Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:22 AM Apr 2016

Sanders on New York: So what if I lose?

Bernie Sanders’ path to the nomination has narrowed to a sliver, and Tuesday’s primary in New York looks like it will squeeze it further. But the Vermont senator was defiant as he made the TV rounds on the eve of the crucial contest. His message: So what if I lose?

Sanders’ campaign in recent days has downplayed the importance of winning the popular vote in the delegate-rich state, pointing to Clinton's once gargantuan advantage in the polls shrinking to single digits by some counts.

"Those are the public polls. The bottom line is, let's look at the real poll tomorrow," Sanders told NBC's "Today" in the first of three in-studio interviews Monday morning. "Generally speaking, polling has underestimated how we do in elections."

...

"Here’s the truth: we don’t have to win New York on Tuesday, but we have to pick up a lot of delegates," campaign manager Jeff Weaver wrote. "This poll shows that if we keep fighting, we may actually have a chance to do both."

Despite his day-long detour to the Vatican last Friday, Sanders maintained that his campaign was focused on winning New York but also laid out several preemptive explanations for why it might not. Among them: the fact that independent voters cannot participate in Tuesday's closed Democratic primary.



http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/bernie-sanders-new-york-222077

Weaver is correct. He doesn't have to win New York, just like he doesn't have to be the nominee.
85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sanders on New York: So what if I lose? (Original Post) geek tragedy Apr 2016 OP
If it's even close XemaSab Apr 2016 #1
Sanders is the one who needs the win, not her. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #3
I think we're heading for a contested convention XemaSab Apr 2016 #5
contested in the way that Bambi contested a piece of ground vs Godzilla. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #9
You really don't understand the situation do you? He is needed by Dems in the Senate... Human101948 Apr 2016 #67
If he's so reliable then he won't try to claim a nomination when he lost the voting geek tragedy Apr 2016 #68
That's a non sequitur Human101948 Apr 2016 #70
if he's a reliable ally then he will respect the votes of primary voters. geek tragedy Apr 2016 #72
How can it be contested? One candidate will have more pledged delegates than the other. hack89 Apr 2016 #10
I don't see why so many people have a problem grasping that Recursion Apr 2016 #18
Miss Cleo? Is that you? nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #56
Are you suggesting some blatantly undemocratic process hack89 Apr 2016 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Apr 2016 #63
The super delegates are going to vote for the candidate with the most pledged delegates hack89 Apr 2016 #64
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Apr 2016 #66
All of Hillary's super delegates in 2008 voted for Obama on the first vote hack89 Apr 2016 #73
By 6/7 he will be over 300 delegates and 3,000,000 popular votes behind. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #11
"By 6/7 he will be over 300 delegates and 3,000,000 popular votes behind." workinclasszero Apr 2016 #17
That's a conservative estimate./nt DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #25
Sweet! workinclasszero Apr 2016 #29
No, we won't. Beacool Apr 2016 #42
This is an example of the type of thinking that occurs ... salinsky Apr 2016 #53
Yep, Sanders isn't doing his supporters any good by misleading them into thinking he BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #59
Not at all...even if he loses he will have advanced liberal policies by giant steps... Human101948 Apr 2016 #69
that's nonsense bigtree Apr 2016 #7
Hillary will be fine if its close because she is way ahead in delegates already but workinclasszero Apr 2016 #16
If she gets 55% tomorrow Bernie falls much further behind. Renew Deal Apr 2016 #38
If he doesn't win tomorrow he's done. Zynx Apr 2016 #39
Podium Bird tell you that too? uponit7771 Apr 2016 #44
Podium Bird! yardwork Apr 2016 #79
Bernie has taught me to look and see what is happening... Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #2
+1000 Shadowflash Apr 2016 #35
Foolish and shortsighted choice, but it's your prerogative. Beacool Apr 2016 #45
It is you that is shortsighted my friend Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #83
Read this. He's not so pure brush Apr 2016 #55
Your link is broken can't see... Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #84
Here it is. You might have to copy and paste it in the url field. brush Apr 2016 #85
Bernie is not a guru, and he is not a god. His "teachings" are BreakfastClub Apr 2016 #62
