2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWeaver was on MSNBC. Planning to file a lawsuit over the Hillary Victory Fund...
He was on MSNBC and said that only 1/3 at most of the money actually goes to down ticket Democrats. Mentioned the Sanders campaign will be serving the DNC a letter over the Victory fund with intention to file lawsuit.
edit: Here is video of it: https://twitter.com/popmonk/status/722122337370255362
pt2: https://twitter.com/popmonk/status/722132626509733888
berniepdx420
(1,784 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)this in January up here in Alaska talking about bundling money and getting around contribution laws. Ha! I hope this bites them on the ass. Hard.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)He ain't skeered of nobody!
Feel the Bern!!!
.
appalachiablue
(41,144 posts)"WHAT DID YOU SAY, FOOL?"
Weaver is The Man and Badass. Love it!!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)They just kept hammering him with negatives and he stood strong and stayed on message.
.
appalachiablue
(41,144 posts)last June where Bernie was one of the 2 main speakers, I noticed Jeff standing at the auditorium exit doors, intently focused on Bernie at the podium the entire time. Weaver is a real force, intellectually, verbally and physically. Cool as Ice and A Major Asset.
bjo59
(1,166 posts)even though I'm getting the picture that it's par for the course, I just can't get over how the pro-Hillary commentary is so solidly comprised of insults. It reminds of of those 1990s tabloid talk shows where a bunch of people sit on stage and yell slurs and insults at their adversaries and never back up one of their claims with any evidence. It's the wild, unsubstantiated claims asserted in a sneering, dismissive tone that I just can't get over. Real bottom-of-the-barrell stuff.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)in front of his supporters yet they chose to ignore it. This was worse even during his second go round. We were attacked on 9/11, sold a bill of good that put us into a quagmire and also in Afghanistan. Yet there were all kinds of excuses for Bush and attacks on everything and everyone else that didn't agree with him. It was insane. Evidence was right there in front of these people and they just would not accept it.
They chose to support needless war over peace. Losing our rights to privacy as citizens, tax cuts again for the wealthy, obvious ties to the Saudi who were involved in 9/11, Abu Gahrib, Hurricane Katrina.....but no their minds were made up and no matter what George W Bush was their guy.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)Was that we haven't been attacked since 9/11. As if that was a credible and not-at-all-weird argument to make! "Yeah, after the terrible attacks of September 11th, we've been totally safe!"
I was too overwhelmed by the empty logic of the argument to respond. It was simply too amazing for words.
noretreatnosurrender
(1,890 posts)that has infected so many here at DU. What you list are the main symptoms.
appalachiablue
(41,144 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)It's a trick.
The state campaigns have to return most of the money to the DNC.
A shell game.
A carney shell game.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)Actually, I was thinking about you today because I read your thread about being disenfranchised for the election tomorrow. I hope you have found a way to vote and if your registration was changed it would have to have a signature-is it yours?
Best to you, Dragonfli.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)as well as all the others in my position. After many emails, calls and letters, I was able to register some complaints (one to the ACLU) and another to My local board of elections, also the Sanders campaign took down my complaint, they were very nice but not hopeful. That problem is, I may be helping a long term cause regarding voter disenfranchisement by doing all this, but nothing I've done will allow me to vote this primary, I was able "to be allowed to vote next primary" (or so they claim) after re-enrolling me as such was still an option when I discovered the "error".
It appear there is no paper to verify my "changes" to "unaffiliated" (actually the portion of my record in the database regarding party affiliation is just blank with no entry), others have proof of paper sent in with signatures that don't match changing their party affiliation and I suppose that may help them regarding our only option when not on the official roles printed out at our poling places, printed from the same database that has me blank I might add.
Because I was so adamant about being on as many records as I could find that would take my complaint, someday if an audit of the database by the FBI is done, it may result in closer monitoring regarding how and why certain changes are made, or data deleted, either by hack or employee with authorized access to the database.
