Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gabeana

(3,166 posts)
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:05 PM Apr 2016

Hillary the ultimate waffler

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hillary-clinton-minimum-wage_us_571143b0e4b06f35cb6f9f1e

For months now, Clinton has insisted that she supports the Fight for $15 — a national labor campaign calling for $15 per hour and union rights for all workers — but backs a more modest federal minimum wage hike, proposed by many Democrats, to $12 from the current $7.25. (As for how those two positions can be compatible, we’ll get to that later.)

Clinton has said she’s concerned that areas with lower costs of living, such as pockets of Upstate New York, can’t absorb a dramatic boost to $15 the way, say, New York City could. Plenty of economists share that worry, given that such a large nationwide hike would be unprecedented.

But on Thursday, Clinton started to crack on the issue. Standing across from her opponent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who unequivocally supports a $15 federal minimum, she ended up shifting from an economic argument against $15 to a political one.

“I think setting the goal to get to $12 is the way to go, encouraging others [cities and states] to get to $15,” Clinton said. “But, of course, if we have a Democratic Congress, we will go to $15.” In other words, if she thought $15 was politically possible in Washington, she would get on board with it — never mind that she’s been trying to make a nuanced case against it for months.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary the ultimate waffler (Original Post) gabeana Apr 2016 OP
Good grief! Why would anyone believe she would stand by anything she says, at this point? djean111 Apr 2016 #1
lol gabeana Apr 2016 #2
When She Goes To A 'Waffle House Restaurant' For Breakfast She Struggles With..... global1 Apr 2016 #3
Bull, $15 is good in rural areas, in NYC it should be doubled. Waiting For Everyman Apr 2016 #4
Crickets crickets crickets gabeana Apr 2016 #5
She is the polar opposite of a leader. vintx Apr 2016 #6
 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
1. Good grief! Why would anyone believe she would stand by anything she says, at this point?
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:08 PM
Apr 2016

It is just campaign bullshit, from her.

global1

(25,247 posts)
3. When She Goes To A 'Waffle House Restaurant' For Breakfast She Struggles With.....
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:30 PM
Apr 2016

Should I have the waffles? Or should I have the pancakes? Should I have the waffles? Or should I have the pancakes? Hmmmm... maybe I should just have ham and eggs with hash browns. No - I think I'll order the waffles. On second thought I'll get the pancakes. But wait - what is Bernie ordering - I have what he has.

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
4. Bull, $15 is good in rural areas, in NYC it should be doubled.
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 03:51 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary should show us she can live on even the full $15 an hour for a year, and donate all her past speaking fees to those small businesses she cares so much about, to help them absorb the higher minimum wage cost.

Stepping down $3 per hour, from $15 down to $12 as she wants to do, is getting 20% less. Yep, she sure does fight for struggling people alright, fights to get them paid 20% less. But that's no big deal, right? Why should they mind, what's $3 per hour to quibble over?

Even comparing at $15 per hour, she makes 15,000 times that for one of her speeches. One hour of her time is NOT worth the labor of 15,000 people for that hour. The truth is, they are being under paid BECAUSE people like her are being over paid.

She is the problem, not the solution. You don't elect the problem and expect anything to improve.

She is "concerned" quoting the article. I'll just bet she is -- for herself and her money sources.

gabeana

(3,166 posts)
5. Crickets crickets crickets
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:01 PM
Apr 2016

from the sycophants, shouldn't they be interjecting, the pope, the taxes, you know their deflections, I'm looking for their mocking avatar of St Bernie, because they don't have substance

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary the ultimate waff...