Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 01:22 PM Mar 2012

Most Senators Leaving Since 1996 May Mean More Polarized Chamber

By Laura Litvan and James Rowley - Mar 1, 2012 12:01 AM ET

Retirement announcements by Senator Olympia Snowe and other centrists are putting more U.S. Senate seats at stake than at any time since 1996 -- and the result may be an even more polarized environment next year.

Snowe, a three-term Maine Republican known for voting with Democrats on some high-profile issues, said her decision was driven by frustration over partisanship and lack of compromise in the Senate. Other departing senators who seek consensus on such issues as debt reduction say they share her view.

“It’s very difficult to get things accomplished,” said Senator Ben Nelson, a Nebraska Democrat who said he will retire after two six-year terms to spend more time with his family. “People back home complain about gridlock, but they send people here who engage in that very thing.”

Ten senators -- seven Democrats and three Republicans --say they won’t face voters again in November, the largest number of elected senators eschewing re-election since 13 decided to forgo new terms in 1996.

MORE...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-03-01/most-senators-leaving-since-1996-may-mean-more-polarized-chamber.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Most Senators Leaving Since 1996 May Mean More Polarized Chamber (Original Post) Purveyor Mar 2012 OP
I see it going one way or the other tech3149 Mar 2012 #1
The best case scenario I can see is davidpdx Mar 2012 #2
I have to wonder whether Snowe will be the last one to declare retirement davidpdx Mar 2012 #3

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
1. I see it going one way or the other
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 04:03 PM
Mar 2012

If progressives do the groundwork there is a massive opportunity to make serious gains. Otherwise the regressives will play the same game and just gain by the apathy of the other side.
For those on the democratic side of the fence, stop trying to elect just any democrat and bust your butt for someone who really supports democratic ideals.

For those on the conservative side of the fence, quit supporting people who support some philosophical ideal that has little or no bearing on the quality of your life.

The same goes for both sides of the political spectrum. Vote for those that will provide the most immediate impact on your lifestyle. If they sold you short with a song and a dance to get elected, bust your butt to expose them and get them out of office as soon as possible.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
2. The best case scenario I can see is
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:35 AM
Mar 2012

Keeping the Senate by a small margin, winning back the House and Obama being re-elected. The Republicans can still filibuster the hell out of us in the Senate though. The chances of a super majority in the Senate are slim to none.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. I have to wonder whether Snowe will be the last one to declare retirement
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 08:37 AM
Mar 2012

Are there any other possibilities?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Most Senators Leaving Sin...