Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:46 PM Apr 2016

Does this Sanders Facebook Post's Image Seem Odd to You?

Here's an image that's posted on Bernie Sanders' Facebook page. Notice the campaign logo superimposed on the photo. You'll find a link to the page itself below the photo. This bothers me a lot. Placing a logo on a Reuters news photo seems over the top to me, for some reason. It implies permission and approval. I doubt that any such permission or approval was granted.



https://www.facebook.com/berniesanders/photos/a.324119347643076.89553.124955570892789/1029290747125929/?type=3&theater

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does this Sanders Facebook Post's Image Seem Odd to You? (Original Post) MineralMan Apr 2016 OP
created and posted by a random bernie supporter Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #1
Come now, he's Just Asking Questions. n/t QC Apr 2016 #2
So many JAQ posts like that lately. JimDandy Apr 2016 #21
So, so many. And so much concern. n/t QC Apr 2016 #35
We need a new term for it... JimDandy Apr 2016 #39
Insinuquestion? or Questinuation? NT northernsouthern Apr 2016 #54
LOL. Good ones! JimDandy Apr 2016 #62
Passive-Agressive minds want to know.... nt m-lekktor Apr 2016 #45
Jon Stewart used to call this the "Cavuto". Now it's "the Clinton Supporter". n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #53
Nope. It's a post by the Sanders campaign. MineralMan Apr 2016 #3
ok. now where's your evidence they didn't pay reuters for the photo? Viva_La_Revolution Apr 2016 #43
OMG beedle Apr 2016 #59
wow - is that ever presumptuous DrDan Apr 2016 #4
What concern is it of ours as long as katsy Apr 2016 #5
Does the campaign have permission to use it? MineralMan Apr 2016 #8
They will be sued if they don't have permission. katsy Apr 2016 #13
Another faux outrage from MM? Segami Apr 2016 #19
. the rantings of a desperate man... oh mineral you do make me chuckle berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #52
the bernie campaign was the only one restorefreedom Apr 2016 #71
I think it's similar to using an FDR quote or photo in an ad. femmedem Apr 2016 #6
Let's see ... fake endorsement or immorality war speech /vote? Scuba Apr 2016 #7
There is no reasonability here anymore Sky Masterson Apr 2016 #14
The things people notice eh? Juicy_Bellows Apr 2016 #17
This message was self-deleted by its author agracie Apr 2016 #9
The message presented being heard and considered concerns me. Prioritites I guess.... think Apr 2016 #10
This is a legit concern if it was posted by his campaign. Hopefully JimDandy Apr 2016 #11
But that would defeat the whole purpose: RufusTFirefly Apr 2016 #51
See #40. JimDandy Apr 2016 #63
No. Why is quoting a world leader you agree with odd? Fawke Em Apr 2016 #12
He put his LOGO on the picture MFM008 Apr 2016 #67
Did anyone ask Reuters? Half-Century Man Apr 2016 #15
Stock photos like this are available for commercial use... pat_k Apr 2016 #20
I was trying to say, as politely as possible, Half-Century Man Apr 2016 #30
Acknowledged. pat_k Apr 2016 #36
Plenty of stock images of pope for sale on shutterstock. pat_k Apr 2016 #16
just sent a note to the Vatican Embassy asking if an endorsement has been offered and sent the link DrDan Apr 2016 #18
Not in any way, shape, or form pat_k Apr 2016 #22
stock photos include "Bernie 2016" DrDan Apr 2016 #24
We use stock photos in eLearning all the time... pat_k Apr 2016 #29
do you put official logos on the stock photos implying a relationship that does not exist? DrDan Apr 2016 #32
Hitting a grey area I guess. pat_k Apr 2016 #41
I think it's a good sign that Karma13612 Apr 2016 #55
I was asked to put my question to another contact - in writing instead of via email DrDan Apr 2016 #68
Thx for update! pat_k Apr 2016 #69
And that is the operative phrase here: Karma13612 Apr 2016 #46
True pat_k Apr 2016 #49
I would NEVER!! lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #56
Actually the Sanders' logo on the Pope photo is interpreted to mean Sanders endorses the Pope JimDandy Apr 2016 #31
you are probably correct - my interpretation might be complety off-base DrDan Apr 2016 #33
All I see here is Bernie endorsing the Pope's message. Punkingal Apr 2016 #23
Existence of stock photos pat_k Apr 2016 #25
I realize now that your aim here is the same thing you claim to have done at FR Fumesucker Apr 2016 #26
You can take the poster out of the Free Republic, but you can't take the Freeper out of the poster. Romulox Apr 2016 #37
Be vewy vewy quiet Fumesucker Apr 2016 #40
He is only *pretending* to be a daschund, my good man. He is really a majestic Great Dane! Romulox Apr 2016 #42
holy-handgun, that is scary-larious.eom Karma13612 Apr 2016 #48
A great quote awake Apr 2016 #27
Far less so than this one GeorgeGist Apr 2016 #28
I don't like it either. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #34
It's the words that you object to, not the logo. Quit pretending (is that even possible for you?) n Romulox Apr 2016 #38
Quoting the Pope, a man Bernie has publicly praised & admired for years, is somehow odd? jillan Apr 2016 #44
Just another lie workinclasszero Apr 2016 #47
I've seen it in many places on the web mcar Apr 2016 #50
Thank you that is a beautiful quote from the Pope nice picture too. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #57
. melman Apr 2016 #58
I'm sure we all knew he was going to exploit the "meeting" or greeting.... bettyellen Apr 2016 #60
It strikes me as odd. Chemisse Apr 2016 #61
MineralMan? Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2016 #64
This is Hugh! I'm Series!! RufusTFirefly Apr 2016 #65
dude, you are so lame. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #66
A Bernie supporter claimed it was Photoshopped NurseJackie Apr 2016 #70
I'm guessing that 'rights' were obtained postatomic Apr 2016 #72
Purposefully misleading juxaposition of a popular Pope's pic with a political campaign's logo. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #73

