Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,911 posts)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:25 AM Apr 2016

#Berniemath

Arizona is the latest poster child of election fraud, along with Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004. Sanders won Utah (a bordering state) and Idaho primaries with nearly 80% of the vote. But he lost in Arizona by 60-38%. Who believes it?

The National Exit Pool (NEP) of six major media conglomerates funds exit pollster Edison Research. The NEP decided not to poll AZ. It’s as if they knew they would have to match the unadjusted poll to a bogus recorded vote; the massive discrepancies would be too obvious. But the networks called it for Hillary with less than 1% of the votes in. How did they know this if they did not exit poll? Luckily the Yavapai County Daily Courier did an exit poll – and Bernie led by 63-37%. Hillary won the county by 54-43%- an impossible 37% difference in margin. But the evidence of fraud goes much further than this one poll.

Of the 15 Arizona counties, Maricopa (Phoenix) is by far the largest with nearly 60% of the vote. Pima County (Tucson) is second with 16%. In the 2008 primary, Maricopa voter turnout was 54.3%. In the other 14 counties, there was a 47.2% turnout. In 2016, 13 counties had higher voter turnout rates than in 2008. The 4.1% decline (17,000 votes) in Maricopa 2016 turnout (50.2%) from 2008 is counter-intuitive. Voter turnout in the other 14 AZ counties increased by 8.27% to 55.48%.

Based on the overall trend, Maricopa should have had an approximate 62.6% turnout. It is a powerful indicator of voter suppression. The probability of the 12.4% difference (153,000 votes) between Maricopa’s projected voter turnout and the actual 50.2% turnout is approximately 6.2E-12 or 1 in 6 trillion.

The probability of the 5.26% difference in voter turnout between 14 AZ counties (55.48%) and Maricopa (50.22%) is approximately 0.03% (1 in 3000).


https://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2016/04/13/17564/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
#Berniemath (Original Post) RandySF Apr 2016 OP
Unreal. n/t Lucinda Apr 2016 #1
I will never forget the inconsistencies in reporting in Arizona. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #2
They did that as a joke on the CIA. RandySF Apr 2016 #3
Oh do you know that for a fact? DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #4
Well, not really. So, just in case... RandySF Apr 2016 #5
Hahaha... DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #6
Please don't link to Rich Charnin. We should try to keep this place bonkers-free Godhumor Apr 2016 #7
the way things have been going AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #9
Where did you get the idea ... NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #10
here AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #11
Jesus Hussein Christ. NanceGreggs Apr 2016 #12
tell me about it AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #13
They expect everyone to just BELIEVE leftynyc Apr 2016 #14
I know this is posted as a joke, but Charnin is a charlatan nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #8
 

DemocracyDirect

(708 posts)
2. I will never forget the inconsistencies in reporting in Arizona.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:32 AM
Apr 2016

I saw a few hiccups in Iowa also, but not even in the same solar system to what happened in Arizona.

Different networks had different %'s reporting.

And then all the networks called it.

And then it was clear that it was only based on absentee votes.

Not even one of the counties had reported an in person vote yet.

And then on top of that all the shenanigans with voter registrations changed.

I called the FBI and they redirected my call to the CIA. Just weird.

 

DemocracyDirect

(708 posts)
6. Hahaha...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:40 AM
Apr 2016

In case you didn't realize it, I was just kidding about the FBI/CIA call.

But the rest of what I said was exactly true and lots of other people know it, even you.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
7. Please don't link to Rich Charnin. We should try to keep this place bonkers-free
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:40 AM
Apr 2016

Discovering fraud in every election one WordPress post at a time.

 

AgerolanAmerican

(1,000 posts)
9. the way things have been going
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:34 AM
Apr 2016

Maybe there is fraud in every election, or a lot of them. Lotta stinky stuff going on. This stuff in NY with the party registrations changing for only Sanders supporters is a major red flag. How can that be coincidence or accident?

NanceGreggs

(27,815 posts)
10. Where did you get the idea ...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:39 AM
Apr 2016

... that in NY "the party registrations changing for only Sanders supporters"?

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
14. They expect everyone to just BELIEVE
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:35 PM
Apr 2016

they tried to change their registration to Democrat. It's just as likely they didn't know the rules and are pissed they can't vote tomorrow. But the Bernie supporters WILL believe anything. They simply cannot fathom that some of us don't care for their candidate (or his supporters).

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»#Berniemath