Oh please back pocket of the NRA Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #82
Don't you see? Bernie has opened sooooo many eyes to the fact wendylaroux Apr 2016 #4
Read this and re-open your eyes. He's not so pure brush Apr 2016 #57
Step 1: Run. Step 2: Lose all the big states. Step 3: ___ Step 4: Win! CrowCityDem Apr 2016 #6
Looks like he's running the Rubio playbook down the stretch, a big second place win for him tomorrow geek tragedy Apr 2016 #8
Step 3 is a moveon.org petition nt firebrand80 Apr 2016 #14
Salon and Huff Post will be pushing it too! workinclasszero Apr 2016 #20
What would they petition??? Beacool Apr 2016 #46
Threaten the SDs with primary challenges nt firebrand80 Apr 2016 #49
On what grounds???? Beacool Apr 2016 #50
Who needs grounds? nt firebrand80 Apr 2016 #52
When Sanders and Weaver are both saying their path to the nomination.... NCTraveler Apr 2016 #12
part of me wants him to try and contest it geek tragedy Apr 2016 #13
Some of my fellow Clinton supporters have been telling me that is who he is since the beginning. NCTraveler Apr 2016 #15
What a delusional bunch. Jesus. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #19
It is not too late for you to switch your support from Clinton to Sanders, geek tragedy. PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #21
My wife and I are voting for Hillary early tomorrow morning nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #22
Who do you plan to vote for in the general election should Sanders be the Democratic nominee? eom PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #27
sanders won't be the nominee nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #28
Probably not but still in realm of possibilty. PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #37
Loyalty oaths suck. Just FYI. Agschmid Apr 2016 #32
You would probably feel good too if change your supoport from Clinton to Sanders. PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #40
I feel fine, thank you. Agschmid Apr 2016 #41
And that is your choice. Hillary Clinton will be less successful and PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #43
In NYC it'll be a beautiful election day. Beacool Apr 2016 #47
Nice to know it's voided by two votes for Bernie The Old Lie Apr 2016 #48
Oh but he was a Sanders supporter Capt. Obvious Apr 2016 #24
I have never met a BernieBros. PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #31
Read this about the Sanders campaign brush Apr 2016 #60
Your link goes to medium.com but not to the article. PufPuf23 Apr 2016 #71
I'll read yours if you read this brush Apr 2016 #75
So what if he can't win the blue states (the states he says matter)? ecstatic Apr 2016 #23
he'll always have Kansas and Alaska nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #26
And Oklahoma don't forget Oklahoma griffi94 Apr 2016 #33
that great bastion of progressivism nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #34
Yep griffi94 Apr 2016 #36
Or the Yuge swing states like Florida and Ohio Haveadream Apr 2016 #30
Even if he loses we win cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #51
Name one policy that Hilary holds now kennetha Apr 2016 #54
Being against the TPP for one cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #74
If you lose, you don't get to be President firebrand80 Apr 2016 #58
Bernie has already won. apnu Apr 2016 #65
It will be interesting to see if Bernie redstateblues Apr 2016 #77
I doubt that too. apnu Apr 2016 #78
That's not helpful, then. yardwork Apr 2016 #80
Yes they do! apnu Apr 2016 #81
K & R most enthusiastically. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #76

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
1. If it's even close
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:26 AM
Apr 2016

it's bad news for Hillary.

She got 55% of the vote in the 2000 senate election.

If she were to get 55% tomorrow, that would imply that almost half the people who voted for her in 2000 are no longer supporting her.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
3. Sanders is the one who needs the win, not her.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:29 AM
Apr 2016

A ten point win for her is a backbreaker for him.

Her goal for the month of April is end Sanders's status as a credible candidate to become the nominee.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. contested in the way that Bambi contested a piece of ground vs Godzilla.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:41 AM
Apr 2016

If Sanders wants to displace the 2014 Brazil World Cup Team for the most spectacular public humiliation, I guess he could try to persuade Democratic party insiders to steal the nomination from the Democrat who won the voting.