I only have the option of voting by affidavit, it will only be counted if my party affiliation is verified, the verification is done by calling up my record in the changed database - catch 22, meaning it will be tossed along with all the others that are the victim of this method of election fraud. The only silver lining is the minority of those switched that were done in their name via paper mailed, but not by them and the signatures don't match, may get their affidavit vote counted, but they will have to see a judge to do so, I wish them God speed and hope, but the rest of us are already, done deal, no turning back, already well and truly fucked.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)So next time be aware when your affiliation is scrubbed and switched behind your back!!
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)vimeo.com/163178551
polichick
(37,152 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)into pointing out that charge comes from a 9/11 truther. Apparently there is no depths into the sewer Bernie supporters wont swim in. Disgusting.
radical noodle
(8,003 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)should we expect next? free republic, red state? You delusional math challenged people are hilarious. And really? You think you can hurt my feelings by calling me a republican? That's pathetic.
polichick
(37,152 posts)What's pathetic is people who support that crap calling out those who support New Deal policies.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)yet to see the depths of the sewers the Bernie supporters will swim in. I don't see anyone other than Bernie supporters asking liberals to believe right wing crap. Why would that be? I guess it could be because the cons have yet to turn their guns on Bernie (they haven't even touched him) but I know I don't visit their sewers and discount anything coming from there. You don't - that's entirely your problem, not mine.
polichick
(37,152 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)A noun, a verb and 9/11.
Debate OVER! That's a shot right through Abby Martin's brain.
Picking off these lefty crazies is so EASY.
Myself, I have no doubts that all truth is known about 9/11 and that transparency rules. To think anything else isn't patriotic. It's to be CT Crazy. I won't even admit the subject is worthy of discussion, I'm so certain of things.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)on 9/11 truthers, knock yourself out. I expect people to know where their sources are coming from. You obviously have a problem with knowledge - but will believe any bullshit that you think gives you ammunition. Like every single right winger I have the misfortune of knowing.
delrem
(9,688 posts)That sure the hell does respond to Abby Martin with the most concise substance so far, from Hillary Clinton's campaign!
I'm impressed.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)isn't your forte, is it? That's also not my problem.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Dig it.
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)How Hillary supporters rush to the defense of Bush & Cheney's criminal incompetence during 9-11 to attack Bernie supporters (left of Hillary) as RWers, thinking Bush & Cheney has been honest about the attack since day 1.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Where did I come to the defense of ANYONE who wants to blame Bush's incompetence and failure to read their memos and know what's going on? I know who was responsible - 19 assholes, 15 of which came from Saudi Arabia. Nice of you to defend the terrorists so you can make a stupid political point (see, I can play that game also).
Bohemianwriter
(978 posts)The dishonesty and RW nature of Hillary supporters comes out in all it's glory....
Still a Bushbot with the faux patriotism, defending a criminal for his treason. Wonder what the 28 pages from the report is hiding. Wonder what Hillary is hiding besides her speeches and her support for criminal coup makers in Latin America (in which she wants to send refugees back to)...
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Keep dreaming. I've been fighting for liberal causes since you were in diapers. I love how the Bernie supporters think only they know the story, only they are REAL liberals, only they can possibly fix what's wrong. Good luck depending on the Hillary supporters giving anything but their vote to your candidate if he manages to ever catch up to her delegate total. You wont be getting a dime from me. ALL my money will be going to down tickets races since you Bernie supporters think all you need is a President who can wave his magic wand.
Call me a right winger all you want since that's the only card you seem to be able to play. I long since stopped giving a shit what dishonest hacks on either side of the aisle have to say. Your opinion of me is worthless.
rock
(13,218 posts)Are you voting tomorrow?
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)and a totally justified rebuke of what Hill's hawkish foreign policy would mean for the world, if God forbid, she becomes president.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)CrowCityDem
(2,348 posts)Time for Bernie to go home. His campaign is getting sad.
