2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumI'll say it. I've been very disappointed in Obama.
And don't want more of same.
No prosecutions of bankers. No opening up 911 investigation. No aggressive pursuit of offshore tax dodgers. Just lets the 1% crimes slide.
Broward
(1,976 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... mind about what he thinks of Obama
now
Protalker
(418 posts)He is a fine man. In the primary I was for Hillary because it was clear the Repugnant would do what they did. We needed a fighter who could win. Bernie fights but has no Allyson to win in congress. No money for down ticket people just a fund raising letter. Hillary has given 30 million
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)that she fought Republicans for and managed to get passed that was more controversial than something like remembering the Revolution or re-naming a post office.
She didn't succeed in getting Billarycare passed--and that was "fighting" with a Democratic Congress and her husband as President and head of the Democratic Party.
I don't know what she fought and won when she was on the board of WalMart or as First Lady of Arkansas. If she fought her husband when he was about to sign Robert E. Lee day into law, she didn't win that one either. Or celebrating Confederate Heritage month or whatever the heck that mess was called.
CorkySt.Clair
(1,507 posts)He's accomplished many good things. Sorry you didn't get your unicorn sparklepony.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)And please explain how they outweigh the total capitulation on healthcare, drone attacks, lack of prosecutions, etc.
Yavin4
(35,441 posts)Negotiated a nukes treaty with Iran; opened relations with Cuba; allowed the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy to expire and maintained them for everyone else. Passed a stimulus which pulled us out of the financial ditch in 2008.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)I agree on the Iran treaty and opening up Cuba. The Bush tax cuts for ony the very, very wealthiest expired as per the law that enacted them, not because of the President's doing. He allowed the rest of them to be made permanent.
The ACA, while better than no ACA, is a far cry short of Universal Healthcare or even the Public Option, both of which he ceded without putting up any fight at all.
None of the good he has done even begins to counter his coddling of banksters, drone program, TPP, etc.
Yavin4
(35,441 posts)That's far from coddling bankers.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Yavin4
(35,441 posts)What laws were violated that warranted a criminal prosecution?
Scuba
(53,475 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)firebrand80
(2,760 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)President Obama has total opposition from the GOP. If they had been reasonable, he might have gotten more accomplished.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)One of the 99
(2,280 posts)The GOP didn't everything to oppose Eric Holder.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)The bushies destroyed the civil rights and voting rights sections of the DOJ. Holder rebuild these sections and has been busy defending voting rights. In Texas, the DOJ played a key role in both the voter id and the redistricting cases.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)He was, and is, politically naïve. Yes, he's done a few good things, but wasting the first two years playing nice, listening to bad advice, cost him (and us) dearly.
brush
(53,787 posts)There was never any two-year Democratic majority in Obama's first two years except very briefly on paper. A super-majority, 60 votes in the Senate, was needed to overcome the repug filibusters. They did it an UNPRECECENTED 400 times
I'm posting the real deal history so that people who call themselves Democrats stop repeating repug talking points to minimize Obama's achievements despite the obstacle's thrown in his path from day one of his administration.
President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support his agenda.
He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Frankens election in Minnesota and he didnt get seated for seven months.
The Presidents cause was helped in April when Pennsylvanias Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties.
That gave the President 59 votes - still a vote shy of the super majority.
But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission.
So while the Presidents number on paper was 59 Senators - he was really working with just 58 Senators.
Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 - but only in theory because, Senator Byrd was still out.
In August, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts died and the number went back down to 59 again until Paul Kirk temporarily filled Kennedys seat in September.
Any pretense of a super-majority ended on February 4, 2010 when Republican Scott Brown was sworn into the seat Senator Kennedy once held. Do you see a two-year super-majority? And there were also summer and holiday recesses during that time.
So no more "he squandered a two-year majority" bs posts please.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)NV Whino
(20,886 posts)But, you are right about the 60 vote super majority, and I fault Harry Reid perhaps even more than Obama for the resulting gridlock.
One of the 99
(2,280 posts)The GOP was filibustering everything in the Senate.
Ino
(3,366 posts)It was unforgivable how he courted the other side!
That being said, I believe he was a much better choice than Hillary. And I like him personally despite everything.
I just can't decide if he was as you said -- being naive, playing nice & listening to bad advice.
Or if he was really one of them and intended to prove it once elected. I hate to think that is the case.
NV Whino
(20,886 posts)He accepted leftovers from the Clinton administration for his advisors, and tried to play nice, assuming the GOP knew how to, or even wanted to, do that. Political naïveté.
In better times, I think he would have been a great President. As it is, he will simply be remembered for being the first black President, not for anything he actually did accomplish.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,841 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Where he gave them permanent things they had sought for decades, but they didn't dare push for, for a few temporary concessions in return.
