Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:09 PM Apr 2016

So yea. Not voting Republican.

And our party has moved to the conservative right. Hillary a "progressive", Ha! Because she says so!?

Hillary Clinton’s stances, while fluid during this election cycle, are historically most in tune with classical Republican ideas, as advocated by Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, and others. As a young woman, she volunteered for the conservative Barry Goldwater, and while today she’s become liberal on some social issues, she’s generally at home with moderate conservative ideas, such as a hawkish military, strict immigration laws, reduced welfare, laissez-faire rules for Wall Street, and international business treaties that favor large corporations.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tony-brasunas/there-is-a-moderate-republican-in-this-race_b_9704194.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So yea. Not voting Republican. (Original Post) Phlem Apr 2016 OP
Not really, just not the far left like some would like it- Wish I didn't have phlegm though snooper2 Apr 2016 #1
Yes really. Phlem Apr 2016 #3
+1 daleanime Apr 2016 #4
That Goldwater line is nonsense firebrand80 Apr 2016 #2
The Clintons got more Republican legislation passed than any Republican has been able to do. nt Live and Learn Apr 2016 #5
Not the lesser of two evils? BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #6
I read and largely agree with that article, Hillary is at best a Republican/Democratic hybrid /nt Dragonfli Apr 2016 #7
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
1. Not really, just not the far left like some would like it- Wish I didn't have phlegm though
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:12 PM
Apr 2016

Fucking hacking up nasty for the first hour each of the last three mornings...

at least I'm the only one sick in the house.....I just have to wipe everything I touch



Phlem

(6,323 posts)
3. Yes really.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:23 PM
Apr 2016

Let's see, from some Clinton supporters:

"Why do we have to let Independents vote, they're going to ruin my life."

"Bernie is an elitist for caring about others over himself"

and the list goes on and on.

firebrand80

(2,760 posts)
2. That Goldwater line is nonsense
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:14 PM
Apr 2016
Barry Goldwater, and while today she’s become liberal on some social issues


It makes it sound as though she was a hardcore conservative when she was young, and has gradually moves to the center on social issues. That's a lie and you know it.

BernieforPres2016

(3,017 posts)
6. Not the lesser of two evils?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 02:29 PM
Apr 2016

Thomas Frank, from his book "Listen, Liberal:"

<Only a Democrat was capable of getting bank deregulation passed; only a Democrat could have rammed NAFTA through Congress; and only a Democrat would be capable of privatizing Social Security, as George W. Bush found out in 2005. "It's kind of the Nixon-goes-to-China theory," the conservative Democrat Charles Stenholm told the historian Steven Gillion on this last subject. "It takes a Democrat to do some of the hard choices in social programs."

To judge by what he actually accomplished, Bill Clinton was not the lesser of two evils, as people on the left always say about Democrats at election time; he was the greater of the two. What he did as President was beyond the reach of even the most diabolical Republicans. Only smiling Bill Clinton, well-known friend of working families, could commit such betrayals.>

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So yea. Not voting Republ...