - which is a word overused. Bernie is simply a fan of the Pope. Remember when you're 14 and really like Madonna or some other singer... You meet the singer and "elevate" the encounter in your mind. You talk about it because it seems to elevate you - it doesn't, but you really think it does. The whole Pope story is stupid... hope it ends soon!
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)When did Bernie say the pope endorsed him? Link please.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)
To the Pope, howeverwell, even the word meeting seems to overstate how he saw their encounter. He made a point of clarifying that the handshake and pleasantries they exchanged should not be seen as a political endorsement.
This morning when I was leaving, Senator Sanders was there, he told reporters in Italian aboard the papal airliner today, after his visit to the refugee-filled Greek island of Lesbos. He knew I was leaving at that time and he had the courtesy to greet me. I greeted him, his wife, and another couple who were there and were sleeping in Santa Martha. This is called good manners and it is not getting involved in politics.
Added the Pope, laughing, If anyone thinks that greeting someone is getting involved in politics, I recommend that he look for a psychiatrist.
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... fact is the pope described the encounter different from a politician
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Live with that and relax.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... about endorsements 2 or 3 times and then this non "meeting" aka handshake as the pope was walking by on the way to his flight
Aerows
(39,961 posts)communique's confirming that the meeting in the Pope's private residence was pre-planned. If it wasn't true, guess what your are doing? (Accuse the Pope of lying - I dare you).
He thanked Bernie Sanders for his attendance.(Again, Accuse the Pope of lying).
Bernie stated kind things about the Pope after his meeting with him. (Met him, tweeted about it).
You folks have lost your damn minds.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... Sanders camp has been known to straight up misrepresent proxy credibility
Aerows
(39,961 posts)That is a fact.
Unless you are insinuating NOW that the Vatican is part of Bernie Sanders camp.
Wait ... That seems to be what you ARE insinuating. Bernie Sanders is a mouthpiece of the Vatican, a proxy of the Vatican.
Well, the Vatican has spoken, and Hillary wasn't there.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)To the Pope, howeverwell, even the word meeting seems to overstate how he saw their encounter. He made a point of clarifying that the handshake and pleasantries they exchanged should not be seen as a political endorsement.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... counter to his statement about a "meeting"
Aerows
(39,961 posts)the relationship between Catholicism, the Pope, and the Pope's role on earth
a rancorous reply is absolutely the wrong thing to do, will not advance any spiritual cause, least of all mine, nor yours.
Have a good day.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)I totally understand why he would stay above the political fray and not publicly endorse a candidate, but it's pretty clear Bernie has his support. I also get why Clinton and her supporters want to spin this as negatively as possible. I say keep it up, it makes you look really, really bad.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)are you using so much energy on this. Kinda creepy.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)Calling Bernie a "proxy of the Vatican" in one breath and berating the Pope in the other, then seeming to demand appreciation as a serious commentator.
I've never seen anything like it before.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Or anything other than that he'd been invited to speak at the Vatican academy conference (he had), that he hoped to meet the Pope, that he did meet the Pope?
Not their fault if the MSM (and some DUers) went into meltdown mode and attach all kinds of stuff to it.
The fact is that he has expressed interest in attending the conference in prior years. This time he got invited. He doesn't schedule the conference and, contrary to some people's claims, he didn't invite himself.
He chose to go because he'd always wanted to and this was his chance.
He was going to be leaving the campaign trail to do so, which guaranteed it would be news.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Journalists writing about the events have stated it lends his campaign gravitas and credibility. That is their opinion.
I have not see a single quote out of the campaign making that claim.
krawhitham
(4,644 posts)Cha
(297,240 posts)Skwmom
(12,685 posts)Haveadream
(1,630 posts)and accused Sanders of showing "monumental discourtesy" by lobbying for an invitation to a church sponsored conference on economic and environmental issues for political gain.
What lies at the heart of the controversy is not the parsing of the words "invitation and "meeting" but the maneuvers Sanders is employing on the eve of the primary in NY. Appearing on national television and stating he has been invited to meet with the Pope is seen by many as campaign tactic to help turn the enormous Catholic vote in NY in his favor. There is a reason candidates seek endorsements and having even the remotest semblance of one is better than nothing, especially when you are double digits behind and desperately need a way to convince people you are still viable.
Sanders spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign funds to travel for a ten minute speaking slot. He then waited in the lobby for the opportunity to press flesh while the Pope was on his way out to meet a flight. The cries of foul are challenging the pretense of the collegiality, common goals and planned meeting between Sanders and the Pope. Neither the vatican nor the Pope are willing to cooperate with that narrative and to that end, the Pope went on record to say in no way should their courtesy when crossing paths be construed as anything political. In terms of getting out the vote, the results on Tuesday will show whether it was money well spent.
?1460752503
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... by saying he "meet" with the pope vs just greeted the guy with a handshake
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)University who sits on the board of a Vatican Academy. She's also a well known conservative with a bit of bias in her mix, shall we say.
Margaret Archer:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Archer
Accuracy is a large part of honesty....
