Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 04:52 PM Apr 2016

Wouldn't you have thought Hillary would have bowed out before NY?

What an embarrassment it must be to limp into your home state, not only to have been contested, but to be losing ever so slowly (I be some even think painfully) to your opponent? She should have switched to the Republican party as soon as Bernie jumped in, just to have had a chance. Had she done that, she might have saved the Republican party. Musing aside, though, I bet those pledged Superdelegates are having internal angst at having pledged so early. It would make so much more sense not to have a delegate system in a "Democracy", but that's what we have, so it all come down to persuasion, and these "elections" we have are just window dressing.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wouldn't you have thought Hillary would have bowed out before NY? (Original Post) silvershadow Apr 2016 OP
Yeah, she's getting her clock cleaned. No idea what keeps her going. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
she is losing the popular vote, the super delegate vote, the delegate count La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #2
Hm. That's hardly consistent with the OP. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #4
Maybe she made a mistake rock Apr 2016 #7
Don't forget the Catholic vote, the Jewish vote, the Protestant vote...... Beacool Apr 2016 #40
If she make is to the general, she will crawl on stage, legs dangling behind her. silvershadow Apr 2016 #3
Except that Trump's is even worse. brooklynite Apr 2016 #5
That's why the Clintons convinced him to jump int. That's what they counted on. Triangulation. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #8
I REALLY don't think Trump will be their nominee. dchill Apr 2016 #29
if by that you mean she'll win by a large margin of delegates both pledged and super La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #6
Bernie isn't going to convention to win concessions she won't abide by anyway, he's silvershadow Apr 2016 #9
lol. we'll see. nt La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #12
:D (I have stay positive and focused). nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #14
staying positive and deriding your opponent are really not the same thing. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #15
Except, than in my particular case, I can't stand her. I cannot promise to vote for her, silvershadow Apr 2016 #16
that's your perogative, but your facts about her limping to victory is innacurate La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #17
They are, in FACT, interlopers. I've been in the party longer than she. I've been more silvershadow Apr 2016 #19
Hillary could not give Bernie the concessions he wants Baobab Apr 2016 #20
Lol. This is a long post for busy "Silvershadow." Hortensis Apr 2016 #23
I think some of the supers pledged early so they could switch Waiting For Everyman Apr 2016 #10
Ah, now that makes sense. Thanks! edited* silvershadow Apr 2016 #13
Her southern firewall is STILL holding! Indeed, it's the only reason she's near the lead at all. HereSince1628 Apr 2016 #11
IL, MA, OH, IA are not in the south La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #18
Point being without the south where would she be? HereSince1628 Apr 2016 #25
without caucuses where would sanders be? without moving to an alternate reality La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #26
And Iowa was not a win in the sense that most of us see jwirr Apr 2016 #30
Nevada also. Another one of those mysterious winning exit polls, but losing the election. Punkingal Apr 2016 #33
In VERY close elections. jwirr Apr 2016 #34
Sanders should have dropped out after March 15th KingFlorez Apr 2016 #21
You mean just when he started winning? I bet you all wish he had, by then we were all talking silvershadow Apr 2016 #22
Still far behind in the delegate count KingFlorez Apr 2016 #36
She is tanking before our eyes, and everyone knows it. Her trend lines are steadily down, silvershadow Apr 2016 #37
Ok KingFlorez Apr 2016 #38
Now I think you knew they couldn't resist a challenge like this, silvershadow senz Apr 2016 #24
Counsel them? silvershadow Apr 2016 #31
But it's not her home state nichomachus Apr 2016 #27
And delivered almost nothing, actually. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #32
Coughh.....ahem....cough.....Sanders is not from VT. Beacool Apr 2016 #41
Since when did Camp Sanders start channeling Baghdad Bob? Tarc Apr 2016 #28
Come on, the answer to that is obvious. . . she has ALWAYS shown poor judgement pdsimdars Apr 2016 #35
There seems to be a lack of oxygen in the parallel world that some here seem to inhabit. Beacool Apr 2016 #39
Exhibit A: silvershadow Apr 2016 #42
It's all about the pledged delegates. Beacool Apr 2016 #45
No actually its all about the general election. Anything short of that is political malpractice. silvershadow Apr 2016 #46
Absolutely not. Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #43
if that truly is the case silvershadow Apr 2016 #44
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
2. she is losing the popular vote, the super delegate vote, the delegate count
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:02 PM
Apr 2016

the black vote, the gay vote, the hispanic vote etc.

oh wait. no, no she's not.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
40. Don't forget the Catholic vote, the Jewish vote, the Protestant vote......
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:43 PM
Apr 2016

Damn, poor Hillary, she's hanging to her lead by a hair.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
3. If she make is to the general, she will crawl on stage, legs dangling behind her.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:05 PM
Apr 2016

MSNBC just reported the dissatisfaction numbers with Hillary and Trump. Both are in the tank, Hillary's was 63% wouldn't vote for her in a general election. I believe it, too.

brooklynite

(94,591 posts)
5. Except that Trump's is even worse.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:09 PM
Apr 2016

...and polling has also pointed out that Democrats are happy to have Clinton as nominee, regardless of whom they voted for.

dchill

(38,502 posts)
29. I REALLY don't think Trump will be their nominee.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:07 PM
Apr 2016

He's gotta be sabotaging his own campaign. Doesn't he?