We'll see how much he values his committee seniority in the Senate.



 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
67. You really don't understand the situation do you? He is needed by Dems in the Senate...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:29 PM
Apr 2016

He has been a much more reliable vote than the jerks known as Blue Dog Democrats (aka Republicans).

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
68. If he's so reliable then he won't try to claim a nomination when he lost the voting
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:34 PM
Apr 2016

To do so would be an insult

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
72. if he's a reliable ally then he will respect the votes of primary voters.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:38 PM
Apr 2016

if not, then he will have been exposed as a third party saboteur

hack89

(39,171 posts)
10. How can it be contested? One candidate will have more pledged delegates than the other.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:42 AM
Apr 2016

that person will win on the first vote at the convention. Contested conventions only come about when there are more than two viable candidates and none can get a majority.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
18. I don't see why so many people have a problem grasping that
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:12 AM
Apr 2016

Our convention will be over on the first ballot; it basically has to be.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
61. Are you suggesting some blatantly undemocratic process
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:10 PM
Apr 2016

like having all the super delegates ignore the will of the voters and giving the nomination to the candidate with the fewer pledged delegates?

Because that is the only way Bernie would win.

Response to hack89 (Reply #61)

hack89

(39,171 posts)
64. The super delegates are going to vote for the candidate with the most pledged delegates
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:17 PM
Apr 2016

that plus the pledged delegates will be enough for Hillary. They will not steal the primary from the person with the majority of delegates.

Response to hack89 (Reply #64)

hack89

(39,171 posts)
73. All of Hillary's super delegates in 2008 voted for Obama on the first vote
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:55 PM
Apr 2016

with her complete and total blessing. Breaking ranks right now is irrelevant - they will all vote for the candidate with the most pledged delegates.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
11. By 6/7 he will be over 300 delegates and 3,000,000 popular votes behind.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:43 AM
Apr 2016

I will just let the sentient posters among us make their own inferences.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
17. "By 6/7 he will be over 300 delegates and 3,000,000 popular votes behind."
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:12 AM
Apr 2016

And diehard Sanders fans are clinging to the fiction of a contested convention??? WOW!

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
42. No, we won't.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:40 AM
Apr 2016

Whichever candidate has the most pledged delegates will be the nominee. Just as it happened in 2008.

salinsky

(1,065 posts)
53. This is an example of the type of thinking that occurs ...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:04 PM
Apr 2016

... when a candidate refuses to shoot straight with his supporters.

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)
59. Yep, Sanders isn't doing his supporters any good by misleading them into thinking he
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:08 PM
Apr 2016

is somehow going to magically win the nomination. Sad.

 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
69. Not at all...even if he loses he will have advanced liberal policies by giant steps...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:34 PM
Apr 2016

something that Hillary does in itsy bitsy teeny weeny incremental baby steps.

She can't do anything bold, she's fighting a tsunami of negatives--

bigtree

(85,998 posts)
7. that's nonsense
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:34 AM
Apr 2016

...either Sanders has a big win and pulls the majority of delegates, or the percentage he needs from the few remaining states rises.

Hillary's percentage needed would fall, in that case, because of the dwindling number of opportunities Sanders has to catch up and the vanishing number of delegate rich states.

The spin about the 2000 election is a new one, but just as baffling. You can only hope the actual campaign doesn't use the same rose-colored glasses, because you need to gotv to win big tomorrow.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
16. Hillary will be fine if its close because she is way ahead in delegates already but
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:10 AM
Apr 2016

ANY win in NY for her is a deathblow for Sanders campaign!

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
2. Bernie has taught me to look and see what is happening...
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:26 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:38 AM - Edit history (1)

He is bringing change in a way the DNC will never understand. I will not vote for Hillary Clinton. It is my vote and I shall use it as I will! Bernie has changed me personally from someone willing to hold her nose and vote for crappy candidate out of fear of what might be. From now on I vote for the candidate that EARNS my vote!

