Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 09:42 AM Apr 2016

Game Changer

As far as I am concerned.

Clinton stated that a 12 year old child wanted to get raped.

There is no amount of excuses for anyone, criminal defense lawyer or not, doing what she did.

Clinton's own words:
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit (my input: remember, a 12-year old child). “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”

That is who you want to vote for???
I will leave you with the description of the attack she choose to defend in this manner.
What happened to that little girl:
"In her interview with The Daily Beast, she recounted the details of her attack in 1975 at age 12 and the consequences it had for both her childhood and adult life. A virgin before the assault, she spent five days afterwards in a coma, months recovering from the beating that accompanied the rape, and over 10 years in therapy. The doctors told her she would probably never be able to have children."

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Game Changer (Original Post) angrychair Apr 2016 OP
In a Comma FreakinDJ Apr 2016 #1
Thank God she wasn't in a semicolon. nt COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #12
. Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #14
Jury Results for a ROFL smiley Cali_Democrat Apr 2016 #27
Wow Bobbie Jo Apr 2016 #34
I think you mean "in a coma" Betty Karlson Apr 2016 #16
Hillary did what was expected of her by the justice system COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #2
Good call angrychair Apr 2016 #6
I know lots and lots of lawyers, since I've been COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #11
Which is fine beedle Apr 2016 #7
It bothers ne that she opted to take this case as a favor karynnj Apr 2016 #13
There was no 'charade of justice' here. Unlike TV shows, criminal cases COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #18
But she took this case as a favor. Because they wanted a woman. She said so herself DebDoo Apr 2016 #20
So? Doesn't make it any less of a court-assigned case COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #35
She said in the interview posted below that she took the case as a favor. DebDoo Apr 2016 #22
Yes. As I already said, she took the case because it was an assigned case AND COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #33
So what? Hillary said it regardless. Avalux Apr 2016 #24
I get a huge chuckle out of people who have no idea what COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #32
Yes I know...I know, I'm stupid and judgemental according to you. Avalux Apr 2016 #36
Fine. That's entirely your prerogative. But don't try and morally COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #42
So my point of view is wrong? How judgemental of you. n/t Avalux Apr 2016 #45
No different than what you're pushing. COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #47
Maybe so from a technical standpoint but disgusting nonetheless. She had a choice and chose ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #38
She did not 'trash' the victim. She pointed out facts to the court COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #39
She trashed her. Spin it however you want. ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #40
Spoken like a person who has absolutely no idea COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #43
I have a very good idea. It is what it is. ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #44
Now there's an answer full of meaning and COLGATE4 Apr 2016 #48
Exactly. ThePhilosopher04 Apr 2016 #49
She laughed about it and bragged about pleading him down to 2 months jail despite knowing he did it. Bonobo Apr 2016 #3
sociopath reddread Apr 2016 #4
Could YOU recount that story without a sense of guilt or without showing signs of feeling troubled? Bonobo Apr 2016 #8
the Hillarity of a 12 year old being raped? reddread Apr 2016 #9
That should go over well with women voters (and fathers with daughters). Skwmom Apr 2016 #5
All you need to know about Clinton here ---> ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #10
This need to be it's own thread! Seeinghope Apr 2016 #19
It is, and it's trying to die. I will be kicking it all day. See it here... ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #21
What happened to that little girl: "In her interview with The Daily Beast, she recount DebDoo Apr 2016 #15
There goes my nonexistent career in politics. DefenseLawyer Apr 2016 #17
You don't have to give a thousand reasons, just post this video: ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2016 #23
Same here democrattotheend Apr 2016 #30
Okay, I'll Do It PCPrincess Apr 2016 #25
Sorry angrychair Apr 2016 #28
so who will receive your vote if Clinton wins the nomination? Jeffersons Ghost Apr 2016 #26
If I have to read about Bernie's "rape fantasies" a billion times, this is fair game Prism Apr 2016 #29
GAME CHANGER! Bernie said women fantasize about being raped. I can't vote for that! nt BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #31
Oh, Jesus Prism Apr 2016 #37
Some do. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #46
Was she the defense lawyer? nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #41
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
27. Jury Results for a ROFL smiley
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:07 PM
Apr 2016

I never knew a ROFL smiley could trigger an alert, but apparently it is possible!


