2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWouldn't you have thought Hillary would have bowed out before NY?
What an embarrassment it must be to limp into your home state, not only to have been contested, but to be losing ever so slowly (I be some even think painfully) to your opponent? She should have switched to the Republican party as soon as Bernie jumped in, just to have had a chance. Had she done that, she might have saved the Republican party. Musing aside, though, I bet those pledged Superdelegates are having internal angst at having pledged so early. It would make so much more sense not to have a delegate system in a "Democracy", but that's what we have, so it all come down to persuasion, and these "elections" we have are just window dressing.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)the black vote, the gay vote, the hispanic vote etc.
oh wait. no, no she's not.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)rock
(13,218 posts)No, she didn't!
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Damn, poor Hillary, she's hanging to her lead by a hair.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)MSNBC just reported the dissatisfaction numbers with Hillary and Trump. Both are in the tank, Hillary's was 63% wouldn't vote for her in a general election. I believe it, too.
brooklynite
(94,591 posts)...and polling has also pointed out that Democrats are happy to have Clinton as nominee, regardless of whom they voted for.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)dchill
(38,502 posts)He's gotta be sabotaging his own campaign. Doesn't he?
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)and the popular vote, you are right. if you mean something else, you are wrong.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)going to win. So, while plausible, your scenario is unlikely.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)especially when your derision is not in the least bit rooted in any factual evidence.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)either, though I will cross that bridge when I get to it. I very well may be leaving my own party in deference to the interlopers.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)she holds a lead in the pledged delegate count, popular vote, super delegate count. She is winning with demographics that are key to democratic victory in the general. She is winning states that look like the democratic party.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-is-winning-the-states-that-look-like-the-democratic-party/
HRC has been in the democratic party a very long time, as have her supporters. They are not the interlopers.
Vote for whomever you want, but if you factual arguments, you should maybe try to back them up with some actual facts.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)supportive of labor than she. And finally, she is "Third Way". DLC. Our supposed band-aid to something better. We are hemorrhaging in the real world, and need more than platitudes. Your insinuation that she is a "real" Democrat is patently offensive to me. Hence, my possible leaving the party.
Baobab
(4,667 posts)They all all blocked by Bill's 1995 trade deal!
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I think you should give it the serious consideration such investment of time deserves. I'm unable to guess which will inspire more responses -- phony window dressing elections, corrupt superdelegate system, or Hillary as closet Republican message?
They're all demoralizing, disheartening allegations that I'm so afraid might hit Sanders supporters especially hard. Gee, what if they decided not to vote in November in despair at such a filthy dirty Democratic system?
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)later and say, 'I supported you as long as I could'. That way, hoping to avoid the Clinton Hit List up until the nomination.
I wouldn't be surprised if a bunch of them intend to switch later in the process but before the convention, especially once the FBI has its say. I think she is toast then, indicted or not. And I don't see a lot of supers wanting to go down in flames with her, for no reason.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)on edit: I forgot about the whole blackmail aspect of the nasty Super Delegate system.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Why should she quit? She hasn't been indicted yet.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)The difference made by her initial southern wins is what holds her up.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)with no south and no caucuses, guess we'll each never know.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)wins. Especially when there were questions about the voting process.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)You'd think he would have wised up after falling so far behind in the delegate count.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)about just how this would all play out, and it has. Remember, he came in saying "all the way to convention" and I still believe him. Don't you?
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)It makes no sense to suggest that the leading candidate should drop out, but it makes a lot of sense for the trailing candidate to drop out.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Bernie's are the polar opposite. The party would indeed be foolish to ignore it, though they are certainly at liberty to.
KingFlorez
(12,689 posts)senz
(11,945 posts)It's like dragging chum through waters infested with large aquatic predators.
Now you got 'em, what are you going to do with 'em?
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)She parachuted in with her carpet bags and bought a senate seat.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)pdsimdars
(6,007 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)Are you for real????? She's ahead by any measure and, barring some unforeseen event, will be the nominee.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)It's not high school. Popularity means squat if less people vote for you and you end up with less pledged delegates.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)But most importantly, did you see those staggering charts? It is unmistakeable.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)She has beaten Sanders...and he most likely knows it.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)if that truly is the case, Then she will go onto a general election loss