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
45. Foolish and shortsighted choice, but it's your prerogative.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 12:06 PM
Apr 2016

I would vote for Mickey Mouse if he was the nominee, anything to stop Trump or Cruz.



 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
83. It is you that is shortsighted my friend
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:40 AM
Apr 2016

You may vote for Mickey if you like. But to say I would vote for anyone to stop (fill-in name here) is scary to me. We have to vote for good candidates no mor settling for the lessor of two evils!

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
84. Your link is broken can't see...
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:43 AM
Apr 2016

To see "secrets" about Bernie. Never said he was perfect, but he is not a Hawk with Kissinger in his pocket as his best advisor, nor will he trade abortion rights with Republicans to open negotiations. Nor is he a bible thumper!!!

BreakfastClub

(765 posts)
62. Bernie is not a guru, and he is not a god. His "teachings" are
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:12 PM
Apr 2016

not divine information he has shared with you. Vote for whomever you like, but don't believe for a second that Bernie is a wise sage. He's not. He's a politician who is in the back pocket of the NRA.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
82. Oh please back pocket of the NRA
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:37 AM
Apr 2016

Now that is one that made me laugh! He has a D- rating

I don't believe in any god my friend so I don't think Bernie is one either. Save the hyperbole for some young kid that is swayed by such silliness!

Have a nice day!

wendylaroux

(2,925 posts)
4. Don't you see? Bernie has opened sooooo many eyes to the fact
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:29 AM
Apr 2016

that hc and other establishment dnc robots are inline with the other side of the isle.[how to help the 1%]

People are saying no more of the same old shit. So have fun with the

crooks,good luck with it.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. Looks like he's running the Rubio playbook down the stretch, a big second place win for him tomorrow
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:38 AM
Apr 2016

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
50. On what grounds????
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 01:55 PM
Apr 2016

There are only two candidates. The one who has the most pledged delegates at the convention will be the nominee. End of story.


 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
12. When Sanders and Weaver are both saying their path to the nomination....
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:01 AM
Apr 2016

is to subvert the will of the people, this is the only attitude they can have.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
15. Some of my fellow Clinton supporters have been telling me that is who he is since the beginning.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:09 AM
Apr 2016

I have fought back on that. As we have gone on I have seen they were correct. I really don't think Sanders and Weaver could shock me at this point.

PufPuf23

(8,785 posts)
21. It is not too late for you to switch your support from Clinton to Sanders, geek tragedy.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:14 AM
Apr 2016

You will feel better about yourself and have a positive effect on the nation and Democratic Party.

Sanders is going to do better in NY than the polls say and what you are selling at DU.

PufPuf23

(8,785 posts)
37. Probably not but still in realm of possibilty.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:26 AM
Apr 2016

Last year few had considered that Sanders would be a serious candidate for POTUS.

Now he is the favored candidate of some large demographics, wins primaries, and draws enthusiastic crowds.

Sanders has a net unfavorable rating of +9 with potential American voters while Clinton is -23.

Clinton was my least favorite candidate in 2008 and her once front-running campaign self-destructed.

I backed into Sanders in 2016 and am glad; Clinton did not learn in 2008 and has made similar mistakes.

I may end up voting for Clinton next Fall but will be angry and bear a grudge.

PufPuf23

(8,785 posts)
40. You would probably feel good too if change your supoport from Clinton to Sanders.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:35 AM
Apr 2016

I have been loyal as registered and voting member of Democratic Party since 1972 when aged into vote.

I became a staunch anti-war Democrat in 1968 age 15. The mother of my roommate at boarding school was the great liberal and anti-war Democrat Maya Miller of Nevada. She took us to an anti-war rally for the Presidio group at the Marina Green in San Francisco. RIP Eric and Maya.

