Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:45 PM Apr 2016

Days after being called a "whore," Hillary gets money thrown at her by Sanders supporters

Eric Boehlert ‏@EricBoehlert 4h4 hours ago
Days after being called a "whore," protesters throw money at her. must be fun running for POTUS as a woman...


Eric Boehlert ‏@EricBoehlert 2h2 hours ago
last wk Obama attended Hollywood fundraiser where tix cost $33K. wonder why progressives didn't throw money and at him call him "whore"
107 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Days after being called a "whore," Hillary gets money thrown at her by Sanders supporters (Original Post) bigtree Apr 2016 OP
Do they have to make everything sexist... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #1
You......--------> pkdu Apr 2016 #7
Can you provide video of these protesters calling Hillary a whore? GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #9
{crickets} InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 2016 #23
OH they saw the whore calling in NY, have no fear of that. Nt pkdu Apr 2016 #30
that isn't what the OP or the tweet says dsc Apr 2016 #33
Oh just make up any old thing you want. bjo59 Apr 2016 #56
What on earth does the OP Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #12
Circumstances are NOT similar.... GeorgiaPeanuts Apr 2016 #19
Yes Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #25
Great clarification! sheshe2 Apr 2016 #41
They have no credibility on real issues ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #20
Despiration is calling Hillary a whore! nt sheshe2 Apr 2016 #43
Corporate Whore, and the shoe fits. She doesn't like it because it hits her where she lives. ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #53
He said Democratic whore. nt sheshe2 Apr 2016 #57
Democratic Corporate Whore to be exact. ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #61
Yes That Is The Two party System That Is ONE That We Have... The MONEY Party! CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #71
Only if it is. Pisces Apr 2016 #104
It's sad, isn't it? cwydro Apr 2016 #2
I know your right gabeana Apr 2016 #89
Oh please. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #3
I cannot believe you are even defending this. NT sheshe2 Apr 2016 #46
Uh, I'm not defending the OP. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #63
Hillary supporters immediately 840high Apr 2016 #91
All of those protestors called her a whore? panader0 Apr 2016 #4
The longer this goes, the more sharks he's jumped. Joe the Revelator Apr 2016 #15
WHo Jumped Bernie? gabeana Apr 2016 #90
Where does the post say all of the protesters called her a whore? Maru Kitteh Apr 2016 #84
If you're going to claim someone called Hillary a whore please post the link Perogie Apr 2016 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author bvf Apr 2016 #44
Let me help you out here Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #6
Exactly, thank you. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #18
What was the fund raised trying to do, raise money for down ticket candidates. Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #64
Please stay on topic Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #73
How about giving the real reason for the fund raiser, we are talking about a fund raiser Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #76
The primise of the OP was to link Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #81
I know this, as she has raised money before and donated $10,000 to Sanders campaign Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #82
You were attempting to deflect Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #83
And in turn you have attempted to defect, goodbye Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #85
Bye....have a good night! Bjornsdotter Apr 2016 #86
This is garbage. Progressives didn't call HRC a 'whore.' Eric J in MN Apr 2016 #8
They sure did (disgustingly) cheer it. CrowCityDem Apr 2016 #22
He was not speaking just of her. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #32
so which is it dsc Apr 2016 #36
He called corporate democrats "whores." SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #38
and mentioned her as a specific example dsc Apr 2016 #47
I already said the choice of word was unfortunate, and he apologized. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #50
Oh, that makes everything pretty then... sheshe2 Apr 2016 #51
No it does not. Didn't say so. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #59
Tossing money at Hill sheshe2 Apr 2016 #69
I can see that we will never see this the same way, SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #74
Still got nothin'........ TheCowsCameHome Apr 2016 #10
The implication was that... Else You Are Mad Apr 2016 #11
Exactly. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #80
You should be ashamed of yourself Joe the Revelator Apr 2016 #13
Look up "conflation." dchill Apr 2016 #14
Another 50 days of these people nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #16
98 days until the convention. morningfog Apr 2016 #39
This forum disappears June 14 at the latest. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #48
Your comment on disenfranchising black voters is silly. morningfog Apr 2016 #52
No, that is exactly what Sanders would seek if he tries to argue the geek tragedy Apr 2016 #60
It's silly. The super delegates are part of the process, the rules. morningfog Apr 2016 #66
Democratic Super delegates who prefer the Democrat geek tragedy Apr 2016 #68
I don't expect the supers to break from the pledged delegate winner. morningfog Apr 2016 #70
That certainly would be the takeaway and it would tear the party apart if they did that. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #79
One candidate is raising money from regular people Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #17
Why were the protesters called a "whore"? k8conant Apr 2016 #21
You beat me to it! nt Bonobo Apr 2016 #26
LOL ky_dem Apr 2016 #29
Yeah, why singular? SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #54
Protesters were called whores? Bonobo Apr 2016 #24
What did she do with the money they threw at her? Depaysement Apr 2016 #27
. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #35
So wrong to call protesters whores Autumn Apr 2016 #28
A ridiculous stunt KingFlorez Apr 2016 #31
I thought it was a very good stunt. nt SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #37
Good for you KingFlorez Apr 2016 #40
Of course it doesn't, directly. SusanCalvin Apr 2016 #45
Lol. The dredges. morningfog Apr 2016 #34
No one called her a whore. Fawke Em Apr 2016 #42
This whole Pope thing going completely the opposite of what you predicted Goblinmonger Apr 2016 #49
Nobody called Hillary a whore AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #55
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #58
you had respect for me? bigtree Apr 2016 #72
No one called her that. Octafish Apr 2016 #62
I'm overjoyed that I helped with your grammar! nt Bonobo Apr 2016 #65
Still butthurt? HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #67
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #75
THIS is what the next 4 years will be like.... RazBerryBeret Apr 2016 #77
Remember the OP is a man, a heterosexual male. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #99
I love this post like butter. Luminous Animal Apr 2016 #78
What the fuck is wrong with a whore? beedle Apr 2016 #87
... AzDar Apr 2016 #107
How much did she pocket this time? jmg257 Apr 2016 #88
This is rich passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #92
It's a ridiculous conflation in the first place. bluedigger Apr 2016 #93
Charming people. Lucinda Apr 2016 #94
"Sure I'll take money from anybody, but I'm the victim here, remember?" Scuba Apr 2016 #95
Okay, Hillary supporters. You've convinced me. Vinca Apr 2016 #96
WOLF! WOLF! WOLF!!! Odin2005 Apr 2016 #97
Yes, showers of $$ are very, very sexist Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #98
Money Shower- Hard Rock Casino Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #100
money shower on Gurdass Maan Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #101
Another pathetic pile-o-poo whatchamacallit Apr 2016 #102
"Days after being called a "whore," Hillary gets money thrown at her by Sanders supporters" workinclasszero Apr 2016 #103
day after day ridiculous over the top completely dishonest posts attacking sanders and supporters Warren Stupidity Apr 2016 #105
Another, poor Hillary thread. Are we supposed to feel sorry for her? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2016 #106
 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
1. Do they have to make everything sexist...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:46 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie Sanders is not running against Obama... Hillary and her supporters need to understand that and get over it.