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
6. if by that you mean she'll win by a large margin of delegates both pledged and super
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:09 PM
Apr 2016

and the popular vote, you are right. if you mean something else, you are wrong.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
9. Bernie isn't going to convention to win concessions she won't abide by anyway, he's
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:16 PM
Apr 2016

going to win. So, while plausible, your scenario is unlikely.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
15. staying positive and deriding your opponent are really not the same thing.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:35 PM
Apr 2016

especially when your derision is not in the least bit rooted in any factual evidence.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
16. Except, than in my particular case, I can't stand her. I cannot promise to vote for her,
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:50 PM
Apr 2016

either, though I will cross that bridge when I get to it. I very well may be leaving my own party in deference to the interlopers.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
17. that's your perogative, but your facts about her limping to victory is innacurate
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:54 PM
Apr 2016

she holds a lead in the pledged delegate count, popular vote, super delegate count. She is winning with demographics that are key to democratic victory in the general. She is winning states that look like the democratic party.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-is-winning-the-states-that-look-like-the-democratic-party/

HRC has been in the democratic party a very long time, as have her supporters. They are not the interlopers.

Vote for whomever you want, but if you factual arguments, you should maybe try to back them up with some actual facts.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
19. They are, in FACT, interlopers. I've been in the party longer than she. I've been more
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:57 PM
Apr 2016

supportive of labor than she. And finally, she is "Third Way". DLC. Our supposed band-aid to something better. We are hemorrhaging in the real world, and need more than platitudes. Your insinuation that she is a "real" Democrat is patently offensive to me. Hence, my possible leaving the party.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
20. Hillary could not give Bernie the concessions he wants
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:57 PM
Apr 2016

They all all blocked by Bill's 1995 trade deal!

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
23. Lol. This is a long post for busy "Silvershadow."
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:02 PM
Apr 2016

I think you should give it the serious consideration such investment of time deserves. I'm unable to guess which will inspire more responses -- phony window dressing elections, corrupt superdelegate system, or Hillary as closet Republican message?

They're all demoralizing, disheartening allegations that I'm so afraid might hit Sanders supporters especially hard. Gee, what if they decided not to vote in November in despair at such a filthy dirty Democratic system?

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
10. I think some of the supers pledged early so they could switch
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:17 PM
Apr 2016

later and say, 'I supported you as long as I could'. That way, hoping to avoid the Clinton Hit List up until the nomination.

I wouldn't be surprised if a bunch of them intend to switch later in the process but before the convention, especially once the FBI has its say. I think she is toast then, indicted or not. And I don't see a lot of supers wanting to go down in flames with her, for no reason.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
13. Ah, now that makes sense. Thanks! edited*
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:20 PM
Apr 2016

on edit: I forgot about the whole blackmail aspect of the nasty Super Delegate system.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
11. Her southern firewall is STILL holding! Indeed, it's the only reason she's near the lead at all.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:18 PM
Apr 2016

Why should she quit? She hasn't been indicted yet.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
25. Point being without the south where would she be?
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:04 PM
Apr 2016

The difference made by her initial southern wins is what holds her up.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
26. without caucuses where would sanders be? without moving to an alternate reality
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:05 PM
Apr 2016

with no south and no caucuses, guess we'll each never know.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
30. And Iowa was not a win in the sense that most of us see
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:09 PM
Apr 2016

wins. Especially when there were questions about the voting process.

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
21. Sanders should have dropped out after March 15th
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 05:57 PM
Apr 2016

You'd think he would have wised up after falling so far behind in the delegate count.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
22. You mean just when he started winning? I bet you all wish he had, by then we were all talking
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:01 PM
Apr 2016

about just how this would all play out, and it has. Remember, he came in saying "all the way to convention" and I still believe him. Don't you?

KingFlorez

(12,689 posts)
36. Still far behind in the delegate count
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:37 PM
Apr 2016

It makes no sense to suggest that the leading candidate should drop out, but it makes a lot of sense for the trailing candidate to drop out.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
37. She is tanking before our eyes, and everyone knows it. Her trend lines are steadily down,
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:39 PM
Apr 2016

Bernie's are the polar opposite. The party would indeed be foolish to ignore it, though they are certainly at liberty to.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
24. Now I think you knew they couldn't resist a challenge like this, silvershadow
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:02 PM
Apr 2016

It's like dragging chum through waters infested with large aquatic predators.

Now you got 'em, what are you going to do with 'em?

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
39. There seems to be a lack of oxygen in the parallel world that some here seem to inhabit.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 06:41 PM
Apr 2016

Are you for real????? She's ahead by any measure and, barring some unforeseen event, will be the nominee.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
45. It's all about the pledged delegates.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:03 PM
Apr 2016

It's not high school. Popularity means squat if less people vote for you and you end up with less pledged delegates.




 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
46. No actually its all about the general election. Anything short of that is political malpractice.
Mon Apr 18, 2016, 10:05 PM
Apr 2016

But most importantly, did you see those staggering charts? It is unmistakeable.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Wouldn't you have thought...