Loyalty oaths do suck especially the ones tied to $ and influence within the Democratic party like many of the super-delegates, that great non-democratic method by establish to dampen power of the grass root democrats.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
41. I feel fine, thank you.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:36 AM
Apr 2016

I voted for, and helped Sanders get elected in VT to Senate. I currently support Clinton, and will most likely continue to do so during the primary process.

PufPuf23

(8,785 posts)
43. And that is your choice. Hillary Clinton will be less successful and
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:50 AM
Apr 2016

less transformative than POTUS Obama; we will at best tread water as Clinton is for the status quo.

I like Sanders for two reasons:

(1) Sanders is transformative. The transformation I support is to get neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism out of the Democratic Party and out of the nation and world. The tide change will take other POTUSs and other pols and a generation in time.

(2) Hillary Clinton has character issues. I do not think Clinton will be disqualified by the character issues because politicians and the wealthy appear to have automatic forgiveness in our not so vibrant democracy.

I respect your decision and that your final decision is some what a gray area.

Sanders could lose my support; Clinton could never earn my support back but could likely get my vote back in the general election (but I will be angry and bear a grudge as I already do regards the Democratic establishment).

PufPuf23

(8,785 posts)
31. I have never met a BernieBros.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 11:19 AM
Apr 2016

I think that a BernieBros is sort of like a unicorn to some Clinton supporters.

PufPuf23

(8,785 posts)
71. Your link goes to medium.com but not to the article.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:37 PM
Apr 2016

In fact, I cannot find the article you cite but will read if you can find and make a link.

Here is a link an article at medium.com:

https://medium.com/jeremy-keeshin/why-i-m-voting-for-bernie-sanders-and-you-should-too-af4dec9c91bb#.fouwui8u2

cannabis_flower

(3,764 posts)
51. Even if he loses we win
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:00 PM
Apr 2016

Hillary started out as a centrist and he has pushed her to the left. If she wins we need to keep her feet to the fire.

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
58. If you lose, you don't get to be President
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:07 PM
Apr 2016

Unless, of course, you're saying that's not your actual goal, which wouldn't surprise me at all.

apnu

(8,758 posts)
65. Bernie has already won.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:19 PM
Apr 2016

He knew form the outset he had a tiny chance to pull this off. But his goal, as it always has been, to drag the conversation left, that he's accomplished and then some. He's come so far and he's done better than anybody ever imagined and he's defined the whole primary with his presence, words and actions, including the Republicans. It is astounding what kind of an effect he's had on national politics.

So yeah, NY doesn't matter. He'll keep on being Bernie and keep on doing what he does, and he'll keep on dragging the conversation left and come Philly in July, if he's not the winner, he's still won all the same.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
77. It will be interesting to see if Bernie
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:01 PM
Apr 2016

Uses his popularity, after he loses the primary, to help us win back the house and senate in the midterms. Somehow I have my doubts.

yardwork

(61,650 posts)
80. That's not helpful, then.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 08:10 AM
Apr 2016

I'm living in a state that is being eaten alive by the Republicans. Down ticket races matter. A lot.

apnu

(8,758 posts)
81. Yes they do!
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 08:25 AM
Apr 2016

No doubt about it. But Bernie has done little for the down ticket races so far. I think his years as an indepentent makes it difficult for him to think in party terms. To connect with different regions that have different concerns.

True, Brenie's main focus on poverty connects with most Americans, but not having the support of a national party to work toward that goal means he would spin his wheels before we even get to talking about Republicans.

Bernie must make in-roads with Democrats. He must convince them that he will help them, not the other way around. It is not that his meaasge does not resonate with Democrats and liberals, it is that he comes from the outside like an invader, not a helper. While that is a breath of fresh air for progressives,it makes party insiders and loyalists cringe. If he wants to use Democratic assets to win in November, he needs those insiders desperatly.

Convince the establishment that his goals are their goals and everything will fall into place. He has not managed to do that so far, look at all the union endorsements Hillary has collected, despite the fact that Bernie's brand of socialism lines up nicely with unions. They should be falling all over themselves for Bernie, but that hasn't happened.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders on New York: So w...