Viva_La_Revolution

(28,791 posts)
1. created and posted by a random bernie supporter
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:48 PM
Apr 2016

Unless you have evidence this was put out by the campaign, ya got nuthin

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
3. Nope. It's a post by the Sanders campaign.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:50 PM
Apr 2016

Only the campaign can post on that page's timeline. Nobody else can. You're incorrect. Sorry.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
59. OMG
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:03 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie supporters might support the homeless, the poor, and respecting everyone.

What a scandal ... what's next? Is there some secret investigation underway that proves Bernie called kittens cute?

Jesus Hillary supporters are such petty little cry babies.

katsy

(4,246 posts)
5. What concern is it of ours as long as
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:51 PM
Apr 2016

The campaign has permission to use it.

I'm sure HRC can get her own pix.

I like SBS's message there.

MineralMan

(146,308 posts)
8. Does the campaign have permission to use it?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:53 PM
Apr 2016

I don't know that it does. Someone photoshopped the logo onto that photo, along with the Sanders swash.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
71. the bernie campaign was the only one
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:21 PM
Apr 2016

to pay for extra security at campaign events. the other candidate has stiffed the municipalities.

http://nypost.com/2016/03/13/des-moines-police-department-waiting-on-a-check-from-hillary/


i doubt he would go rogue on a copyright issue. i am sure all the permissions have been obtained.

femmedem

(8,203 posts)
6. I think it's similar to using an FDR quote or photo in an ad.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:52 PM
Apr 2016

Or similar to using any quote and photo from a public figure.

It's a quote that Sanders agrees with, from a public person whom he admires.

Sanders has been very careful not to imply that Pope Francis endorses him.

Response to MineralMan (Original post)

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
11. This is a legit concern if it was posted by his campaign. Hopefully
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:54 PM
Apr 2016

you made your concerns known to his campaign instead of just complaining on a forum on the internets.

MFM008

(19,808 posts)
67. He put his LOGO on the picture
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:54 PM
Apr 2016

making it look like its approved by Francis and the Vatican.
A bit presumptuous Id say.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
15. Did anyone ask Reuters?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 02:58 PM
Apr 2016

Did anyone check with the Vatican or the Sanders campaign?

Other than doing volunteer work for the respective campaigns, I don't think any of us can speak for either campaigns in an official way.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
30. I was trying to say, as politely as possible,
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:15 PM
Apr 2016

Outrage here at DU isn't indicative of an actual scandal.


While I do not agree with MM as to the best choice in possible Democratic candidates, I do respect his opinions on 99% of all things Democratic and his calls to dial back on internal conflicts.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
36. Acknowledged.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:22 PM
Apr 2016

I didn't mean to feed into "scandal" -- just wanted to point out that commercial use of a stock photo isn't an out of the ordinary thing.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
18. just sent a note to the Vatican Embassy asking if an endorsement has been offered and sent the link
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:00 PM
Apr 2016

This is a serious breach and the Sanders campaign has overstepped.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
24. stock photos include "Bernie 2016"
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

and "BernieSanders.com" is right next to the Pope Francis attribution

An image clearly implying an endorsement

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
29. We use stock photos in eLearning all the time...
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:14 PM
Apr 2016

... and the screen often has the logo of the entity sponsoring the training. These courses go through extensive legal review.

I just don't see the problem, but I'm sure you'll be hearing from the vatican soon. Keep us posted.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
32. do you put official logos on the stock photos implying a relationship that does not exist?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

An entity sponsoring training would be a completely different circumstance, I would think.