pkdu

(3,977 posts)
7. You......-------->
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:50 PM
Apr 2016

<-----------point


Calling a woman a whore and throwing dollar bills , classless...just classless.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
33. that isn't what the OP or the tweet says
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:07 PM
Apr 2016

It isn't his or the OP's fault you can't or won't read English. It says days after, It says it quite clearly.

bjo59

(1,166 posts)
56. Oh just make up any old thing you want.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:20 PM
Apr 2016

As a woman, I really, really, really find it extremely distasteful when people use the phenomenon of sexism so utterly cynically. But the corporate media have fattened us all up on a constant diet of cynicism and an ethics of "the ends justify the means" and "winner takes all" so .... sigh ..... what can one expect?

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
12. What on earth does the OP
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:52 PM
Apr 2016

have to do with "running against Obama?"

It's a comparison about how they were treated under similar circumstances.

Whooooosh!

 

GeorgiaPeanuts

(2,353 posts)
19. Circumstances are NOT similar....
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:55 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary is running for the nomination, as is Sanders.

Obama is NOT running for a nomination or for President.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
20. They have no credibility on real issues
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:56 PM
Apr 2016

so they resort to baiting on gender, race, and religion. A sign of real desperation.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
2. It's sad, isn't it?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:47 PM
Apr 2016

I think the sexism is even more obvious than the racism with Obama.

Our country is so far behind .

gabeana

(3,166 posts)
89. I know your right
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:27 PM
Apr 2016

the sexism of accusing anyone of sexism who criticises Hillary and those people like Albright and Steinham basically saying all women should vote for Hillary because she is a women, now that is sexism

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
3. Oh please.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:47 PM
Apr 2016

Not everything is sexist. Some things are corporatist.