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Bernie's internals tell him how far he is behind- He don't give a crap that the Pope is against women's rights, LGBT rights. Bernie thinks his one size fits all will solve everything. Bernie is a politician. First and foremost
Haveadream
(1,630 posts)People would be less cynical if he didn't try to pretend the trip was anything other than finding a way to seem relatable and not get hurt too badly in the upcoming primaries. NY, RI, CT, NJ and PA all have a significant number of Democratic Catholics. It made sense for him to try to connect with them. The fact that the relationship is so forced makes that connection tenuous at best. We'll see if Catholics buy what he is selling. So far, older people haven't, women haven't, blacks haven't and the Jewish community hasn't. Hail Mary is right.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)You Hillary fanatics have no connection to the truth. You have totally mischaracterized what has happened through this entire Vatican trip.
I understand Hillary's big dollar campaign fundraising trip is embarrassing so you've got to find a way to deflect attention from that. It isn't working.
Bernie had a great trip and did meet the Pope. Eat your heart out conservaDem.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)your assertions because that support does not exist. You have been asked to prove your assertions and you can't. You would if you could but you can't so you don't and you won't.
I see your motive as being one of bias.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)a bit of the respect for him that I had before the start of the primaries. This issue is one of plenty that contributed to that.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)Arrrggghhh. To greet is to meet. You can meet and not greet. You can't greet in person if you don't meet. Can't call it a "meeting" though they met and spoke. What then? A gremeeting?
Arrghh, I can't take all this Noise! Noise! Noise! Noise!
How much I would LOVE a Suess book on the "road to the nomination."
cloudythescribbler
(2,586 posts)It's true there was a report from someone in the Vatican that the invitation was recent and at Bernie's behest, which turned out to be inaccurate and corrected by a higher up figure in the Church. So there was that granule
But everything else has been just pouting and supposition and accusation and innuendo and sour grapes with an attempted disguise of high-mindedness
Really now!
The resonance between the social (and ecological) message of Laudato Si and the central message of Bernie's campaign is plain, and has been rightly noted by Bernie, and he was invited to a Conference at the Vatican on the subject. I think he was wise to have gone, but why are Hillary supporters concerned -- what that he was wasting time and should stay stateside through the entire primary season? The whole thing was important to Bernie and he went. Good. And he met the pope. Obviously as the whole thing took place during the middle of a campaign, the Vatican had to be very careful not to imply however faintly any sort of endorsement or involvement in the campaign. Neither Bernie nor his surrogates ever implied otherwise -- although some on DU seem to, which is the right of enthusiastic grassroots supporters I suppose. But like this thread, it is NOT that Bernie's supporters are baiting Hillary's, or that we need to. The visit reflects that affinity of social message of a moral economy. I agree with those who say to the Hillary supporters who have put forward countless poutage threads to simply DEAL WITH IT.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Flip that bird!
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)And as I said you are totally fine with that long winded set of lies and insults. Here you are defending it, excusing it and dismissing it yet again, Defending the indefensible.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)you can't even understand the horrors of what she's saying. The fact is the LGBT community spent years and years of activism and building the organizations to serve people with AIDS while your candidate's heroes sat in the WH and ignored the deaths of tens of thousands of gay and black Americans. The activists in the gay community and in the African American community started that hard work and long conversation years and years before your candidate falsely claims the Reagans got that work and conversation going. What she said was the opposite of the truth and the fact that you don't mind that is definitive of you and of her supporting cohort.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Insulting, false and outlandishly out of touch with reality.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)Do you know how to post imbeded vids?
tia
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The lack of concern out of her supporters for this set of filth lets me know that you don't know the history anymore than Hillary does. Disgusting display of bigoted attitudes.
betsuni
(25,528 posts)Squinch
(50,949 posts)RazBerryBeret
(3,075 posts)what kind of socks did he wear?
there are a thousand negative posts about this very subject and
I think that's the ONLY thing that hasn't been posted here, or talked about, or linked....
will this obsession be over soon?
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... who's just about as full of shit as everyone else just different.
RazBerryBeret
(3,075 posts)i just think it makes a group of people look small and petty.
Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)My take on the this whole "Popegate" Hillary supporters are so worked up about is about the same as what I believe Bernie's take on this is. He got an opportunity to do something most people don't get to do. He got to meet The Pope.
I take the whole trip as something he saw as a once in a life time experience. One you simply don't pass up, regardless of what else is going on in your life. He admires this Pope, why wouldn't he do this? Nothing political.
I believe Bernie doesn't take becoming President for granted, knowing if it doesn't happen he may not get another invite.
He was invited to speak on something that came about as an anniversary, again not an everyday thing.
This has never been an endorsement of Bernie in my mind, but an opportunity that came about because the message going out across the world, one which Bernie is one of the people sending that message. The only other politician from our country beating that same drum is Elizabeth Warren. Being this is the Catholic Church, I don't see a woman being invited to speak at the conference.
And the nastiness being spewed by the Hillary camp over this is reminiscent of RW hatefulness.
uponit7771
(90,339 posts)... holds in his hand and this establish's such with solid proof.
Sanders is involving a guy who had to come out with a statement countering his claim of a meeting
Pope Francis: "..I greeted him, I shook his hand and nothing more..." direct quote
Lazy Daisy
(928 posts)Show me where Bernie stated the pope endorsed him?
Why do Hillary supporters want to make this anything but what this is, a very nice moment. The hatefulness is saddening.
The Pope made that statement not because what you and all the others want to think, but because he doesn't want to get involved. Bernie has, for a very long time, spoken out on financial equality. Something this Pope has also taken a stand on. Something this particular conference was about.
Hillary supporters need to concentrate on Hillary's positives instead of trying to go negative on Bernie.
If she get the nomination, there's a whole bunch of votes that need to be earned. This ain't doing it.