-------------------------------

On Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:50 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=1767469

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

These two are getting their yucks over a story about a 12 year old being in a coma after being raped. Rude and over the top.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:05 PM, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is an unneeded alert.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: C'mon, they're getting their yucks off a typo. TIME TO PANIC

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
34. Wow
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:42 PM
Apr 2016

Thank you, CD and jury.

Dear alerter: If you only knew what I have done for a living for the last 28 years, you would understand just how ridiculous this assertion really is.

i hesitate to post a facepalm smile for obvious reasons.

Thanks again.



 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
16. I think you mean "in a coma"
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:37 AM
Apr 2016

and we all agree that attacking a 12 year old in a coma after she has been sexually abused is pretty disgusting, even for someone like Saint Hillary of Walmart, blessed lay of inevitability, and the affluent fruit of her labor.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
2. Hillary did what was expected of her by the justice system
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:00 AM
Apr 2016

when she was handed an on;igatory, court-appointed case to defend. We have an adversarial justice system where a defendant is entitled to receive a competent, vigorous defense. That's exactly what Hillary did. Your personal feelings about her conduct are not really relevant.

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
6. Good call
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:25 AM
Apr 2016

Justifying Clinton saying a 12-year wanted to be raped and beaten is a good call.

Not sure what kind of lawyers you know but there are legitimate ways to give a person a good defense without saying it was a child's fault she was raped and beaten.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
11. I know lots and lots of lawyers, since I've been
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:33 AM
Apr 2016

in practice for over 25 years now. You are purposely distorting what the article reports. I'd love to hear your professional advice on how to give a person a 'good defense' without exploring all the possibilities that may have had bearing on the case. I'll be waiting...

 

beedle

(1,235 posts)
7. Which is fine
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:29 AM
Apr 2016

just when asked about it your should be saying something like you just stated, not bragging how you knew he was guilty, blamed the victim and then gleefully laugh about it.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
13. It bothers ne that she opted to take this case as a favor
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:35 AM
Apr 2016

To people wanting the man's lawyer to be a woman. This was not an assigned case that she as a young lawyer was randomly assigned.

I get that everyone is entitled to a lawyer, but I am disheartened that she was willing to be part of what seems to have been a charade of justice. No one at any age "ASKS" for what this child got.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
18. There was no 'charade of justice' here. Unlike TV shows, criminal cases
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:47 AM
Apr 2016

are rarely neat, clean or particularly satisfying. While you say that you 'get that everyone is entitled to a lawyer' the implied subtext of what you're saying is "I get that everyone is entitled to a lawyer but, in this case, not a very good one'. There was no 'charade' of justice here. The guy was forced to plead guilty and went to jail. Most of the time that's about as good as it gets.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
35. So? Doesn't make it any less of a court-assigned case
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:44 PM
Apr 2016

where Hillary got paid not much of anything for the time she spent on it. I doubt if she even got reimbursed for any of the experts she consulted. There's no incentive for taking a court-assigned Defendant except that you're required by law to do it. You waste your time, your money, your emotions and, eventually (here years later) people criticize you for having done it.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
33. Yes. As I already said, she took the case because it was an assigned case AND
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:41 PM
Apr 2016

the Prosecutor asked her to take it as a favor because the Defendant asked for a female attorney. That doesn't change the fact that it was a court-assigned case.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
24. So what? Hillary said it regardless.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:07 AM
Apr 2016

If she's willing to say something so horrible because it was expected as an attorney, then what did she say to Wall Street?

This is precisely why we'll never see her transcripts. Hillary will do and say anything, she has no moral compass.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
32. I get a huge chuckle out of people who have no idea what
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:40 PM
Apr 2016

they're talking about dragging out their own, individual and particular 'moral' compass to judge others. Hope it makes you feel good. To a whole lot of us, we're just not interested.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
36. Yes I know...I know, I'm stupid and judgemental according to you.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:51 PM
Apr 2016

Let's just say Hillary does not conduct herself in a way that makes me want to vote for her. Just the opposite.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
42. Fine. That's entirely your prerogative. But don't try and morally
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:16 PM
Apr 2016

browbeat others into accepting your very personal (and very wrong) point of view.