Sequestration is a perfect example.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)Bill Clinton's comment about Bernie supporters wanting "to line up and shoot Wall Street bankers" was a very revealing hyperbole, intended to reinforce the belief that doing anything about bank fraud and abuse would be ludicrous. It shouldn't even be considered. Clinton has no plans to reform the banking system or address inequality. There is a class war and I don't know how Hillary will convince anyone she is on the side of working people. This election isn't about incremental changes that might be possible if you just wait a while, it's about changing the whole meaning of what is politically possible. This is about redressing great crimes and inequalities.
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)with chained CPI/tax cut extensions/etc. That's when he lost me.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Reply #16)
Post removed
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I am way to the left of most Democrats, including him. I don't expect the party to be as far left as I am. I'm thankful when a Democrat is able to do good, and I think Obama has done good. I don't agree with him about everything, but I am overall happy with him as President.
EndElectoral
(4,213 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)I think he has been pretty masterful in advancing the ball in the face of enormous opposition.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)sufrommich
(22,871 posts)LexVegas
(6,067 posts)ecstatic
(32,709 posts)And they don't give two shits about the social issues that Bernie was forced to add to his platform.
betsuni
(25,537 posts)bjo59
(1,166 posts)I'll go even further and say that I figured that out before the first election. I had completely given up until Bernie came along.
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)to get over here and let you know how little they care about corruption, inequality and labor. It's perverse.
basselope
(2,565 posts)basselope
(2,565 posts)But I think Obama is better than Clinton, thus he earns the new title.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)I would change a couple of things, but I don't need a "revolution."
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)... or maybe even before he was nominated.
The last 8 years has aged him like someone who has enemies all around him.
Contrary1
(12,629 posts)which makes me wonder why he signed on for the second act.
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)And felt he could do enough good for the country otherwise that it was worth it.
I give him a lot of credit for leaving the Republicans in shambles.
I put all the blame on Hillary for what could happen to the Democratic party.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)Or maybe by other powerful interests including but not limited to his own cabinet, his secretary of state, previous presidents, party leaders, industry captains, the 0.01% etc.
Like I said, someone who ages 20 years in 8 years might be surrounded with enemies.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)Who wish to complain...well...America would be way different if McCain or Romney were elected...and not in a good way.... Btw I'm sure the wholesale obstruction by conservatives had little to do with what could have been done...
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Certainly not the ones on Wall St.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Public subsidization of private insurance companies instead of actually paying for healthcare. Pushes for public education privatization. Agressive expansion of the Surveillance State. Agressive pursuit of pro-corporatte trade policy.
He's "liberal" around the edges.
CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Obama is no liberal.
Peregrine Took
(7,415 posts)I'll be glad to see him go.
Big talker but, other than some of the good aspects of Obamacare, a pretty thin resume.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I expect to be. I am overall extremely happy with him and think he has done very well fighting for me. I absolutely want to continue the Obama trend.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)Shocking
polichick
(37,152 posts)right from the beginning when he stuffed his administration with the same corporate tools that HRC will choose.
Obama inspired me to quit the party after four decades of activism. Clinton is inspiring me to quit voting for whatever "Dem" lesser-of-evils they serve up.
oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)If we could have given him the House and kept the Senate things would have been different -- maybe -- change requires everyone being involved. Bernie and clinton will face the same problems.
PufPuf23
(8,789 posts)I was more excited by his success in 2008 than I have ever been by a politician but was sickened when he started to make appointments.
POTUS Obama started in a huge hole given the foreign policy blunders of GWB and the meltdown of the economy.
I remain proud of the face he puts on the USA and his eloquence but sad that he made so little use of the huge grass root support he squandered early.
POTUS Obama alas is a corporatist and as a nation we are still in great need of transformation.
ecstatic
(32,709 posts)Well maybe you can answer this question, since Bernie couldn't: Do you have a sense that there is a particular statute or statutes that a prosecutor could have or should have invoked to bring indictments?
Comic strip 1: Wall Streets criminals would be hauled off in handcuffs, if only a President had the nerve to criminally convict and imprison them.
As one recent example, Sanders sees a conspiracy in a pending legal settlement between Goldman Sachs and the Justice Department and the New York and Illinois attorneys general. The investment bank will pay a hefty sum to close investigations into alleged misrepresentations in decade-old mortgage-securities dealings.
Except that the Justice Department already investigated and found insufficient evidence to pursue criminal charges.
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/bernie-bad-accounting-article-1.2522119
http://www.businessinsider.com/bernie-sanders-wall-street-banks-daily-news-2016-4
Opening a 911 investigation requires Congress.
Obama's IRS is very aggressive. Where did that talking point come from? https://www.justice.gov/tax/offshore-compliance-initiative
There's perception, and then there's reality. At the very least, you should get your facts straight first.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesnt always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one youre already in.[/center][/font][hr]
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)That will go well.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)wendylaroux
(2,925 posts)LostOne4Ever
(9,289 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)Just count your fucking blessings!
Please!
And use the brain you were born with.
This primary doesn't pit Obama against ANYBODY, so why are you attacking Obama in GD: P?
WTF do you think is gained?