Loudestlib
(980 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)It's a rather pathetic argument you're making.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Those internals for New York must be real bad.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)The fact is over 2/3 of the money the Victory Fund raises is funneled back to the Clinton campaign due to loopholes the supreme court opened up. Unfortunately the Clinton Campaign misleads the donors to the Victory Fund by suggesting it is used to help downballot candidates, when less than 1/3 is going to downticket candidates.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Time for Bernie to put up or shut up.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Words is Lucy Flores got a yuge sum of money from her moneybomb.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)And you guys call Bernie a grifter...
nm
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)One cannot make a claim, in this case... that most of the money is going to down-ballot dems... and not carry through. Campaign Finance laws take that sort of thing very seriously.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)Not really. They are all bark, no bite. Sanders have repeated FEC voilations. Nothing.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)If you look to most of the major campaign finance lawsuits, you'll find a fairly common theme; Misrepresentation of what the donations were intended for. Republicans get hit with it a lot. And it tends to end careers and can include fines and jail time.
In this case, special attention should be paid to b-1, and a-1.... in that order.
(a)In general
No person who is a candidate for Federal office or an employee or agent of such a candidate shall-
(1) fraudulently misrepresent himself or any committee or organization under his control as speaking or writing or otherwise acting for or on behalf of any other candidate or political party or employee or agent thereof on a matter which is damaging to such other candidate or political party or employee or agent thereof; or
(2) willfully and knowingly participate in or conspire to participate in any plan, scheme, or design to violate paragraph (1).
(b) Fraudulent solicitation of funds
No person shall-
(1) fraudulently misrepresent the person as speaking, writing, or otherwise acting for or on behalf of any candidate or political party or employee or agent thereof for the purpose of soliciting contributions or donations; or
(2) willfully and knowingly participate in or conspire to participate in any plan, scheme, or design to violate paragraph (1).
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title52-section30124&num=0&edition=prelim
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)Sheer insanity.
itsrobert
(14,157 posts)They will be returning to their "safe spaces".
Admiral Loinpresser
(3,859 posts)Broward
(1,976 posts)though which you're probably very proud of.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)MFM008
(19,814 posts)They will lose, because if they do, there goes the 'revolution' and the momentum.
funny how thousands of people that rally don't seem to actually vote.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)One should ask Alex Sink on her steering committee. Florida's former CFO, now looking for a job in Hillary's cabinet.
ViseGrip
(3,133 posts)Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,518 posts)It doesn't appear to agree Weavers claim.
As of 12/31/15:
Total Receipts: $26,921,630
Total Spent: 14,118,114
Received by HRC: 4,440,000
https://www.opensecrets.org/jfc/summary.php?id=C00586537&cycle=2016
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)The way the loophole that allows this works is that money from victory fund goes to state parties and the DNC. State party money then funnels to the DNC. The DNC then distributes the money back into the Clinton campaign.
This article explains it in full detail: http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/01/how-hillary-clinton-bought-the-loyalty-of-33-state-democratic-parties/
The key part referring the loophole.
JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)I thought the DNC was to be neutral? Surely it's a sign of favoritism that they give the money back to the Clinton campaign, since it isn't in their financial best interests to do so (at this time)
creeksneakers2
(7,473 posts)He chooses not to take it.
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)I'm glad he's not doing it. I hope she get's put through the ringer FOR doing it. Her, and DWS.
hill2016
(1,772 posts)does he have standing to sue???
what kind of relief is he asking???
Uncle Joe
(58,365 posts)Thanks for the thread, GeorgiaPeanuts.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)...I think they think it gives them credibility...or strikes fear. Either way, it's so silly.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Weaver's a clown.
Sid
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Good old Weaver. Always ready with a lawsuit of one sort or another. Lame. Crappy optics, too.
Desperation time...
panader0
(25,816 posts)I don't know the details, but I doubt that Weaver is uninformed. If what he says is true, and I believe it is,
it is a violation.
Marr
(20,317 posts)IMPOSSIBLE.
R B Garr
(16,954 posts)They are under investigation by the FEC for massive improprieties, which totally undermines Sanders' own credibility about one of his main campaign platforms. They get more laughable/desperate by the minute.
msongs
(67,413 posts)Seeinghope
(786 posts)How many people could that have fed?
Congessmen/women, Senators, and other dignitaries spend that all of the time going to "elective" meetings of far less meaning.....even - wink wink - the business meetings that end up being a vacation of sorts.
Grow up.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,943 posts)Good riddance
morningfog
(18,115 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)I wouldn't be shocked if the FBI recommends RICO when they're done investigating. The Clinton governing method is 100% fraud.