And nobody called her personally a "whore." It was meant to apply to a lot of elected officials. And it was meant in a corporate manner in any case.

(Yes, I know that word should not have been used in any case. But it was not applied directly to her nor meant only for her.)

Perogie

(687 posts)
5. If you're going to claim someone called Hillary a whore please post the link
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:49 PM
Apr 2016

I think you will find that the phase was Corporate whore.

Response to Perogie (Reply #5)

Bjornsdotter

(6,123 posts)
6. Let me help you out here
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:49 PM
Apr 2016

1. Obama is not running for president

2. The throwing of the money was directly related to the incredibly, expensive price of the fundraising dinner at the Clooney's.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
64. What was the fund raised trying to do, raise money for down ticket candidates.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:26 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders has received $10,000 in the past from a Hillary find raiser, we need a Democratic congress to get progressive ideas passed. How much did their fund raiser get?

Bjornsdotter

(6,123 posts)
73. Please stay on topic
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:36 PM
Apr 2016

...the topic was about the money being thrown at Hillary and an attempt to link it to sexism.

I have no idea how much the Clooney extravaganza raised.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
76. How about giving the real reason for the fund raiser, we are talking about a fund raiser
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:40 PM
Apr 2016

Go back and read the OP again, "fund raiser" was there.

Bjornsdotter

(6,123 posts)
81. The primise of the OP was to link
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:48 PM
Apr 2016

.......sexism and the money being thrown. Just because a word is there does not mean it is the subject, but you already knew that.

Hillary collected her maximum amount before monies were funneled elsewhere. Also Hillary attended another fundraiser the same day....entry price $2700.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
82. I know this, as she has raised money before and donated $10,000 to Sanders campaign
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:53 PM
Apr 2016

When he was running for the Senate, down ticket candidates. Oh, I don't need my post rewritten or told what I can and can not have in my post.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
8. This is garbage. Progressives didn't call HRC a 'whore.'
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:51 PM
Apr 2016

Dr. Song, MD, a speaker at a Sanders rally, said we should stop electing "corporate Democratic whores." He promptly apologized.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
32. He was not speaking just of her.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:06 PM
Apr 2016

And while the verbiage could have been improved, I agree with the sentiment.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
38. He called corporate democrats "whores."
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:10 PM
Apr 2016

I disagree with the term for a number of reasons, but agree with the sentiment.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
47. and mentioned her as a specific example
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:14 PM
Apr 2016

If someone had named Obama and then talked about corporate lawn jockeys no one, not a single solitary person, would say that was OK. I fail to see any difference at all with listing the only woman who has ever won a presidential primary and then talking about corporate whores and what my analogy.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
50. I already said the choice of word was unfortunate, and he apologized.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:15 PM
Apr 2016

However, I agree with what I believe was meant.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
59. No it does not. Didn't say so.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:21 PM
Apr 2016

Disagree with choice of word. Agree with sentiment. And the throwing money was not sexist by any rational interpretation. Which is why I got involved in this thread.

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
69. Tossing money at Hill
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:32 PM
Apr 2016

was sexist. That is how you treat a whore. It was meant to malign and demean her.

Else You Are Mad

(3,040 posts)
11. The implication was that...
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:52 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary is the embodiment of greed NOT that she is a whore. In fact the gentleman that used the term 'corporate whore' was not associated with those throwing the money.

But, please spin away.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
80. Exactly.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:43 PM
Apr 2016

And I'll give an example of greed - giving those corporate speeches when she already had plenty of money and knew good and well she was going to run for president.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
48. This forum disappears June 14 at the latest.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:15 PM
Apr 2016

Whether Sanders wants to foment a leftwing Brooks Brothers riot in an effort to disenfranchise all the black voters who provided Hillary with her margin of victory in the primary will be up to him. I don't think his ego is that out of control, but we will see.

But here on June 14 the primary voting will be over, and there will be a winner and a loser, whether the loser acknowledges reality or not. Then it will be general election mode here.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
52. Your comment on disenfranchising black voters is silly.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:18 PM
Apr 2016

This forum will last until one candidate concedes.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
60. No, that is exactly what Sanders would seek if he tries to argue the
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:22 PM
Apr 2016

superdelegates to overrule the voters.

The election is over when the voting is over. Sanders can pretend to be the nominee all he wants, he'll just get laughed at.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
66. It's silly. The super delegates are part of the process, the rules.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:27 PM
Apr 2016

It would not be Sanders disenfranchising anyone, it is the DNC who made the rules. If Sanders went to the convention 50-100 delegates behind Hillary, for example, and the super delegates broke in favor of Bernie, he would not have disenfranchised a single voter. If anyone had, it would the DNC and the super delegates.