 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
38. Maybe so from a technical standpoint but disgusting nonetheless. She had a choice and chose
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:05 PM
Apr 2016

trash the victim. Nothing she can do or say can change that.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
39. She did not 'trash' the victim. She pointed out facts to the court
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:09 PM
Apr 2016

which had an influence on how the rape victim's testimony would be viewed, What you insinuate is her "choice' would have been a conflct with her professional obligation to her client. Remember, she didn't represent the victim - she represented the accused. And, in our system, the accused has the right to vigorous, competent representation. No less.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
43. Spoken like a person who has absolutely no idea
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 03:17 PM
Apr 2016

whatsoever as to how the legal system in our country works. "Philosopher" indeed.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
3. She laughed about it and bragged about pleading him down to 2 months jail despite knowing he did it.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:03 AM
Apr 2016

Fine, well done as a lawyer.

But when recounting it, WHY DID YOU LAUGH? WHY DID YOU SHOW ZERO FEELINGS?

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
8. Could YOU recount that story without a sense of guilt or without showing signs of feeling troubled?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:30 AM
Apr 2016

I sure as hell could not.

DebDoo

(319 posts)
15. What happened to that little girl: "In her interview with The Daily Beast, she recount
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:36 AM
Apr 2016

Because there is NO reason to justify or explain this away I know the only alternative response is to bury the horrific details I will repost them here


What happened to that little girl:
"In her interview with The Daily Beast, she recounted the details of her attack in 1975 at age 12 and the consequences it had for both her childhood and adult life. A virgin before the assault, she spent five days afterwards in a coma, months recovering from the beating that accompanied the rape, and over 10 years in therapy. The doctors told her she would probably never be able to have children."

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
17. There goes my nonexistent career in politics.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

I'm a Sanders supporter and a Sanders donor. I can give you a thousand reasons why I don't support Hillary Clinton. This isn't one of them.

democrattotheend

(11,605 posts)
30. Same here
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:34 PM
Apr 2016

As an attorney, I recognize that she was doing her job, and that it is important for criminal defense lawyers to mount a vigorous defense of their clients, even if that means taking unpopular positions.

PCPrincess

(68 posts)
25. Okay, I'll Do It
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:13 PM
Apr 2016

First: I am Bernie Or Bust, one-hundred percent. Because I'd like to think that most readers here are intelligent, thoughtful, logical people, I'm not going to even waste my time stating that rape is horrific. That is a given.

Although I am now a computer scientist (programmer), my first passion was criminal law and I wanted nothing more than to work as a paralegal for a public defender's office. I believe firmly that ALL human beings deserve their day in court. I would need to add that the defendant in the above post was also entitled to his. He is also a human being.

Since none of us are privy to the facts of the case and to the people involved, we must allow that Hillary, at that time, was doing her job. Trust me, I'm NO fan of hers and will not vote for her, but, I think we all need to keep ourselves, at all times, above the fray, and insist on honesty, ethics, and fairness, in all matters.

angrychair

(8,702 posts)
28. Sorry
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:21 PM
Apr 2016

I don't have a problem with the "everyone deserves their day in court and a strong defense" but nothing will make me believe that that defense should include saying a 12 year old child deserves to be raped and beaten because she had fantasies of older men.
That is "blame the victim " rape culture bullshit and is never ok.

Jeffersons Ghost

(15,235 posts)
26. so who will receive your vote if Clinton wins the nomination?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:46 PM
Apr 2016

Trump? At least, many Sanders fans are rejecting this Opening Post for the right reasons. Trump=Hitler; is it code?

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
29. If I have to read about Bernie's "rape fantasies" a billion times, this is fair game
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:24 PM
Apr 2016

And the thing is, I get that she was doing her job as a lawyer. Sometimes it's unsavory, and you have to give 100% for your client. Understood.

It's her reaction in the aftermath. She laughs and brags about getting the physical evidence thrown out.

You don't laugh and brag about getting a rapist off. You just sigh and go, "Well, that was my job. It sucked, but there it is."

She's weirdly heartless.

 

Prism

(5,815 posts)
37. Oh, Jesus
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:58 PM
Apr 2016

I'd say you should read his article and compare it to feminist literature at the time, but that would require reading, and I'm against imposing torture.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Game Changer