But I am no lawyer.

pat_k

(9,313 posts)
41. Hitting a grey area I guess.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:36 PM
Apr 2016

I imagine that some of the people in the images we use wouldn't be thrilled about being related to Pfizer (yeah, last training I did was for "the dark side&quot , but I don't think they'd have grounds to object once the photo has been put out there for commercial use.

But, we don't tend to use public figures. You're probably right about the law not being black and white on the question of what constitutes misleading use of a photo of a public figure sold for commercial use. I'm not a lawyer either (although I played one in an 8 year long pro se case against our securitized mortgage trustee).

It really wasn't my intention to be snarky. I am interested in finding out if you hear anything back.

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
55. I think it's a good sign that
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:56 PM
Apr 2016

the photo gives proper credit to the photographer in the lower RT corner, and further, that the Sanders campaign credited the Pope for his quote.

I am optimistic that it is all good....

You seem to have had some interesting legal experiences thru work.

I love the law, but don't 'practice it' in my daily life or work. I am always disappointed when I am called for Jury duty and then get released without serving. I would love to serve, but with my luck it would either be something very boring, or something involving rape or child abuse, both of which I wouldn't be able to stomach.

Anyway, I hold out hope that Bernie is in the clear on this FB posting.

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
68. I was asked to put my question to another contact - in writing instead of via email
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 09:46 PM
Apr 2016

I will do so tomorrow

Karma13612

(4,552 posts)
46. And that is the operative phrase here:
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:33 PM
Apr 2016
But I am no lawyer.


I would find it hard to believe that the Sanders campaign is going about grabbing photos and quotes and creating FB postings using ill-gotten sources.

Last I knew, in this country, our actions are considered innocent until proven to be criminal.

If Sanders campaign overstepped, they will hear about it in short order, I'm sure.



JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
31. Actually the Sanders' logo on the Pope photo is interpreted to mean Sanders endorses the Pope
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:15 PM
Apr 2016

not the other way around. To make the interpretation you have, that the Pope is endorsing Sanders, it would have to be a photo of Sanders with the Pope's papal stamp on it

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
33. you are probably correct - my interpretation might be complety off-base
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:19 PM
Apr 2016

still seems a bit presumptuous.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
23. All I see here is Bernie endorsing the Pope's message.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

I guess if I was given to passive-aggressive faux outrage I would see something else.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
26. I realize now that your aim here is the same thing you claim to have done at FR
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:08 PM
Apr 2016

I'm still trying to decide if you're on my side and subtle as a serpent or on the other side and a bull in a china shop or perhaps just here for the grins, this has been an interesting primary and proves to get even more so.

Since you have a detectable sense of humor I'm starting to lean toward you are actually very subtle.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
37. You can take the poster out of the Free Republic, but you can't take the Freeper out of the poster.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:23 PM
Apr 2016
Since you have a detectable sense of humor I'm starting to lean toward you are actually very subtle.


I've never seen it. Plenty that has been laughable from that one, however.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
42. He is only *pretending* to be a daschund, my good man. He is really a majestic Great Dane!
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:39 PM
Apr 2016

(now excuse him as he continues to waddle on his stumpy "Great Dane" legs!)

awake

(3,226 posts)
27. A great quote
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:11 PM
Apr 2016

Does Hillary have a quote from her close friend Henery Kishinger on her face book page promoting the next war?

jillan

(39,451 posts)
44. Quoting the Pope, a man Bernie has publicly praised & admired for years, is somehow odd?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:26 PM
Apr 2016

Hmmmm.

Nope.

Chemisse

(30,811 posts)
61. It strikes me as odd.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:04 PM
Apr 2016

As though the Bernie campaign were trying to hang onto the coattails of a popular pope.

If it were a picture of Sanders himself, with the Pope's quote underneath it, it would seem more appropriate, as though Bernie's own philosophy was bolstered by the Pope's words.

No big deal though. It's certainly not an indictment of Bernie in any way, and probably is a result of someone in his campaign being just a little tone deaf.

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
65. This is Hugh! I'm Series!!
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 05:27 PM
Apr 2016

Please let us know ASAP what you find out, so we can shut down our computers and get on with our lives.

Keep up the good work!

Here's a cookie.

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
70. A Bernie supporter claimed it was Photoshopped
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:12 PM
Apr 2016

... fake (presumably to embarrass Bernie) ... I guess it's real after all.

It's misleading ... like those tv ads that suggested newspaper endorsements that never happened.

postatomic

(1,771 posts)
72. I'm guessing that 'rights' were obtained
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:30 PM
Apr 2016

To obtain a clean image (without watermarks). This photo is from 2013 and not every guideline required by Reuters was followed. Nothing that would throw The Sandman in jail, but there are some ethical issues. I've contacted the Photographer to hopefully get the skinny on this.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
73. Purposefully misleading juxaposition of a popular Pope's pic with a political campaign's logo.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 10:52 PM
Apr 2016

Dubious taste and ethics.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does this Sanders Faceboo...