Because as we all know, "it depends on what the meaning of 'is' is", to quote Bill Clinton.
askew
(1,464 posts)Dem donors who had no idea they were getting involved in a Ponzi scheme.
It does make me feel better that I laughed at the guy who called me from the Hillary Victory Fund to donate.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)I was wondering if he knew he had been hoodwinked by Hillary's campaign. Will he say anything publicly when he figures it out?
Beacool
(30,250 posts)His candidate won't be the nominee.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)The money to be spent where it's touted to be going ... down-ticket candidates. Would you have a problem with that?
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Down ticket candidates aren't getting shit. It's all getting funneled back to Hillary.
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)is some form of money landering>influence peddling>cronyism>self enrichment. Say goodbye to Clintonism.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)Merryland
(1,134 posts)brought to you by the neocon dems we need to overthrow NOW
ecstatic
(32,707 posts)What an ungrateful, spiteful, and sore loser.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Maybe she should not have violated election laws by using her Hillary Victory Fund as the operation that finances small donor fundraising operations that only go to the Hillary Campaign, thus allowing her big money donors a way to donate to her campaign above the legal limit.
ecstatic
(32,707 posts)He fooled quite a few people, but these days, you can't win if your campaign is based on lies and smears.
GeorgiaPeanuts
(2,353 posts)Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
Scootch over!
northernsouthern
(1,511 posts)...blah,blah,blah...down ticket...something,something...Bernie!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Who has spent the last couple of months making Sanders look bad. I'm wondering if he is on Clintons payroll. Keep talking Weaver.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)just sayin
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)LuvLoogie
(7,011 posts)primaries, unless....
Land of Enchantment
(1,217 posts)pausing both at the same time. I have no clue what Jeff said.
Muchas gracias!!!
Many thanks!!!!
Merci beau coup!!!
Grazi!!!
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)Joint committee helps state parties, but spends most of its cash boosting Clinton.
By Kenneth P. Vogel
04/16/16 12:14 AM EDT
Hillary Clinton in the first three months of the year raised $33 million into a joint account her campaign formed with Democratic Party committees, according to a report filed Friday night with the Federal Election Commission.
The report shows that the joint account, called the Hillary Victory Fund, spent heavily trying to develop a small donor base for Clintons presidential campaign, but also took advantage of its unique structure to raise nearly $5 million from just 14 mega-rich donors, including entertainment titans Barry Diller, James Cameron and Haim Saban.
The fund comprises Clintons presidential campaign committee, as well as the Democratic National Committee and 32 state party committees. As a result, it can accept checks as large as $358,000 per person a total determined by the maximum donation to each of its component committees ($5,400 to the Clinton campaign, $33,400 to the DNC and $10,000 to each of the state parties).
The idea is that the committee will help the state parties raise money for their general election efforts, an area where Clintons allies argue that her insurgent rival for the Democratic presidential nomination Bernie Sanders has done little. Sanders has a joint fundraising committee, as well, but it has been relatively inactive.
Yet, during the first three months of the year, the $2 million transferred by the Hillary Victory Fund to various state party committees paled in comparison to the $9.5 million it transferred to Clintons campaign committee or the $3.5 million it transferred to the DNC.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-committee-raised-33-million-222044#ixzz46Dd5lzR1
snip*Brad Deutsch, the lawyer for the Sanders campaign, wrote an open letter to DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz arguing that the Clinton campaign's Hillary Victory Fund, the joint account between the campaign and various Democratic Party committees, "skirts legal limits on federal campaign donations." The fund is made up of the Clinton campaign, 32 state Democratic committees, and the DNC.
https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Bernie-2016-Letter-to-DNC-1.pdf
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/sanders-clinton-dnc-campaign-finance-laws-222102
Bubzer
(4,211 posts)Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Bubzer
(4,211 posts)islandmkl
(5,275 posts)and too many people didn't look past the (D)...
she would make Ronald Reagan proud...nothing he would have enjoyed more than a Democrat pursuing his agenda...
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)and proud of it
cui bono
(19,926 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)unless real Democrats would bargain away women's rights?
she wants the pro-life vote, among others.
too bad.