Further, you can't claim that the 50-100 pledged delegate difference can be reduced to African American voters. It is just silly.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
68. Democratic Super delegates who prefer the Democrat
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:31 PM
Apr 2016

are not going to override the votes of Democrats in order to steal the Democratic nomination on behalf of a non-Democrat.

We'll see what kind of human being Sanders is in the first two weeks of June.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
70. I don't expect the supers to break from the pledged delegate winner.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:33 PM
Apr 2016

But if they did, it's in their discretion and the recipient would not be disenfranchising black voters.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
79. That certainly would be the takeaway and it would tear the party apart if they did that.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:40 PM
Apr 2016

Sanders would lose superdelegate support if he tried that kind of stunt--no way would Jeff Merkley and Keith Ellison support that kind of effort.

The media would have a field day with him. So would late night comedians/talk shows.

We'll see what kind of person he is.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
17. One candidate is raising money from regular people
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 09:53 PM
Apr 2016

27 dollars at a time, the other is raising money from the 0.01%, 350,000 dollars at a time.

I'm with the people's candidate.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
31. A ridiculous stunt
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:05 PM
Apr 2016

Such is the behavior of supporters of a campaign that is losing the delegate count and set to fall further behind.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
40. Good for you
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:11 PM
Apr 2016

Unfortunately it doesn't get Sanders any delegates, but moral victories are always nice for some people.

SusanCalvin

(6,592 posts)
45. Of course it doesn't, directly.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:14 PM
Apr 2016

Didn't even say it was a moral victory.

But I don't think it will lose him any delegates either. And I think it made a good point and got attention.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
49. This whole Pope thing going completely the opposite of what you predicted
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:15 PM
Apr 2016

really has got y'all in a tizzy, hasn't it.

And Mr. Boehlert should know better as a writer than to misplace a modifier like that. I mean, that's a grammar test example if I ever saw one.

Response to bigtree (Original post)

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
72. you had respect for me?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:34 PM
Apr 2016

...and you write all of this?

I have NEVER come onto a thread of yours and called you out, much less like this. You need to check the definition of respect.

Response to bigtree (Original post)

RazBerryBeret

(3,075 posts)
77. THIS is what the next 4 years will be like....
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 10:40 PM
Apr 2016

if she manages to reach the WH. I'm a woman and I'm not ready for this.

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
87. What the fuck is wrong with a whore?
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:22 PM
Apr 2016

really? They do work that usually is a result of circumstances beyond their control.

They are usually forced into their situations. It's like calling someone 'middle class' as an intended insult.

The sexism, if there is any, comes from the 'Johns' that use the service, and the morons that think being called a 'Whore' just means you're being negatively equated as a female sex worker. The ignorance and stereotyping is breath-taking.

If any of the females in my family were discovered to be sex workers I would still proudly call them my family ... if they were discovered to be in a government position, taking money from large corporations and then writing laws that benefited the people giving them money over the average citizens, I would no longer consider them part of my family.

Hillary should strive to be as open and honest as a sex worker.

bluedigger

(17,086 posts)
93. It's a ridiculous conflation in the first place.
Sun Apr 17, 2016, 11:51 PM
Apr 2016

When people give money to a whore they have a reasonable expectation of services being provided in exchange. This is more a case of people throwing good money after bad money if one must make an analogy.

Vinca

(50,278 posts)
96. Okay, Hillary supporters. You've convinced me.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 07:40 AM
Apr 2016

Apparently she is a sensitive, tender flower who is easily intimidated and prone to hiding in corners. You're right . . . she shouldn't be commander-in-chief. If dollar bills are so upsetting, how will she deal with Vlad? How will she deal with Trump?

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
98. Yes, showers of $$ are very, very sexist
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 08:26 AM
Apr 2016



Odd that the OP sees Stepp Blatter as a sex symbol but to each his own is my motto!!!!
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
101. money shower on Gurdass Maan
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 08:34 AM
Apr 2016

huge lot of Indian currency notes being showered on Gurdass Maan, the living legend of Punjabi Muse, by A Famous Saint in Punjab.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
103. "Days after being called a "whore," Hillary gets money thrown at her by Sanders supporters"
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:07 AM
Apr 2016

Sickening!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Days after being called a...